green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mukamal v. General Electric Capital Corp. (In re Palm Beach Finance Partners, L.P.)
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 315 (1965); Reider v. Dorsey, 98 So.3d 1223, 1226-27 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (noting that Florida follows the Restatement (Second) approach); Estate of Johnson v. Condell Mem’l Hosp., 119 Ill.2d 496 , 117 Ill.Dec. 47 , 520 N.E.2d 37, 40 (1988) (same, as to approach followed by Illinois); Jaramillo v. Weaver, No. A06-2343, 2007 WL 4303775 , at *4 (Minn. Ct.App.
examined
Cited "see"
Dorsey v. Reider
(3×)
See Reider, 98 So.3d at 1225 (citing Carney v. Gambel, 751 So.2d 653, 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)); see also K.M. ex rel.
Eugene E. MORI
v.
WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., and Judith Vondra
v.
WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., and Judith Vondra
No. 3D11-2109.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sep 27, 2012.
David M. Goldstein and Ergio I. Fernandez, Miami, for appellant., Kula & Samson and Elliot B. Kula and Daniel M. Samson (Aventura), for appel-lees Wachovia Bank, N.A., and Judith Von-dra.
Fernandez, Rothenberg, Schwartz.
Published
Affirmed. See Law-Yue v. Miami River, LLC, 50 So.3d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Voigt, 21 So.3d 895 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); DR Lakes, Inc. v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of W. Palm Beach, 819 So.2d 971, 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); In re Estate of Barsanti v. Cypen, 773 So.2d 1206, 1208 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).