Lee v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 92 So. 3d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). · Go Syfert
Lee v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 92 So. 3d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 5060460.
Harvey S. LEE
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA
No. 1D11-6305.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 31, 2012.
92 So. 3d 930
Sean C. Barber of the Law Offices of Bohdan Neswiacheny, Orange Park, for Appellant., Dean A. Morande, Michael K. Winston, Cynthia L. Comras, and Donna L. Eng of Carlton Fields, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellee.
Davis, Lewis, Makar.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a final summary judgment of foreclosure. He argues that summary judgment was improperly entered because there was a disputed issue of material fact regarding the lender’s compliance with the notice requirements for accelerating the mortgage. Appellee concedes error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the judgment on appeal for further proceedings.

Appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees is denied without prejudice. See Termaforoosh v. Wash, 952 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

REVERSED.

DAVIS, LEWIS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.