Cases Citing Rule 9.140
Total Results: 1729
397 So. 2d 1120
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1981 | Docket: 2461324
Cited 429 times | Published
and independent ground for appellate reversal. Rule 9.140(f) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
760 So. 2d 114, 2000 WL 565100
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 1324934
Cited 316 times | Published
So.2d at 902; Harriel, 710 So.2d at 106; Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii).
Category: Appellate Procedure
199 F.3d 1256, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 31, 2000 WL 3723
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 4, 2000 | Docket: 395717
Cited 223 times | Published
Supreme Court on January 1, 1997. Under Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B) and (C), as then amended, Florida
Category: Appellate Procedure
520 So. 2d 250, 1988 WL 4367
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1988 | Docket: 1709237
Cited 213 times | Published
*253 ruling excluding evidence. We disagree. Rule 9.140(c) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
852 So. 2d 226, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 624, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1177
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2003 | Docket: 64824346
Cited 191 times | Published
evidence to support the conviction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(f). This Court always reviews such eases
Category: Appellate Procedure
983 So. 2d 562, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 357
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2008 | Docket: 1687975
Cited 188 times | Published
have been preserved for appeal as required by rule 9.140(e)." Jackson v. State, 952 So.2d 613, 615 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
760 So. 2d 89
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 1324543
Cited 171 times | Published
P. 3.800(b); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B), 9.140(d).[7]
We acknowledge that rule 9.140(d) requires that
Category: Appellate Procedure
852 So. 2d 226, 2003 WL 21555122
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2003 | Docket: 400951
Cited 128 times | Published
evidence to support the conviction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). This Court always reviews such cases
Category: Appellate Procedure
762 So. 2d 879, 2000 WL 674581
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2000 | Docket: 57131
Cited 124 times | Published
e.g., § 921.141(4), Fla. Stat. (1999); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h); Brown v. State, 721 So.2d 274, 277 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
444 So. 2d 939
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1984 | Docket: 451991
Cited 87 times | Published
interest of justice requires a new trial." Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(f). The interest of justice, substantive
Category: Appellate Procedure
774 So. 2d 649, 2000 WL 1588020
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2000 | Docket: 368435
Cited 74 times | Published
evidence. See § 921.141(4), Fla. Stat. (1999); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h). Therefore, the jury's verdict will not
Category: Appellate Procedure
733 So. 2d 980, 1999 WL 215347
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1999 | Docket: 1188622
Cited 74 times | Published
case, see § 921.141(4), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h), we find the above-mentioned evidence
Category: Appellate Procedure
685 So. 2d 773, 1996 WL 673822
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 1414934
Cited 65 times | Published
we proposed amendments to rule 9.020(g) and rule 9.140(b), as well as Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
422 So. 2d 308
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1982 | Docket: 2038925
Cited 62 times | Published
foreclosed from appealing that decision. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
Rule 3.190(h)(4) does not, however
Category: Appellate Procedure
199 F.3d 1256
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 4, 2000 | Docket: 395719
Cited 59 times | Published
1996, the Florida Supreme Court adopted Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(j)(3)(B)-(C), which permitted filing in
Category: Appellate Procedure
484 So. 2d 568, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 526
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1985 | Docket: 1343632
Cited 58 times | Published
which support the trial court's decision. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(f); §§ 59.04 and 924.33, Fla. Stat. (1981);
Category: Appellate Procedure
894 F.2d 1268, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2296, 1990 WL 6924
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 20, 1990 | Docket: 823728
Cited 55 times | Published
Dist.Ct.App.1983) (footnote omitted).
Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) sets forth the procedure to be followed
Category: Appellate Procedure
801 So. 2d 906, 2001 WL 1130695
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2001 | Docket: 2518457
Cited 51 times | Published
denial of his 3.850 motion as required under rule 9.140(b)(6)(E) of the appellate rules. We deny the
Category: Appellate Procedure
696 So. 2d 1103, 1996 WL 908661
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 2037954
Cited 51 times | Published
we proposed amendments to rule 9.020(g) and rule 9.140(b), as well as Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
493 So. 2d 489
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1986 | Docket: 1671734
Cited 47 times | Published
request a response from the Attorney General.
Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) governs such appeals. That Rule provides
Category: Appellate Procedure
926 So. 2d 1203, 2006 WL 721612
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2006 | Docket: 467210
Cited 43 times | Published
evidence supports the murder conviction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); Davis v. State, 859 So.2d 465, 480 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
461 F.3d 1380, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21943, 2006 WL 2466912
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 28, 2006 | Docket: 659286
Cited 42 times | Published
3.800(a). Fla. Stat. Ann. § 924.066(2); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(3).
4
. In
Jones
Category: Appellate Procedure
502 So. 2d 1221, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 57
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1987 | Docket: 1657681
Cited 42 times | Published
an application for writ of habeas corpus. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(F). Thus, by the terms of rule 3.850
Category: Appellate Procedure
851 So. 2d 650, 2003 WL 21511317
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2003 | Docket: 1691488
Cited 39 times | Published
State, 721 So.2d 274, 277 (Fla. 1998); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h). Based on our review, we find that there
Category: Appellate Procedure
840 So. 2d 1040, 2003 WL 359316
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2003 | Docket: 1748307
Cited 38 times | Published
the plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b). A claim that a defendant was not informed
Category: Appellate Procedure
800 So. 2d 204, 2001 WL 1284827
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2001 | Docket: 417775
Cited 37 times | Published
1998) (noting that rule 9.140(b)(2)(B) adopts the holding of Robinson). Rule 9.140 is applicable to juvenile
Category: Appellate Procedure
597 So. 2d 309, 1992 WL 41536
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1992 | Docket: 1350401
Cited 37 times | Published
appeal by the state as well as the defendant. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(J). However, any such appeal must be
Category: Appellate Procedure
597 So. 2d 309, 1992 WL 41536
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1992 | Docket: 1350401
Cited 37 times | Published
appeal by the state as well as the defendant. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(J). However, any such appeal must be
Category: Appellate Procedure
503 So. 2d 310, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 39
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1987 | Docket: 1452774
Cited 37 times | Published
section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (1985); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b), has no application in the context of
Category: Appellate Procedure
863 So. 2d 169, 2003 WL 22207892
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2003 | Docket: 1728613
Cited 36 times | Published
see also § 921.141(4), Fla. Stat. (2002); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h). We have referred to that evidence in
Category: Appellate Procedure
708 So. 2d 617, 1998 WL 106947
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1998 | Docket: 1550477
Cited 36 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d). The amended appellate rules applicable
Category: Appellate Procedure
469 So. 2d 735, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 257
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1985 | Docket: 1271981
Cited 36 times | Published
2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); see generally Fla.R.App.P. 9.140, Committee Note.
This understanding is in
Category: Appellate Procedure
894 So. 2d 178, 2004 WL 2922143
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2004 | Docket: 1767969
Cited 35 times | Published
sufficient to support the murder conviction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); Davis v. State, 859 So.2d 465, 480 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
626 So. 2d 1364, 1993 WL 471267
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1993 | Docket: 1685093
Cited 35 times | Published
UNDER SECTION 924.07(1)(i), FLORIDA STATUTES, AND RULE 9.140(c)(1)(J)?
Id., at 117. We have jurisdiction pursuant
Category: Appellate Procedure
550 So. 2d 1122, 1989 WL 21573
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1989 | Docket: 1052021
Cited 35 times | Published
9.140 does not apply to juvenile cases. "Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c) concerns only appeals from orders in `criminal
Category: Appellate Procedure
742 So. 2d 509, 1999 WL 821259
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1999 | Docket: 1303283
Cited 34 times | Published
jurisdiction. § 924.07(1)(j), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E). Our review of the record indicates
Category: Appellate Procedure
730 So. 2d 296, 1999 WL 34708
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1999 | Docket: 1645757
Cited 33 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d).
Although the preclusive language of
Category: Appellate Procedure
865 So. 2d 1259, 2004 WL 170362
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2004 | Docket: 58859
Cited 32 times | Published
that "the simultaneous filing requirement in rule 9.140(b)(6)(E) and 3.851(b)(2) does apply to defendants
Category: Appellate Procedure
866 So. 2d 674, 2003 WL 22508502
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2003 | Docket: 1680233
Cited 32 times | Published
the record for sufficiency of evidence."); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). Accordingly, we affirm Ault's convictions
Category: Appellate Procedure
699 So. 2d 1366, 1997 WL 618667
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1997 | Docket: 1321022
Cited 32 times | Published
appeal. However, rule 9.140(j)(3)(C) provides that the time period set forth in rule 9.140(j)(3)(B) "shall
Category: Appellate Procedure
873 So. 2d 1205, 2004 WL 524922
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2004 | Docket: 412380
Cited 31 times | Published
entered after a `finding of guilt,' pursuant to rule 9.140(b)(1)(C)"); Downs v. State, 700 So.2d 789 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
667 So. 2d 343, 1995 WL 619890
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1995 | Docket: 1511539
Cited 31 times | Published
evidence obtained by search and seizure." Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Whatever its efficacy, a statute
Category: Appellate Procedure
392 So. 2d 1013
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1981 | Docket: 467871
Cited 31 times | Published
DAUKSCH, C.J., and COBB, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Rule 9.140(c)(1)(A), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
841 F.2d 371, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3874, 1988 WL 20019
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 28, 1988 | Docket: 980331
Cited 29 times | Published
either 30 days to file a notice of appeal, Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2), or 15 days to file a motion for rehearing
Category: Appellate Procedure
894 So. 2d 842, 2005 WL 67025
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2005 | Docket: 1768263
Cited 28 times | Published
sufficient to support the murder conviction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); Davis v. State, 859 So.2d 465, 480 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
476 So. 2d 144, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 435
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1985 | Docket: 1277461
Cited 28 times | Published
or information or any count thereof." See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). I would therefore hold that the
Category: Appellate Procedure
866 So. 2d 688, 2003 WL 22669486
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2003 | Docket: 1680040
Cited 27 times | Published
reserving the right to appeal. See generally Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) ("A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
794 So. 2d 595, 2001 WL 776293
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2001 | Docket: 1473410
Cited 27 times | Published
mirrors the simultaneous filing requirement of rule 9.140(b)(6)(E). In Robinson v. Moore, 773 So.2d 1,
Category: Appellate Procedure
884 So. 2d 316, 2004 WL 1969521
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2004 | Docket: 273542
Cited 26 times | Published
preserved by a motion to withdraw plea." Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). It is possible that a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
470 So. 2d 1377, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 247
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1985 | Docket: 1676735
Cited 26 times | Published
to permit an appeal by the state pursuant to Rule 9.140(c)(1)(F). Without a statute or rule *1382 permitting
Category: Appellate Procedure
409 So. 2d 510
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1982 | Docket: 526212
Cited 26 times | Published
as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B); Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(b)(2)(A).
Respondent
Category: Appellate Procedure
851 So. 2d 678, 2003 WL 21543546
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2003 | Docket: 1313318
Cited 25 times | Published
721 So.2d 274, 277 (Fla.1998); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h) (requiring this Court to determine the
Category: Appellate Procedure
729 So. 2d 984, 1999 WL 156815
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1999 | Docket: 1653080
Cited 25 times | Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing." Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). The present record does not conclusively
Category: Appellate Procedure
462 So. 2d 471, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 236
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1984 | Docket: 53080
Cited 25 times | Published
and independent ground for appellate reversal. Rule 9.140(f) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
469 F.3d 963, 2006 WL 3257426
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 13, 2006 | Docket: 398814
Cited 24 times | Published
267 F.3d 1202, 1208 (11th Cir.2001); Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(a), (b). Williams expected to receive two
Category: Appellate Procedure
739 So. 2d 77, 1999 WL 343072
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1999 | Docket: 1688796
Cited 24 times | Published
sufficient grounds for a belated appeal under rule 9.140(j). See id.
In an en banc decision, the First
Category: Appellate Procedure
466 So. 2d 1051, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 126
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1985 | Docket: 412938
Cited 24 times | Published
justice he should be granted a new trial. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(f). Appellant concedes that there is legally
Category: Appellate Procedure
442 So. 2d 193
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1983 | Docket: 1515930
Cited 24 times | Published
justice require a new trial, we must reverse. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(f). In the event fundamental error has occurred
Category: Appellate Procedure
365 So. 2d 149
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1978 | Docket: 1314665
Cited 24 times | Published
(1975).
[3] § 921.141(4), Fla. Stat. (1975); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(f).
[4] The sentencing order of the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
893 So. 2d 1278, 2004 WL 2727683
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2004 | Docket: 1720655
Cited 23 times | Published
if the issue is not raised on appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); Davis v. State, 859 So.2d 465, 480 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
770 So. 2d 1221, 2000 WL 1637591
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2000 | Docket: 1779207
Cited 23 times | Published
1982); see generally Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1). This is in contrast to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), which authorizes
Category: Appellate Procedure
719 So. 2d 1230, 1998 WL 671409
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1998 | Docket: 527247
Cited 23 times | Published
error." (Emphasis supplied). The construction of rule 9.140(d) applied in Maddox would obviously frustrate
Category: Appellate Procedure
716 So. 2d 827, 1998 WL 537277
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1998 | Docket: 424574
Cited 23 times | Published
jurisdiction. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(l); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii).
On February 21, 1997, Daniels
Category: Appellate Procedure
704 So. 2d 1080, 1997 WL 799913
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1997 | Docket: 1705903
Cited 23 times | Published
Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii).
We emphasize that our decision
Category: Appellate Procedure
360 So. 2d 1158
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1978 | Docket: 1474244
Cited 23 times | Published
review of an order modifying his probation. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1)(C). Appellant, who had been adjudged
Category: Appellate Procedure
975 So. 2d 1073, 2008 WL 248662
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2008 | Docket: 1425079
Cited 22 times | Published
nonfinal orders issued in the county court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(2). Here, it was the defendants who sought
Category: Appellate Procedure
860 So. 2d 960, 2003 WL 22097440
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2003 | Docket: 1511598
Cited 22 times | Published
State, 721 So.2d 274, 277 (Fla. 1998); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h). Based on our review, we find that there
Category: Appellate Procedure
708 So. 2d 941, 1998 WL 133991
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1998 | Docket: 542128
Cited 22 times | Published
entitled to relief); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i) (providing that unless the record shows
Category: Appellate Procedure
685 So. 2d 1253
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1996 | Docket: 1735082
Cited 22 times | Published
Procedure, 685 So.2d 773 (Fla.1996) (adopting Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)). However, we add the following Court
Category: Appellate Procedure
645 So. 2d 386, 1994 WL 525894
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1994 | Docket: 1222889
Cited 22 times | Published
issue. See § 924.07(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (1989); Rule 9.140(c)(1)(I), Fla.R.App.P. However, the district
Category: Appellate Procedure
877 So. 2d 680, 2004 WL 792826
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2004 | Docket: 1285292
Cited 21 times | Published
otherwise appealable to the circuit court under rule 9.140(c), that the county court has certified to be
Category: Appellate Procedure
490 So. 2d 24, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 191
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1986 | Docket: 223178
Cited 21 times | Published
mitigating circumstance. § 921.141(6)(g).
[*] Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(f):
Scope of Review. The court shall review
Category: Appellate Procedure
706 So. 2d 1349, 1998 WL 29642
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1998 | Docket: 1682515
Cited 20 times | Published
6 as they were admissions within the ambit of rule 9.140(c)(1)(B). Id. at 754. The court also found that
Category: Appellate Procedure
706 So. 2d 1349, 1998 WL 29642
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1998 | Docket: 1682515
Cited 20 times | Published
6 as they were admissions within the ambit of rule 9.140(c)(1)(B). Id. at 754. The court also found that
Category: Appellate Procedure
535 So. 2d 642, 1988 WL 133965
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1988 | Docket: 1711162
Cited 20 times | Published
thirty days thereafter in which to file an appeal. Rule 9.140(b)(2), Fla.R.App.P. The judgment and sentence
Category: Appellate Procedure
984 So. 2d 1227, 2008 WL 1901668
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2008 | Docket: 76966
Cited 19 times | Published
the sentence imposed after revocation. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
As recognized by this Court in
Category: Appellate Procedure
820 So. 2d 337, 2002 WL 429180
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2002 | Docket: 1715494
Cited 19 times | Published
0024 which exceeds the statutory minimum), and Rule 9.140(b)(1)(D), Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
791 So. 2d 1130, 2001 WL 331984
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2001 | Docket: 1655865
Cited 19 times | Published
"commissioner" to determine these matters. Cf. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j) (Comm. Notes 1996); Swain v. Moore, 744
Category: Appellate Procedure
780 So. 2d 834, 2000 WL 1508541
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2000 | Docket: 1298753
Cited 19 times | Published
of Procedure 12.492)"), which is stricken.
In rule 9.140 ("Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases"), we
Category: Appellate Procedure
543 So. 2d 294, 1989 WL 41177
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1989 | Docket: 1437828
Cited 19 times | Published
appellate review is limited to the matters listed in rule 9.140(c)(1), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Category: Appellate Procedure
846 So. 2d 660, 2003 WL 21273777
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2003 | Docket: 1301563
Cited 18 times | Published
grounds is that the plea was involuntary. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c); Brown v. State, 835 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
756 So. 2d 272, 2000 WL 560996
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2000 | Docket: 471103
Cited 18 times | Published
cause remanded for further proceedings. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). The transcript of defendant's guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
711 So. 2d 1371, 1998 WL 315784
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 1337844
Cited 18 times | Published
attachment of further record excerpts. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(g).
*1373 As to the remaining grounds,[1]
Category: Appellate Procedure
876 F.2d 1470, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8672
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 1989 | Docket: 820490
Cited 18 times | Published
might have been presented to the court. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(f) requires that "[i]n capital cases, the
Category: Appellate Procedure
495 So. 2d 1170, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 194
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1986 | Docket: 1748649
Cited 18 times | Published
court did not feel fell within the purview of rule 9.140(c)(1)(B). We find it difficult to fathom why
Category: Appellate Procedure
25 So. 3d 518, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 541, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1577, 2009 WL 3029662
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2009 | Docket: 1662100
Cited 17 times | Published
___,129 S.Ct. 400, 172 L.Ed.2d 292 (2008); Fla.R.App.P.' 9.140(i). For the reasons also addressed in this
Category: Appellate Procedure
995 So. 2d 233, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 608
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2008 | Docket: 1684816
Cited 17 times | Published
852 So.2d 226, 230 (Fla.2003); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). This Court affirmed Morton's convictions
Category: Appellate Procedure
766 So. 2d 1255, 2000 WL 1434120
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2000 | Docket: 1329971
Cited 17 times | Published
the date of this decision, in accordance with Rule 9.140(e)(6), and appellant shall file the initial brief
Category: Appellate Procedure
735 So. 2d 482, 1999 WL 314646
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1999 | Docket: 1728547
Cited 17 times | Published
to preserve" this issue).
[3] See also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b), which provides in relevant part:
(2)
Category: Appellate Procedure
716 So. 2d 269
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1998 | Docket: 426569
Cited 17 times | Published
delinquency cases shall be as in rule 9.140 except as modified by this rule."
Rule 9.140 governs appeal proceedings
Category: Appellate Procedure
559 So. 2d 601
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1990 | Docket: 1515802
Cited 17 times | Published
appeal a non-final order under the provisions of Rule 9.140(b)(1) and initially invoke the court's jurisdiction
Category: Appellate Procedure
959 So. 2d 1254, 2007 WL 1931352
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2007 | Docket: 1525783
Cited 16 times | Published
is if appellant's plea was involuntary. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c.
In addition to this court's
Category: Appellate Procedure
742 So. 2d 290, 1998 WL 422729
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1998 | Docket: 1710181
Cited 16 times | Published
first-degree arson. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). Because we conclude that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
351 So. 2d 981
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1977 | Docket: 1247477
Cited 16 times | Published
is sought. This requirement also applies under Rule 9.140(d). As explained in the Commentary accompanying
Category: Appellate Procedure
845 So. 2d 1007, 2003 WL 21203876
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2003 | Docket: 1309218
Cited 15 times | Published
later than 30 days after the rendition date. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D) & (3). Failure to do so deprives
Category: Appellate Procedure
710 So. 2d 102, 1998 WL 171495
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1998 | Docket: 1444475
Cited 15 times | Published
except for jurisdictional defects. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1997)
Category: Appellate Procedure
638 So. 2d 931, 1994 WL 245624
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1994 | Docket: 1168833
Cited 15 times | Published
have the right to an interlocutory appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b). See State ex rel. Shevin v. Pierce, 269
Category: Appellate Procedure
506 So. 2d 1094, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1155
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1987 | Docket: 1700225
Cited 15 times | Published
of William Manning. We have jurisdiction. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
Manning's wife, Margaret, took
Category: Appellate Procedure
492 So. 2d 1317, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 348
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1986 | Docket: 478549
Cited 15 times | Published
to support the convictions and sentences. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(f). We affirm Kokal's conviction and sentence
Category: Appellate Procedure
439 So. 2d 255
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1983 | Docket: 2517858
Cited 15 times | Published
State, 348 So.2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g). Obviously, the absence of the remedy
Category: Appellate Procedure
998 So. 2d 494, 2008 WL 4354880
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2008 | Docket: 2527438
Cited 14 times | Published
courts, as provided by rule 9.141(c) and former rule 9.140(j), derives from the right to effective assistance
Category: Appellate Procedure
990 So. 2d 494, 2008 WL 3926789
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2008 | Docket: 1293329
Cited 14 times | Published
sexual predator designations, in addition to rule 9.140(b)(1)(D), rule 3.800(b) (which was designed to
Category: Appellate Procedure
818 So. 2d 567, 2002 WL 360013
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2002 | Docket: 1652880
Cited 14 times | Published
failed to reflect a change in the numbering of rule 9.140(b).
Category: Appellate Procedure
711 So. 2d 1225, 1998 WL 235977
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1998 | Docket: 1700608
Cited 14 times | Published
for which he or she is entitled to relief. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d). Ethically, however, we will not prohibit
Category: Appellate Procedure
630 So. 2d 660, 1994 WL 7694
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1994 | Docket: 481353
Cited 14 times | Published
proceeded in summary fashion, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), on the authority of Butler v. State,
Category: Appellate Procedure
433 So. 2d 1236
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1983 | Docket: 1425135
Cited 14 times | Published
would now appeal that ruling on the basis of Rule 9.140(c)(1)(H), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
380 So. 2d 534
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1980 | Docket: 1403336
Cited 14 times | Published
with second degree grand theft of a heater. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). The *535 dismissal was based on
Category: Appellate Procedure
46 So. 3d 1171, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16637, 2010 WL 4320398
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2010 | Docket: 1927482
Cited 13 times | Published
raised in his rule 3.800(b) motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e) (noting that sentencing errors must be
Category: Appellate Procedure
939 So. 2d 192
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2006 | Docket: 1237582
Cited 13 times | Published
the right to appeal a suppression issue. See rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The sole issue raised by him on
Category: Appellate Procedure
840 So. 2d 1145, 2003 WL 1566558
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2003 | Docket: 1463520
Cited 13 times | Published
in violation of the plea agreement. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). Even
Category: Appellate Procedure
783 So. 2d 1191, 2001 WL 420996
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2001 | Docket: 1259529
Cited 13 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(ii); Meriweather v. State, 26 Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
706 So. 2d 332, 1998 WL 15840
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1998 | Docket: 1280304
Cited 13 times | Published
Circuit Court of Columbia County in accordance with rule 9.140(j)(5)(D). We also relinquish jurisdiction to
Category: Appellate Procedure
633 So. 2d 112, 1994 WL 72142
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1994 | Docket: 1296519
Cited 13 times | Published
review sentencing errors on direct appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1)(E); § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1991)
Category: Appellate Procedure
617 So. 2d 350, 1993 WL 113314
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1993 | Docket: 1512510
Cited 13 times | Published
section 924.06, Florida Statutes (1991), nor rule 9.140(b)(1) contain any provision for a defendant to
Category: Appellate Procedure
538 So. 2d 518, 1989 WL 10990
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1989 | Docket: 1517135
Cited 13 times | Published
because that order is not within the purview of Rule 9.140(c)(1), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Category: Appellate Procedure
380 So. 2d 564
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1980 | Docket: 1402865
Cited 13 times | Published
contention that jurisdiction is conferred by Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1)(C), which provides that a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
21 So. 3d 1276, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 616, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1922, 2009 WL 3763088
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2009 | Docket: 1438599
Cited 12 times | Published
894 So.2d 842, 847 (Fla. 2005) (citing Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i)). In Winkles, this Court explained:
"[W]hen
Category: Appellate Procedure
980 So. 2d 473, 2008 WL 382710
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2008 | Docket: 1736134
Cited 12 times | Published
Carter's first-degree murder convictions. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); Davis v. State, 859 So.2d 465, 480 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
884 So. 2d 510, 2004 WL 2289594
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2004 | Docket: 1683096
Cited 12 times | Published
the time he filed his second motion, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d), and because Sharp did not seek to discharge
Category: Appellate Procedure
881 So. 2d 693, 2004 WL 1919989
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2004 | Docket: 1465745
Cited 12 times | Published
granting new trials in criminal cases. See Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(C).
