green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
cited
Cited "see"
Dempsey v. Law Firm of Cauthen & Odham, P.A.
See Townsend v. Lane, 659 So.2d 720 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), cause dismissed, 667 So.2d 776 (Fla.1996).
Randall TOWNSEND
v.
Charles E. LANE, Jr., d/b/a Sabal Marketing
v.
Charles E. LANE, Jr., d/b/a Sabal Marketing
No. 94-1913.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sep 1, 1995.
Randall Townsend, Odessa, pro se., Charles E. Williams, Jr., of Brown & Williams, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.
Goshorn, Harris, Peterson.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Flemenbaum v. Flemenbaum, 636 So.2d 579 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (To entitle a movant to an evidentiary hearing, a rule 1.540(b)(3) motion must specify the fraud and explain why the fraud, if it exists, would entitle the movant to have the judgment set aside); Shienvold v. Habie, 627 So.2d 1203, 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (“Because appellant did not specifically plead the two grounds that would have formed a basis for relief — fraud and coercion — the trial court correctly dismissed the petition for failure to state a cause of action.”), rev. denied, 640 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1994).
AFFIRMED.
PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.