McTaggart v. State, 143 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). · Go Syfert
Search
McTaggart v. State, 143 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“this appeal involves an order that prevents the state from developing its evidence in the criminal case ,... the order not only suppresses the evidence, it seals the information so that the state can never know what evidence is contained within the sealed documents.”
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Stahl (fladistctapp, 2016-12-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) State v. Stahl
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: cf. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
this appeal involves an order that prevents the state from developing its evidence in the criminal case ,... the order not only suppresses the evidence, it seals the information so that the state can never know what evidence is contained within the sealed documents.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State of Florida v. Strickling
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
State v. Crumbley, 143 So.3d 1059, 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). a.
Jarius A. McTAGGART
v.
The STATE of Florida
Nos. 3D14-898, 3D14-944.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 23, 2014.
143 So. 3d 1059
Jarius A. McTaggart, in proper person., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Fernandez, Lagoa, Shepherd.
Published
PER CURIAM.

On Motion for Rehearing and/or Clarification

We grant Jarius McTaggart’s motion for rehearing and/or clarification in Case No. 14-898, withdraw the opinion issued May 28, 2014, sua sponte consolidate this matter with Case No. 14-944 and issue the following opinion instead of our prior opinion:

Affirmed.