Mazal v. Colonial Penn Ins., 768 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Mazal v. Colonial Penn Ins., 768 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Kuttas v. Ritter (fladistctapp, 2004-04-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kuttas v. Ritter
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
In Gauthier v. Gauthier, 768 So.2d 1119, 1120 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), this court, emphasizing the equitable nature of proceedings under chapter 61, quoted the following pertinent observations of the Florida Supreme Court in Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So.2d 697, 700 (Fla.1997): *9 Under [chapter 61], the financial resources of the parties are the primary factor to be considered.
Dr. Alejandro MAZAL and Susana Mazal
v.
COLONIAL PENN INSURANCE COMPANY
No. 3D99-2164.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 9, 2000.
768 So. 2d 1119
De La Cruz & Cutler and Albert D. Viener, for appellants., Cole White & Billbrough and G. Bart Billbrough, for appellee.
Goderich, Ramirez, Shevin.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Percefull, 653 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1995).