Drago v. Drago, 895 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Drago v. Drago, 895 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: KRYSTLE ODDO vs CHRISTOPHER ODDO (fladistctapp, 2022-06-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) KRYSTLE ODDO vs CHRISTOPHER ODDO
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2022 · confidence medium
Our conclusion reflects the majority view.”); Drago v. Drago, 895 So. 2d 529, 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (redesignating a petition for writ of certiorari as an appeal from a nonfinal order modifying visitation rights under rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii)). 2 See Fla. R.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Xu v. Board of Trustees of the University
N.D. Fla. · 2011 · confidence medium
In evaluating a claim of retaliation or discriminatory termination, “the relevant analysis focuses on why the particular adverse employment action with respect to the particular employee occurred.” Ponce v. Cingular Wireless, 2005 WL 545213, at *3 (S.D.Fla.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hickey v. Burlinson
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
See Lawrence v. Peyton, 9 So.3d 670, 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (stating, “[W]e are comfortable that non-final orders determining visitation in family law cases are reviewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii).... ”); Cuartas v. Cuartas, 951 So.2d 980, 981, n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (accepting jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii) of an order denying former husband’s motion for contempt and for immediate change of primary residence); Drago v. Drago, 895 So.2d 529, 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (re-designating a petition for writ of certiorari concerning an ord…
cited Cited "see" Leneve v. Leneve
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Drago v. Drago, 895 So.2d 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jade Winds Ass'n v. Citibank, N.A.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Corp. of Am., L.P. v. Frankhouse, 551 So.2d 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (reversing post-judgment order postponing foreclosure sale finding an abuse of discretion, and remanding with instructions to schedule judicial sale); see also Drago v. Drago, 895 So.2d 529, 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (re-designating a petition for writ of certiorari concerning an order modifying visitation rights as reviewable as a non-final order under rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii)).
James DRAGO, Appellant,
v.
Elizabeth DRAGO, Appellee.
4D04-988.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 9, 2005.
895 So. 2d 529
Per Curiam.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

James P. Drago, Boca Raton, pro se.

Elizabeth Drago, Coral Springs, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The former husband petitioned for a writ of certiorari concerning an order modifying visitation rights and awarding attorney's fees. We previously redesignated this petition as an appeal from a non-final order under Fla. R.App. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii). We affirm the order in all respects, except the award of attorney's fees.

In its order, the trial court held the former husband "responsible in the entirety with respect to all legal fees incurred" by the former wife. The court further ordered the former husband to contact the former wife's counsel within seven days regarding payment. The order does not, however, determine the amount of fees, and further fails to contain the requisite findings concerning the parties' needs and ability to pay. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So.2d 697 (Fla.1997). We therefore affirm the order regarding visitation rights, but dismiss that part of the appeal relating to attorney's fees as premature.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.