green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sayih v. Perlmutter
See Bendeck v. Berry, 546 So.2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (Cope, J., concurring); Chatmon v. Woodard, 492 So.2d 1115 , 1116 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Salcedo v. Asociacion Cubana, Inc., 368 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 342 (Fla. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morris v. NN Investors Life Ins. Co.
See Bendeck v. Berry, 546 So.2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (Cope, J., concurring); Chatmon v. Woodard, 492 So.2d 1115 , 1116 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Salcedo v. Asociacion Cubana, Inc., 368 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 342 (Fla. 1979).
Mark WALLACH and Mark Wallach, Ltd., a New York corporation
v.
Luis F. Rodriguez KOHLY
v.
Luis F. Rodriguez KOHLY
No. 88-838.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 9, 1989.
Richard L. Katz and W. Allen Adams, for appellants., Luis F. Rodriguez Kohly, in pro. per.
Baskin, Cope, Nesbitt.
Published
We reverse the partial summary judgment entered below, as it is not clear on this record that appellee has carried his burden of showing the nonexistence of a disputed issue of material fact with respect to the affirmative defenses of appellant Mark Wallach, and the comparable defenses raised by the pending motion to dismiss of appellant Mark Wallach, Ltd. O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). We therefore do not reach appellant’s alternative contention that the trial court erred by denying leave to submit a belated affidavit on rehearing.
Reversed and remanded.