[2] Appellee claims he could not
Category: Appellate Procedure
846 So. 2d 1141, 2003 WL 21087995
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 15, 2003 | Docket: 1709883
Cited 12 times | Published
Counsel, filed May 6, 2002, is denied. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B); Wattles v. State, 771 So.2d 1209
Category: Appellate Procedure
807 So. 2d 633
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2001 | Docket: 1505804
Cited 12 times | Published
after the order denying relief is rendered.
RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
(a) Applicability
Category: Appellate Procedure
767 So. 2d 1235, 2000 WL 1140023
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2000 | Docket: 1661502
Cited 12 times | Published
07, 924.071, Fla. Stat. (1997); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140. DOC cannot rescind the state attorney's
Category: Appellate Procedure
715 So. 2d 960, 1998 WL 283291
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1998 | Docket: 1366095
Cited 12 times | Published
1368 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), we will do so no more. Rule 9.140 provides in pertinent part:
(d) Sentencing Errors
Category: Appellate Procedure
655 So. 2d 1245, 1995 WL 316330
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1995 | Docket: 1696882
Cited 12 times | Published
Hardy's appeal is timely and appealable. Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (E).
[5] This requirement also
Category: Appellate Procedure
530 So. 2d 924, 1988 WL 93749
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1988 | Docket: 1678279
Cited 12 times | Published
Appellate Procedure relied upon by the state, rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), which permits review by appeal of an
Category: Appellate Procedure
479 So. 2d 169, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2597
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1985 | Docket: 1514375
Cited 12 times | Published
vacating the judgment of acquittal. See Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(1)(C). Thompson's amended petition was
Category: Appellate Procedure
435 So. 2d 249
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1983 | Docket: 1328337
Cited 12 times | Published
Notwithstanding Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv), Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b), and § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1981), apparently
Category: Appellate Procedure
392 So. 2d 602
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1981 | Docket: 304519
Cited 12 times | Published
should be denied.
It is so ordered.
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
[2] Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
Category: Appellate Procedure
776 So. 2d 1066, 2001 WL 99229
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2001 | Docket: 422135
Cited 11 times | Published
NOTES
[1] This court has jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(E).
[2] Section 812.133, Florida Statutes
Category: Appellate Procedure
732 So. 2d 1187, 1999 WL 247206
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1999 | Docket: 1513338
Cited 11 times | Published
which previously had no time limit. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3); McCray v. State, 699 So.2d 1366,
Category: Appellate Procedure
718 So. 2d 260, 1998 WL 559321
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 2512711
Cited 11 times | Published
prohibits appellant from raising any of these issues. Rule 9.140(d) provides:
A sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
714 So. 2d 479, 1998 WL 282807
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1998 | Docket: 461495
Cited 11 times | Published
matters are reviewable by direct appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1). We are obliged, however, to treat
Category: Appellate Procedure
689 So. 2d 276, 1995 WL 675420
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1995 | Docket: 1739272
Cited 11 times | Published
compensation immunity as a matter of law." Fla.R.App.P. 9.140.
II.
As a preliminary matter, the employee
Category: Appellate Procedure
656 So. 2d 448, 1995 WL 256206
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1995 | Docket: 1283658
Cited 11 times | Published
the right to self-representation.
Fla.R.App.P. Rule 9.140(b)(3) (emphasis added). Florida courts clearly
Category: Appellate Procedure
636 So. 2d 1329, 1994 WL 192202
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1994 | Docket: 1715301
Cited 11 times | Published
breathalyzer test is a "search" as contemplated by rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
574 So. 2d 1207, 1991 WL 21751
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1991 | Docket: 1436721
Cited 11 times | Published
Then it would have complied technically with Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Rules of Appellate Procedure. But the
Category: Appellate Procedure
574 So. 2d 1207, 1991 WL 21751
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1991 | Docket: 1436721
Cited 11 times | Published
Then it would have complied technically with Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Rules of Appellate Procedure. But the
Category: Appellate Procedure
514 So. 2d 374, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2147
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1987 | Docket: 1748970
Cited 11 times | Published
state may appeal an order granting a new trial. Rule 9.140(c)(1)(C), Fla.R. App.P. On the other hand, if
Category: Appellate Procedure
436 So. 2d 1056
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1983 | Docket: 1339303
Cited 11 times | Published
The state timely filed its notice of appeal. Rule 9.140(c)(1)(A) and (c)(2), Fla.R.App.P. We have jurisdiction
Category: Appellate Procedure
402 So. 2d 1147
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1981 | Docket: 1691460
Cited 11 times | Published
those specifically appealable by the state. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). The order of dismissal was also
Category: Appellate Procedure
925 So. 2d 404, 2006 WL 846762
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2006 | Docket: 1516952
Cited 10 times | Published
893.135(1)(b); § 843.02, Fla. Stat.
[2] Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382
Category: Appellate Procedure
915 So. 2d 740, 2005 WL 3327342
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2005 | Docket: 1150608
Cited 10 times | Published
plea; and a sentencing error, if preserved. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Liebman v. State, 853 So.2d 514
Category: Appellate Procedure
871 So. 2d 929, 2004 WL 587652
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2004 | Docket: 1709435
Cited 10 times | Published
fundamental error, and that this appeal is permitted by rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)e as one "otherwise provided by law
Category: Appellate Procedure
854 So. 2d 686, 2003 WL 21672826
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2003 | Docket: 1459817
Cited 10 times | Published
no corresponding provision for state appeals, Rule 9.140(c)(1)(K) allows the state to appeal orders "imposing
Category: Appellate Procedure
848 So. 2d 1222, 2003 WL 21522789
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2003 | Docket: 1309408
Cited 10 times | Published
fundamental error, and that this appeal is permitted by rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)e as one "otherwise provided by law
Category: Appellate Procedure
724 So. 2d 1192, 1998 WL 121499
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1998 | Docket: 1734025
Cited 10 times | Published
of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j); State v. District Court of Appeal of
Category: Appellate Procedure
665 So. 2d 1063, 1995 WL 693077
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1995 | Docket: 1705034
Cited 10 times | Published
summarily affirm the order below was made pursuant to rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, *1064
Category: Appellate Procedure
598 So. 2d 135, 1992 WL 75655
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1992 | Docket: 1737594
Cited 10 times | Published
that the defendant is not entitled to relief (Rule 9.140(g)); on the contrary it affirmatively indicates
Category: Appellate Procedure
521 So. 2d 1100, 1988 WL 21008
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1988 | Docket: 1348463
Cited 10 times | Published
DCA 1981); Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(2) and Fla.R. App.P. 9.140.
The second search occurred after the police
Category: Appellate Procedure
450 So. 2d 1275
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1984 | Docket: 1433908
Cited 10 times | Published
800(a),[1] therefore, it is appealable under Rule 9.140(g), which rule provides the appeal shall be commenced
Category: Appellate Procedure
413 So. 2d 469
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1982 | Docket: 1344463
Cited 10 times | Published
seek review of such an adjudication. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1). We also believe that the ruling below
Category: Appellate Procedure
399 So. 2d 1064
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1981 | Docket: 2578923
Cited 10 times | Published
contemporaneously with the entry of the plea. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv). See Robinson
Category: Appellate Procedure
383 So. 2d 752
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1980 | Docket: 1512386
Cited 10 times | Published
question of whether this Court has jurisdiction. Rule 9.140(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure permits
Category: Appellate Procedure
94 So. 3d 468, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 259, 2012 WL 1123738, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 641
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2012 | Docket: 60310893
Cited 9 times | Published
purposes of a state appeal” under section 924.07 or rule 9.140(c). McMahon, 47 So.3d at 369 (citing Figuer*471oa
Category: Appellate Procedure
24 So. 3d 566, 2009 WL 2342472
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2009 | Docket: 1648543
Cited 9 times | Published
motions addressed to post-trial release pursuant to rule 9.140(h). Cf. Brown v. State, 744 So.2d 1209, 1209
Category: Appellate Procedure
827 So. 2d 299, 2002 WL 2001331
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2002 | Docket: 1726417
Cited 9 times | Published
age of sixteen. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E). We reverse and remand with directions
Category: Appellate Procedure
814 So. 2d 1203, 2002 WL 662247
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2002 | Docket: 1369427
Cited 9 times | Published
and the trial court has denied the motion. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c). Because Wilson's motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
779 So. 2d 571, 2001 WL 98560
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2001 | Docket: 420223
Cited 9 times | Published
the supplemental record in this court. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(e)(6). As a result, we conclude that we have
Category: Appellate Procedure
769 So. 2d 1100, 2000 WL 1459595
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2000 | Docket: 1476431
Cited 9 times | Published
procedure is by petition to this court pursuant to rule 9.140. Funchess.
On the merits, the state's response
Category: Appellate Procedure
770 So. 2d 1151, 2000 WL 1353726
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2000 | Docket: 1778881
Cited 9 times | Published
670 and 3.700(b), 760 So.2d 67 (Fla.1999).
[7] Rule 9.140(d) requires that sentencing errors be preserved
Category: Appellate Procedure
745 So. 2d 541, 1999 WL 1115432
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1999 | Docket: 237387
Cited 9 times | Published
066(2) of the Florida Statutes. We disagree.
Rule 9.140(c)(1) enumerates several types of orders from
Category: Appellate Procedure
698 So. 2d 1313, 1997 WL 541321
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1997 | Docket: 1524243
Cited 9 times | Published
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). We affirm because the record conclusively
Category: Appellate Procedure
688 So. 2d 459, 1997 WL 90822
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1997 | Docket: 411396
Cited 9 times | Published
beappealable as a final appeal under rule 9.110 or rule 9.140. Final appeals are not terribly efficient, however
Category: Appellate Procedure
661 So. 2d 962, 1995 WL 627453
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1995 | Docket: 1526351
Cited 9 times | Published
witnesses.
NOTES
[1] We have jurisdiction. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
[2] Collins did not testify at
Category: Appellate Procedure
591 So. 2d 1147, 1992 WL 4093
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1992 | Docket: 541264
Cited 9 times | Published
of trial counsel in a criminal case. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(3)(A); Turner v. State, 588 So.2d 1042
Category: Appellate Procedure
578 So. 2d 793, 1991 WL 60030
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1991 | Docket: 1525353
Cited 9 times | Published
1985) (reversal for "fundamental injustice" under Rule 9.140(f), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure).
We
Category: Appellate Procedure
468 So. 2d 495, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1164
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1985 | Docket: 1402752
Cited 9 times | Published
C.J., and COWART, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
Category: Appellate Procedure
419 So. 2d 725
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1982 | Docket: 2586323
Cited 9 times | Published
guilty except in very limited circumstances. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b), Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
372 So. 2d 126
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1979 | Docket: 1695731
Cited 9 times | Published
expressed.
Reversed and remanded.
NOTES
[1] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
[2] "790.001 Definitions
* *
Category: Appellate Procedure
366 So. 2d 411
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1978 | Docket: 1655518
Cited 9 times | Published
[6] Although the recently adopted Appellate Rule 9.140(c) does not expressly contemplate an appeal by
Category: Appellate Procedure
19 So. 3d 935, 2009 WL 1544264
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2009 | Docket: 1651573
Cited 8 times | Published
129 S.Ct. 400, 172 L.Ed.2d 292 (2008); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). We find that sufficient evidence exists
Category: Appellate Procedure
969 So. 2d 544, 2007 WL 4180879
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2007 | Docket: 1403682
Cited 8 times | Published
issue for appeal as an "unlawful" sentence under rule 9.140(c)(1)(M), but it is more difficult to conclude
Category: Appellate Procedure
952 So. 2d 613, 2007 WL 936341
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2007 | Docket: 1703346
Cited 8 times | Published
So.2d 1078, 1078 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). However, rule 9.140(e) provides that "[a] sentencing error may not
Category: Appellate Procedure
951 So. 2d 954, 2007 WL 714116
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2007 | Docket: 1280621
Cited 8 times | Published
courts of appeal to hear interlocutory appeals. Rule 9.140(c) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
946 So. 2d 108, 2007 WL 29197
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2007 | Docket: 1771258
Cited 8 times | Published
Appellate jurisdiction is proper pursuant to rule 9.140(c) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
919 So. 2d 669, 2006 WL 197215
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2006 | Docket: 1269121
Cited 8 times | Published
the merits of the claim. See id.; see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). Furthermore, even if we were to
Category: Appellate Procedure
848 So. 2d 1060, 2003 WL 21354789
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2003 | Docket: 1309447
Cited 8 times | Published
Court recognized the preclusive plain language of rule 9.140, but because the limitation of time in the 1996
Category: Appellate Procedure
806 So. 2d 590, 2002 WL 126052
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2002 | Docket: 1712983
Cited 8 times | Published
2000); see § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2000); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). In the instant case, the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
744 So. 2d 1256, 1999 WL 1062209
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 1999 | Docket: 1721339
Cited 8 times | Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing." Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i).
If defendant was arrested (as his postconviction
Category: Appellate Procedure
717 So. 2d 1087, 1998 WL 568274
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1998 | Docket: 1277566
Cited 8 times | Published
filing of a State notice of appeal, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(3), unless the latter rule were amended
Category: Appellate Procedure
708 So. 2d 289, 1998 WL 10878
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1998 | Docket: 1528296
Cited 8 times | Published
motion to correct sentencing errors. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iv), (d). We write to discuss the
Category: Appellate Procedure
685 So. 2d 975, 1997 WL 1244
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1997 | Docket: 1735108
Cited 8 times | Published
guilty plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(4); Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b). Additionally, we certify conflict with
Category: Appellate Procedure
680 So. 2d 581
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1996 | Docket: 1663858
Cited 8 times | Published
reserved. § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1). The records before us do not reflect
Category: Appellate Procedure
660 So. 2d 376, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2109
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1995 | Docket: 1755873
Cited 8 times | Published
issues which require an evidentiary hearing, Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), which appears to authorize evidentiary
Category: Appellate Procedure
475 So. 2d 1215, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 466
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1985 | Docket: 1677262
Cited 8 times | Published
appeal was permitted under the provisions of rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
454 So. 2d 1061
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1984 | Docket: 444628
Cited 8 times | Published
the state requested to do so by us pursuant to rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.[1]*1064
Category: Appellate Procedure
430 So. 2d 563
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1983 | Docket: 445998
Cited 8 times | Published
authorized by art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const., and Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
[2] Appellant has not raised as
Category: Appellate Procedure
416 So. 2d 1258
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1982 | Docket: 1655065
Cited 8 times | Published
held that under the statutory counterpart to Rule 9.140(c)(1)(A), the right of the State to appeal is
Category: Appellate Procedure
415 So. 2d 796
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1982 | Docket: 1512925
Cited 8 times | Published
DCA 1980).
Reversed.
NOTES
[1] Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
[2] The dispositive findings of
Category: Appellate Procedure
394 So. 2d 541
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1981 | Docket: 1692186
Cited 8 times | Published
such relief may be appealed by the State. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140; § 924.07, Fla. Stat. (1979). However, the
Category: Appellate Procedure
391 So. 2d 299
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1980 | Docket: 1174252
Cited 8 times | Published
J., and ORFINGER, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
[2] See State v. Thompson, 390
Category: Appellate Procedure
394 So. 2d 126
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1980 | Docket: 1315087
Cited 8 times | Published
will lie.
We hold that it is not and dismiss.
Rule 9.140(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, governs
Category: Appellate Procedure
378 So. 2d 1240
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1979 | Docket: 1794744
Cited 8 times | Published
suppress and subject to our review on appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
The order reflects that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
224 So. 3d 803, 2017 WL 3316912, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11252
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2017 | Docket: 60271728
Cited 7 times | Published
theft (count 2). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm Mr. Devlin’s judgment
Category: Appellate Procedure
804 F.3d 1137, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18449, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1743
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 23, 2015 | Docket: 3006584
Cited 7 times | Published
to file a timely appeal.
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3). When he failed to do so, 105 more
Category: Appellate Procedure
627 F.3d 823, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 24949, 2010 WL 4942800
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 7, 2010 | Docket: 599582
Cited 7 times | Published
of Judicial Acts to be Reviewed," pursuant to Rule 9.140(d) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
26 So. 3d 534, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 629, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1948, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 629
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2009 | Docket: 1117422
Cited 7 times | Published
Sentences) is amended to correct a cross-reference to rule 9.140(d), Withdrawal of Defense Counsel after Judgment
Category: Appellate Procedure
22 So. 3d 745, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17235, 2009 WL 3837228
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2009 | Docket: 1639879
Cited 7 times | Published
appeal only under limited circumstances. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)-(ii). One such circumstance
Category: Appellate Procedure
21 So. 3d 157, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16848, 2009 WL 3763045
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2009 | Docket: 1656037
Cited 7 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e). Here, the defendant entered his plea
Category: Appellate Procedure
16 So. 3d 280, 2009 WL 2602282
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2009 | Docket: 1641028
Cited 7 times | Published
dispositive order of the trial court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). A motion is dispositive if
Category: Appellate Procedure
4 So. 3d 734, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3518, 2009 WL 485061
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2009 | Docket: 1217055
Cited 7 times | Published
(reversing for "fundamental injustice" under rule 9.140(f)).
The trial court's ruling on the admission
Category: Appellate Procedure
988 So. 2d 138, 2008 WL 2915086
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2008 | Docket: 1385178
Cited 7 times | Published
for the first time on appeal notwithstanding rule 9.140(b)(2)(A), Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure)
Category: Appellate Procedure
951 So. 2d 97, 2007 WL 750528
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2007 | Docket: 1682595
Cited 7 times | Published
Gisela Knudsen. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A), (c)(3). We reverse.
The charges
Category: Appellate Procedure
884 So. 2d 1023, 2004 WL 2289617
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2004 | Docket: 1683121
Cited 7 times | Published
a record is provided to this court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B). Thus, if a defendant files a facially
Category: Appellate Procedure
835 So. 2d 402, 2003 WL 202675
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2003 | Docket: 1754995
Cited 7 times | Published
involuntary plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c); see also Harris, 818 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
821 So. 2d 1267, 2002 WL 1769002
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2002 | Docket: 1236384
Cited 7 times | Published
Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A). Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A) provides that a defendant who has pleaded
Category: Appellate Procedure
755 So. 2d 836, 2000 WL 553997
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2000 | Docket: 1699325
Cited 7 times | Published
Jurisdiction to review this order is proper pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
747 So. 2d 439, 1999 WL 1191447
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1999 | Docket: 1475793
Cited 7 times | Published
jurisdiction. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(1); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii).
This case involved serious
Category: Appellate Procedure
741 So. 2d 517, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8196, 1999 WL 13343
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1999 | Docket: 453105
Cited 7 times | Published
virtually identical, as is Florida Appellate Rule 9.140(b)(1) in its application here. It thus appears
Category: Appellate Procedure
725 So. 2d 441, 1999 WL 49135
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1999 | Docket: 1688930
Cited 7 times | Published
GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
[2] §§ 316.193(1), 361.193(a)
Category: Appellate Procedure
718 So. 2d 283, 1998 WL 567959
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1998 | Docket: 466400
Cited 7 times | Published
697 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)(same); Fla. R.Crim. P. 9.140(d).
Postconviction relief may well be available
Category: Appellate Procedure
681 So. 2d 901, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11110, 1996 WL 603787
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1996 | Docket: 1722208
Cited 7 times | Published
chapter 921's definition of a conviction and rule 9.140(b)(1)(C) so that it is construed to allow a full
Category: Appellate Procedure
637 So. 2d 972, 1994 WL 241730
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1994 | Docket: 422485
Cited 7 times | Published
and independent ground for appellate reversal. Rule 9.140(f) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
527 So. 2d 941, 1988 WL 67263
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1988 | Docket: 1525998
Cited 7 times | Published
not appeal within the time limits set forth in Rule 9.140, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, providing
Category: Appellate Procedure
496 So. 2d 971, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2329
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1986 | Docket: 1522742
Cited 7 times | Published
eighth judicial circuit, timely filed, pursuant to rule 9.140(d), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the
Category: Appellate Procedure
452 So. 2d 1017
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1984 | Docket: 367792
Cited 7 times | Published
contention of appellee, we find that pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
444 So. 2d 434
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1983 | Docket: 1510655
Cited 7 times | Published
a defendant's right to appeal is governed by Rule 9.140(b)(1) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
449 So. 2d 280
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1983 | Docket: 1695649
Cited 7 times | Published
and 924.071 Florida Statutes (1977), and Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(c)"), and by the obvious unacceptability
Category: Appellate Procedure
416 So. 2d 10
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1982 | Docket: 41174
Cited 7 times | Published
thereafter reversed by this court on review under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(e)(4).
Category: Appellate Procedure
405 So. 2d 294
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1981 | Docket: 1703939
Cited 7 times | Published
in criminal cases to those prescribed by Rule 9.140. Rule 9.140 does not authorize review of the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
384 So. 2d 687
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1980 | Docket: 1269708
Cited 7 times | Published
Procedure 9.130(a)(2) to those prescribed by Rule 9.140. Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) in turn authorizes appeal by the
Category: Appellate Procedure
139 So. 3d 958, 2014 WL 2722762, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8689
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2014 | Docket: 60241252
Cited 6 times | Published
Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.800(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e). In most circumstances, this would bar
Category: Appellate Procedure
93 So. 3d 473, 2012 WL 2946509, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11741
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2012 | Docket: 60310610
Cited 6 times | Published
judgment" in criminal cases. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D) (formerly rule 9.140(b)(1)(C)). It is arguable
Category: Appellate Procedure
17 So. 3d 812, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11583, 2009 WL 2517059
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2009 | Docket: 1644903
Cited 6 times | Published
convicted felon. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) (2009). For the reasons set forth
Category: Appellate Procedure
992 So. 2d 304, 2008 WL 4330020
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2008 | Docket: 1723189
Cited 6 times | Published
proceedings. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). Neither the transcript of defendant's
Category: Appellate Procedure
988 So. 2d 1258, 2008 WL 3978286
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2008 | Docket: 1722202
Cited 6 times | Published
preserved by a motion to withdraw plea. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). Here, no motion to withdraw
Category: Appellate Procedure
963 So. 2d 328, 2007 WL 2330927
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2007 | Docket: 1697317
Cited 6 times | Published
assessment of the points for sexual penetration. Rule 9.140(e) provides that a claim of "sentencing error"
Category: Appellate Procedure
954 So. 2d 97, 2007 WL 1159727
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2007 | Docket: 948397
Cited 6 times | Published
guilt for indirect criminal contempt), with Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) (allowing appeal of final judgment
Category: Appellate Procedure
919 So. 2d 684, 2006 WL 229051
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2006 | Docket: 2589335
Cited 6 times | Published
matters regarding his plea and sentence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)-(ii). Mr. Greene's admission
Category: Appellate Procedure
914 So. 2d 1070, 2005 WL 3179892
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2005 | Docket: 2356876
Cited 6 times | Published
counsel is considered to have withdrawn. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d)(1)(D). Because Mingo still had counsel
Category: Appellate Procedure
915 So. 2d 622, 2005 WL 1923121
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2005 | Docket: 1310786
Cited 6 times | Published
The state appeals. We have jurisdiction. See Rule 9.140(c)(1)(L), Fla. R.App. P.
Section 948.20 reads
Category: Appellate Procedure
874 So. 2d 617, 2004 WL 587640
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2004 | Docket: 1473662
Cited 6 times | Published
the proper remedy had been sought...."); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i) ("In the interest of justice, the court
Category: Appellate Procedure
814 So. 2d 1138, 2002 WL 529899
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2002 | Docket: 1717869
Cited 6 times | Published
appealed to this court to seek review of the order.
Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
788 So. 2d 379, 2001 WL 686522
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2001 | Docket: 1685231
Cited 6 times | Published
only if it is dispositive of the case. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Zambuto v. State, 731 So.2d 46
Category: Appellate Procedure
745 So. 2d 1119, 1999 WL 1127724
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1999 | Docket: 2559923
Cited 6 times | Published
raising a double jeopardy issue on appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j). Thomas was convicted of two counts of
Category: Appellate Procedure
741 So. 2d 1268, 1999 WL 820990
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1999 | Docket: 1511122
Cited 6 times | Published
NOTES
[1] § 893.13(6)(a), Fla. Stat.
