Hoffman v. State, 776 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Hoffman v. State, 776 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Gilbert v. State (fladistctapp, 2003-02-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Gilbert v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2003 · confidence medium
Since the trial court is allowed to impose consecutive sentences, see § 921.16, Fla. Stat., Tripp, 622 So.2d at 942-43 ; Hoffman v. State, 776 So.2d 286, 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), it follows that the consecutive term of thirty years of probation in this case is within the legal maximum.
Eric M. HOFFMAN
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D99-2912.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 22, 2000.
776 So. 2d 286
Eric M. Hoffman, in proper person., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Jan E. Vair, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Cope, Goderich, Shevin.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986); Hoffman v. State, 736 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Rehearing

[*287] On Denial of Rehearing and Certification

PER CURIAM.

The sentence is consistent with the plea agreement and Hoffman v. State, 700 So.2d 765 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). The court is allowed to use a corrected scoresheet on resentencing. Roberts v. State, 644 So.2d 81 (Fla.1994). A guidelines sentence can include á split sentence like that imposed here. Wick v. State, 651 So.2d 765, 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Consecutive sentences on the two counts are permissible, § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (1991), and appellant acknowledged in the written plea agreement that sixty years is the total legal maximum for the two counts. The incarceration is within the guidelines and the split sentence is within the legal maximum.

Rehearing and certification denied; clarification granted.