Klonis v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 770 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Klonis v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 770 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 7796116.
Nicholas KLONIS and Mary Klonis
v.
STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Panhandle Consultants, Inc., a Florida Corporation
No. 1D99-4572.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 6, 2000.
770 So. 2d 296
Marie A. Mattox of Mattox & Hood, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants., Jacalyn N. Kolk of Hilton, Hilton, Kolk & Roesch, P.A., Panama City, for Appel-lees.
Ervin, Lawrence, Padovano.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Because any information that Panhandle Consultants, Inc. may have withheld from appellant’s counsel was available to her as of August 6, 1999, before the limitations period expired, equitable estoppel cannot apply. See, e.g., Metropolitan Dade County v. Jones Boatyard, Inc., 611 So.2d 512 (Fla.1993); Overstreet v. Bishop, 343 So.2d 958 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.