Se. Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena, 106 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Se. Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena, 106 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
SOUTHEAST FISH AND SEAFOOD CO., etc.
v.
Edsel CADENA
No. 3D12-1246.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb 20, 2013.
106 So. 3d 1009
Roniel Rodriguez, IV, Aventura, for appellant., Ritter Chusid Bivona & Cohen, LLP, and Shawn R. Horwick, Boca Raton, and Gregory Ritter, Coral Springs, for appel-lee.
Cortinas, Salter, Suarez.
Published
Pinpoint authority: bottom 30%
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Pariz v. Colon, 77 So.3d 721, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that a trial court had in rem jurisdiction over property situated within the county); Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co., 854 So.2d 841, 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“Only the circuit court in the county where the real property is located has in rem jurisdiction.”).