discussed Cited as authority (rule) Shamrock-Shamrock, Inc. v. Remark (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g." Gayer , 970 So.2d at 426 (citation omitted); Cont'l Ins.

discussed Cited as authority (rule) Shamrock-Shamrock, Inc. v. Remark (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g." Gayer , 970 So.2d at 426 (citation omitted); Cont'l Ins.

examined Cited as authority (rule) Electric MacHinery Enterprises, Inc. v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc. (In Re Electric MacHinery Enterprises, Inc.) (3×) also: Cited "see" Id. (holding that “we find Royal’s argument that there was a common law duty to preserve the evidence in anticipation of litigation to be without merit”); Gayer, 970 So.2d at 426 (holding that “[b]ecause a duty to preserve evidence does not exist at common law, the duty must originate either in a contract, a statute, or a discovery request”); but see Penn.

discussed Cited as authority (rule) Gayer v. FINE LINE CONSTRUCTION & ELECTRIC, INC. This court reversed the final summary judgment in favor of Fine Line, holding that “a special employer using a laborer from a help supply services company has a duty under section 440.39(7), Florida Statutes, to preserve evidence for the injured laborer’s claim against a third-party tortfeasor.” Gayer v. Fine Line Constr. & Elec., Inc., 970 So.2d 424, 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).