Malu v. City of Gainesville, 872 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Malu v. City of Gainesville, 872 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State, Department of Revenue v. Brown (fladistctapp, 2010-03-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State, Department of Revenue v. Brown
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Malu v. City of Gainesville, 872 So.2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (holding that order granting motion for summary judgment and determining that “final judgment shall be entered” is insufficient to demonstrate an unequivocal completion of the lower tribunal’s judicial labor).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bryant
5th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
Brown v. State, 848 So.2d 361, 364 (Fla. Dist.Ct.App.2003) (concluding that a defendant did not take a purse from the victim’s person when the purse had been placed on a park bench near her, but apart from her person ); see State v. Floyd, 872 So.2d 445, 446-47 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2004) (reversing a conviction for robbery by sudden snatching in a case in which the defendant snatched a woman’s purse that was located near the center con-' sole of a vehicle, but not on her person). 14 .
cited Cited "see" Nichols v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Floyd, 872 So.2d 445, 446 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 848 So.2d 361, 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Owens v. State, 787 So.2d 143 , 143-44 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
Steve T. MALU, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF GAINESVILLE, Appellee.
1D04-0049.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 13, 2004.
872 So. 2d 445
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Appellant, pro se.

Thomas M. Gonzalez and Jennifer Zumarraga of Thompson, Sizemore & Gonzalez, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant's responses to the Court's orders of February 18, 2004, and March 24, 2004, the Court has determined that the order is not final because, although the order grants a motion for summary judgment, it fails to enter judgment. C.f. McQuaig v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 789 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). A determination that "final judgment shall be entered," is insufficient to unequivocally demonstrate finality. Id. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

BARFIELD, DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.