Chunn v. McMillan, 929 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). · Go Syfert
Chunn v. McMillan, 929 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 7839353.
Douglas D. CHUNN, P.A.
v.
Jean B. McMILLAN, Finley L. McMillan and F & J McMillan, LLC, a Florida corporation
No. 1D05-6028.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 2, 2006.
929 So. 2d 597
Douglas D. Chunn of Douglas D. Chunn, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant., D. Andrew Byrne of Cooper & Byrne, PLLC, Tallahassee, for Appellees.
Barfield, Davis, Padovano.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s ’motion to dismiss, abate, or transfer venue. The “Purchase & Sale Agreement,” which expressly governs the escrow transaction that is the subject of this litigation, contains a mandatory venue selection clause indicating that any litigation arising out of the agreement must be brought in Duval County, Florida. The trial court erred in not honoring this venue selection clause. Mgmt. Computer Controls, Inc. v. Charles Perry Constr., Inc., 743 So.2d 627, 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BARFIELD, DAVIS, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.