green
Positive treatment
12.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
E.N. v. Department of Children & Families
Cf. J.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 83 So.3d 883, 887-88 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (“The order, which has the effect of prohibiting the grandfather from residing with his wife, results in an injury that cannot be remedied on postjudgment appeal.” (emphasis added)).
discussed
Cited "see"
N.H. v. Department of Children & Families
(2×)
See J.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 83 So.3d 883, 887 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). “[A] petitioner can demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of the law by showing that ‘the trial court made an error so serious that it amounts to,a miscarriage of justice.’ ” Id. at 888 (quoting K.G. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 66 So.3d 366, 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)).
cited
Cited "see"
Tommy L. Green, Sr. v. State of Florida
See Green v. State, 83 So.3d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
C.B. v. Fischgrund
(2×)
See In re S.C., 83 So.3d 883, 887 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). “[A] petitioner can demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of the law by showing ‘that the trial court made an error so serious that it amounts to a miscarriage of justice.’” Id. at 888 (quoting K.G. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Families, 66 So.3d 366, 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gawker Media, LLC v. Bollea
See, e.g., J.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 83 So.3d 883, 887 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (observing that to obtain a writ of certiorari the petitioner must demonstrate that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law and that the trial court’s order “caused irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on post-judgment appeal”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
K.K. v. Department of Children & Families
See, e.g., J.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 83 So.3d 883, 887 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Dep’t of Children & Family Servs. v. J.G., 67 So.3d 251, 253 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Dep’t of Children & Families v. L.D., 840 So.2d 432, 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
Tommy Lee GREEN, Sr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee
5D11-1376.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan 20, 2012.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant., Tommy L. Green, Sr., Wewahitchka, pro se., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appel-lee.
Monaco, Evander, Jacobus.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
We affirm Green’s convictions and sentence without prejudice to his right to seek appropriate and timely postconviction relief. See Dunbar v. State, 35 So.3d 54, 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (sentencing errors that occur after effective date of amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), even if formerly deemed fundamental or patent on face of record, cannot be reviewed by appellate court if issue is not raised at sentencing or in timely post-sentencing proceeding pursuant to Rule 3.800); see also Williams v. State, 56 So.3d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).
AFFIRMED.