Grimes v. State, 10 So. 3d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). · Go Syfert
Grimes v. State, 10 So. 3d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Blake Edwin Tripp v. State of Florida (fladistctapp, 2018-07-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Blake Edwin Tripp v. State of Florida (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
Cf. D.A. v. State, 10 So. 3d 674, 677 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding, in the context of a consensual encounter, that a question “is neither a search nor a seizure”).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Arevalo
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
Given the observed traffic violation, it was reasonable for the deputy to call appellee back to issue a traffic citation or warning, 3 and to then conduct “the customary driver’s license ... and active warrant checks that routinely accompany a traffic stop.” D.A. v. State, 10 So.3d 674, 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Jenkins (2×)
Conn. · 2010 · confidence medium
December 4, 2009) (officer's question prior to issuing ticket about whether defendant "had any dead bodies or anything in his car," followed by request for consent to search, did not violate fourth amendment because time to inquire was only approximately two minutes out of twenty-two minute stop, and therefore "negligible" in context of entire stop); D.A. v. State, 10 So.3d 674, 676-78 (Fla.App.) (despite having already decided not to issue summons for expired temporary registration, police officer properly asked driver whether vehicle contained anything illegal), review denied, 20 So.3d 848 (…
discussed Cited "see" Ray v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See D.A. v. State, 10 So.3d 674, 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (stating that “a seizure is permissible if the seizing officer has probable cause to believe a traffic infraction has occurred.”).
Daric Jamahl GRIMES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
5D08-875.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Apr 28, 2009.
10 So. 3d 674
Per Curiam.
Published

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Anne Moorman Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hayes v. State, 780 So.2d 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Rumph v. State, 544 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

ORFINGER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.