Hudson v. State, 761 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Hudson v. State, 761 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Cocking v. State (fladistctapp, 2015-01-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cocking v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
This court reversed on the authority of Wade, Parrella, and Hudson v. State, 761 So.2d 1161, 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (reversing and remanding with directions to strike forty-seven out of forty-eight counts of possession of child pornography with intent to promote), and held that because all of the images were found during one search, there was only one episode of promotion.
Robert HUDSON
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 2D99-1033.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 26, 2000.
761 So. 2d 1161
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John Thor White, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sonya Roebuck Hor-belt, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Campbell, Stringer, Threadgill.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

In this Anders[1] appeal, Robert Hudson challenges his conviction and sentence for 280 counts of possession of child pornography (counts 1-280), and 48 counts of possession of child pornography with intent to promote (counts 281-328). We affirm, without discussion, the convictions and sentences on counts 1 through 280; however because Hudson was convicted of more than one count of possession with intent to promote, we reverse. See Wade v. State, 751 So.2d 669, 671 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (holding a defendant found in possession of three or more copies of the same article of child pornography during a single episode may only be prosecuted for a single count of possession with intent to promote). On remand counts 282 through 328 should be stricken from the judgment, and Hudson should be resentenced for one count of possession of child pornography with intent to promote.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., THREADGILL and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
1

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).