Ecj Investments, Inc. v. Monarch Grove Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 26 So. 3d 700 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). · Go Syfert
Ecj Investments, Inc. v. Monarch Grove Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 26 So. 3d 700 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“lthough the defendant did not specifically name 'the best evidence rule' as a basis for his objection, we conclude that he adequately presented the issue to the trial court by objecting to the witness's testimony about the video's contents.”
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People of Guam v. Jared John Santos (guam, 2025-12-30)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) People of Guam v. Jared John Santos
Guam · 2025 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
lthough the defendant did not specifically name 'the best evidence rule' as a basis for his objection, we conclude that he adequately presented the issue to the trial court by objecting to the witness's testimony about the video's contents.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State of New Jersey v. Cowan Rainey
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2026 · confidence medium
Similarly, in Dyer v. State, 26 So. 3d 700, 702 (Fla. Dist.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Tristan Michael Bailes v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2024 · confidence medium
Dyer v. State, 26 So. 3d 700, 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Timothy P.
N.M. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
In Dyer, a copy of surveillance footage purportedly showing the 7 defendant stealing videos from a store was admitted at trial, but due to technical 8 difficulties with the video, it was not played for the court. 26 So. 3d at 702.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Demond Lavette Moore v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2025 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Dyer v. State, 26 So. 3d 700, 702-04 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (holding that a store manager was improperly allowed to testify that the store’s surveillance video showed the defendant opening DVDs and putting DVDs in his pocket); Russell v. State, 844 So. 2d 725, 727-28 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (finding best evidence rule violation where a detective testified that a video showed the defendant placing a large amount of change on the counter of a 7–Eleven after a large quantity of change had been stolen from a Taco Bell).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." T.D.W. v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Dyer v. State, 26 So.3d 700, 702-04 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (store manager improperly allowed to testify that the store’s surveillance video showed the defendant opening DVD boxes and putting DVDs into his pocket); Russell v. State, 844 So.2d 725, 727-28 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (finding best evidence rule violation where a detective testified that a video showed the defendant placing a large amount of change on the counter of a 7-Eleven after a large quantity of change had been stolen from a Taco Bell).
E.C.J. INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellant,
v.
The MONARCH GROVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
3D09-815.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb 3, 2010.
26 So. 3d 700
Wells, Cortiã‘as, and Salter.
Published

Charles L. Neustein, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Becker & Poliakoff and Lilliana M. Farinas-Sabogal, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before WELLS, CORTIÑAS, and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Barco Holdings, LLC v. Terminal Inv. Corp., 967 So.2d 281, 287-89 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).