Firganza v. State, 994 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
Firganza v. State, 994 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: T.K.B. v. Durham (fladistctapp, 2011-05-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) T.K.B. v. Durham
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
R.A.P. v. Parkins, 994 So.2d 414, 415 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).
cited Cited "see" J.P. v. Judd
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See RAP, v. Parkins, 994 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).
cited Cited "see" J.P. v. Judd
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See RAP, v. Parkins, 994 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).
Roy FIRGANZA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
3D07-690.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 22, 2008.
994 So. 2d 414
Cope, Cortiã‘as, and Lagoa.
Published

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Roy Firganza, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, CORTIÑAS, and LAGOA, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse that portion of the trial court's Order of Revocation of Probation titled "FAILURE TO PAY COURT COSTS" which provides as follows:

Violation of Condition (L-8A) of the Order of Probation, by failing to make court costs payments to the probation officer, as directed in accordance with the payment instructions of the court, and as grounds for belief that the offender violated his probation, Department of Corrections Records states the offender as of July 19, 2005, has a balance of $303.00 plus 4% surcharge.

As the record clearly shows that the trial court found that the State of Florida had not met its burden on this issue, this portion of the order was erroneously entered.

We affirm as to all other issues on appeal.