[2] Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898
Category: Appellate Procedure
748 So. 2d 292, 1999 WL 415116
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1999 | Docket: 1750621
Cited 6 times | Published
following appellant's no contest plea. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(a). This appeal is therefore dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
715 So. 2d 1054, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9709, 1998 WL 428978
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1998 | Docket: 1716975
Cited 6 times | Published
Hence, they argue there is no need to comply with Rule 9.140. We disagree with this reasoning.
Appellees are
Category: Appellate Procedure
712 So. 2d 1206, 1998 WL 323491
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1998 | Docket: 1471929
Cited 6 times | Published
orders in criminal cases shall be as prescribed by rule 9.140." Although the state is permitted to take an
Category: Appellate Procedure
710 So. 2d 144, 1998 WL 176640
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1998 | Docket: 2583357
Cited 6 times | Published
establishes the procedure for seeking a belated appeal. Rule 9.140(j)(2)(F) states that the petition shall include
Category: Appellate Procedure
702 So. 2d 633, 1997 WL 783051
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1997 | Docket: 460214
Cited 6 times | Published
defendant's "straight-up" plea. See also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(J) & (K) (authorizing the state to
Category: Appellate Procedure
702 So. 2d 240, 1997 WL 710297
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1997 | Docket: 182152
Cited 6 times | Published
DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
Category: Appellate Procedure
648 So. 2d 1249, 1995 WL 25291
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1995 | Docket: 1701876
Cited 6 times | Published
court's order of summary denial in accordance with rule 9.140(g) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
647 So. 2d 180, 1994 WL 284249
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1994 | Docket: 437685
Cited 6 times | Published
particularity the point of law being reserved. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1); § 924.06, Fla. Stat. (1993). When
Category: Appellate Procedure
621 So. 2d 752, 1993 WL 242584
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1993 | Docket: 1265261
Cited 6 times | Published
evidence obtained by search and seizure.
Pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), we conclude that the state may appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
609 So. 2d 112, 1992 WL 341953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1992 | Docket: 1473480
Cited 6 times | Published
924.06 and 924.07, Florida Statutes (1991), and rule 9.140(c)(1)(J), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
603 So. 2d 613, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1840
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1992 | Docket: 1739051
Cited 6 times | Published
present appeal is being decided under appellate rule 9.140(g), we are confined to the limited record now
Category: Appellate Procedure
586 So. 2d 1173, 1991 WL 180683
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1991 | Docket: 1487889
Cited 6 times | Published
follows:
Except to the extent of conflict with Rule 9.140 governing appeals in criminal cases, this rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
569 So. 2d 897, 1990 WL 175910
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1990 | Docket: 1660676
Cited 6 times | Published
effect, pretrial for purposes of review under rule 9.140(c)(1)(B).
Although we don't have the same circumstances
Category: Appellate Procedure
563 So. 2d 188, 1990 WL 85446
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1990 | Docket: 1281677
Cited 6 times | Published
evidence obtained by search and seizure," see Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
543 So. 2d 760, 1989 WL 11945
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1989 | Docket: 1437747
Cited 6 times | Published
the state appeals. We have jurisdiction. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(C) & (D).
Award of a New Trial on
Category: Appellate Procedure
473 So. 2d 34, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1822
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1985 | Docket: 451582
Cited 6 times | Published
order is not appealable until it is rendered. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(2); State v. Wells, 326 So.2d 175 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
471 So. 2d 1297, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1432
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1985 | Docket: 1724645
Cited 6 times | Published
against the defendants. We have jurisdiction. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). We reverse.
The state filed a two-count
Category: Appellate Procedure
466 So. 2d 1152, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 842
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1985 | Docket: 438264
Cited 6 times | Published
although the state brings this case to us under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(b) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
464 So. 2d 691, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 626
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1985 | Docket: 1661211
Cited 6 times | Published
D. UPCHURCH, Jr., J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)()(B).
Category: Appellate Procedure
443 So. 2d 366
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1983 | Docket: 72300
Cited 6 times | Published
by the state from an alleged illegal sentence. Rule 9.140(c)(1)(I). The state says the sentence is illegal
Category: Appellate Procedure
443 So. 2d 302
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1983 | Docket: 1103289
Cited 6 times | Published
trafficking in cocaine. We have jurisdiction. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). We reverse.
Armando Valdes made
Category: Appellate Procedure
423 So. 2d 520
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1982 | Docket: 1528729
Cited 6 times | Published
granting probation which is appealable under Rule 9.140(b)(1)(B). Under any fair statement of the principle
Category: Appellate Procedure
414 So. 2d 278
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1982 | Docket: 2552497
Cited 6 times | Published
this is an appeal from a criminal case. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(2). Orange County also has filed a motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
399 So. 2d 16
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 1652376
Cited 6 times | Published
defendant appeals his judgment of conviction." Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(H). See Sands v. State, 328 So.2d 563
Category: Appellate Procedure
378 So. 2d 1258
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1979 | Docket: 1795492
Cited 6 times | Published
appropriate collateral attack." See also Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1). The rule has been construed to preclude
Category: Appellate Procedure
378 So. 2d 1258
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1979 | Docket: 1795492
Cited 6 times | Published
appropriate collateral attack." See also Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1). The rule has been construed to preclude
Category: Appellate Procedure
373 So. 2d 451
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1979 | Docket: 1772123
Cited 6 times | Published
State v. Ashby, 245 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1971); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b).
The crime of possessing burglary tools
Category: Appellate Procedure
219 So. 3d 160, 2017 WL 1788017, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6367
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2017 | Docket: 6061255
Cited 5 times | Published
appeal certain enumerated orders, id (citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)), and the order under consideration here
Category: Appellate Procedure
135 So. 3d 1153, 2014 WL 1600443, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5739
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2014 | Docket: 60239449
Cited 5 times | Published
regarding an unrelated discovery order.
Pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
143 So. 3d 936, 2014 WL 1258540, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4679
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2014 | Docket: 60242395
Cited 5 times | Published
Stat. (2010). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). Because the trial court erred
Category: Appellate Procedure
136 So. 3d 680, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1194, 2014 WL 340672
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2014 | Docket: 60240057
Cited 5 times | Published
Stat. (2009). We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D), and affirm. We write to address
Category: Appellate Procedure
79 So. 3d 747, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14233, 2011 WL 3962910
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2011 | Docket: 2356189
Cited 5 times | Published
order are properly before us on appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
III. THE STANDARD OF REVIEW
Category: Appellate Procedure
55 So. 3d 1267, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 755, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 2092, 2010 WL 5110225
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2010 | Docket: 2408451
Cited 5 times | Published
evidence supports the murder conviction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). When a defendant pleads guilty, however
Category: Appellate Procedure
19 So. 3d 1045, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14520, 2009 WL 3103888
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2009 | Docket: 1651513
Cited 5 times | Published
and sentence. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A).
Battle was charged by information
Category: Appellate Procedure
16 So. 3d 280, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12518
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2009 | Docket: 60246753
Cited 5 times | Published
dispositive order of the trial court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). A motion is dispositive if
Category: Appellate Procedure
2 So. 3d 89, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 908, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 2089, 2008 WL 4876766
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2008 | Docket: 1644022
Cited 5 times | Published
toll the time for filing a notice of appeal.
RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
(a)-(b)
Category: Appellate Procedure
988 So. 2d 1128, 2008 WL 2853149
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2008 | Docket: 1722168
Cited 5 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e); see Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562
Category: Appellate Procedure
964 So. 2d 881, 2007 WL 2780882
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2007 | Docket: 1240691
Cited 5 times | Published
the issue in a Rule 3.800(b) motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e).
*884 Even if the issue of Perez's death
Category: Appellate Procedure
927 So. 2d 1064, 2006 WL 1236051
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2006 | Docket: 1765270
Cited 5 times | Published
involuntarily. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c. "A mandatory minimum sentence
Category: Appellate Procedure
924 So. 2d 971, 2006 WL 932540
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2006 | Docket: 390896
Cited 5 times | Published
supreme court expressly implemented this statute in rule 9.140(c)(2), which states: "Non-final orders. The state
Category: Appellate Procedure
913 So. 2d 1203, 2005 WL 2509344
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2005 | Docket: 1698179
Cited 5 times | Published
dispositive order of the lower tribunal." Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). In this context, an "issue
Category: Appellate Procedure
889 So. 2d 108, 2004 WL 2623941
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2004 | Docket: 1742657
Cited 5 times | Published
recede from the Bogan decision. Additionally, rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(e) allows an appeal from a nolo
Category: Appellate Procedure
887 So. 2d 1090, 2004 WL 2201732
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2004 | Docket: 1515169
Cited 5 times | Published
original *1152 be retained, except that under rule 9.140(d) (governing criminal cases), the original is
Category: Appellate Procedure
879 So. 2d 651, 2004 WL 1485848
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2004 | Docket: 463727
Cited 5 times | Published
seek relief via a direct appeal.
[4] See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)a. ("A defendant who pleads
Category: Appellate Procedure
875 So. 2d 1271, 2004 WL 1354252
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2004 | Docket: 1684056
Cited 5 times | Published
treated as a petition for writ of certiorari. Rule 9.140(c)(1), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, authorizes
Category: Appellate Procedure
863 So. 2d 386, 2003 WL 22970997
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2003 | Docket: 1728647
Cited 5 times | Published
found in his car after it was impounded. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The court should have granted
Category: Appellate Procedure
841 So. 2d 488, 2003 WL 187455
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2003 | Docket: 1234134
Cited 5 times | Published
and should be corrected under the authority of rule 9.140(i), which states that "in the interest of justice
Category: Appellate Procedure
835 So. 2d 1217, 2003 WL 161718
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2003 | Docket: 353026
Cited 5 times | Published
PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] See Fla. R.App. P.9.140(c)(1)(K).
Category: Appellate Procedure
812 So. 2d 527, 2002 WL 460319
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2002 | Docket: 1716257
Cited 5 times | Published
appeal is otherwise permitted by law. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(E), (F); § 924.06(1)(d), (e), Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
805 So. 2d 818, 2001 WL 220012
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2001 | Docket: 1669452
Cited 5 times | Published
prior to the attachment of jeopardy. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1). If we affirm an order of dismissal
Category: Appellate Procedure
791 So. 2d 525, 2001 WL 844500
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2001 | Docket: 1655723
Cited 5 times | Published
be *527 addressed on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(d).
The procedure established by rule 3.800(b)
Category: Appellate Procedure
789 So. 2d 1082, 2001 WL 673580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2001 | Docket: 2513257
Cited 5 times | Published
140(b)(2)(B)(i)-(v)."[1] (Emphasis added.) The incorporation of rule 9.140(b)(2)(B)(i)(v) accurately reflects the limited
Category: Appellate Procedure
826 So. 2d 1022, 2001 WL 649810
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2001 | Docket: 1198219
Cited 5 times | Published
orders granting the motions to suppress. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(3). The trial court denied petitioners'
Category: Appellate Procedure
786 So. 2d 43, 2001 WL 527530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2001 | Docket: 1278436
Cited 5 times | Published
appeal from a sentence following a plea, under rule 9.140(b)(2)(B)(ii).
Appellant relies on Amaya v. State
Category: Appellate Procedure
776 So. 2d 309, 2000 WL 1873062
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2000 | Docket: 422048
Cited 5 times | Published
files a Petition for Belated Appeal, pursuant to rule 9.140(j)."
Category: Appellate Procedure
773 So. 2d 574, 2000 WL 1700878
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2000 | Docket: 1291580
Cited 5 times | Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing." Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i).
The record does not conclusively refute
Category: Appellate Procedure
762 So. 2d 929, 2000 WL 526083
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2000 | Docket: 1311495
Cited 5 times | Published
timely filing a rule 3.800(b) motion. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d).
FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
NOTES
Category: Appellate Procedure
752 So. 2d 79, 2000 WL 192163
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2000 | Docket: 1279503
Cited 5 times | Published
reserved. See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382
Category: Appellate Procedure
750 So. 2d 654, 1999 WL 420154
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1999 | Docket: 1736538
Cited 5 times | Published
rule 9.145, appeals in delinquency cases follow rule 9.140, except as modified by rule 9.145. Rule 9.145(b)
Category: Appellate Procedure
732 So. 2d 20, 1999 WL 242262
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1999 | Docket: 460526
Cited 5 times | Published
possession of the cocaine and paraphernalia. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). We reverse the appellant's convictions
Category: Appellate Procedure
700 So. 2d 384, 1997 WL 422525
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1997 | Docket: 1373634
Cited 5 times | Published
685 So.2d 1253, 1257 (Fla. 1996). Appellate Rule 9.140(b)(2)(B)(i)-(v) in turn provides as follows:
Category: Appellate Procedure
695 So. 2d 778, 1997 WL 215777
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1997 | Docket: 43464
Cited 5 times | Published
appeal by filing a petition in this court under rule 9.140(j) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
659 So. 2d 491, 1995 WL 516464
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1995 | Docket: 156992
Cited 5 times | Published
State, 624 So.2d 417 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
COBB and GOSHORN
Category: Appellate Procedure
658 So. 2d 1215, 1995 WL 478317
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1995 | Docket: 439298
Cited 5 times | Published
attachment of record or an evidentiary hearing. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
ERVIN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ.,
Category: Appellate Procedure
657 So. 2d 929, 1995 WL 390268
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1995 | Docket: 1459847
Cited 5 times | Published
court's failure to comply with the requirement of rule 9.140(g).
Id. at 112 (citations omitted).
Accordingly
Category: Appellate Procedure
639 So. 2d 634, 1994 WL 287819
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1994 | Docket: 1712726
Cited 5 times | Published
Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(d).[4] Rule 9.140(d) mandates that the clerk of the lower court
Category: Appellate Procedure
639 So. 2d 634, 1994 WL 287819
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1994 | Docket: 1712726
Cited 5 times | Published
Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(d).[4] Rule 9.140(d) mandates that the clerk of the lower court
Category: Appellate Procedure
596 So. 2d 715, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2724, 1992 WL 48733
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1992 | Docket: 64666534
Cited 5 times | Published
otherwise appealable to the circuit court under rule 9.140(c). Fla. R.App.P. 9.030(b)(4)(B), 9.160. Appellant
Category: Appellate Procedure
591 So. 2d 270, 1991 WL 200136
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1991 | Docket: 36076
Cited 5 times | Published
attachment, and our summary review procedures under Rule 9.140(g) depend on their inclusion. The supplementation
Category: Appellate Procedure
585 So. 2d 1125, 1991 WL 178111
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1991 | Docket: 1293681
Cited 5 times | Published
before us for limited review pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), we will not consider this defect fatal
Category: Appellate Procedure
577 So. 2d 689, 1991 WL 46843
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1991 | Docket: 2556451
Cited 5 times | Published
to section 924.07, Florida Statutes (1990) or Rule 9.140, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The state's
Category: Appellate Procedure
566 So. 2d 893, 1990 WL 129663
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1990 | Docket: 1529156
Cited 5 times | Published
first hold that this is an appealable order. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1)(C). See Thompson v. Crawford, 479 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
565 So. 2d 354, 1990 WL 98459
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1990 | Docket: 1403845
Cited 5 times | Published
So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(3)(A)(i) and (b)(3)(B), defense counsel
Category: Appellate Procedure
565 So. 2d 354, 1990 WL 98459
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1990 | Docket: 1403845
Cited 5 times | Published
So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(3)(A)(i) and (b)(3)(B), defense counsel
Category: Appellate Procedure
549 So. 2d 1198, 1989 WL 120486
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1989 | Docket: 1373992
Cited 5 times | Published
counsel will be appointed at public expense. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(3); § 27.51(4), Fla. Stat.; Douglas v
Category: Appellate Procedure
490 So. 2d 1054, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1469
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1986 | Docket: 1489225
Cited 5 times | Published
However, the court was specific that, based on Rule 9.140(f), Fla.R.App.P., which provides that "[i]n the
Category: Appellate Procedure
482 So. 2d 1388, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 282
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1986 | Docket: 1768998
Cited 5 times | Published
unappealable order. § 924.07, Fla. Stat. (1981); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1); State v. Creighton, 469 So.2d 735
Category: Appellate Procedure
465 So. 2d 1369, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 835
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1985 | Docket: 1695042
Cited 5 times | Published
motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure (1985)
Category: Appellate Procedure
463 So. 2d 525, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 432
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1985 | Docket: 448889
Cited 5 times | Published
See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(J). But unlike an appeal from an illegal sentence under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(I)
Category: Appellate Procedure
463 So. 2d 495, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 371
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1985 | Docket: 448896
Cited 5 times | Published
Statutes, Rule 3.172(c)(iv), Fla.R.Crim.P., and Rule 9.140(b)(1), Fla.R.App.P., there is no right to a direct
Category: Appellate Procedure
424 So. 2d 163
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1983 | Docket: 364213
Cited 5 times | Published
this appeal. Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A), (B).
The relevant facts pertaining
Category: Appellate Procedure
418 So. 2d 1203
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1982 | Docket: 2560223
Cited 5 times | Published
more than thirty days after sentencing. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2).
The State's motion to dismiss is
Category: Appellate Procedure
401 So. 2d 1114, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19099
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1981 | Docket: 2536329
Cited 5 times | Published
show appellant is entitled to no relief. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g); Rice v. State, 400 So.2d 461 (Fla. 5th
Category: Appellate Procedure
391 So. 2d 720
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1980 | Docket: 1653742
Cited 5 times | Published
interlocutory and therefore not reviewable under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b) (1978). In Interest of R.J.B., 394 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
390 So. 2d 92
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1980 | Docket: 2587290
Cited 5 times | Published
924.071(1), Florida Statutes (1979), and Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
[2] Only the officers testified
Category: Appellate Procedure
364 So. 2d 523
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1978 | Docket: 2581892
Cited 5 times | Published
we must dismiss this appeal as untimely. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(2); Kurz v. State, 303 So.2d 431 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
264 So. 3d 1055
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2019 | Docket: 64705092
Cited 4 times | Published
court's order dismissing the information. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A) ("The state may appeal an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
217 So. 3d 215, 2017 WL 1401463, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5363
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2017 | Docket: 60265671
Cited 4 times | Published
illegal sentence”). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Because a sentencing error involves
Category: Appellate Procedure
219 So. 3d 14, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 451, 2017 WL 1366987, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 829
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2017 | Docket: 4684619
Cited 4 times | Published
at 1260-61 (footnote omitted) (citing Fla. R.. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)). The Fifth District reasoned
Category: Appellate Procedure
187 So. 3d 283, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2967, 2016 WL 764734
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 2016 | Docket: 60254035
Cited 4 times | Published
denial.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.691(b); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h)(3). Review of orders denying post-trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
187 So. 3d 283, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2967, 2016 WL 764734
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 2016 | Docket: 60254035
Cited 4 times | Published
denial.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.691(b); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h)(3). Review of orders denying post-trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
134 So. 3d 1025, 2012 WL 6633860, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21974
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2012 | Docket: 60238998
Cited 4 times | Published
requires written findings.” Id.; see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h)(3) (“All orders denying post-trial release
Category: Appellate Procedure
59 So. 3d 191, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3199, 2011 WL 799735
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2011 | Docket: 60299625
Cited 4 times | Published
proceedings. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(i).
Reversed and remanded.
Category: Appellate Procedure
50 So. 3d 733, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 20674, 2009 WL 7229247
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2010 | Docket: 2398060
Cited 4 times | Published
withdraw her plea with the trial court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c.;[1]see also Hicks v. State
Category: Appellate Procedure
8 So. 3d 393, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1953, 2009 WL 605388
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2009 | Docket: 1654223
Cited 4 times | Published
to suppress. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A).
While on patrol in Vero Beach
Category: Appellate Procedure
1 So. 3d 1243, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1111, 2009 WL 321569
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2009 | Docket: 1653757
Cited 4 times | Published
plea was involuntary, a recognized ground under Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). Where a motion to withdraw a plea
Category: Appellate Procedure
961 So. 2d 195, 2007 WL 1215217
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2007 | Docket: 468688
Cited 4 times | Published
appeal an adverse ruling of a 3.800(a) motion. Rule 9.140(b)(1)(D) allows defendants to appeal "orders
Category: Appellate Procedure
941 So. 2d 352, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 732, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2544, 2006 WL 3025623
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2006 | Docket: 299199
Cited 4 times | Published
a supplemental report proposing amendments to rule 9.140 (Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases) to correct
Category: Appellate Procedure
917 So. 2d 404, 2006 WL 26180
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2006 | Docket: 2516448
Cited 4 times | Published
2d 959, 960 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (noting that rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) allows the appeal of a dispositive
Category: Appellate Procedure
909 So. 2d 942, 2005 WL 1923389
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2005 | Docket: 1199192
Cited 4 times | Published
JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(3).
[2] Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(3).
[3] § 924.07(1)(e)
Category: Appellate Procedure
877 So. 2d 803, 2004 WL 1485983
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2004 | Docket: 1285283
Cited 4 times | Published
warrant was invalid. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R.Crim. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
We begin our analysis by discussion
Category: Appellate Procedure
848 So. 2d 1209, 2003 WL 21511102
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2003 | Docket: 1712359
Cited 4 times | Published
appealed the dismissal of a criminal charge. Rule 9.140(h)(3) provides that an incarcerated defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
849 So. 2d 398, 2003 WL 21459598
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2003 | Docket: 1509391
Cited 4 times | Published
investigatory stop. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R.Crim. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
Defendants, Davis and John, were
Category: Appellate Procedure
846 So. 2d 1220, 2003 WL 21294885
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2003 | Docket: 1444410
Cited 4 times | Published
mitigate, the appeal is not timely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(3); Downs v. State, 700 So.2d 789 (Fla.
Category: Appellate Procedure
840 So. 2d 439, 2003 WL 1386646
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2003 | Docket: 2583322
Cited 4 times | Published
permitted to appeal from such an order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1). We agree.
It is well settled that
Category: Appellate Procedure
809 So. 2d 910, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3312, 2002 WL 397065
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2002 | Docket: 1722358
Cited 4 times | Published
guidelines on this basis.").
NOTES
[1] See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(J)(authorizing the State to appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
807 So. 2d 204, 2002 WL 246671
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2002 | Docket: 1505847
Cited 4 times | Published
("Briefs in summary appeals are now governed by rule 9.140(i) and must be filed with the appellate court
Category: Appellate Procedure
784 So. 2d 1164, 2001 WL 282720
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2001 | Docket: 1491968
Cited 4 times | Published
unrelated to the order the State has appealed. Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b); State v. Miller, 710 So.2d 686 (Fla.
Category: Appellate Procedure
779 So. 2d 625, 2001 WL 209026
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2001 | Docket: 2529912
Cited 4 times | Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing," Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i), as to these issues. We agree with the
Category: Appellate Procedure
768 So. 2d 1128, 2000 WL 1180167
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2000 | Docket: 1525555
Cited 4 times | Published
should be excused because of counsel's mistake.
Rule 9.140(j)(3)(B) permits a petition of this nature to
Category: Appellate Procedure
744 So. 2d 1172, 1999 WL 992683
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1999 | Docket: 1721420
Cited 4 times | Published
2d DCA 1997). There is no similar provision in rule 9.140 that would allow the State to appeal an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
730 So. 2d 419, 1999 WL 234783
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1999 | Docket: 585161
Cited 4 times | Published
appeal. See § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
728 So. 2d 1195, 1999 WL 123520
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1999 | Docket: 1673867
Cited 4 times | Published
Constitution. See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
A trial court's ruling on a motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
734 So. 2d 1086, 1999 WL 71255
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1999 | Docket: 1731044
Cited 4 times | Published
set forth all of the information required by rule 9.140(j), we cannot treat it as a petition for belated
Category: Appellate Procedure
711 So. 2d 640, 1998 WL 306766
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1998 | Docket: 2586007
Cited 4 times | Published
notice of appeal in case number 93-1103. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). The Public Defender is appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
709 So. 2d 135, 1998 WL 107292
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1998 | Docket: 1681994
Cited 4 times | Published
circuit court clerk under the then-operative rule, 9.140(g), must be paginated and indexed according to
Category: Appellate Procedure
704 So. 2d 151, 1997 WL 749240
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1997 | Docket: 2576234
Cited 4 times | Published
the Third District Court of Appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j).
DISMISSED.
DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
698 So. 2d 602, 1997 WL 464213
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1997 | Docket: 434529
Cited 4 times | Published
court's failure to comply with the requirement of rule 9.140(g) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
696 So. 2d 490, 1997 WL 362844
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1997 | Docket: 1325795
Cited 4 times | Published
this court for a belated appeal, pursuant to rule 9.140(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1997)
Category: Appellate Procedure
609 So. 2d 613, 1992 WL 171115
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1992 | Docket: 1737990
Cited 4 times | Published
have been reviewable in the circuit court under rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), and by earlier order accepted the appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
582 So. 2d 1200, 1991 WL 109696
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1991 | Docket: 1363405
Cited 4 times | Published
unless specifically reserved by the defendant. Rule 9.140 allows an appeal by the defendant from orders
Category: Appellate Procedure
573 So. 2d 1021, 1991 WL 10435
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1991 | Docket: 1518782
Cited 4 times | Published
time for filing such an appeal is controlled by Rule 9.140(b)(2). That rule provides in pertinent part:
Category: Appellate Procedure
570 So. 2d 990, 1990 WL 115536
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1990 | Docket: 1349818
Cited 4 times | Published
prepared.
[2] Although not clearly specified in Rule 9.140, when the trial court denies the motion because
Category: Appellate Procedure
560 So. 2d 355, 1990 WL 51713
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1990 | Docket: 1739594
Cited 4 times | Published
from which an appeal is permitted pursuant to Rule 9.140(c)(1)(E), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
545 So. 2d 521, 1989 WL 72747
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1989 | Docket: 1344826
Cited 4 times | Published
clerk was following the procedure set forth in Rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, for
Category: Appellate Procedure
538 So. 2d 106, 1989 WL 9155
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1989 | Docket: 1517131
Cited 4 times | Published
5th DCA 1988), the Fifth District, citing to rule 9.140(b) and (c), Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509
Category: Appellate Procedure
494 So. 2d 957
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1986 | Docket: 1510789
Cited 4 times | Published
v. Creighton, 469 So.2d 735 (Fla. 1985); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140. No Florida statute authorizes the state
Category: Appellate Procedure
474 So. 2d 7, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1845
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1985 | Docket: 1470199
Cited 4 times | Published
[2] At the time of petitioner's convictions, Rule 9.140, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, was not
Category: Appellate Procedure
460 So. 2d 915
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1984 | Docket: 1766942
Cited 4 times | Published
meaning of section 924.06(d), Florida Statutes, and Rule 9.140(b)(D), which grant a defendant the right to a
Category: Appellate Procedure
456 So. 2d 1209
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1984 | Docket: 1446924
Cited 4 times | Published
[2] Section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes, and Rule 9.140(b)(1), do not limit the right under section 924
Category: Appellate Procedure
445 So. 2d 666
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1984 | Docket: 1288000
Cited 4 times | Published
faith prosecution. We have jurisdiction. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). For the reasons which follow we
Category: Appellate Procedure
444 So. 2d 71
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1984 | Docket: 1510716
Cited 4 times | Published
appeal denial of certain pretrial motions, under Rule 9.140(b) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
422 So. 2d 1065
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1982 | Docket: 2568633
Cited 4 times | Published
robbery. Section 924.06(1), Fla. Stat. (1981); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1). In rejecting appellant's attack upon
Category: Appellate Procedure
413 So. 2d 156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1982 | Docket: 1345419
Cited 4 times | Published
the entry of a written order imposing sentence. Rule 9.140(b)(2), Fla. R.App.P. Consequently, only a motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
399 So. 2d 1043
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1981 | Docket: 1652382
Cited 4 times | Published
concur.
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.172(c)(iv); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140 (b)(1).
[2] Cf. Pendarvis v. State, 400
Category: Appellate Procedure
397 So. 2d 939
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1981 | Docket: 1357481
Cited 4 times | Published
C.J., and COWART, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
[2] Section 322.262(2)(c), Florida
Category: Appellate Procedure
257 So. 3d 66
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2018 | Docket: 8081303
Cited 3 times | Published
Committee Notes
[No change]
RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
Category: Appellate Procedure
238 So. 3d 880
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2018 | Docket: 6304066
Cited 3 times | Published
battery, and one
1 We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(4) (providing that the district
court
Category: Appellate Procedure
223 So. 3d 1053, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4390, 2017 WL 1202378
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2017 | Docket: 4667147
Cited 3 times | Published
2d 493 (1967). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm Alex Rodriguez’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
206 So. 3d 124, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18067
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2016 | Docket: 4550694
Cited 3 times | Published
Here, the order is not appealable pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1) and the State cannot appeal an acquittal
Category: Appellate Procedure
201 So. 3d 847, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15584
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2016 | Docket: 60257105
Cited 3 times | Published
preserved; or
e. as otherwise provided by law.”
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii).
First, we reject the State’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
201 So. 3d 666, 2016 WL 3201036, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8961
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2016 | Docket: 3077257
Cited 3 times | Published
2016) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.691(c); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h)(4)).
2
. The jury acquitted
Category: Appellate Procedure
146 So. 3d 76, 2014 WL 4086561, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12740
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2014 | Docket: 60243013
Cited 3 times | Published
contemporaneous objection at sentencing. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e).
The State argues that as a result of
Category: Appellate Procedure
141 So. 3d 229, 2014 WL 2472301, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8385
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2014 | Docket: 60241826
Cited 3 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e); see Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452
Category: Appellate Procedure
129 So. 3d 446, 2013 WL 6865084, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20726
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2013 | Docket: 60237400
Cited 3 times | Published
enumerated in Rule 9.140(b)(2) (A) (ii) (a)-(e) as well as a “manifest injustice.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b)-(c);
Category: Appellate Procedure
95 So. 3d 911, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11873, 2012 WL 3000596
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2012 | Docket: 60311339
Cited 3 times | Published
denial issues proceeding separately under the rule 9.140(b)(2) procedure.’’ We felt instead "that the
Category: Appellate Procedure
94 So. 3d 631, 2012 WL 2613556, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10889
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2012 | Docket: 60310920
Cited 3 times | Published
because the State has no remedy by appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c) (listing the orders from which the State
Category: Appellate Procedure
93 So. 3d 371, 2012 WL 2345119, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9996
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2012 | Docket: 60310560
Cited 3 times | Published
by means of a Rule 3.800(b) motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e) ("A sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
134 So. 3d 975, 2012 WL 1109129, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5234
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2012 | Docket: 60239376
Cited 3 times | Published
dispositive order of the lower tribunal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). An issue is dispositive only
Category: Appellate Procedure
74 So. 3d 158, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18111, 2011 WL 5555836
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2011 | Docket: 2360687
Cited 3 times | Published
preserved for review as trial court error. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b); see Ross v. State, 848
Category: Appellate Procedure
72 So. 3d 306, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16516, 2011 WL 4953424
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2011 | Docket: 2353370
Cited 3 times | Published
Margarita Perez. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). The State argues that "[t]he plain
Category: Appellate Procedure
66 So. 3d 350, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10508, 2011 WL 2624431
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2011 | Docket: 2362226
Cited 3 times | Published
whether his sentences were illegal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(d). We affirm in part and reverse
Category: Appellate Procedure
67 So. 3d 1066, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10355, 2011 WL 2586346
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2011 | Docket: 60301923
Cited 3 times | Published
rulings, whether conditional or not. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1) (listing the grounds upon which the
Category: Appellate Procedure
65 So. 3d 107, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10177, 2011 WL 2555398
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 60301616
Cited 3 times | Published
after pleading guilty or nolo contendere. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). However, a defendant will be permitted
Category: Appellate Procedure
40 So. 3d 120, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10453, 2010 WL 2795381
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2010 | Docket: 1667046
Cited 3 times | Published
appealed the order. We have jurisdiction. See Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
35 So. 3d 143, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7027, 2010 WL 2011578
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2010 | Docket: 1645792
Cited 3 times | Published
(4) a sentencing error, if preserved. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(d); Biggs v. State, 24
Category: Appellate Procedure
9 So. 3d 717, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3445, 2009 WL 1066290
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2009 | Docket: 1221118
Cited 3 times | Published
sentences imposed on the other charges.
[2] See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (allowing a defendant who enters
Category: Appellate Procedure
997 So. 2d 486, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2853
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2008 | Docket: 1377977
Cited 3 times | Published
preserve the error for appellate review. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e)(1).
Accordingly, we affirm Mr. Williams'
Category: Appellate Procedure
991 So. 2d 969, 2008 WL 4224287
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2008 | Docket: 1725174
Cited 3 times | Published
(2007). This court has jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(L).
Raymond Scriber made an open plea
Category: Appellate Procedure
978 So. 2d 825, 2008 WL 656671
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2008 | Docket: 1508425
Cited 3 times | Published
within fifteen days of the judgment. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 9.140(c)(3). The state also has a right under
Category: Appellate Procedure
941 So. 2d 1185, 2006 WL 3019822
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2006 | Docket: 431883
Cited 3 times | Published
McGlades sought review of the July 18 order under rule 9.140. On October 13, we determined that the judge
Category: Appellate Procedure
927 So. 2d 1, 2006 WL 357889
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2006 | Docket: 1765212
Cited 3 times | Published
State, 915 So.2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
[2] See § 985.03(15), Fla. Stat
Category: Appellate Procedure
920 So. 2d 709, 2006 WL 436115
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2006 | Docket: 1769337
Cited 3 times | Published
to reserve for appeal be dispositive. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The denial of Sears' motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
919 So. 2d 481, 2005 WL 2861105
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2005 | Docket: 389672
Cited 3 times | Published
battery count. The State has appealed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).[1]
II.
This court has said that
Category: Appellate Procedure
904 So. 2d 573, 2005 WL 1383343
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2005 | Docket: 1716465
Cited 3 times | Published
appeal their convictions within 30 days. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(3). Petitions for postconviction relief
Category: Appellate Procedure
892 So. 2d 1183, 2005 WL 264113
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2005 | Docket: 472222
Cited 3 times | Published
924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2004); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). In the instant case, the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
886 So. 2d 280, 2004 WL 2532996
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2004 | Docket: 1721251
Cited 3 times | Published
denied. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)(B); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(f)(6)(A); Robinson v. State, 850 So.2d 658
Category: Appellate Procedure
877 So. 2d 938, 2004 WL 1666417
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 2004 | Docket: 1684616
Cited 3 times | Published
(e) as otherwise provided by law. See also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e). Rather than allege
Category: Appellate Procedure
866 So. 2d 1257, 2004 WL 305748
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2004 | Docket: 1274043
Cited 3 times | Published
conviction or to correct an illegal sentence. Rule 9.140(b)(1)(D) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
864 So. 2d 533, 2004 WL 40563
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2004 | Docket: 1426461
Cited 3 times | Published
later free to file a motion to withdraw. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d)(1).
Category: Appellate Procedure
862 So. 2d 847, 2003 WL 22901035
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2003 | Docket: 1762246
Cited 3 times | Published
failed to preserve this issue for appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
Second, the defendant's reliance
Category: Appellate Procedure
835 So. 2d 397, 2003 WL 201341
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2003 | Docket: 1643089
Cited 3 times | Published
right to initiate a nonfinal appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b). Thus, a Lopez cross-appeal expands the
Category: Appellate Procedure
837 So. 2d 481, 2002 WL 31875014
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2002 | Docket: 1527503
Cited 3 times | Published
Rule 9.141(C); prior to January 1, 2000, it was rule 9.140(j). The rule provides that ordinarily, a petition
Category: Appellate Procedure
816 So. 2d 230, 2002 WL 939638
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2002 | Docket: 1753473
Cited 3 times | Published
State, 710 So.2d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii)).
Category: Appellate Procedure
816 So. 2d 199, 2002 WL 857336
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2002 | Docket: 1565689
Cited 3 times | Published
Procedure 9.141(c) (and prior to January 1, 2001, was rule 9.140(j)). In his petition, petitioner alleged only
Category: Appellate Procedure
800 So. 2d 204, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 709, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2136
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2001 | Docket: 64810293
Cited 3 times | Published
1998) (noting that rule 9.140(b)(2)(B) adopts the holding of Robinson). Rule 9.140 is applicable to juvenile
Category: Appellate Procedure
770 So. 2d 237, 2000 WL 1584031
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2000 | Docket: 2585245
Cited 3 times | Published
sentencing or through a Rule 3.800(b) motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d). The State was prohibited by rule from
Category: Appellate Procedure
770 So. 2d 183, 2000 WL 1363077
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2000 | Docket: 1779416
Cited 3 times | Published
control until that order is rendered. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(C). Thus, before we can review a trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
765 So. 2d 282, 2000 WL 1154044
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2000 | Docket: 428843
Cited 3 times | Published
preserved; or
*284 (v) as otherwise provided by law.
Rule 9.140(b)(2)(B)(i)-(v), Fla. R.App. P.
We agree with
Category: Appellate Procedure
766 So. 2d 348, 2000 WL 889783
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2000 | Docket: 2574097
Cited 3 times | Published
court to be treated as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
PETITION GRANTED.
ALLEN, LAWRENCE
Category: Appellate Procedure
747 So. 2d 978, 1999 WL 965555
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1999 | Docket: 1738955
Cited 3 times | Published
prior dispositive order in the case, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(1999), "[a]n issue is dispositive
Category: Appellate Procedure
736 So. 2d 1224, 1999 WL 371338
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1999 | Docket: 2523012
Cited 3 times | Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing." Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). As the record does not conclusively
Category: Appellate Procedure
731 So. 2d 46, 1999 WL 140587
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1999 | Docket: 602022
Cited 3 times | Published
dispositive order of the lower tribunal...." Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A) (emphasis added); see also §§ 924
Category: Appellate Procedure
725 So. 2d 393, 1998 WL 889257
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1998 | Docket: 1294004
Cited 3 times | Published
Livingston, 681 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1996); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
[2] On a separate issue, we also
Category: Appellate Procedure
720 So. 2d 247, 1998 WL 766811
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1998 | Docket: 1719055
Cited 3 times | Published
under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140. Rule 9.140, entitled "Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases
Category: Appellate Procedure
719 So. 2d 963, 1998 WL 712699
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1998 | Docket: 1705155
Cited 3 times | Published
See § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b); Cf. Gordon
Category: Appellate Procedure
714 So. 2d 617, 1998 WL 409004
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1998 | Docket: 461517
Cited 3 times | Published
orders on review are not appealable pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure,
Category: Appellate Procedure
705 So. 2d 713, 1998 WL 60405
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1998 | Docket: 1457060
Cited 3 times | Published
be treated as the notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If appellant qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
716 So. 2d 789, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12292, 1997 WL 683294
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1997 | Docket: 1233553
Cited 3 times | Published
Statutes (1993) or rule 9.140(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Rule 9.140(b)(1)(C) provides that
Category: Appellate Procedure
687 So. 2d 315, 1997 WL 33801
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1997 | Docket: 1371182
Cited 3 times | Published
justice otherwise requires a reversal pursuant to Rule 9.140(f) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
691 So. 2d 484, 1997 WL 12935
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1997 | Docket: 1727287
Cited 3 times | Published
we recede and adopt the procedure set forth in Rule 9.140(b) and section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (1995)
Category: Appellate Procedure
660 So. 2d 1386, 1995 WL 582215
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1995 | Docket: 1657731
Cited 3 times | Published
102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(f). In Parker's direct appeal, we "conducted
Category: Appellate Procedure
653 So. 2d 435, 1995 WL 124353
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1995 | Docket: 552024
Cited 3 times | Published
in the instant appeal is warranted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 9.140(f) ("In the interest of justice, the court
Category: Appellate Procedure
645 So. 2d 166, 1994 WL 655896
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 1654580
Cited 3 times | Published
that appellant is not entitled to relief. See rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See
Category: Appellate Procedure
640 So. 2d 117, 1994 WL 380912
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1994 | Docket: 1719043
Cited 3 times | Published
(Fla. 1958); Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b).
Accordingly, if Stephenson files a legally
Category: Appellate Procedure
638 So. 2d 111, 1994 WL 202953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1994 | Docket: 38014
Cited 3 times | Published
furnish to this court the record as described in rule 9.140(g), even after an order to show cause was issued
Category: Appellate Procedure
629 So. 2d 980, 1993 WL 535972
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1993 | Docket: 1264465
Cited 3 times | Published
also filed on that date with the clerk. Under rule 9.140(c)(2), the state had *981 fifteen days from January
Category: Appellate Procedure
622 So. 2d 1084, 1993 WL 288645
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1993 | Docket: 1528946
Cited 3 times | Published
State, 521 So.2d 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(4); § 924.06(3)
Category: Appellate Procedure
616 So. 2d 1182, 1993 WL 118102
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1993 | Docket: 2547382
Cited 3 times | Published
order, which shall proceed in accordance with Rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
JOANOS
Category: Appellate Procedure
616 So. 2d 1182, 1993 WL 118102
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1993 | Docket: 2547382
Cited 3 times | Published
order, which shall proceed in accordance with Rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
JOANOS
Category: Appellate Procedure
616 So. 2d 132, 1993 WL 84529
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1993 | Docket: 1371349
Cited 3 times | Published
orders in criminal cases shall be as prescribed by rule 9.140.
(3) Review of non-final orders of lower tribunals
Category: Appellate Procedure
601 So. 2d 279, 1992 WL 121374
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1992 | Docket: 1710898
Cited 3 times | Published
determined that review was inappropriate pursuant to Rule 9.140(g). The basis of the motion was the State's contention
Category: Appellate Procedure
588 So. 2d 1042, 1991 WL 227892
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1991 | Docket: 1708468
Cited 3 times | Published
counsel was technically in noncompliance with Fla.R.App.P. 9.140.
(2) THAT trial counsel did not withdraw
Category: Appellate Procedure
586 So. 2d 449, 1991 WL 185192
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1991 | Docket: 1487949
Cited 3 times | Published
has nothing before it on which to rule. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1) ("A defendant may not appeal from a
Category: Appellate Procedure
585 So. 2d 424, 1991 WL 169554
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1991 | Docket: 1688647
Cited 3 times | Published
pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P. See also Rule 9.140(g), Fla. R.App.P. (no briefing shall be required
Category: Appellate Procedure
604 So. 2d 824, 1991 WL 167314
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1991 | Docket: 1686503
Cited 3 times | Published
and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.
NOTES
[1] Rule 9.140(c)(1)(A) contains the exact same language.
[2]
Category: Appellate Procedure
579 So. 2d 264, 1991 WL 68853
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1991 | Docket: 1432768
Cited 3 times | Published
because of the untimely notice of cross-appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(2), 9.420(d).
Affirmed.
DANAHY, A.C.J
Category: Appellate Procedure
578 So. 2d 826, 1991 WL 63418
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1991 | Docket: 440319
Cited 3 times | Published
specifically dismissing a count of the information. See Rule 9.140(c)(1)(A), Rules of Appellate Procedure. However
Category: Appellate Procedure
567 So. 2d 988, 1990 WL 155113
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1990 | Docket: 1721383
Cited 3 times | Published
prepared an abbreviated record in accordance with Rule 9.140(g). However, the record was not indexed nor were
Category: Appellate Procedure
567 So. 2d 988, 1990 WL 155113
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1990 | Docket: 1721383
Cited 3 times | Published
prepared an abbreviated record in accordance with Rule 9.140(g). However, the record was not indexed nor were
Category: Appellate Procedure
566 So. 2d 848, 1990 WL 125102
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1990 | Docket: 1529150
Cited 3 times | Published
DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Rule 9.140(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. This
Category: Appellate Procedure
565 So. 2d 873, 1990 WL 116376
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1990 | Docket: 1403537
Cited 3 times | Published
A defendant cannot appeal a guilty plea. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1). For this court to have appellate *874
Category: Appellate Procedure
548 So. 2d 778, 1989 WL 101068
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1989 | Docket: 1333734
Cited 3 times | Published
required in appellate proceedings governed by Rule 9.140(g).[1] Ketion correctly replies that this court
Category: Appellate Procedure
561 So. 2d 587, 1989 WL 72110
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1989 | Docket: 1740170
Cited 3 times | Published
298 So.2d 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). The present rule 9.140(d), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, provides
Category: Appellate Procedure
518 So. 2d 457, 1988 WL 1075
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1988 | Docket: 1472937
Cited 3 times | Published
appeal, if conviction ensues, is available. See Rule 9.140(b) and (c), Fla.R.App.P.; Martin-Johnson, Inc
Category: Appellate Procedure
507 So. 2d 711, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1262
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1987 | Docket: 460177
Cited 3 times | Published
court. Ordinarily this might be so. However, rule 9.140 governs appeal proceedings in criminal cases
Category: Appellate Procedure
479 So. 2d 306, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2755
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1985 | Docket: 463636
Cited 3 times | Published
granting the motion in limine does not fall within Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) as one which is "otherwise appealable
Category: Appellate Procedure
478 So. 2d 430, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2494
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1985 | Docket: 1484720
Cited 3 times | Published
Associate Judge, concur.
NOTES
[1] See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(I).
[2] The trial court subsequently
Category: Appellate Procedure
464 So. 2d 684, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 582
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1985 | Docket: 1661355
Cited 3 times | Published
jurisdiction. See § 924.07(9), Fla. Stat. (1983); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(J).
[2] The points allocated to a
Category: Appellate Procedure
462 So. 2d 596, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 232
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1985 | Docket: 159781
Cited 3 times | Published
COBB, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Fla.R.App.P.
Category: Appellate Procedure
457 So. 2d 563
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1984 | Docket: 426399
Cited 3 times | Published
on appeal to the Attorney General pursuant to Rule 9.140(d), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Petitioner
Category: Appellate Procedure
444 So. 2d 1151
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1984 | Docket: 378231
Cited 3 times | Published
defendant in a criminal case may appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b). Since that portion of the order complained
Category: Appellate Procedure
433 So. 2d 616
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1983 | Docket: 1425847
Cited 3 times | Published
state would be permitted to appeal pursuant to Rule 9.140(c)(1)(E), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
409 So. 2d 25
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1982 | Docket: 1525369
Cited 3 times | Published
original opinion in this cause.
NOTES
[1] See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140.
[2] See Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c).
Category: Appellate Procedure
404 So. 2d 760
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1981 | Docket: 85169
Cited 3 times | Published
§ 924.07(1), Fla. Stat. (1979); see also Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
II
"Our forgery statute, F.S.
Category: Appellate Procedure
399 So. 2d 1082
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1981 | Docket: 1652488
Cited 3 times | Published
State, 349 So.2d 226 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
Depending upon the outcome of such hearing
Category: Appellate Procedure
399 So. 2d 374
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 1746036
Cited 3 times | Published
State, 371 So.2d 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b). Nor may a claim of ineffective counsel
Category: Appellate Procedure
397 So. 2d 960
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1981 | Docket: 1357098
Cited 3 times | Published
a final judgment adjudicating guilt. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) and 9.140(c)(1). The defendant has
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 643
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1980 | Docket: 419447
Cited 3 times | Published
specifically identified order of the trial court. Rule 9.140(b)(1), Fla.R. App.P.[1]
There was no reservation
Category: Appellate Procedure
378 So. 2d 899
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1980 | Docket: 1795691
Cited 3 times | Published
1977 appellate rules. It is now required by Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d) that trial counsel for the defendant serve
Category: Appellate Procedure
364 So. 2d 67
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1978 | Docket: 461736
Cited 3 times | Published
Appellate Procedure and is thus not governed by Rule 9.140(g).
The order appealed states that the 3.850
Category: Appellate Procedure
359 So. 2d 503
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1978 | Docket: 2574671
Cited 3 times | Published
06(3), Florida Statutes (1977). See also Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b).[1] Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
255 So. 3d 957
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2018 | Docket: 7511594
Cited 2 times | Published
suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). As
explained below, the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
238 So. 3d 810
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2017 | Docket: 6240864
Cited 2 times | Published
added). The 30-day time limit established by Rule
9.140(b)(3) establishes a bright line rule that encourages
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 886
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2017 | Docket: 6223866
Cited 2 times | Published
verdict. See § 924.07(j), Fla. Stat. (2009); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E). No double jeopardy issue arises
Category: Appellate Procedure
201 So. 3d 145, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 96
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026006
Cited 2 times | Published
his plea was involuntary, as contemplated in Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c). While the record is silent as
Category: Appellate Procedure
166 So. 3d 840, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5862, 2015 WL 1849497
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 2679389
Cited 2 times | Published
3d 157, 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e)). Here, appellant preserved the error
Category: Appellate Procedure
139 So. 3d 968, 2014 WL 2587716, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8844
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2014 | Docket: 60241255
Cited 2 times | Published
rendition of the order to be reviewed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(3) (requiring that any state criminal
Category: Appellate Procedure
142 So. 3d 883, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7598, 2014 WL 2086938
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2014 | Docket: 60242230
Cited 2 times | Published
resulting from Appellant’s nolo con-tendere plea and rule 9.140(b)(2)(A), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
137 So. 3d 1133, 2014 WL 1304724, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4823
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2014 | Docket: 60240187
Cited 2 times | Published
proceed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(2); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(H).
