green
Positive treatment
12.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Florida Carry, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach
A person in or about a place of nuisance as defined in s. 823.05 unless such person is there for law enforcement or some other lawful purpose. carrying a firearm.”); Bethel v. State, 93 So.3d 410, 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (finding probable cause where “the officer saw four inches of the butt of a gun sticking out of the defendant’s right pants pocket.”); United States v. Lewis, 674 F.3d 1298, 1304 (11th Cir. 2012) (explaining that “[b]ased on [a defendant’s] admission that he was carrying a handgun in his waistband, the officers had reasonable suspicion to believe that [he] was comm…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Alfredo Arturo Sotelo Gomez v. State
“Probable cause to arrest or search exists when the totality of the facts and circumstances within an officer’s knowledge sufficiently warrant a reasonable person to believe that, more likely than not a crime has been committed.” Bethel v. State, 93 So.3d 410, 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (quoting State v. Blaylock, 76 So.3d 13, 14 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Pamphile v. State
Analysis “A trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress comes to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness and the court must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences and deductions derived therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling.” Bethel v. State, 93 So.3d 410, 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (citation and quotations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Lavonte Davis v. State
See Bethel v. State, 93 So.3d 410, 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Florida v. Stacey Renee McRae
See Markus v. State, 160 So.3d 488, 492 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (stating “[t]o rebut the presumed illegality of warrant-less entry by police officers, the exigent circumstance must involve a threat to the safety of the public, property, or police which required immediate action by officers with no time to obtain a warrant”); see also Bethel v. State, 93 So.3d 410, 414 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (finding exigent circumstances — “to protect officers’ safety” existed to justify a warrantless entry into the curtilage of the defendant’s house where the officer recognized the butt of a handgun .s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carlos A. Luna v. State
“The appellate court defers to the trial court’s findings regarding the facts and uses the de novo standard of review for legal conclusions.” Nshaka v. State, 82 So.3d 174,178-79 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (citation omitted); see also Bethel v. State, 93 So.3d 410, 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
Stuart DELANCY
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 1D12-2960.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 3, 2012.
Start Delaney, pro se, Petitioner., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Padovano, Ray, Rowe.
Published
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.