Lea-Scandrett v. State, 804 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Lea-Scandrett v. State, 804 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Davis v. State (fladistctapp, 2009-11-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Davis v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
E.g., Lea-Scandrett v. State, 804 So.2d 531, 531 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (vacating order denying newer motion and remanding for the trial court to dismiss that motion).
Michael A. LEA-SCANDRETT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
1D00-4781.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 8, 2002.
804 So. 2d 531
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied on its merits the appellant's Rule 3.800(a) motion, which was filed while an appeal of the appellant's previous Rule 3.800(a) motion was pending in this Court. The trial court should have dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction. See Williams v. State, 795 So.2d 975 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Accordingly, we vacate the order denying the motion and remand for the trial court to dismiss the motion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.