Cupas v. State, 57 So. 3d 228 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Cupas v. State, 57 So. 3d 228 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nautilus Insurance Company v. Pinnacle Engineering & Development, Inc. (flsd, 2024-03-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Nautilus Insurance Company v. Pinnacle Engineering & Development, Inc. (2×)
S.D. Fla. · 2024 · confidence medium
Co., 57 So. 3d 228, 230-31 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
cited Cited as authority (rule) COMMODORE, INC., D/B/A GREENSTREET CAFE v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON, etc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2022 · confidence medium
Co., 57 So. 3d 228, 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); accord Swire Pac.
cited Cited as authority (rule) GENE DODGE and KATHLEEN DODGE v. PEOPLE'S TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2021 · confidence medium
Co., 57 So. 3d 228, 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
cited Cited as authority (rule) STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY v. JOSEPH VALENTI, JR
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
Co., 57 So. 3d 228, 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Gov’t Emps.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Cernogorsky
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
Co., 57 So.3d 228, 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (same). *1122 Where the facts are not in dispute and the language of an insurance policy is unambiguous and not subject to conflicting inferences, “its construction is for the court, not the jury.” Ellenwood v. S. United Life Ins.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Kurtz v. AF & L Insurance Co.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
Co., 57 So.3d 228, 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (same). 2 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Botee v. Southern Fidelity Insurance Co.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
Co., 57 So.3d 228, 230-31 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Harrington v. Citizens Prop.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Exotic Motorcars and Jewelry, Inc. v. Essex Insurance Company
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
Co., 57 So.3d 228, 230-31 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
Alain CUPAS
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 4D09-1277.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 23, 2011.
57 So. 3d 228
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Diane F. Medley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Gerber, Stevenson, Warner.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Alain Cupas was tried by jury and convicted of three counts of lewd and lascivious molestation of a child. Cupas seeks reversal of his convictions, challenging the admission of collateral crimes evidence (point I), the exclusion of evidence concerning the victim’s suspension from school and the incremental punishment of the school’s disciplinary system (point II), and the giving of a curative jury instruction (point III). We affirm as to points I and III without further comment. As for point II, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ruling that any probative value in evidence concerning the victim’s prior suspension from school and the incremental punishment of the school’s disciplinary system was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice and thus affirm as to this ground as well.

Affirmed.

WARNER, STEVENSON and GERBER, JJ., concur.