State v. Bennett, 944 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Bennett, 944 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 7842881.
STATE of Florida
v.
Salvatore BENNETT
No. SC05-979.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov 2, 2006.
944 So. 2d 250
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Celia Terenzio and Myra J. Fried, Assistant Attorneys General, West Palm Beach, FL, for Petitioner., Salvatore Bennett, Pro se, Indiantown, FL, for Respondent.
Anstead, Bell, Cantero, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Wells.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We have for review Bennett v. State, 904 So.2d 447 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal cited its decision in Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), reh’g granted in part, 884 So.2d 950, 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), quashed, 915 So.2d 86, 89 (Fla.2005). At the time that the Fourth District Court of Appeal issued its decision in Bennett, Richardson was pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981).

The petition for review is granted. On the authority of our decision in State v. Richardson, 915 So.2d 86 (Fla.2005), the decision under review is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the Fourth District Court of Appeal for reconsideration upon application of this Court’s decision in Richardson.

[*251] Any and all pending motions and requests are hereby denied as moot.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.