. Section 916.106(13), Florida
Category: Appellate Procedure
132 So. 3d 734, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 884, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2638, 2013 WL 6331351
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2013 | Docket: 60238541
Cited 2 times | Published
Only minor amendments are made to rule 3.851.
RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
(a) [No
Category: Appellate Procedure
124 So. 3d 953, 2013 WL 5539334, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16014
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2013 | Docket: 60235584
Cited 2 times | Published
the inter*957est of justice.” Id. (citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(f), now found at 9.140(i): “In the interest
Category: Appellate Procedure
117 So. 3d 478, 2013 WL 3778916, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11509
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2013 | Docket: 60232687
Cited 2 times | Published
Appellant challenges is not an appealable order under rule 9.140(b)(1)(D), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
111 So. 3d 273, 2013 WL 1629224, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6125
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2013 | Docket: 60230797
Cited 2 times | Published
Stat. (2008-09). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). We affirm in part and reverse
Category: Appellate Procedure
110 So. 3d 113, 2013 WL 1194940, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2013 | Docket: 60230182
Cited 2 times | Published
See § 924.07(l)(j), Fla. Stat. (2010); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E); State v. Williams, 742 So.2d 509
Category: Appellate Procedure
110 So. 3d 33, 2013 WL 811478, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3803
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60230276
Cited 2 times | Published
See § 924.07(l)(j), Fla. Stat. (2011); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E). Upon granting the motion, the
Category: Appellate Procedure
102 So. 3d 451, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 638, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2063, 2012 WL 4936363
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2012 | Docket: 60226665
Cited 2 times | Published
(c)-(h) [No Change]
Committee Notes
[No Change]
RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
(a) [No
Category: Appellate Procedure
90 So. 3d 902, 2012 WL 2138102, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9596
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2012 | Docket: 60309692
Cited 2 times | Published
dispositive order of the lower tribunal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). An issue is dispositive only
Category: Appellate Procedure
84 So. 3d 1242, 2012 WL 1232622
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2012 | Docket: 2415017
Cited 2 times | Published
cases shall be as in rule 9.140 except as modified by this rule."). Rule 9.140(b)(2) describes the situations
Category: Appellate Procedure
84 So. 3d 1242, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5626
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2012 | Docket: 60306638
Cited 2 times | Published
cases shall be as in rule 9.140 except as modified by this rule.”). Rule 9.140(b)(2) describes the situations
Category: Appellate Procedure
73 So. 3d 364, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17538, 2011 WL 5301608
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2011 | Docket: 2568701
Cited 2 times | Published
timely invoke the Court's jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
"The operative written order in a
Category: Appellate Procedure
72 So. 3d 238, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16049, 2011 WL 4809119
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2011 | Docket: 60303231
Cited 2 times | Published
though it had the authority to do so. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(C) (permitting the State to appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
51 So. 3d 1264, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 576, 2011 WL 252317
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2011 | Docket: 60297535
Cited 2 times | Published
to appeal the denial of his motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
Analysis
The trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
52 So. 3d 793, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 20137, 2010 WL 5391539
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2010 | Docket: 60297843
Cited 2 times | Published
This court possesses jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
50 So. 3d 744, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19427, 2010 WL 5175520
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2010 | Docket: 1130540
Cited 2 times | Published
probation and sentencing him to prison. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). The trial court required his counsel
Category: Appellate Procedure
41 So. 3d 1030, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11628, 2010 WL 3059517
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2010 | Docket: 1668251
Cited 2 times | Published
lower tribunals and orders granting a new trial. Rule 9.140(g), which applies to appeals in criminal cases
Category: Appellate Procedure
31 So. 3d 229, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3359, 2010 WL 935479
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2010 | Docket: 2410319
Cited 2 times | Published
section 924.06, Florida Statutes. See also, Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1). "Subdivision (b)(1) lists the only
Category: Appellate Procedure
23 So. 3d 1263, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20399, 2009 WL 5126522
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2009 | Docket: 1181543
Cited 2 times | Published
pursuant to Rule 3.170(1), Fla. R.Crim. P., and Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b). A notice of appeal on such grounds
Category: Appellate Procedure
23 So. 3d 211, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18393, 2009 WL 4282283
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2009 | Docket: 60282003
Cited 2 times | Published
" Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(0- One of the grounds rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c) specifies is "an involuntary
Category: Appellate Procedure
18 So. 3d 1149, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14083, 2009 WL 3018154
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2009 | Docket: 60251987
Cited 2 times | Published
concealed weapon. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) (2008). For the reasons set forth
Category: Appellate Procedure
5 So. 3d 765, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2016, 2009 WL 607495
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2009 | Docket: 203179
Cited 2 times | Published
motion to correct a sentencing error.[1]See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(d); Jackson v. State, 983 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
4 So. 3d 712, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1485, 2009 WL 436847
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2009 | Docket: 1666405
Cited 2 times | Published
or gives an incorrect jury instruction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(K).
Category: Appellate Procedure
997 So. 2d 1221, 2008 WL 5411979
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2008 | Docket: 1378661
Cited 2 times | Published
thirty days after the order was rendered. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).[1] Under Florida Rule of Appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
980 So. 2d 1270, 2008 WL 1987274
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2008 | Docket: 1418310
Cited 2 times | Published
Enrique Lopez. We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A), and reverse.
During a valid traffic
Category: Appellate Procedure
983 So. 2d 49, 2008 WL 1958618
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2008 | Docket: 1756416
Cited 2 times | Published
subject matter jurisdiction is appealable. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a). The state contends that
Category: Appellate Procedure
980 So. 2d 1189, 2008 WL 1827430
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2008 | Docket: 1419802
Cited 2 times | Published
NOTES
[1] Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(A) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
978 So. 2d 862, 2008 WL 942043
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2008 | Docket: 444804
Cited 2 times | Published
cruelty to a dog. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). The trial court sentenced Mr.
Category: Appellate Procedure
993 So. 2d 540, 2007 WL 3355120
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2007 | Docket: 2556705
Cited 2 times | Published
a dispositive order of the trial court. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). A ruling is dispositive if
Category: Appellate Procedure
970 So. 2d 376, 2007 WL 3085164
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2007 | Docket: 1695487
Cited 2 times | Published
Procedure 3.800(a). We have jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). Mullins was convicted of a single
Category: Appellate Procedure
511 F. Supp. 2d 1263, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35077, 2007 WL 1427045
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 14, 2007 | Docket: 901252
Cited 2 times | Published
equivalent of a guilty plea in Florida. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2).
[26] Olsen and Butz also argue they
Category: Appellate Procedure
948 So. 2d 968, 2007 WL 489231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2007 | Docket: 1465187
Cited 2 times | Published
We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (2006) (providing that a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
948 So. 2d 700, 2007 WL 63641
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2007 | Docket: 1773487
Cited 2 times | Published
provisions of section 924.07(1) have been adopted in rule 9.140(c) by the Florida Supreme Court, the portions
Category: Appellate Procedure
934 So. 2d 438, 2006 WL 1838942
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2006 | Docket: 1460945
Cited 2 times | Published
cases.
Except to the extent of conflict with rule 9.140 governing appeals in criminal cases, this rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
915 So. 2d 746, 2005 WL 3331654
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2005 | Docket: 2515600
Cited 2 times | Published
1992).
[2] See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(g); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Category: Appellate Procedure
911 So. 2d 221, 2005 WL 2321699
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2005 | Docket: 1207243
Cited 2 times | Published
to create rule 9.141(c)(4) had been added to rule 9.140 in 1996. Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
910 So. 2d 418, 2005 WL 2292027
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2005 | Docket: 1744642
Cited 2 times | Published
1010, 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2). To be timely, a defendant must file
Category: Appellate Procedure
919 So. 2d 471, 2005 WL 2088008
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2005 | Docket: 1269764
Cited 2 times | Published
that order, purportedly taken pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(M)("The state may appeal an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
902 So. 2d 267, 2005 WL 1163211
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2005 | Docket: 1675029
Cited 2 times | Published
otherwise appealable to the circuit court under rule 9.140(c), that the county court has certified to be
Category: Appellate Procedure
899 So. 2d 1195, 2005 WL 856924
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2005 | Docket: 1353852
Cited 2 times | Published
State v. Thompson, 735 So.2d 482 (Fla. 1999). Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)b, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
898 So. 2d 134, 2005 WL 525537
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2005 | Docket: 1732233
Cited 2 times | Published
majority opinion states that "this rule [then Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(2), now 9.140(c)(3)] . . . can be waived
Category: Appellate Procedure
888 So. 2d 730, 2004 WL 2827240
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2004 | Docket: 2563715
Cited 2 times | Published
924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2003); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2). Accordingly, we affirm. Leonard v
Category: Appellate Procedure
889 So. 2d 139, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18158, 2004 WL 2726022
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2004 | Docket: 64834986
Cited 2 times | Published
findings when release is denied. See also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h)(3)(2003)(all orders denying post-trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
888 So. 2d 76, 2004 WL 2409350
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2004 | Docket: 2542989
Cited 2 times | Published
Brian Miller. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 9.140(c)(1)(K), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
883 So. 2d 887, 2004 WL 2191156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2004 | Docket: 1718303
Cited 2 times | Published
jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Because we conclude that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
853 So. 2d 537, 2003 WL 22023231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2003 | Docket: 1189309
Cited 2 times | Published
State, 673 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2); § 924.051(4), Fla. Stat. (2002).
Category: Appellate Procedure
851 So. 2d 913, 2003 WL 21918798
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2003 | Docket: 1313214
Cited 2 times | Published
dispositive motion to suppress physical evidence. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The court should have granted
Category: Appellate Procedure
825 So. 2d 959, 2002 WL 1307480
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2002 | Docket: 1312222
Cited 2 times | Published
as a direct appeal of a nonfinal order under rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), which authorizes the state to appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
819 So. 2d 862, 2002 WL 1049744
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2002 | Docket: 2510062
Cited 2 times | Published
which limits the grounds to those provided in rule 9.140(b)(2)(B).[1] Accordingly, the lower court did
Category: Appellate Procedure
796 So. 2d 1286, 2001 WL 1245198
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2001 | Docket: 1672516
Cited 2 times | Published
nor was it raised below, we affirm. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c.
Vance was charged with burglary
Category: Appellate Procedure
795 So. 2d 1086, 2001 WL 1111626
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2001 | Docket: 1310619
Cited 2 times | Published
denial issues proceeding separately under the rule 9.140(b)(2) procedure, we have determined that the
Category: Appellate Procedure
792 So. 2d 570, 2001 WL 803426
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2001 | Docket: 2560985
Cited 2 times | Published
granting a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 9.140(c)(1)(D), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
785 So. 2d 1254, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7840, 2001 WL 609082
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2001 | Docket: 450150
Cited 2 times | Published
141(c)(4)(C). The committee notes to the former rule 9.140(j)(3) state that such language was to ensure
Category: Appellate Procedure
785 So. 2d 1254, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7840, 2001 WL 609082
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2001 | Docket: 450150
Cited 2 times | Published
141(c)(4)(C). The committee notes to the former rule 9.140(j)(3) state that such language was to ensure
Category: Appellate Procedure
785 So. 2d 623, 2001 WL 427401
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2001 | Docket: 450286
Cited 2 times | Published
So.2d 449 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d) ("[a] sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
763 So. 2d 394, 2000 WL 650481
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2000 | Docket: 823860
Cited 2 times | Published
review of nonfinal orders is prescribed by Rule 9.140. Rule 9.140(c)(1)[2] sets forth an exclusive list of
Category: Appellate Procedure
750 So. 2d 734, 2000 WL 121275
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2000 | Docket: 1736584
Cited 2 times | Published
not conclusively refute those claims. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). If defendant is correct then the guidelines
Category: Appellate Procedure
751 So. 2d 115, 2000 WL 5925
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2000 | Docket: 1310232
Cited 2 times | Published
appeal. See § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (1999); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140. We therefore affirm appellant's convictions
Category: Appellate Procedure
746 So. 2d 1249, 1999 WL 1260017
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1999 | Docket: 1715015
Cited 2 times | Published
for treatment of as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
746 So. 2d 544, 1999 WL 1127714
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1999 | Docket: 2533891
Cited 2 times | Published
grant belated appeal if petitioner complies with Rule 9.140(j)(2)(F) and alleges that he made a timely request
Category: Appellate Procedure
747 So. 2d 982, 1999 WL 992989
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1999 | Docket: 1475751
Cited 2 times | Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing." Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). As the record does not conclusively
Category: Appellate Procedure
741 So. 2d 560, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10478, 1999 WL 565896
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1999 | Docket: 1511143
Cited 2 times | Published
of such pretrial order is appealable. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Because the state has no similar
Category: Appellate Procedure
730 So. 2d 382, 1999 WL 173971
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1999 | Docket: 1755418
Cited 2 times | Published
not conclusively refute this claim, See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i), and the State concedes that the defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
731 So. 2d 7, 1999 WL 2703
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1999 | Docket: 1409326
Cited 2 times | Published
suppress prior to trial, the state may appeal. Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B). When the motion to suppress or objection
Category: Appellate Procedure
720 So. 2d 598, 1998 WL 736321
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1998 | Docket: 1371771
Cited 2 times | Published
order failed to comply with the requirements of rule 9.140(g)(3) for the following reasons. *599 We disagree
Category: Appellate Procedure
722 So. 2d 211, 1998 WL 316558
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1998 | Docket: 1241632
Cited 2 times | Published
REVERSE the decision of the trial court. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h). The case is REMANDED to the trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
718 So. 2d 323, 1998 WL 618160
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1998 | Docket: 466212
Cited 2 times | Published
preserved; or
(v) as otherwise provided by law.
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)-(B).
Similarly, effective July
Category: Appellate Procedure
717 So. 2d 128, 1998 WL 568331
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1998 | Docket: 1681326
Cited 2 times | Published
subsection (a) that appeal proceedings "shall be as in rule 9.140 except as modified by this rule." Rule 9.145
Category: Appellate Procedure
717 So. 2d 104, 1998 WL 484052
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1998 | Docket: 2559249
Cited 2 times | Published
See § 924.051(4), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B); Leonard v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly
Category: Appellate Procedure
717 So. 2d 1070, 1998 WL 484568
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1998 | Docket: 276302
Cited 2 times | Published
timebarred sometime in 1994.
The promulgation of Rule 9.140(j), effective January 1, 1997, superseded State
Category: Appellate Procedure
720 So. 2d 548, 1998 WL 466780
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1998 | Docket: 584774
Cited 2 times | Published
issue is thus not preserved for appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d); Hyden v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1342
Category: Appellate Procedure
717 So. 2d 1050, 1998 WL 453852
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1998 | Docket: 1276803
Cited 2 times | Published
ruling if the motion to suppress is granted. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
In these two cases, there appears
Category: Appellate Procedure
710 So. 2d 211, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4853, 1998 WL 216115
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1998 | Docket: 1731477
Cited 2 times | Published
refers to rule 9.140 to determine the procedure in appeals from orders of delinquency. Rule 9.140(c)(3) requires
Category: Appellate Procedure
708 So. 2d 337, 1998 WL 158785
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1998 | Docket: 1528293
Cited 2 times | Published
sentence were entered prior to the changes in rule 9.140(b)(2)(B). Therefore, they do not provide authority
Category: Appellate Procedure
706 So. 2d 73, 1998 WL 60413
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1998 | Docket: 956286
Cited 2 times | Published
facially sufficient motion as a petition under rule 9.140(j) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
694 So. 2d 855, 1997 WL 295266
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 1450797
Cited 2 times | Published
counsel from the trial court to this court. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(1997). We agree with the first district's
Category: Appellate Procedure
688 So. 2d 462, 1997 WL 90823
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1997 | Docket: 443984
Cited 2 times | Published
ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B). This new rule provides, however
Category: Appellate Procedure
660 So. 2d 409, 1995 WL 552382
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1995 | Docket: 1637072
Cited 2 times | Published
4th DCA 1994). Thus, we have jurisdiction. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b).
Category: Appellate Procedure
643 So. 2d 1157, 1994 WL 539185
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1994 | Docket: 1493292
Cited 2 times | Published
opportunity to change his mind.
[5] See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
[6] There is authority on the issue
Category: Appellate Procedure
632 So. 2d 73, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9489, 1993 WL 372192
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1993 | Docket: 64746431
Cited 2 times | Published
e.g., Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.380, 1.720, 1.730; Fla.R.App.P. 9.140; § 768.79, Fla. Stat. (1991). In this case
Category: Appellate Procedure
603 So. 2d 120, 1992 WL 185762
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1992 | Docket: 1475519
Cited 2 times | Published
be as prescribed by rule 9.140. The appeals permitted a defendant by rule 9.140 do not include an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
596 So. 2d 682, 1992 WL 281
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1992 | Docket: 1358898
Cited 2 times | Published
3.800(a) relief is entitled.
At first glance rule 9.140 does not appear to have an express provision
Category: Appellate Procedure
567 So. 2d 503, 1990 WL 134769
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1990 | Docket: 1381580
Cited 2 times | Published
sentence when the notice of appeal is filed.
Rule 9.140(b)(1)(A), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
553 So. 2d 161, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 582, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1172, 1989 WL 145523
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1989 | Docket: 1675672
Cited 2 times | Published
the court held:
The essence of an appeal under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(J) is not that the trial court departed
Category: Appellate Procedure
518 So. 2d 1305, 1987 WL 1335
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1987 | Docket: 1778583
Cited 2 times | Published
DCA 1984); Section 924.07(4) Fla. Stat. (1985); Rule 9.140(c)(1)(H) Fla.R.App.P.
Category: Appellate Procedure
508 So. 2d 1249, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1086
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1987 | Docket: 367791
Cited 2 times | Published
the order is not one of those designated in Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B), compare State v. Palmore, 495 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
441 So. 2d 186
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1983 | Docket: 2539631
Cited 2 times | Published
statement of judicial acts to be reviewed. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d).
The order denying appellant's motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
440 So. 2d 520
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1983 | Docket: 2090475
Cited 2 times | Published
the right of appeal with specificity. See Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b) and Taylor v. State, 355 So.2d 180 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
440 So. 2d 520
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1983 | Docket: 2090475
Cited 2 times | Published
the right of appeal with specificity. See Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b) and Taylor v. State, 355 So.2d 180 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
417 So. 2d 1162
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1982 | Docket: 1383788
Cited 2 times | Published
judgment and sentence based on a guilty plea, Rule 9.140(b), Fla.R. App.P., and because appellant failed
Category: Appellate Procedure
413 So. 2d 791
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1982 | Docket: 1345128
Cited 2 times | Published
entertain it, and accordingly dismiss it. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1).
The lower court's order granting the
Category: Appellate Procedure
413 So. 2d 791
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1982 | Docket: 1345128
Cited 2 times | Published
entertain it, and accordingly dismiss it. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1).
The lower court's order granting the
Category: Appellate Procedure
410 So. 2d 976
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1982 | Docket: 2579966
Cited 2 times | Published
entry of a written order imposing sentence. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2). The notice of appeal in this case
Category: Appellate Procedure
407 So. 2d 959
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1981 | Docket: 467485
Cited 2 times | Published
Florida Statutes (1979), and in Florida Appellate Rule 9.140(b)(1)(B). It is noteworthy that none of the judicial
Category: Appellate Procedure
395 So. 2d 575
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1981 | Docket: 2546208
Cited 2 times | Published
argument.
A verdict is not appealable. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1) and § 924.06(1), Fla. Stat. (1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
392 So. 2d 1022
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1981 | Docket: 1268429
Cited 2 times | Published
C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
Category: Appellate Procedure
390 So. 2d 808
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1980 | Docket: 2393734
Cited 2 times | Published
circumstances. § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1979); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
389 So. 2d 333
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1980 | Docket: 2580817
Cited 2 times | Published
judgment of conviction based on a plea of guilty. Rule 9.140(b), Fla.R. App.P. However, the dismissal is without
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 1366
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1980 | Docket: 2569160
Cited 2 times | Published
UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Rule 9.140(g), Fla.R.App.P.
[2] The rules provide a complete
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 581, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16831
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1980 | Docket: 64578248
Cited 2 times | Published
bail following conviction, and pending appeal. Rule 9.140(e)(4), Fla.R.App.P.
Appellant was convicted by
Category: Appellate Procedure
266 So. 3d 234
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2019 | Docket: 14579154
Cited 1 times | Published
plea agreement. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). We affirm the judgment and
Category: Appellate Procedure
267 So. 3d 463
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2019 | Docket: 8513171
Cited 1 times | Published
Robert Boston. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
The State argues that Mr. Boston
Category: Appellate Procedure
262 So. 3d 859
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2018 | Docket: 8465990
Cited 1 times | Published
So. 2d 475, 478-79 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
262 So. 3d 859
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2018 | Docket: 8465990
Cited 1 times | Published
So. 2d 475, 478-79 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
256 So. 3d 1218
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2018 | Docket: 8081305
Cited 1 times | Published
deny a motion to disqualify counsel.
In rule 9.140 (Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases), we amend
Category: Appellate Procedure
240 So. 3d 120
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2018 | Docket: 64675479
Cited 1 times | Published
Court's jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
241 So. 3d 914
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2018 | Docket: 6309420
Cited 1 times | Published
order suppressing evidence from the trunk, Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B), but it chose not to—perhaps because
Category: Appellate Procedure
225 So. 3d 319, 2017 WL 3045484, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10411
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2017 | Docket: 6122328
Cited 1 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).” Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e).
A written sentencing order that
Category: Appellate Procedure
208 So. 3d 1208, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 291
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2017 | Docket: 60294190
Cited 1 times | Published
jeopardy. This Court has jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(e); Holubek v. State, 173 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
203 So. 3d 972, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16438
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2016 | Docket: 4485678
Cited 1 times | Published
stop. We have jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
A trial court’s ruling on
Category: Appellate Procedure
205 So. 3d 782, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13936
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2016 | Docket: 60257635
Cited 1 times | Published
Fla. Stat. (2014). We have jurisdiction, Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(B), and affirm.
A.L.H. was a passenger
Category: Appellate Procedure
200 So. 3d 137, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8060, 2016 WL 3030829
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2016 | Docket: 60294185
Cited 1 times | Published
376 So.2d 382, 384 (Fla. 1979); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). In the instant case, Senger’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
191 So. 3d 1000, 2016 WL 2930515, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7630
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2016 | Docket: 60254980
Cited 1 times | Published
consider.
. Jurisdiction is grounded in Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i):
(2) Guilty or Nolo Contendere
Category: Appellate Procedure
191 So. 3d 395, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 192, 2016 WL 1700525, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 900, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6438
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2016 | Docket: 3059071
Cited 1 times | Published
that a defendánt committed any crime. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); Young, 141 So.3d at 165; F.B., 852 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
189 So. 3d 1050, 2016 WL 1602132, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6155
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2016 | Docket: 3057066
Cited 1 times | Published
(2018). We have jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). Because the trial court fundamentally
Category: Appellate Procedure
193 So. 3d 916, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3373, 2016 WL 833518
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2016 | Docket: 3041726
Cited 1 times | Published
Miranda 1 warnings.
We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Because Ms. Thompson was not in
Category: Appellate Procedure
185 So. 3d 679, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1745, 2016 WL 519907
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2016 | Docket: 3035158
Cited 1 times | Published
motion to withdraw plea.
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c). The First District recently
Category: Appellate Procedure
180 So. 3d 235, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18972, 2015 WL 9264083
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2015 | Docket: 60252352
Cited 1 times | Published
days of rendition of the order on appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). A timely motion to withdraw plea
Category: Appellate Procedure
159 So. 3d 293
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2015 | Docket: 2639468
Cited 1 times | Published
*296
II.
We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Ordinarily, this Court reviews
Category: Appellate Procedure
157 So. 3d 481, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1778, 2015 WL 574253
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2015 | Docket: 2633530
Cited 1 times | Published
We have, jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). The trial court erred in denying
Category: Appellate Procedure
156 So. 3d 1116, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1848, 2015 WL 548231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2015 | Docket: 2633400
Cited 1 times | Published
appeal until a notice of appeal is filed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(1).
