green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
20.7 score
“on appeal, this court reviews ... any of the trial court's findings of fact under the competent, substantial evidence standard of review.”
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Sun Harbor Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bonura
on appeal, this court reviews ... any of the trial court's findings of fact under the competent, substantial evidence standard of review.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
ANNE GANNON, in her capacity as PALM BEACH COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR, on behalf of PALM BEACH COUNTY v. AIRBNB, INC.
Further, “[o]n appeal, this court reviews a trial court’s application of a statute de novo.” Chackal v. Staples, 991 So. 2d 949, 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
William E. Campbell and Flora D. Campbell v. State of Florida Department of Transportation
Chackal v. Staples, 991 So. 2d 949, 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
EASTWOOD SHORES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
Reading the statutes in such a way as to exclude from MRTA's definition of a homeowners' association an association 8"Appurtenances are things belonging to another thing as principal and which pass as incident to the principal thing." Blok Builders, LLC v. Katryniok, 245 So. 3d 779 , 783 n.1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (quoting Chackal v. Staples, 991 So. 2d 949, 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
BLOK BUILDERS, LLC d/b/a IKON BUILDERS v. PEDRO KATRYNIOK, MASTEC NORTH AMERICA, INC
Mastec and BellSouth suggest that this is because it is a 1 “Appurtenances are things belonging to another thing as principal and which pass as incident to the principal thing.” Chackal v. Staples, 991 So. 2d 949, 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (quoting Trask v. Moore, 24 Cal. 2d 365, 368 , 149 P.2d 854, 856 (1944)). 5 utility contract, and section 725.06 does not apply to utility contracts.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Young v. Levy
“On appeal, this court reviews a trial court’s application of a statute de novo and any of the trial court’s findings of fact under the competent substantial evidence standard of review.” Chackal v. Staples, 991 So.2d 949, 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Mathers and Brenda Mathers v. Wakulla County, a political subdivision etc.
See e.g., Chackal v. Staples, 991 So.2d 949, 953-56 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Pasco v. City of Oldsmar, 953 So.2d 766, 769-70 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Hancock v. Tipton, 732 So.2d 369, 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Lee v. Calhoun Cty., 532 So.2d 43, 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Osceola Cty. v. Castelli, 435 So.2d 417, 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Hodges v. City of Winter Park, 433 So.2d 1257, 1259 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Balbier v. City of Deerfield Beach, 408 So.2d 764, 765 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Campanella v. Shuford, 336 So.2d 1257, 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
James STEPHENS, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
1D08-3537.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 9, 2008.
Per Curiam.
Published
James Stephens, pro se, Petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Gibson v. McDonough, 937 So.2d 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
DAVIS, PADOVANO, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.