Sharp v. Barreto, 95 So. 3d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Sharp v. Barreto, 95 So. 3d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas E. SHARP
v.
Luis E. BARRETO
No. 3D11-1382.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 18, 2012.
95 So. 3d 321
Shutts & Bowen and William Jay Palmer, for appellant., Billbrough & Marks and G. Bart Billb-rough, for appellee.
Fernandez, Schwartz, Shepherd.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See In re Estate of Paris, 699 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (Stockman requirement is inapplicable to attorney’s fee claims in probate proceeding); Levine v. Keaster, 862 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (appellant must identify the particular allegedly erroneous items of challenged attorney’s fees award).