However, a trial court has discretion
Category: Appellate Procedure
157 So. 3d 346, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 609, 2015 WL 248848
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2015 | Docket: 2626273
Cited 1 times | Published
§ 924.07(1)0), Fla. Stat. (2012); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E);
State v. Green,
Category: Appellate Procedure
150 So. 3d 249
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2014 | Docket: 1310317
Cited 1 times | Published
failure to conform to the pronounced sentence, rule 9.140(e), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, requires
Category: Appellate Procedure
146 So. 3d 91, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13391
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2014 | Docket: 1164430
Cited 1 times | Published
thirty (80) days after the record is served. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(g).
Significantly, however, the rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
145 So. 3d 902, 2014 WL 3971544, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12516
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2014 | Docket: 1003008
Cited 1 times | Published
sentencing error, if preserved.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii).
He raises a sentencing
Category: Appellate Procedure
142 So. 3d 978, 2014 WL 3730009, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11606
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2014 | Docket: 3598
Cited 1 times | Published
under the law regarding searches and seizures, rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) has been broadly interpreted as authorizing
Category: Appellate Procedure
149 So. 3d 1146, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9329, 2014 WL 2777693
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2014 | Docket: 60243762
Cited 1 times | Published
judgment of acquittal after jury trial); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E) (effectuating by procedural rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
135 So. 3d 517, 2014 WL 1255838, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4607
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2014 | Docket: 60239673
Cited 1 times | Published
court’s dispositive suppression ruling. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140.
The defendant maintains that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
130 So. 3d 757, 2014 WL 258752, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 738
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2014 | Docket: 60237880
Cited 1 times | Published
Stat. (2012). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)®. Ms. Williams argues that the
Category: Appellate Procedure
135 So. 3d 364, 2014 WL 73822, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 243
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2014 | Docket: 60239587
Cited 1 times | Published
. Appellate review is authorized pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(A) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
124 So. 3d 1046, 2013 WL 5989688, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18003
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2013 | Docket: 60235299
Cited 1 times | Published
trafficking charges. We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A), (B), and reverse.
Mr. Mitchell
Category: Appellate Procedure
120 So. 3d 641, 2013 WL 4764639, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14319
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2013 | Docket: 60234176
Cited 1 times | Published
of an order granting such a motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c) (an order granting a motion under the
Category: Appellate Procedure
121 So. 3d 71, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14170, 2013 WL 4734570
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2013 | Docket: 60234498
Cited 1 times | Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i).
The record in this case fails to justify
Category: Appellate Procedure
121 So. 3d 71, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14170, 2013 WL 4734570
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2013 | Docket: 60234498
Cited 1 times | Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i).
The record in this case fails to justify
Category: Appellate Procedure
114 So. 3d 418, 2013 WL 2359074, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8590
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2013 | Docket: 60231917
Cited 1 times | Published
of such.1 Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); Foster v. State, 106 So.3d 6, 7 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
114 So. 3d 422, 2013 WL 2359077, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8587, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1200
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2013 | Docket: 60231920
Cited 1 times | Published
concur.
. Appellate review is authorized under rule 9.140(c)(l)(L) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
110 So. 3d 27, 2013 WL 692648, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3176
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2013 | Docket: 60230269
Cited 1 times | Published
judgments of acquittal after a jury verdict. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E); see also State v. Higdon, 814
Category: Appellate Procedure
102 So. 3d 739, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21517
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2012 | Docket: 60226774
Cited 1 times | Published
in cases 09-CF-13383 and 09-CF-14318. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). We conclude that Mr. Jenkins’
Category: Appellate Procedure
113 So. 3d 31, 2012 WL 3326347, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13573
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2012 | Docket: 60231532
Cited 1 times | Published
circumstances in which the state has a right to appeal. Rule 9.140(c) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
78 So. 3d 706, 2012 WL 301051, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1446
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2012 | Docket: 2355420
Cited 1 times | Published
that the time for appeal from a sentence under rule 9.140, either by the defendant or by the state, begins
Category: Appellate Procedure
84 So. 3d 192, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 3036, 2011 WL 7758579
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2011 | Docket: 60306681
Cited 1 times | Published
comments: one comment addressing amendments to rule 9.140; one comment addressing new rule 9.170; and two
Category: Appellate Procedure
72 So. 3d 290, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16514, 2011 WL 4949811
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2011 | Docket: 2357889
Cited 1 times | Published
3.170(l). The rule governing this appeal is rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c), which provides that one may
Category: Appellate Procedure
81 So. 3d 451, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15255, 2011 WL 4467635
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2011 | Docket: 60305930
Cited 1 times | Published
information. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Mr. Parker’s conduct, as we
Category: Appellate Procedure
126 So. 3d 277, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10183, 2011 WL 2555711
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 60236386
Cited 1 times | Published
allegations that bring it within the ambit of Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)a.-e. However, if the pro se motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
126 So. 3d 277, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10183, 2011 WL 2555711
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 60236386
Cited 1 times | Published
allegations that bring it within the ambit of Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)a.-e. However, if the pro se motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
62 So. 3d 1236, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8947, 2011 WL 2341397
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2011 | Docket: 2326909
Cited 1 times | Published
voluntarily. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c). "Before accepting a plea
Category: Appellate Procedure
60 So. 3d 560, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6451, 2011 WL 1707210
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2011 | Docket: 60300280
Cited 1 times | Published
prison sentence imposed on Jason Torres. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(N). It argues that the trial court’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
46 So. 3d 1061, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15584, 2010 WL 4025133
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2010 | Docket: 2397013
Cited 1 times | Published
involuntary plea is a ground for withdrawal under rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c),” Council v. State, 9 So.3d 721
Category: Appellate Procedure
41 So. 3d 966, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10873, 2010 WL 2926044
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 2010 | Docket: 1668138
Cited 1 times | Published
exception of certain documents not at issue here. Rule 9.140 delineates the procedures for criminal appeals
Category: Appellate Procedure
36 So. 3d 794, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6673, 2010 WL 1930173
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2010 | Docket: 60294477
Cited 1 times | Published
who shall treat it as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(5)(D).
The circuit court is directed
Category: Appellate Procedure
34 So. 3d 107, 2010 WL 1460222
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2010 | Docket: 116186
Cited 1 times | Published
review.") and cases cited therein; see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e) ("a sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
29 So. 3d 1176, 2010 WL 889874
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2010 | Docket: 2583217
Cited 1 times | Published
Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(4)(b).
MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and COHEN,
Category: Appellate Procedure
24 So. 3d 797, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12, 2010 WL 21171
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2010 | Docket: 1648783
Cited 1 times | Published
(4) a sentencing error, if preserved. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(d); see also Robinson v
Category: Appellate Procedure
37 So. 3d 269, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20398, 2009 WL 5126371
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2009 | Docket: 1668533
Cited 1 times | Published
error. Therefore, this appeal is ripe. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e) ("A sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
16 So. 3d 928, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11236, 2009 WL 2448112
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2009 | Docket: 2573420
Cited 1 times | Published
some years earlier. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D) (“A defendant may appeal ... orders
Category: Appellate Procedure
13 So. 3d 1044, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 452, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1123, 2009 WL 2045399
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2009 | Docket: 1659389
Cited 1 times | Published
Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
RULE 9.140. Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases
(a) [No
Category: Appellate Procedure
12 So. 3d 864, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7440, 2009 WL 1562178
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2009 | Docket: 1646936
Cited 1 times | Published
to preserve it for appellate review. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). Consequently, we conclude
Category: Appellate Procedure
9 So. 3d 721, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3435, 2009 WL 1066292
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2009 | Docket: 1221878
Cited 1 times | Published
sentencing only upon grounds specified in Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e)). But, "[c]oercion by
Category: Appellate Procedure
6 So. 3d 106, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2938, 2009 WL 838267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2009 | Docket: 1665774
Cited 1 times | Published
(Count IV). This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A).
On the morning of November 5,
Category: Appellate Procedure
4 So. 3d 734, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1537, 2009 WL 485035
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2009 | Docket: 60295114
Cited 1 times | Published
appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Thomas v. State, 948 So.2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
1 So. 3d 1257, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1051, 2009 WL 323333
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2009 | Docket: 352480
Cited 1 times | Published
(4) a sentencing error, if preserved. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii).
As such, Espinoza cannot now
Category: Appellate Procedure
621 F. Supp. 2d 1249, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96209, 2008 WL 4925634
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2008 | Docket: 2286661
Cited 1 times | Published
petition was untimely under state procedural rules.
Rule 9.140(j)(3)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
993 So. 2d 155, 2008 WL 4722502
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2008 | Docket: 133712
Cited 1 times | Published
below and preserve it for review pursuant to rule 9.140(b)(2)(A).
We deny the State's motion to dismiss
Category: Appellate Procedure
993 So. 2d 568, 2008 WL 4643060
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2008 | Docket: 2581167
Cited 1 times | Published
jurisdiction to review this type of order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140.
Category: Appellate Procedure
992 So. 2d 233, 2008 WL 4346442
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2008 | Docket: 1723813
Cited 1 times | Published
these subjects to a new rule, in part because rule 9.140 was becoming lengthy. In addition, review proceedings
Category: Appellate Procedure
992 So. 2d 294, 2008 WL 4265310
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2008 | Docket: 1723182
Cited 1 times | Published
precludes it from raising the issue now. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e).
The State also challenges the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
982 So. 2d 1277
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2008 | Docket: 2571371
Cited 1 times | Published
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) ("A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
982 So. 2d 1249, 2008 WL 2219294
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2008 | Docket: 2557189
Cited 1 times | Published
after his motion to disqualify was denied. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2).
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
Category: Appellate Procedure
967 So. 2d 1008, 2007 WL 3144858
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2007 | Docket: 1397175
Cited 1 times | Published
for rehearing, filed on October 6, 2006. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140. Because the notice of appeal was filed
Category: Appellate Procedure
963 So. 2d 366, 2007 WL 2457438
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2007 | Docket: 1328246
Cited 1 times | Published
of his motion to suppress evidence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The trial court sentenced Mr
Category: Appellate Procedure
953 So. 2d 655, 2007 WL 934891
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2007 | Docket: 1317374
Cited 1 times | Published
by rules adopted by the supreme court"); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B) (permitting appeals by the *656
Category: Appellate Procedure
918 So. 2d 390, 2006 WL 64432
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2006 | Docket: 1715192
Cited 1 times | Published
that the order was not appealable pursuant to rule 9.140(b)(1)(C) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
942 So. 2d 899, 2005 WL 2993843
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2005 | Docket: 1736921
Cited 1 times | Published
from a final judgment. See Fla. R.App. 9.110(g). Rule 9.140, governing criminal appeals, also contains a
Category: Appellate Procedure
866 So. 2d 144, 2004 WL 256487
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2004 | Docket: 1274133
Cited 1 times | Published
for consideration on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e)(2)(2003); see also In re Anders Briefs
Category: Appellate Procedure
858 So. 2d 1247, 2003 WL 22681590
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2003 | Docket: 1513540
Cited 1 times | Published
Kearse may assert in this appeal are limited. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). The argument Kearse makes, that
Category: Appellate Procedure
858 So. 2d 1013, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 797, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1779, 2003 WL 22410375
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2003 | Docket: 64826361
Cited 1 times | Published
cases.
Except to the extent of conflict with rule 9.140 governing appeals in criminal cases, this rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
852 So. 2d 444, 2003 WL 21990260
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2003 | Docket: 2513729
Cited 1 times | Published
convictions violate double jeopardy. We affirm.
Under rule 9.140(b) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
830 So. 2d 243, 2002 WL 31507141
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2002 | Docket: 235325
Cited 1 times | Published
raises a colorable claim under rule 3.170(l). Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)[1]. As such, we hold Hulett
Category: Appellate Procedure
814 So. 2d 1235, 2002 WL 832202
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2002 | Docket: 1369090
Cited 1 times | Published
893.03(2)(a)(4), Fla. Stat. (2000).
[2] Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b); Jones v. State, 806 So.2d 590 (Fla.
Category: Appellate Procedure
816 So. 2d 179, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5894, 2002 WL 825943
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2002 | Docket: 64815049
Cited 1 times | Published
traffic stop. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Despite the broad deference afforded
Category: Appellate Procedure
801 So. 2d 304, 2001 WL 1589187
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2001 | Docket: 1495270
Cited 1 times | Published
Procedure, 2001 WL 1276878 (Fla. Oct. 18, 2001) (Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)); Blanco v. State, 752 So.2d 79 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
803 So. 2d 797, 2001 WL 1555529
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2001 | Docket: 1785203
Cited 1 times | Published
J. and COBB, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Formerly Rule 9.140. We note that Brigham was published prior to
Category: Appellate Procedure
786 So. 2d 24, 2001 WL 420601
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2001 | Docket: 1681939
Cited 1 times | Published
State v. Gaines, 731 So.2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Rule 9.140 entitled "Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases"
Category: Appellate Procedure
783 So. 2d 1120, 2001 WL 252057
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2001 | Docket: 2580494
Cited 1 times | Published
Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) (formerly Rule 9.140(j), see Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
793 So. 2d 986, 2001 WL 98595
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2001 | Docket: 168367
Cited 1 times | Published
file a motion to withdraw the plea. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(ii)(defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
769 So. 2d 529, 2000 WL 1595729
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2000 | Docket: 2515935
Cited 1 times | Published
were true. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin.2060(e); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(2)(F); Hall v. State, 746 So.2d 544 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
769 So. 2d 529, 2000 WL 1595729
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2000 | Docket: 2515935
Cited 1 times | Published
were true. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin.2060(e); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(2)(F); Hall v. State, 746 So.2d 544 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
766 So. 2d 425, 2000 WL 1205467
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2000 | Docket: 1697811
Cited 1 times | Published
"imposing an unlawful or illegal sentence." Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(J)(2000). The supreme court in Cotton
Category: Appellate Procedure
760 So. 2d 89, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 367, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 906
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 64797897
Cited 1 times | Published
P. 3.800(b); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B), 9.140(d).7
We acknowledge that rule 9.140(d) requires that
Category: Appellate Procedure
756 So. 2d 1119, 2000 WL 572684
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2000 | Docket: 471119
Cited 1 times | Published
not require briefing in accordance with Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i), resulted in per curiam affirmances.
Category: Appellate Procedure
745 So. 2d 535, 1999 WL 1112220
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1999 | Docket: 2589593
Cited 1 times | Published
tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
761 So. 2d 1015, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 530, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1989, 1999 WL 1029285
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1999 | Docket: 64798487
Cited 1 times | Published
changes to subdivisions (h)(1) through (h)(3).]
Rule 9.140. Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases
[No changes
Category: Appellate Procedure
736 So. 2d 1270, 1999 WL 512094
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1999 | Docket: 1736675
Cited 1 times | Published
was effective as of January 1, 1997. However, Rule 9.140(j)(3)(C) provides that "[t]ime periods under
Category: Appellate Procedure
733 So. 2d 606, 1999 WL 410334
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1999 | Docket: 11265
Cited 1 times | Published
court's mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
722 So. 2d 838, 1998 WL 765025
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1998 | Docket: 2583579
Cited 1 times | Published
belated appeal in the appellate court. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j); Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
704 So. 2d 1078, 1998 WL 25570
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1997 | Docket: 2485883
Cited 1 times | Published
he waived his appeal as to this issue. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d); Middleton v. State, 689 So.2d 304, 305-06
Category: Appellate Procedure
696 So. 2d 1334, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8411, 1997 WL 408742
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1997 | Docket: 1696278
Cited 1 times | Published
otherwise appealable to the circuit court under rule 9.140(c) that the county court has certified to be
Category: Appellate Procedure
689 So. 2d 1178, 1997 WL 100902
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1997 | Docket: 1739304
Cited 1 times | Published
orders in criminal cases shall be as prescribed by rule 9.140." Although the state is permitted to take an
Category: Appellate Procedure
696 So. 2d 813, 1997 WL 102019
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1997 | Docket: 2570290
Cited 1 times | Published
Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c).
Rule 9.140(c) does not confer appellate jurisdiction upon
Category: Appellate Procedure
673 So. 2d 547, 1996 WL 252856
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1996 | Docket: 2567100
Cited 1 times | Published
to appeal. § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1993); Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
660 So. 2d 1161, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10193, 1995 WL 566006
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1995 | Docket: 64759074
Cited 1 times | Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.” Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(g). No briefs are required, and the method
Category: Appellate Procedure
643 So. 2d 1146, 1994 WL 534915
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1994 | Docket: 1744302
Cited 1 times | Published
adopted by the supreme court." Moreover, Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(c) authorizing the state to appeal from certain
Category: Appellate Procedure
622 So. 2d 132, 1993 WL 288717
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 1993 | Docket: 252139
Cited 1 times | Published
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(d); State v. Weeks
Category: Appellate Procedure
586 So. 2d 1266, 1991 WL 192032
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1991 | Docket: 1742355
Cited 1 times | Published
of the final judgment and sentence pursuant to Rule 9.140(b)(1).[3] Since this is not an appeal of a denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
583 So. 2d 369, 1991 WL 118233
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1991 | Docket: 1684161
Cited 1 times | Published
untimely if taken from judgment and sentence. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2). The question thus arises whether the
Category: Appellate Procedure
587 So. 2d 1343, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4112, 1991 WL 71562
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1991 | Docket: 64662524
Cited 1 times | Published
subject of which is authorized as appealable under rule 9.140(c) as there is no jurisdictional restriction
Category: Appellate Procedure
558 So. 2d 525, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1921, 1990 WL 32456
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1990 | Docket: 64648875
Cited 1 times | Published
jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 9.140(c)(1)(A), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
502 So. 2d 1274, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6309, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 273
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1987 | Docket: 64625247
Cited 1 times | Published
evidence obtained by search and seizure.” Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B); State v. Palmore, 495 So.2d 1170
Category: Appellate Procedure
467 So. 2d 1119, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1123
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1985 | Docket: 1680576
Cited 1 times | Published
the State may appeal an illegal sentence. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(I).
Section 893.135(1)(a)1, Florida
Category: Appellate Procedure
464 So. 2d 659, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 617
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1985 | Docket: 1193483
Cited 1 times | Published
evidentiary *661 hearing proceeds as an appeal under rule 9.140(b)(1)(C).
The motion presently before this court
Category: Appellate Procedure
450 So. 2d 907
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1984 | Docket: 1433602
Cited 1 times | Published
counsel) proceeded in accordance with Appellate Rule 9.140(b)(3) in the filing of the notice of appeal,
Category: Appellate Procedure
408 So. 2d 744, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18924
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1982 | Docket: 64587324
Cited 1 times | Published
appeal as one from an illegal sentence under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(I) and Sec. 924.07(5), Fla.Stat. (1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
400 So. 2d 1012
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1981 | Docket: 1677269
Cited 1 times | Published
constitutes a felony of the first degree ...
[2] Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A) allows the State to appeal an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
381 So. 2d 1370
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1980 | Docket: 1757964
Cited 1 times | Published
is sought. This requirement also applies under Rule 9.140(d). As explained in the Commentary accompanying
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2025 | Docket: 71276001
Published
transactions. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A). We reverse in part 1 because
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2025 | Docket: 71174495
Published
4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; §
924.071, Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse,
concluding Pastor
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2025 | Docket: 69533864
Published
reserved for appeal
is not dispositive. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Before the
en banc court, however
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2025 | Docket: 71098308
Published
appointed counsel filed an Anders brief under
rule 9.140(g)(2). The brief provided a statement of the
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2025 | Docket: 71038918
Published
which we have authority to consider. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B). The State argues that the law
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2025 | Docket: 71038918
Published
which we have authority to consider. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B). The State argues that the law
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2025 | Docket: 70962107
Published
analysis, the majority recognized a “gap” in rule
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii) concerning the appealability of
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2025 | Docket: 70807687
Published
the trial court’s
suppression order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). It argues that
the warrant was
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2025 | Docket: 70739434
Published
evidence obtained by search and seizure.” Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B). Our standard of review is de novo
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2025 | Docket: 70690157
Published
argue that we have appellate jurisdiction under rule
9.140(b)(1)(D), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2025 | Docket: 70629869
Published
dismisses this appeal as
untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and WINOKUR and
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2025 | Docket: 70630875
Published
Adams (“Adams”). We have jurisdiction.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). For the reasons that follow, we
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2025 | Docket: 70576137
Published
court agreed was case-dispositive. See Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Churchill v. State, 219 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2025 | Docket: 70454061
Published
dispositive order of the lower tribunal. Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Emerson did not reserve any
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2025 | Docket: 69673940
Published
subject to our independent review. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(g)(2)(A); In re Anders Briefs, 581 So. 2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2025 | Docket: 70411135
Published
suppress. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B). Law enforcement conducted a valid
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2025 | Docket: 70409813
Published
("[W]e adopted rule 9.140(d), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
(now rule 9.140(e)), requiring that
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2025 | Docket: 70236134
Published
Gabriel Trevino. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(c)(1)(A); § 924.07(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2022)
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2025 | Docket: 70186670
Published
direct appeal." (emphasis
added)); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) ("A defendant who pleads
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2025 | Docket: 69843479
Published
response to this statute, the
supreme court amended Rule 9.140 to codify section 924.051(4),
but with the additions
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2025 | Docket: 69843479
Published
response to this statute, the
supreme court amended Rule 9.140 to codify section 924.051(4),
but with the additions
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2025 | Docket: 69767009
Published
appeal expired on
November 6, 2019. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3); Gust v. State, 535 So. 2d 642,
643
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2025 | Docket: 69760560
Published
notice” that is timely as to each order); Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(3) (providing time for commencing appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2025 | Docket: 69737679
Published
animal
cruelty. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). We remand for
the trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2025 | Docket: 69710619
Published
9.110, 28-6-0 as to rule 9.130, 26-6-0 as to rule 9.140,
and 35-0-0 as to rule 9.800. The Florida Bar’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2025 | Docket: 69674150
Published
timely appealed. We have jurisdiction. See Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(L).
The State argues that
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2025 | Docket: 69660853
Published
before its fifteen-day
appeal deadline. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(2). And if the trial court had not ruled
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2025 | Docket: 69660853
Published
before its fifteen-day
appeal deadline. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(2). And if the trial court had not ruled
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2025 | Docket: 69631018
Published
appeal followed. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2025 | Docket: 69574751
Published
following its transmission to this Court. 1 See Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(f)(1). Citing Florida Rule of Appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2025 | Docket: 69464048
Published
Fla. Stat. (2023).
3
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2025 | Docket: 69554643
Published
failed to preserve his claim for
appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)b. (2023). Gore argues
that
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2025 | Docket: 69525635
Published
backpack. The
1
We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant
who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2025 | Docket: 69523374
Published
marijuana or hemp. This Court has
jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2024 | Docket: 69477033
Published
right to appeal the nonfinal order. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
This appeal follows.
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2024 | Docket: 69464048
Published
Fla. Stat. (2023).
3
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 2024 | Docket: 69420047
Published
suppress. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B). We accept Howard’s concession
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2024 | Docket: 69378866
Published
double jeopardy. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(M). Because Banda’s offenses did
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2024 | Docket: 69354846
Published
dispositive order denying his motions. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
The following facts were
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2024 | Docket: 69324004
Published
suppress. See § 924.051(4), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. App. P
9.140(b)(2)(A); see also Le Boss v. State, 359
Category: Appellate Procedure
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 21, 2024 | Docket: 68973334
Published
Argued: Jul 24, 2024
court,
not the appellate court, see FLA. R. APP. P. 9.140(d)(1)(E) (to
USCA11 Case: 22-11903
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2024 | Docket: 69135344
Published
jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(L)–(M).
2 See § 914.22(1), (2)(c)
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2024 | Docket: 68484477
Published
challenge an involuntary plea on appeal. Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c. (permitting a defendant who
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2024 | Docket: 69063221
Published
of the same judgment, was untimely. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(3) (“The defendant must file the notice
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2024 | Docket: 69025991
Published
for the stop. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
For reasons discussed below,
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2024 | Docket: 69054997
Published
jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(c)(1)(M). We reverse and remand for a new
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2024 | Docket: 68792897
Published
a battery. 1 We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). Dixon raises four issues on appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2024 | Docket: 68980754
Published
jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(L).
Hanberry was charged with
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 2024 | Docket: 68950669
Published
traffic stop. We have jurisdiction. See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Aldama contends that the search
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2024 | Docket: 68912873
Published
appointed counsel filed an Anders brief under rule
9.140(g)(2). The brief certified that “undersigned
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2024 | Docket: 68913255
Published
dismisses this appeal as untimely. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(3).
LEWIS, NORDBY, and TANENBAUM, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2024 | Docket: 68886701
Published
CURIAM.
