green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1925 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1925
1975
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lee v. Williams
Co. v. McRae, 86 Fla. 393 , 98 So. 505, 520 (1923), dismissed, 269 U.S. 531 , 46 S.Ct. 22 , 70 L.Ed. 397 (1925) ("land grants to private ownership do not include lands under navigable waters or tidelands, unless such an intent clearly appears from acts of competent authority to pass title to such lands").
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Walker v. Commissioner
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Absent a specific transfer to the contrary, "private ownership of lands bordering on navigable waters [in Florida] extends only to high-water mark." 86 Fla. at 430, 98 So. at 517.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. 2,899.17 Acres of Land
Martin v. Busch, supra, 112 So. at p. 283 , Broward v. Mabry, 58 Fla. 398 , 50 So. 826, 829, 830 (Fla.S.Ct.1909), Apalachicola Land and Development Co. v. McRae, 86 Fla. 393 , 98 So. 505, 525 (Fla.S.Ct.1923).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
BD. OF TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL IMP. TR. FUND v. Sand Key Assoc.
See, e.g., Apalachicola Land and Development Co. v. McRae, 86 Fla. 393 , 98 So. 505 (1923); Brickell v. Trammell, 77 Fla. 544 , 82 So. 221 (1919); Merrill-Stevens Co. v. Durkee, 62 Fla. 549 , 57 So. 428 (1911); Clement v. Watson, 63 Fla. 109 , 58 So. 25 (1912); Broward v. Mabry, 58 Fla. 398 , 50 So. 826 (1909); Ferry Pass, Inspectors' & Shippers' Ass'n v. White's River Inspectors' & Shippers' Ass'n, 57 Fla. 399 , 48 So. 643 (1909) and State ex rel.
Rosa Lee Lanier, Joined by Her Husband, F. M. Lanier
v.
P. O. Rickman, Jr., Nannie Mae Woodward, Joined by Her Husband, J. D. Woodward, and Lizzie Rickman
v.
P. O. Rickman, Jr., Nannie Mae Woodward, Joined by Her Husband, J. D. Woodward, and Lizzie Rickman
Leitner & Leitner, for Appellants;, Treadwell & Treadwell, for Appellees.
Terrell, West, Whitfield.
Published
Per Curiam.
The appeal herein was taken from an in-, terloeutory order overruling a general demurrer to a bill of complaint in an equity cause. Upon due consideration it appears that the allegations of the bill state an equity for appropriate relief if proper and sufficient proofs are adduced' in due course of procedure, therefore, the interlocutory order appealed from is affirmed on the authority of Crosland v. Brickell et al., (No. 1) 97 South. Rep. 286, decided at this term.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.