green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
28.2 score
“intent, a state of mind, is rarely susceptible of direct proof. it is almost always shown solely by circumstantial evidence.”
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Marlon Edgardo Lara-Castillo v. State of Florida
intent, a state of mind, is rarely susceptible of direct proof. it is almost always shown solely by circumstantial evidence.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Byron Turner v. the State of Florida
intent, a state of mind, is rarely susceptible of direct proof. it is almost always shown solely by circumstantial evidence.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Alvaro Juan Silva v. The State of Florida
Green v. State, 90 So. 3d 835, 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); see also Sebastiano v. State, 14 So. 3d 1160, 1164 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
T. K., a child v. State of Florida
It is almost always shown solely by circumstantial evidence.” State v. Sims, 110 So. 3d 113, 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (quoting Green v. State, 90 So. 3d 835, 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)) (emphasis added by Sims).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Sims
It is almost always shown solely by circumstantial evidence.” Green v. State, 90 So.3d 835, 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (emphasis added).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Martin v. State
State v. Waters, 436 So.2d 66, 71 (Fla.1983); Green v. State, 90 So.3d 835, 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tate v. State
“Because direct evidence of intent is rare, and intent is usually proven through inference, ⅛ trial court should rarely, if ever, grant a motion for judgment of acquittal on the issue of intent.’ ” Manuel v. State, 16 So.3d 833, 835 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (quoting Washington v. State, 737 So.2d 1208, 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)); see also Green v. State, 90 So.3d 835, 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (holding that intent “is rarely susceptible of direct proof’ and “is almost always shown solely by circumstantial evidence” (citing Sebastiano v. State, 14 So.3d 1160, 1165 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009))); …
Willie BROOKS
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 1D12-0645.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 4, 2012.
Willie Brooks, pro se, Appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle Denise Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Benton, Clark, Makar.
Published
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
AFFIRMED. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).