DISMISSED as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and TANENBAUM
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2024 | Docket: 68848200
Published
granting or denying
collateral relief."); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(J).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2024 | Docket: 68848200
Published
granting or denying
collateral relief."); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(J).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2024 | Docket: 68553257
Published
exception to the
preservation requirement of rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)” in the
Florida Rules of Appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2024 | Docket: 68509970
Published
May 8, 2024
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(b) from the Circuit Court
for Pinellas
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2024 | Docket: 68272574
Published
April 19, 2024
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 from the County Court for
Pinellas County;
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2024 | Docket: 68422842
Published
and to “an
unlawful or illegal sentence”), not rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c.
(regarding “an involuntary plea
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2024 | Docket: 68335132
Published
March 13, 2024
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F) from the Circuit
Court for
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2024 | Docket: 68335464
Published
or (e) as otherwise provided by the law. Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); see also Amendments to Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2024 | Docket: 68313512
Published
community control. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Based on the State’s appropriate
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2024 | Docket: 68290548
Published
exception to the preservation requirement of rule
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c).”); Hicks v. State, 915 So. 2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2024 | Docket: 68277197
Published
would be appealable under the rule. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). The State also argues that
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2024 | Docket: 68276720
Published
February 23, 2024
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) from the Circuit Court
for Manatee
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2024 | Docket: 68238241
Published
in juvenile
delinquency cases shall be as in rule 9.140 except as modified by this rule.” Fla. R.
App
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2024 | Docket: 68034266
Published
February 9, 2024
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(b) from the Circuit Court
for Pinellas
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2024 | Docket: 68209010
Published
evidence. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Because the trial court’s conclusions
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2024 | Docket: 68012052
Published
with the clerk of the lower
tribunal.”); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1).
B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and WINOKUR,
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2024 | Docket: 68138398
Published
search warrant.1
We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Because the trial court
erred
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2024 | Docket: 68138398
Published
search warrant.1
We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Because the trial court
erred
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2023 | Docket: 68103690
Published
Daniel
Arshadnia. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). The
overarching issue implicated
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2023 | Docket: 68091935
Published
See § 924.07(1)(j), Fla. Stat. (2022); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(E); see also United States v. Scott
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2023 | Docket: 68073239
Published
instruction because it is not dispositive. 1 See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68043830
Published
preservation
requirement of rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)”); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c) (allowing
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2023 | Docket: 67748974
Published
the order to be reviewed, except as
provided in rule 9.140(c)(3).
(c) Exception; Administrative Action
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2023 | Docket: 67748974
Published
the order to be reviewed, except as
provided in rule 9.140(c)(3).
(c) Exception; Administrative Action
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2023 | Docket: 67696340
Published
release. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.691(c); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(h)(4); Petersen v. State, 187 So. 3d 283
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2023 | Docket: 68034346
Published
appeals and this Court has jurisdiction.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
We affirm Wells’s conviction
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2023 | Docket: 67557697
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant may not
appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2023 | Docket: 67109201
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant may not
appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2023 | Docket: 66795932
Published
any basis for reversal after appealing under Rule 9.140. See
Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114, 119 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2023 | Docket: 65420656
Published
3081958 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 26, 2023); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e) (“A
sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2023 | Docket: 67482053
Published
community control. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Because Diaz admitted to violating
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2023 | Docket: 67359008
Published
order required. Including the time provided by Rule 9.140(g)(1),
counsel succeeded in obtaining a total
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2023 | Docket: 67270637
Published
claim unpreserved for appellate review. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e) (“A
sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2023 | Docket: 67025968
Published
-3-
Appendix
RULE 9.140. Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2023 | Docket: 67020527
Published
-3-
Appendix
RULE 9.140. Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2023 | Docket: 67012421
Published
assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(D). Because the trial court properly
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2023 | Docket: 66833841
Published
Dortch, 317 So. 3d 1074,
1084 (Fla. 2021); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c. Here, Defendant did
not file
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2022 | Docket: 66575238
Published
We have
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(4). As the State properly
concedes
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2022 | Docket: 67366072
Published
competency is not independently reviewable under rule 9.140(b), Florida
Rules of Appellate Procedure.”)
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2022 | Docket: 65664767
Published
800. Morgan, 293 So. 3d at 1084 (quoting Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(J)).
After the Second District
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2022 | Docket: 65382144
Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(e); see also Jackson v. State, 983 So. 2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2022 | Docket: 65365635
Published
of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). See Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(g)(2)(b).
First, the trial court erred
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2022 | Docket: 65346487
Published
from rendition of a defendant’s sentence.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). This is jurisdictional. See State
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2022 | Docket: 64916767
Published
jurisdiction. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.691(c); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(4).
2
Younghans v. State, 90 So. 2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2022 | Docket: 64898827
Published
3d 1158, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1).
Dismissed.
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2022 | Docket: 63654630
Published
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(k); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(C).
2
Woodruff cross-appeals the
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2022 | Docket: 63385751
Published
provided by law.
(Emphasis added).
In turn, rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e) provides the following:
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2022 | Docket: 63372590
Published
exception to the preservation
requirement of rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c).”).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2021 | Docket: 61574091
Published
Florida Bar.
We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). Because we find the
trial court’s order
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2021 | Docket: 60688689
Published
119 -
[NO CHANGE]
RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2021 | Docket: 60680655
Published
119 -
[NO CHANGE]
RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2021 | Docket: 60123705
Published
establish a prima facie case, and he relies on
rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)e. to invoke this court’s jurisdiction
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2021 | Docket: 59954628
Published
deadly weapon. We have jurisdiction.
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A); State v. Mackey, 271 So. 3d 128
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2021 | Docket: 59921668
Published
level.” Id.
B. Voluntariness and Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)
Dortch’s appeal is governed
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2021 | Docket: 59678194
Published
underlying case. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B); see also State v. Palmore, 495
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2021 | Docket: 59678191
Published
1 We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A). Because Symonette failed to properly
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2021 | Docket: 59295943
Published
deadly weapon. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A). Baxter argues there was insufficient
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2021 | Docket: 59245136
Published
Except to the extent of conflict with rule 9.140 governing appeals in criminal
cases, this rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2021 | Docket: 45654210
Published
of the filing of the notice of appeal.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(f)(1). The rules do not preclude the early
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2021 | Docket: 31030494
Published
deadly weapon. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A). Baxter argues there was insufficient
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2021 | Docket: 29102113
Published
of appeals
authorized by section 924.07(1) or rule 9.140(c)(1). Instead, the State suggests that,
in
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2020 | Docket: 18726906
Published
underlying case. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). The
State argues the trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2020 | Docket: 18642879
Published
jury trial. We
have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). Kopp argues the trial court
abused
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2020 | Docket: 18584685
Published
amendments to rule 9.030 (Jurisdiction of Courts), rule 9.140 (Appeal
Proceedings in Criminal Cases), and
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 2020 | Docket: 18557495
Published
“denying relief” under rule 3.800(a). Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140 (b)(1)(D).
Id.
We agree with the
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2020 | Docket: 18512284
Published
2019) (Makar, J.
dissenting); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(i) (“In the interest of justice, the
court
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2020 | Docket: 18458088
Published
jurisdiction. Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2020 | Docket: 18408687
Published
defendant can appeal from an adverse judgment); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A) (appeal), 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (plead
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2019 | Docket: 16503204
Published
violence (count 2). We
have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). Counsel filed a brief pursuant
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2019 | Docket: 16400364
Published
Stat. (2018) (emphasis added); see also Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(E). However, Pickersgill submits that
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2019 | Docket: 16338039
Published
1Wehave jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B) (providing that
the state may appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2019 | Docket: 16223265
Published
140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e) except as provided by law." Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)
provides for withdrawal when
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2019 | Docket: 16102231
Published
rule sets forth the same requirements. Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (adding that a defendant who
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2019 | Docket: 16095932
Published
2 See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)a.-e. (restricting the grounds
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2019 | Docket: 16006954
Published
evidentiary ruling in this appeal.
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(K); see also Jennings v. Stephens
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2019 | Docket: 15992402
Published
hotel room." We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). The State failed to justify law
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2019 | Docket: 15948148
Published
relief.
See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2018); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(J).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2019 | Docket: 15762813
Published
challenge his
conviction on appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); see also
Lewis v. State, 262 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2019 | Docket: 15738235
Published
filed June 7, 2019.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(D) from the Circuit Court for
Collier
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2019 | Docket: 15738280
Published
order “denying
relief” under rule 3.800(a). Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 (b)(1)(D).
Here, though the trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
274 So. 3d 1173
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2019 | Docket: 15738271
Published
right to appeal a dispositive order. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
273 So. 3d 281
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2019 | Docket: 15733749
Published
particularity the point of law being reserved.”
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); see also § 924.051(4), Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
271 So. 3d 1245
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2019 | Docket: 64714213
Published
Court's jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
271 So. 3d 1245
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2019 | Docket: 64714214
Published
Court's jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2019 | Docket: 15682017
Published
Court’s
jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2019 | Docket: 15682017
Published
Court’s
jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2019 | Docket: 15665581
Published
Committee) filed a petition
proposing amendments to rule 9.140(g) (Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases;
Briefs)
Category: Appellate Procedure
270 So. 3d 1287
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2019 | Docket: 15651838
Published
withdraw plea. See
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c.
3 “[T]he trial judge
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2019 | Docket: 15048662
Published
filed May 3, 2019.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(D) from the Circuit Court for
Manatee
Category: Appellate Procedure
266 So. 3d 880
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2019 | Docket: 64707925
Published
issue was dispositive of the case. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A) (providing that defendant may not
Category: Appellate Procedure
266 So. 3d 880
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2019 | Docket: 64707924
Published
issue was dispositive of the case. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A) (providing that defendant may not
Category: Appellate Procedure
271 So. 3d 128
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2019 | Docket: 14693150
Published
sought within fifteen days of rendition. See Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(c)(3) (providing that the State shall file
Category: Appellate Procedure
266 So. 3d 238
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2019 | Docket: 14618601
Published
Pettis's car. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
As framed by the trial court's
Category: Appellate Procedure
264 So. 3d 1101
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2019 | Docket: 14554435
Published
plea" and "a sentencing error." Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c), (d). These rules
also
Category: Appellate Procedure
263 So. 3d 291
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2019 | Docket: 14545175
Published
that decision. We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(C), and we affirm.
The State
Category: Appellate Procedure
264 So. 3d 333
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2019 | Docket: 14534780
Published
prescribed by the appellate rules, see Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(g)(1) (requiring the initial brief to be
Category: Appellate Procedure
269 So. 3d 580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2019 | Docket: 14533667
Published
2010); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c). “[I]f a defendant’s guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
264 So. 3d 1055
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2019 | Docket: 64705093
Published
court's order dismissing the information. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A) ("The state may appeal an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
264 So. 3d 1055
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2019 | Docket: 64705093
Published
court's order dismissing the information. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A) ("The state may appeal an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
260 So. 3d 1185
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2018 | Docket: 8466966
Published
competency is not independently
reviewable under rule 9.140(b), Florida Rules of Appellate
Procedure.
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 8449828
Published
and sentence. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(4). In
denying Elias’s motion for post-trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
257 So. 3d 1248
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 8439944
Published
denial. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.691 (b); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(h)(3). The lower court committed reversible
Category: Appellate Procedure
260 So. 3d 440
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2018 | Docket: 64699766
Published
listed in the form used here by Petitioner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
Clearly, the clerk of court is not
Category: Appellate Procedure
260 So. 3d 440
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2018 | Docket: 64699767
Published
listed in the form used here by Petitioner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
Clearly, the clerk of court is not
Category: Appellate Procedure
259 So. 3d 907
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2018 | Docket: 8158548
Published
offender of special concern (VFOSC). See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(d) (providing that a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
257 So. 3d 1046
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2018 | Docket: 8074517
Published
defendant’s
argument was not preserved. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e) (“A sentencing
error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
255 So. 3d 530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2018 | Docket: 64689262
Published
Court's jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2018 | Docket: 8034492
Published
Court’s jurisdiction in a
timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
261 So. 3d 649
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2018 | Docket: 8020198
Published
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e) ("A
sentencing error may not be
Category: Appellate Procedure
257 So. 3d 540
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2018 | Docket: 7974927
Published
order imposing Appellant’s sentence. See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Furthermore, the record
unquestionably
Category: Appellate Procedure
254 So. 3d 1107
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2018 | Docket: 7775015
Published
order denying his suppression motion. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). We affirm.
The pertinent
Category: Appellate Procedure
252 So. 3d 827
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2018 | Docket: 7569510
Published
found was dispositive of the
charges. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
Category: Appellate Procedure
246 So. 3d 1303
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2018 | Docket: 64681805
Published
to review the Judgment and Sentence. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2018 | Docket: 7387548
Published
to review the Judgment and Sentence. See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2018 | Docket: 7387548
Published
to review the Judgment and Sentence. See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
250 So. 3d 805
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2018 | Docket: 7320154
Published
3d 143, 144 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b)).
However, in this case
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2018 | Docket: 7254066
Published
by a defendant in a
criminal case. Cf. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1). Appellee’s motion is
granted, and
Category: Appellate Procedure
249 So. 3d 759
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2018 | Docket: 64683356
Published
Per Curiam.
*760DISMISSED . See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
Rowe, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2018 | Docket: 7151434
Published
2018
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
ROWE, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ.,
Category: Appellate Procedure
249 So. 3d 665
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2018 | Docket: 7144571
Published
motion to correct sentencing error. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(e) (“A sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
246 So. 3d 1282
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2018 | Docket: 7096599
Published
2
dispositive motion. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The court
imposed a fifteen-month
Category: Appellate Procedure
248 So. 3d 1226
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2018 | Docket: 7024343
Published
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(3); Miami-Dade County v. Peart, 843 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
243 So. 3d 535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2018 | Docket: 7024342
Published
correct the sentence in the lower court. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(g)(2)(B). Counsel did so, and the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
247 So. 3d 666
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2018 | Docket: 6862842
Published
informations. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
Section 458.3265, Florida Statutes
Category: Appellate Procedure
247 So. 3d 61
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2018 | Docket: 6525134
Published
granting Pena’s suppression motion.
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B) (“The state may appeal an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2018 | Docket: 6368663
Published
DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(3). Any request for belated appeal must
Category: Appellate Procedure
240 So. 3d 903
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2018 | Docket: 64675920
Published
DISMISSED . See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b) ; Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Any request for belated appeal must
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2018 | Docket: 6359023
Published
DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(3). Any request for belated appeal must
Category: Appellate Procedure
241 So. 3d 982
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2018 | Docket: 64677079
Published
DISMISSED . See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b) ; Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Any request for belated appeal must
Category: Appellate Procedure
241 So. 3d 969
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2018 | Docket: 6349197
Published
raising
the issue on direct appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e) (providing
that a sentencing error may
Category: Appellate Procedure
248 So. 3d 177
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2018 | Docket: 6340879
Published
sale of cocaine. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). Appellant's counsel
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2018 | Docket: 6318764
Published
Court’s
jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
237 So. 3d 1110
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2018 | Docket: 6250703
Published
this issue on direct appeal. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c) (stating that a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 1285
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2017 | Docket: 60282822
Published
suspicion. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Because the undisputed facts establish
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2017 | Docket: 6240834
Published
McMahon, 94 So. 3d 468, 472 (Fla. 2012); see Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c) (listing the
same types of orders the
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2017 | Docket: 6240846
Published
in case number F07-18812 on appeal. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2017 | Docket: 6238218
Published
lascivious conduct. We have
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm his conviction
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2017 | Docket: 6236460
Published
lascivious conduct. We have
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm his conviction
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2017 | Docket: 6236459
Published
relief as to
counts four and five. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Category: Appellate Procedure
229 So. 3d 445
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2017 | Docket: 60281704
Published
PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). WINOKUR, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2017 | Docket: 6217747
Published
Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
WINOKUR, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2017 | Docket: 6185392
Published
abuse (count 2). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm Mr. Williams’ judgment
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2017 | Docket: 6183869
Published
a sentencing error, if
preserved. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Liebman v. State, 853 So.
Category: Appellate Procedure
238 So. 3d 343
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2017 | Docket: 6183862
Published
trial counsel agreed to file one. See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 cmt. n. (1996 amend.) (“In the rare case
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 510
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2017 | Docket: 6165068
Published
(Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (per curiam); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Fla Stat. § 924.051(4) (2015);
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 140
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 60282832
Published
-Upon the Court is not an appealable order. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). Therefore, the Court lacks appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 145
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 60282833
Published
to Dismiss is not an appealable order. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). Therefore, the Court lacks appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2017 | Docket: 6158997
Published
to
Dismiss is not an appealable order. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). Therefore, the Court
lacks appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2017 | Docket: 6158996
Published
Upon the Court is not an appealable order. Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b). Therefore, the Court lacks appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
226 So. 3d 376, 2017 WL 4103218
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2017 | Docket: 60274332
Published
contest and his sentence is legal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). However, the judgment contains a scrivener’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2017 | Docket: 6160701
Published
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). However, the judgment contains a scrivener’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
227 So. 3d 215, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12833, 2017 WL 3879295
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2017 | Docket: 6148140
Published
order is not an ap-pealable order pursuant to rule 9.140(b)(1)(D), and we therefore dismiss the appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
224 So. 3d 899, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11983, 2017 WL 3613987
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2017 | Docket: 60271783
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); see also Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114
Category: Appellate Procedure
225 So. 3d 932, 2017 WL 3495874, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11729
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2017 | Docket: 6138601
Published
such, it was not an appealable order pursuant to rule 9.140(b)(1)(D). Although the Appellant’s November 15
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2017 | Docket: 6132936
Published
theft (count 2). We have
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm Mr. Devlin's
Category: Appellate Procedure
225 So. 3d 345, 2017 WL 3318004, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11281
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2017 | Docket: 6136507
Published
was involuntary, is a recognized ground under rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii).
Once a sentence has been imposed
Category: Appellate Procedure
229 So. 3d 860
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2017 | Docket: 6070161
Published
88 So.3d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3)). This requirement' is jurisdictional
Category: Appellate Procedure
219 So. 3d 911, 2017 WL 1202398, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4371
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2017 | Docket: 4667149
Published
is from the judgment and sentence. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b); Griffith v. Stale, 171 So.2d 597, 598
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2017 | Docket: 4583382
Published
Miranda warnings.1 We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(A), and reverse.
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 443
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2017 | Docket: 60283031
Published
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pas-co County; Susan G. Barthle
Category: Appellate Procedure
268 So. 3d 813
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2017 | Docket: 4579969
Published
and three are not subject to review. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e);
Jackson v. State, 983 So. 2d 562, 574
Category: Appellate Procedure
208 So. 3d 1208
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2017 | Docket: 4571014
Published
jeopardy. This Court has jurisdiction. Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(e); Holubek v. State, 173
Category: Appellate Procedure
206 So. 3d 822, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18458
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2016 | Docket: 4556058
Published
and sentences. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm.
Arguments
Category: Appellate Procedure
207 So. 3d 961, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18446
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2016 | Docket: 4556756
Published
stipulated that the order was dispositive. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Finding that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
206 So. 3d 123, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17996
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2016 | Docket: 63630784
Published
and disposition. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)©. S.A.W. argues that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2016 | Docket: 4550695
Published
and disposition. We have
jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). S.A.W. argues that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
207 So. 3d 340, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17464
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2016 | Docket: 4544297
Published
the appeal is dismissed.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)
1
;
Williams
Category: Appellate Procedure
205 So. 3d 831, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17235
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2016 | Docket: 60257640
Published
now appeals. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Because the trial court erred
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2016 | Docket: 4540933
Published
now appeals. We have
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Because the trial court erred
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2016 | Docket: 4422977
Published
Fla. Stat. (2014). We have jurisdiction, Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(B),
and affirm.
A.L
Category: Appellate Procedure
210 So. 3d 101, 2016 WL 4648800, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13369
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2016 | Docket: 4422987
Published
convictions. We have jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). The trial court found Mr. Davis
Category: Appellate Procedure
210 So. 3d 97, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13262
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2016 | Docket: 4418857
Published
without further comment.
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i);
Leonard v. State,
Category: Appellate Procedure
228 So. 3d 162, 2016 WL 4396084
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2016 | Docket: 60278721
Published
BILBREY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
. Rule 9.140 was recently amended'to address circumstances
Category: Appellate Procedure
199 So. 3d 357, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12161, 2016 WL 4261970
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2016 | Docket: 4136149
Published
against Eugene Maye. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). The State argues that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
198 So. 3d 961, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12036, 2016 WL 4197955
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2016 | Docket: 4118415
Published
criminal contempt. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). He argues that he was entitled
Category: Appellate Procedure
196 So. 3d 496, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10676, 2016 WL 3702906
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2016 | Docket: 4111804
Published
1
. We have jurisdiction, Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
2
. “There are
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2016 | Docket: 3090189
Published
Committee) filed a petition proposing amendments to rule 9.140(g) (Appeal
Proceedings in Criminal Cases; Briefs)
Category: Appellate Procedure
204 So. 3d 13, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1388
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2016 | Docket: 63630487
Published
opinion reflecting the January 28, 2016, version of rule 9.140(g)(1) is released contemporaneously with this
Category: Appellate Procedure
194 So. 3d 511, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8778, 2016 WL 3186010
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2016 | Docket: 3071049
Published
would have been dispositive of the case. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat (2015)
Category: Appellate Procedure
194 So. 3d 309, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 241, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1121, 2016 WL 3018569
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2016 | Docket: 3067642
Published
Committee) filed a petition proposing amendments to rule 9.140(g) (Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases; Briefs)
Category: Appellate Procedure
200 So. 3d 137
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2016 | Docket: 3069654
Published
376 So. 2d 382, 384 (Fla. 1979); see also Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). In the instant case, Senger’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
190 So. 3d 1122, 2016 WL 1718847, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2016 | Docket: 60254750
Published
Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e). Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii) in turn provides the grounds:
(a)
Category: Appellate Procedure
188 So. 3d 930, 2016 WL 1385894, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5423
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2016 | Docket: 3054130
Published
384 (Fla.1979);
see also
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
2
. No testimony
Category: Appellate Procedure
188 So. 3d 913, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6511, 2016 WL 1573942
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2016 | Docket: 3050054
Published
for appeal, we cannot consider the merits. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(d);
see also Rackley
Category: Appellate Procedure
198 So. 3d 783, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3382, 2016 WL 833583
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2016 | Docket: 3041725
Published
(2012). We have jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). We consolidated these cases for
Category: Appellate Procedure
192 So. 3d 495, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2179, 2016 WL 618892
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2016 | Docket: 3036698
Published
credit award was improper.
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(M).
Following her arrest on the
Category: Appellate Procedure
185 So. 3d 686, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1754, 2016 WL 540650
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2016 | Docket: 3035162
Published
error that is preserved.
See
Fla.- R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(d). In its order denying Latham’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
185 So. 3d 542, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 362, 2016 WL 104343
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2016 | Docket: 60253596
Published
sentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(a); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(2)(A)(ii)d; Hernandez v. State, 137 So.3d
Category: Appellate Procedure
181 So. 3d 574, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19506, 2015 WL 9491820
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2015 | Docket: 60252603
Published
not file a motion to set aside the plea. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c); Hicks v. State, 915 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
181 So. 3d 547, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17902, 2015 WL 7544961
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 2015 | Docket: 3016002
Published
raised on appeal are not among those allowed by Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii).
Affirmed.
GROSS, MAY
Category: Appellate Procedure
179 So. 3d 405, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16977, 2015 WL 7008028
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2015 | Docket: 3011951
Published
e. as otherwise provided by law.
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A) (emphasis added). The Defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
184 So. 3d 1151, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16724, 2015 WL 6777158
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2015 | Docket: 3010553
Published
theft. We have jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R.. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). Mr. Walls argues that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
177 So. 3d 562, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 591, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2416, 2015 WL 6514301
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008266
Published
entered after final judgment.”
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). We conclude that an order denying
Category: Appellate Procedure
177 So. 3d 562, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 591, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2416, 2015 WL 6514301
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008266
Published
entered after final judgment.”
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). We conclude that an order denying
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2015 | Docket: 2991359
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b); S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb,
304 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
176 So. 3d 364
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2015 | Docket: 2991550
Published
appearance, to appellant’s original counsel. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(d)(1) (“The attorney of record for a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
176 So. 3d 1010, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15277, 2015 WL 5968725
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2015 | Docket: 60250740
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b); S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
176 So. 3d 980, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 544, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2216, 2015 WL 5877975
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2015 | Docket: 2866127
Published
for victims of human trafficking.
