P.M. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 86 So. 3d 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
P.M. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 86 So. 3d 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“an anonymous tip requires that the information be 'sufficiently corroborated' by the officer to constitute reasonable suspicion because the tipster's veracity, reliability, and basis of knowledge are typically unknown.”
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Bullock (fladistctapp, 2015-05-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Bullock (3×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
an anonymous tip requires that the information be 'sufficiently corroborated' by the officer to constitute reasonable suspicion because the tipster's veracity, reliability, and basis of knowledge are typically unknown.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State of Florida v. Milton (2×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2025 · confidence medium
“To justify a Terry stop, a law enforcement officer must have a well-founded, articulable suspicion that the person detained has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime.” Berry v. State, 86 So. 3d 595, 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (citations omitted).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matthew A. Tobin v. State of Florida (2×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
It is well settled that, to effect a constitutionally-permissible investigatory stop, a law enforcement officer must have a well-founded, articulable suspicion that the person stopped has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2012), Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993); Berry v. State, 86 So.3d 595, 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).
P.M., SR., Father and S.G., Mother of R.A. and P.M., Children
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Nos. 5D11-2692, 5D11-2693.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 4, 2012.
86 So. 3d 595
Edward M. Abel, of Law Office of Edward M. Abel, D.M.D., ESQ., LLC, Spring Hill, for Appellant, P.M., Sr., E.J. Lynum, of Lynum & Associates, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellant, S.G., Deborah Anne Schroth, of Department of Children & Families, Orange Park, for Appellee., Wendie Michelle Cooper, Appellate Counsel, Guardian ad Litem Program, Ta-vares, for Guardian ad Litem.
Evander, Jacobus, Monaco.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 82%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See K.P. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 997 So.2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); D.O. v. S.M., 981 So.2d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); In re K.A., 880 So.2d 705 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

MONACO, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.