Rogers v. State, 775 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Rogers v. State, 775 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Baez v. State (fladistctapp, 2001-03-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see" Baez v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Heaton v. State, 775 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Cook v. State, 767 So.2d 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)(affirming denial of post-conviction motion seeking additional gain time pursuant to Heggs without taking a position on the merits of the claim, but noting that although section 26 of chapter 95-184 affects the gain-time statute, the major 1995 amendment to that statute, section 944.275, occurred in chapter 95-294, which Heggs did not address); Newsome v. Singletary, 637 So.2d 9, 11 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).
Bruce D. ROGERS
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 1D00-1175.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec 29, 2000.
775 So. 2d 1002
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Ervin, Padovano, Wolf.
Published

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse this case in part and remand with instructions for the trial court to reconsider its retention of jurisdiction in light of this Court’s opinion in Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). We affirm the caáe in all other respects.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

ERVIN and PADOVANO, JJ„ concur. WOLF, J., Specially concurs with opinion.

Concurrence

WOLF, J.,

specially concurring.

I concur only because I am required to do so because of Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).