Collins v. State, 835 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). · Go Syfert
Collins v. State, 835 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Koile v. State (fla, 2006-07-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Koile v. State
Fla. · 2006 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913, 916 (Fla.1997) (approving award of restitution for victim's investigative costs); Hollingsworth v. State, 835 So.2d 373, 374 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (approving restitution for wages lost by mother of victim during time she was too upset by crime to go to work).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Koile v. State
Fla. · 2006 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913, 916 (FIa.1997) (approving award of restitution for victim’s investigative costs); Hollingsworth v. State, 835 So.2d 373, 374 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (approving restitution for wages lost by mother of victim during time she was too upset by crime to go to work).
discussed Cited "see" Burke v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Collins v. State, 835 So.2d 373, 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), citing Mayo v. State, 825 So.2d 1006, 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(noting that "the records attached to the trial court's order denying relief appear to be nothing more than clerk's notes and do not conclusively refute the claim").
cited Cited "see, e.g." Koile v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Graham v. State, 720 So.2d 294, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); see also Hollingsworth v. State, 835 So.2d 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
Timothy R. COLLINS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
1D02-4248.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 29, 2003.
835 So. 2d 373
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Appellant, pro se.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Janelle C. Gillaspie, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his rule 3.800 motion for jail credit. The appellant has made a facially sufficient claim for jail credit under rule 3.800 by providing the dates for which he is seeking credit, the date of his sentence, and alleging that the jail certificate would show that he is entitled to credit. See Thomas v. State, 634 So.2d 175, 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998). Furthermore, the record portions attached to the trial court's order were clerk's notes that do not conclusively refute the appellant's claim. Mayo v. State, 825 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We accordingly reverse and remand for the trial court to support its denial with record attachments or to grant the relief sought.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, Concur.