United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ricardo, 916 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ricardo, 916 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Silva v. State (fladistctapp, 2018-11-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Silva v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · confidence medium
Corvo v. State, 916 So. 2d 44, 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Bertonatti v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
Corvo v. State, 916 So.2d 44, 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cephus v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
While claims of ineffective assistance of counsel usually must be presented in a timely post conviction motion, “[tjhere are rare exceptions where appellate counsel may successfully raise the issue on direct appeal because the ineffectiveness is apparent on the face of the record and it would be a waste of judicial resources to require the trial court to address the issue.” Smith v. State, 998 So.2d 516, 522 (Fla.2008) (quoting Blanco v. State, 507 So.2d 1377, 1384 (Fla.1987)); Corvo v. State, 916 So.2d 44, 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (recognizing that with respect to claims of ineffective assis…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Valdes v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
See Sanford v. Rubin, 237 So.2d 134, 137 (Fla.1970); Corvo v. State, 916 So.2d 44, 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Barfield v. State, 871 So.2d 929, 930-31 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
cited Cited as authority (rule) MERCURY INS. CO. OF FLORIDA v. Anatkov
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · confidence medium
Co. v. Ricardo, 916 So.2d 44, 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
cited Cited "see" Dicks v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Corvo v. State, 916 So.2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
discussed Cited "see" AMW v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Corvo v. State, 916 So.2d 44, 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (rejecting the argument the State *570 makes here and reversing sentence of grand theft); Toson v. State, 864 So.2d 552, 554-55 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (vacating convictions under section 812.025 though several items stolen were not alleged to be dealt).
discussed Cited "see" A.M.W. v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Corvo v. State, 916 So.2d 44, 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (rejecting the argument the State makes here and reversing sentence of grand theft); Toson v. State, 864 So.2d 552, 554-55 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (vacating convictions under section 812.025 though several items stolen were not alleged to be dealt).
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Nelson RICARDO, Appellee.
3D05-904.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 7, 2005.
916 So. 2d 44
Green, Fletcher, and Ramirez.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Mark A. Gatica, for appellant.

Jones Wolfe, P.A. and K.P. Jones (Plantation), for appellee.

Before GREEN, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On the record before us, we cannot conclude that the lower court abused its discretion when it awarded the appellee a 2.0 multiplier on an attorney's fee award in the instant action for a determination of coverage under a policy issued by the appellant insurer. See Holiday v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Ins., 864 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Padron, 775 So.2d 372 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.