Brasher v. State, 160 So. 3d 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). · Go Syfert
Search
Brasher v. State, 160 So. 3d 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 5006155.
David BRASHER
v.
STATE of Florida
Nos. 4D14-3031, 4D14-4137.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 18, 2015.
160 So. 3d 107
David Brasher, Fort Lauderdale, pro se., No appearance required for appellee.
Taylor, Warner.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a sworn and legally sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. See Mathis v. State, 139 So.3d 988 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Thereafter, appellant can revisit the legality of his sentence. See, e.g., McLeod v. State, 58 So.3d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Lawson v. State, 46 So.3d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ, concur.