green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
16.5 score
“lthough the defendant did not specifically name 'the best evidence rule' as a basis for his objection, we conclude that he adequately presented the issue to the trial court by objecting to the witness's testimony about the video's contents.”
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
People of Guam v. Jared John Santos
lthough the defendant did not specifically name 'the best evidence rule' as a basis for his objection, we conclude that he adequately presented the issue to the trial court by objecting to the witness's testimony about the video's contents.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State of New Jersey v. Cowan Rainey
Similarly, in Dyer v. State, 26 So. 3d 700, 702 (Fla. Dist.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Tristan Michael Bailes v. State of Florida
Dyer v. State, 26 So. 3d 700, 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Timothy P.
In Dyer, a copy of surveillance footage purportedly showing the 7 defendant stealing videos from a store was admitted at trial, but due to technical 8 difficulties with the video, it was not played for the court. 26 So. 3d at 702.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Demond Lavette Moore v. State of Florida
See, e.g., Dyer v. State, 26 So. 3d 700, 702-04 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (holding that a store manager was improperly allowed to testify that the store’s surveillance video showed the defendant opening DVDs and putting DVDs in his pocket); Russell v. State, 844 So. 2d 725, 727-28 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (finding best evidence rule violation where a detective testified that a video showed the defendant placing a large amount of change on the counter of a 7–Eleven after a large quantity of change had been stolen from a Taco Bell).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
T.D.W. v. State
See, e.g., Dyer v. State, 26 So.3d 700, 702-04 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (store manager improperly allowed to testify that the store’s surveillance video showed the defendant opening DVD boxes and putting DVDs into his pocket); Russell v. State, 844 So.2d 725, 727-28 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (finding best evidence rule violation where a detective testified that a video showed the defendant placing a large amount of change on the counter of a 7-Eleven after a large quantity of change had been stolen from a Taco Bell).
E.C.J. INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellant,
v.
The MONARCH GROVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
v.
The MONARCH GROVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
3D09-815.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb 3, 2010.
Wells, Cortiãas, and Salter.
Published
Charles L. Neustein, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Becker & Poliakoff and Lilliana M. Farinas-Sabogal, Coral Gables, for appellee.
Before WELLS, CORTIÑAS, and SALTER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Barco Holdings, LLC v. Terminal Inv. Corp., 967 So.2d 281, 287-89 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).