James Goldsmith & Monica Goldsmith v. Pedro J. Garcia, etc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2024). · Go Syfert
James Goldsmith & Monica Goldsmith v. Pedro J. Garcia, etc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2024). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 9492302.
James Goldsmith and Monica Goldsmith
v.
Pedro J. Garcia, etc.
2022-1692.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 10, 2024.
Published
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida

Opinion filed April 10, 2024.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1692
Lower Tribunal No. 21-6
________________

James Goldsmith and Monica Goldsmith,
Appellants,

vs.

Pedro J. Garcia, etc., et al.,
Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge.

Mark A. Goldstein, for appellants.

Geraldine Bonzon-Keenan, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Ryan Carlin, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee Pedro J. Garcia, as Property Appraiser of Miami-Dade County.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jones v. Flowers, 547 U.S. 220, 226 (2006) (“Due process does not require that a property owner receive actual notice before

the government may take his property.”); Miles v. Parrish, 199 So. 3d 1046, 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (“There is no requirement that the property appraiser give the property owner actual notice of the tax lien . . . .”) (quoting

Genesis Ministries, Inc. v. Brown, 186 So. 3d 1074, 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA

2016)).

[*2]