McCleese v. State, 94 So. 3d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
McCleese v. State, 94 So. 3d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Swaters v. United States Department of Transportation (cadc, 2016-06-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Swaters v. United States Department of Transportation
D.C. Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Quest Diagnostics, Inc. v. Swaters, 94 So.3d 635, 636-37 (Fla. Dist.
discussed Cited "see" Moreno v. ODACS, Inc.
Ohio Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Quest Diagnostics, Inc., v. Swaters, 94 So.3d 635 , 5 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS (Fla.App.2012) (holding that the trial court erred by ordering a laboratory, which performed DOT drug testing, to produce a urine specimen for identity testing absent the consent of ODAPC, in a negligence action against the laboratory). {¶11} Moreno argues that the trial court’s order was not expressly preempted by the DOT regulations because QDI was able to properly comply with the DOT regulations as well as the trial court’s order.
Alan McCLEESE
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 4D11-2822.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jul 11, 2012.
94 So. 3d 635
Alan McCleese, Lake City, pro se., No appearance required for appellee.
Stevenson, Taylor, Warner.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Shiflet v. State, 50 So.3d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Mercado v. State, 13 So.3d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.