Lastly, rule 9.140(b)(1)(D) (Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases;
Category: Appellate Procedure
173 So. 3d 1139, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13415, 2015 WL 5559757
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2015 | Docket: 2757051
Published
See § 924.07(l)(i), Fla. Stat. (2013); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(M).
Category: Appellate Procedure
172 So. 3d 993, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12956, 2015 WL 5090297
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2015 | Docket: 60250188
Published
C.J., and SWANSON, J., concur.
. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B) (providing for appeal by State
Category: Appellate Procedure
172 So. 3d 993, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12956, 2015 WL 5090297
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2015 | Docket: 60250188
Published
C.J., and SWANSON, J., concur.
. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B) (providing for appeal by State
Category: Appellate Procedure
172 So. 3d 982, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12852, 2015 WL 5051134
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2015 | Docket: 60250183
Published
motion, and this appeal followed. The State cited rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Ap*983pellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
174 So. 3d 554, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12875, 2015 WL 5062267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2015 | Docket: 2688891
Published
of the record had passed.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(f)(1) (requiring service of the record within
Category: Appellate Procedure
171 So. 3d 222, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11801, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1847
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2015 | Docket: 60249695
Published
Certiorari is treated as an appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
AFFIRMED.
LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA
Category: Appellate Procedure
169 So. 3d 1260, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11181, 2015 WL 4486620
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2015 | Docket: 60248844
Published
cannot be challenged on direct appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)©; Garcia-Roque v. State, 120 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
170 So. 3d 892, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11041, 2015 WL 4464404
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2015 | Docket: 2679151
Published
safe harbor requirements of section 57.105 and Rule 9.140, on December 18, 2014, Safeco filed a Motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
169 So. 3d 1227, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10848, 2015 WL 4366543
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 2015 | Docket: 60248835
Published
with opinion.
. Jurisdiction is proper under rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
169 So. 3d 264, 2015 WL 4154174
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2015 | Docket: 2679110
Published
the order on the motion.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(C).
Reversed and remanded for
Category: Appellate Procedure
168 So. 3d 308, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9992, 2015 WL 4002453
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2015 | Docket: 60248637
Published
JJ., concur.
. Jurisdiction is proper under rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
164 So. 3d 739, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7721, 2015 WL 2431657
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2015 | Docket: 2659196
Published
robbery. We have jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). The trial court imposed the consecutive
Category: Appellate Procedure
159 So. 3d 1012, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4198, 2015 WL 1319800
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2015 | Docket: 2644398
Published
1
.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(a)(i).
2
.
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2015 | Docket: 2642462
Published
3d 157, 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citing Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(e)). Here, appellant preserved the error
Category: Appellate Procedure
159 So. 3d 267, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3044, 2015 WL 894349
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2015 | Docket: 2639006
Published
089.” § 924.07(1)(k), Fla. Stat. (2012). Under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(O), the State may appeal an order “denying
Category: Appellate Procedure
159 So. 3d 232, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2155, 2015 WL 685619
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2015 | Docket: 60246520
Published
CURIAM.
DISMISSED without prejudice. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D); see also Saye v. Pieschacon, 750
Category: Appellate Procedure
153 So. 3d 967, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20984, 2014 WL 7404076
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2014 | Docket: 60245383
Published
Court case number 01-2011-CF-004280-A. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). Upon issuance of mandate in this
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2014 | Docket: 2620073
Published
case number 01-
2011-CF-004280-A. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). Upon issuance of mandate in
this
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2014 | Docket: 2616692
Published
the order to be
reviewed, except as provided in rule 9.140(c)(3).
(c) – (j) [No Change]
Category: Appellate Procedure
150 So. 3d 842, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17600, 2014 WL 5460612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2014 | Docket: 1453495
Published
this dispositive issue.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)®. “The standard of review for motions
Category: Appellate Procedure
149 So. 3d 1163
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2014 | Docket: 1421760
Published
170(£), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
149 So. 3d 113
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2014 | Docket: 1310556
Published
denying his motion was not dispositive. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (providing that a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
147 So. 3d 1057, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14103, 2014 WL 4435946
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2014 | Docket: 1185181
Published
Santiago had begun to serve the sentence. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(c)(1)(M), (N). The State did not take an
Category: Appellate Procedure
146 So. 3d 134, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13679, 2014 WL 4344387
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2014 | Docket: 1150535
Published
plea; and a sentencing error, if preserved. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A);
Liebman v. State,
853
Category: Appellate Procedure
143 So. 3d 1059, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11386, 2014 WL 3673872
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2014 | Docket: 371698
Published
obtained by search and seizure.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
As explained in this opinion
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2014 | Docket: 742445
Published
and statements. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse the trial court's
Category: Appellate Procedure
141 So. 3d 1278, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11020, 2014 WL 3543910
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2014 | Docket: 60241799
Published
and statements. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse the trial court’s order
Category: Appellate Procedure
144 So. 3d 575, 2014 WL 3375018
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2014 | Docket: 453310
Published
Appellate jurisdiction is proper pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
136 So. 3d 1226, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5359, 2014 WL 1400085
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2014 | Docket: 60239938
Published
Thompson's claim for direct appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii).
Category: Appellate Procedure
135 So. 3d 449, 2014 WL 1051968, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3967
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2014 | Docket: 60239644
Published
and statements. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(B)(l). We reverse the trial court’s order
Category: Appellate Procedure
135 So. 3d 448, 2014 WL 1051966, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3966
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2014 | Docket: 60239642
Published
Rick Menendez. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse the trial court’s order
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2014 | Docket: 401593
Published
- 39 -
RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
Category: Appellate Procedure
126 So. 3d 1247, 2013 WL 6050854, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18222
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2013 | Docket: 60236281
Published
appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3). This disposition is without prejudice
Category: Appellate Procedure
124 So. 3d 444, 2013 WL 5932261, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17698
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2013 | Docket: 60235508
Published
prior dispositive trial court order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). This, Appellant did.
Category: Appellate Procedure
123 So. 3d 53, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 679, 2013 WL 5355040, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2066
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2013 | Docket: 60235108
Published
(Appeals by the State; Appeals Permitted) of rule 9.140 to conform to the statutory changes by replacing
Category: Appellate Procedure
122 So. 3d 426, 2013 WL 5226545, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14803
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2013 | Docket: 60234686
Published
particularity the point of law being re*427served.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); see also Leonard v. State,
Category: Appellate Procedure
117 So. 3d 447, 2013 WL 3455565, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10938
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2013 | Docket: 60232671
Published
979 So.2d 453, 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(G). We reverse, in part, and remand
Category: Appellate Procedure
114 So. 3d 1110, 2013 WL 2661734, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9426
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2013 | Docket: 60231758
Published
specified in [rule] 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e)-” One of the grounds specified in rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)
Category: Appellate Procedure
114 So. 3d 1090, 2013 WL 2501982, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2013 | Docket: 60231745
Published
State agrees. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). We affirm Mr. Murphy’s judgment
Category: Appellate Procedure
112 So. 3d 721, 2013 WL 1891336, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7350
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2013 | Docket: 60231238
Published
motion to dismiss the alprazolam charge. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). We reject without further discussion
Category: Appellate Procedure
112 So. 3d 1234, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 247, 2013 WL 1666737, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 710
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2013 | Docket: 60230994
Published
Only minor amendments are made to rule 3.851.
RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
(a) [Ño
Category: Appellate Procedure
112 So. 3d 572, 2013 WL 1441995, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5710
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2013 | Docket: 60231165
Published
an appeal “as otherwise provided by law” under rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)e. “because a double jeopardy violation
Category: Appellate Procedure
108 So. 3d 731, 2013 WL 757627, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3286
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2013 | Docket: 60229222
Published
days of rendition of the sentencing order. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3) (2011). Where a sentencing order is
Category: Appellate Procedure
104 So. 3d 1180, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20881, 2012 WL 6028838
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2012 | Docket: 60227353
Published
was harmless. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(C), (c)(3). We reverse.
A trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
96 So. 3d 1057, 2012 WL 3822128, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14740
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2012 | Docket: 60311408
Published
untimely filing of the notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(h). Because counsel
Category: Appellate Procedure
126 So. 3d 1178, 2012 WL 3711512, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14490
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2012 | Docket: 60236214
Published
decision was made and the reasons therefor.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h)(3). We remand to the trial court for
Category: Appellate Procedure
96 So. 3d 1039, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14005, 2012 WL 3586927
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2012 | Docket: 60311383
Published
dispositive order of the lower tribunal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)(2011) (“A defendant may not
Category: Appellate Procedure
95 So. 3d 986, 2012 WL 3588174, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13894
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2012 | Docket: 60311359
Published
order entered after final judgment. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). Although from this record we cannot
Category: Appellate Procedure
93 So. 3d 417, 2012 WL 2579595, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10810
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2012 | Docket: 60310580
Published
probation, which the state appeals. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(M).
“The standard of review for the
Category: Appellate Procedure
93 So. 3d 361, 2012 WL 1959291, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8816
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2012 | Docket: 60310555
Published
dismiss is not an *362appealable order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b). As the petition fails to allege that
Category: Appellate Procedure
86 So. 3d 562, 2012 WL 1368180, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6178
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2012 | Docket: 60307716
Published
Stat. (2010). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(M). The State argues that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
86 So. 3d 538, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5648, 2012 WL 1232619
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2012 | Docket: 60307705
Published
appealed the dismissal of the charge. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
Generally, when the trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
81 So. 3d 590, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3353, 2012 WL 669304
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2012 | Docket: 60305959
Published
924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2010); Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SAWAYA, PALMER
Category: Appellate Procedure
79 So. 3d 852, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1095, 2012 WL 246465
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2012 | Docket: 2414774
Published
orders are properly before us on appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
As we did in Mullis, we affirm
Category: Appellate Procedure
75 So. 3d 239, 2011 WL 5218961
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2011 | Docket: 60303673
Published
comments: one comment addressing amendments to rule 9.140; one comment addressing new rule 9.170; and two
Category: Appellate Procedure
71 So. 3d 933, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16133, 2011 WL 4817314
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2011 | Docket: 2566736
Published
rendition of the judgment and sentence. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3). The lower tribunal rendered the judgment
Category: Appellate Procedure
82 So. 3d 948, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12209, 2011 WL 3300246
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2011 | Docket: 60306303
Published
non-appealable order, we do not have jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b). Additionally, pursuant to Florida Rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
61 So. 3d 484, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7569, 2011 WL 2029622
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2011 | Docket: 60300487
Published
dispositive motion to suppress evidence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The trial court withheld adjudication
Category: Appellate Procedure
82 So. 3d 824, 2011 WL 1004571, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4141
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2011 | Docket: 60306264
Published
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
HAZOURI, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
82 So. 3d 824, 2011 WL 1004571
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2011 | Docket: 2531496
Published
for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
HAZOURI, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ.,
Category: Appellate Procedure
57 So. 3d 245, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3272, 2011 WL 830634
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2011 | Docket: 60298976
Published
concur.
. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to rule 9.140(C)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
56 So. 3d 51, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 954, 2011 WL 265842
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2011 | Docket: 2582337
Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)." Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e). See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b) (permitting
Category: Appellate Procedure
50 So. 3d 1208, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19827, 2010 WL 5345841
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2010 | Docket: 60297266
Published
that his plea was involuntary, as specified in rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c. The motion explained, in pertinent
Category: Appellate Procedure
56 So. 3d 787, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19465, 2010 WL 5173843
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2010 | Docket: 60298641
Published
concurrently. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A).
Puglisi and his co-defendant,
Category: Appellate Procedure
50 So. 3d 738, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19157, 2010 WL 5128135
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2010 | Docket: 60297343
Published
State, 783 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c. (providing that “[a] defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
54 So. 3d 508, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19541
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2010 | Docket: 60298298
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2).
MONACO, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
54 So. 3d 508, 2010 WL 5288159
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2010 | Docket: 1788207
Published
for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2).
MONACO, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER,
Category: Appellate Procedure
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 7, 2010 | Docket: 2906744
Published
of Judicial Acts to be Reviewed,” pursuant to Rule 9.140(d) of
the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
36 So. 3d 833, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7599, 2010 WL 2134102
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2010 | Docket: 60214
Published
statement made during a taped interview. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B) (permitting appeal by the State
Category: Appellate Procedure
98 So. 3d 68, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5961, 2010 WL 1728921
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2010 | Docket: 60312523
Published
conjunction with post-trial release pursuant to rule 9.140(h).” To the extent that posttrial release is
Category: Appellate Procedure
34 So. 3d 107, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4937
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2010 | Docket: 60289974
Published
review.”) and cases cited therein; see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e) (“a sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
31 So. 3d 867, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3360, 2010 WL 935477
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2010 | Docket: 60289834
Published
of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).” (citing Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e))).
“Because a motion to correct a sentencing
Category: Appellate Procedure
29 So. 3d 1176, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3550
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2010 | Docket: 60288877
Published
Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(4)(b).
MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and COHEN,
Category: Appellate Procedure
29 So. 3d 1163, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1786, 2010 WL 547174
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2010 | Docket: 60288870
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
KAHN, PADOVANO, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
20 So. 3d 380, 2009 WL 3296242
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2009 | Docket: 1177931
Published
proceedings arising from a death penalty case. See rule 9.140(f)(5); Florida Rule of Judicial Administration
Category: Appellate Procedure
24 So. 3d 562, 2009 WL 1872339
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2009 | Docket: 1648650
Published
included offense. This Court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) (2007).
Brown was charged by information
Category: Appellate Procedure
20 So. 3d 959, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14928, 2009 WL 3189354
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2009 | Docket: 1177560
Published
3.800(a). This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1).
In November 1997, Alphonso was charged
Category: Appellate Procedure
17 So. 3d 1272, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14257, 2009 WL 3049001
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2009 | Docket: 60249079
Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e); see Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562
Category: Appellate Procedure
18 So. 3d 615, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6925, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1136
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2009 | Docket: 60252139
Published
filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(8). Any delays in filing a notice of
Category: Appellate Procedure
13 So. 3d 108, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5857, 2009 WL 1423999
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2009 | Docket: 1660063
Published
must be filed within fifteen days, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(3), or is civil and can be filed within
Category: Appellate Procedure
10 So. 3d 149, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2514, 2009 WL 763484
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2009 | Docket: 1132811
Published
carefully circumscribed by law and rule. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). Under this Rule, a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
612 F. Supp. 2d 1209, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29093, 2009 WL 800135
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2009 | Docket: 2361666
Published
the validity of the plea and sentence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) and (ii).
[11] See generally
Category: Appellate Procedure
9 So. 3d 40, 2009 WL 559868
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2009 | Docket: 14959
Published
unconstitutional. This Court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) and 9.140(c)(1)(K).
We are unable
Category: Appellate Procedure
994 So. 2d 1191, 2008 WL 4862685
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2008 | Docket: 1666719
Published
probation. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A).
Brown was charged with throwing
Category: Appellate Procedure
992 So. 2d 889, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 19286, 2008 WL 4682519
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2008 | Docket: 64855824
Published
The State has appealed this order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
II. THE DIFFICULTIES CREATED BY
Category: Appellate Procedure
993 So. 2d 581, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 20623, 2008 WL 4682314
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2008 | Docket: 64856289
Published
appeal from this order.
We have jurisdiction. Rule 9.140(c)(1)(A) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
993 So. 2d 97, 2008 WL 4550199
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2008 | Docket: 64856236
Published
State, 959 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b).
BROWNING, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
994 So. 2d 1169, 2008 WL 4471651
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2008 | Docket: 1130126
Published
the Court's appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby
Category: Appellate Procedure
988 So. 2d 636, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8419, 2008 WL 2356702
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2008 | Docket: 64855487
Published
challenging the convictions and sentences. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). Mr. Nunes argues that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
982 So. 2d 1277, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8412
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2008 | Docket: 64854933
Published
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)® (“A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
970 So. 2d 942, 2008 WL 34818
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2008 | Docket: 1695503
Published
of the motion. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
Relying on the United States
Category: Appellate Procedure
970 So. 2d 371, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16697, 2007 WL 3085379
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2007 | Docket: 64853416
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(a), (b); Combs v. State, 486 So.2d 93, 96 (Fla.1983)
Category: Appellate Procedure
963 So. 2d 317, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12783, 2007 WL 2330678
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2007 | Docket: 64851905
Published
SAWAYA and MONACO, JJ., concur.
. See Fla. R.App. P.9.140(b)(1)(D).
Category: Appellate Procedure
959 So. 2d 827, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10527, 2007 WL 1946535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2007 | Docket: 64851439
Published
this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b).
DISMISSED.
BENTON, PADOVANO, and THOMAS
Category: Appellate Procedure
959 So. 2d 800, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9621, 2007 WL 1790758
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2007 | Docket: 64851433
Published
preserved by a motion to withdraw the plea. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b). Because Lewis did not preserve
Category: Appellate Procedure
955 So. 2d 1227, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7162, 2007 WL 1372629
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2007 | Docket: 64850575
Published
Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e); State v. Hamner, 816 So.2d 810, 812
Category: Appellate Procedure
952 So. 2d 546, 2007 WL 120017
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2007 | Docket: 239010
Published
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1); Owens v. State, 579 So.2d 311 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
941 So. 2d 464, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18118, 2006 WL 3052627
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2006 | Docket: 64847737
Published
242 So.2d 737, 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1). To the extent the appellant argues
Category: Appellate Procedure
939 So. 2d 220, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16935, 2006 WL 2872530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2006 | Docket: 64847178
Published
vacated, and that appellant be discharged. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Fernandez v. State, 917 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
939 So. 2d 192, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16606
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2006 | Docket: 64847165
Published
the right to appeal a suppression issue. See rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The sole issue raised by him on
Category: Appellate Procedure
933 So. 2d 656, 2006 WL 1835113
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2006 | Docket: 2566547
Published
appointment of counsel is not an appealable order under rule 9.140).
BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
932 So. 2d 596, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10798, 2006 WL 1788218
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2006 | Docket: 64845615
Published
well beyond the thirty-day limit prescribed in Rule 9.140(b)(3), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure,
Category: Appellate Procedure
932 So. 2d 582, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10775, 2006 WL 1787782
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2006 | Docket: 64845611
Published
result only.
. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
931 So. 2d 254, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10191, 2006 WL 1687595
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2006 | Docket: 64845411
Published
have been able to appeal from this order under rule 9.140(c)(1)(A), our disposition of such an appeal would
Category: Appellate Procedure
932 So. 2d 431, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7004, 2006 WL 1331505
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2006 | Docket: 64845556
Published
date of the amendment to Rule 3.800. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b) (2000); Brannon
Category: Appellate Procedure
927 So. 2d 1028, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6827, 2006 WL 1194306
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2006 | Docket: 64844486
Published
purposes is the judgment and sentence. Further, rule 9.140(i) states that the appellate court “shall review
Category: Appellate Procedure
929 So. 2d 587, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6841, 2006 WL 1375056
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2006 | Docket: 64844692
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Rule 9.140(b), Fla. R.App. P.
GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
927 So. 2d 1, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1996, 2006 WL 357889
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2006 | Docket: 64844183
Published
State, 915 So.2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
. See § 985.03(15), Fla. Stat
Category: Appellate Procedure
920 So. 2d 708, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2564, 2006 WL 436045
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2006 | Docket: 64842338
Published
“preserved by a motion to withdraw plea.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)b. By abandoning the motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
919 So. 2d 431, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 33, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 10, 2006 WL 129653
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2006 | Docket: 64842009
Published
references a record being prepared in accord with rule 9.140(e), Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases — Record
Category: Appellate Procedure
919 So. 2d 575, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 127, 2006 WL 47501
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2006 | Docket: 64842037
Published
of appellate counsel is not appealable under rule 9.140, see Thurston v. State, 812 So.2d 516 (Fla. 4th
Category: Appellate Procedure
918 So. 2d 973, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19842, 2005 WL 3750637
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2005 | Docket: 64841834
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3); McIntosh v. State, 906 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 5th DCA
Category: Appellate Procedure
914 So. 2d 513, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18578, 2005 WL 3116104
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2005 | Docket: 64840912
Published
review regarding his plea and sentence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)-(ii). The trial court conducted
Category: Appellate Procedure
913 So. 2d 1243, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17665, 2005 WL 2990490
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2005 | Docket: 64840832
Published
to appeal was made as to this issue. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). While appellant’s lawyer said
Category: Appellate Procedure
913 So. 2d 730, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17034, 2005 WL 2806329
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2005 | Docket: 64840772
Published
appeal. See § 924.06(3),' Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). See also Eisaman v. *731State
Category: Appellate Procedure
913 So. 2d 1208, 2005 WL 2654367
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2005 | Docket: 1698358
Published
particularity the point of law being reserved." Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (emphasis supplied). To be legally
Category: Appellate Procedure
913 So. 2d 1203, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16227
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2005 | Docket: 64840817
Published
dispositive order of the lower tribunal.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)®. In this context, an “issue is
Category: Appellate Procedure
909 So. 2d 435, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12771, 2005 WL 1991753
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2005 | Docket: 64840152
Published
. § 893.147(1), Fla. Stat. (2004).
. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
.The fact that a citizen
Category: Appellate Procedure
906 So. 2d 383, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11630, 2005 WL 1761766
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2005 | Docket: 64839561
Published
dispositive motion to suppress evidence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The police *384seized the evidence
Category: Appellate Procedure
906 So. 2d 383, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11630, 2005 WL 1761766
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2005 | Docket: 64839561
Published
dispositive motion to suppress evidence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The police *384seized the evidence
Category: Appellate Procedure
902 So. 2d 889, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8087, 2005 WL 1262103
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2005 | Docket: 64838501
Published
is not an appealable non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1). We, however, treat the notice of
Category: Appellate Procedure
904 So. 2d 505, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7566, 2005 WL 1186313
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2005 | Docket: 64839043
Published
not preserved for appellate review. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e); see also Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
901 So. 2d 109, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 231, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 614, 2005 WL 774382
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2005 | Docket: 64837994
Published
The Committee proposes a new subdivision (L) to rule 9.140(c)(1) in response to chapter 2004-60, Laws of
Category: Appellate Procedure
896 So. 2d 812, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1587, 2005 WL 357001
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2005 | Docket: 64836878
Published
will not be addressed on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e). Therefore, because Williams was convicted
Category: Appellate Procedure
894 So. 2d 202, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 84, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 154, 2005 WL 242690
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2005 | Docket: 64836172
Published
otherwise ap-pealable to the circuit court under rule 9.140(c), that the county court has certified to be
Category: Appellate Procedure
889 So. 2d 220, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19519, 2004 WL 2953316
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2004 | Docket: 64835014
Published
to appeal a prior dispositive order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)®. We affirm without comment.
Foskey
Category: Appellate Procedure
885 So. 2d 967, 2004 WL 2452472
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2004 | Docket: 1286686
Published
Hampton v. State, 680 So.2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
887 So. 2d 410, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15587, 2004 WL 2346139
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2004 | Docket: 64834271
Published
review. See § 924.051(4), Fla. Stat. (2003); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
Affirmed.
ALTENBERND, C.J, and
Category: Appellate Procedure
881 So. 2d 662, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12493, 2004 WL 1885953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2004 | Docket: 64832445
Published
motion to correct sentencing error. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A), (e); Williams v. State, 873 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
878 So. 2d 485, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11425, 2004 WL 1736798
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2004 | Docket: 64831998
Published
sentence. See § 924.07(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2001); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(K). A sentence that does not impose
Category: Appellate Procedure
876 So. 2d 701, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10033, 2004 WL 1637019
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2004 | Docket: 64831377
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114 (Fla.2000);
Category: Appellate Procedure
875 So. 2d 563, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 247, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 675, 2004 WL 1119477
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2004 | Docket: 64831082
Published
Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, we also amend rule 9.140(c), relating to the State’s right to appeal a
Category: Appellate Procedure
884 So. 2d 95, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5252, 2004 WL 813290
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2004 | Docket: 64833427
Published
800(b). See § 924.051, Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(d); Maddox v. State, 760 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
872 So. 2d 286, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4602, 2004 WL 736504
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2004 | Docket: 64830184
Published
appeal any issue upon his plea of guilty. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). Therefore, appellant’s second
Category: Appellate Procedure
867 So. 2d 1273, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3732, 2004 WL 574216
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2004 | Docket: 64828894
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
866 So. 2d 1278, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3332, 2004 WL 433231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2004 | Docket: 64828537
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
868 So. 2d 585, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2287, 2004 WL 351779
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2004 | Docket: 64828973
Published
involuntarily, which is a ground specified in rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c), because he was fearful of the
Category: Appellate Procedure
864 So. 2d 41, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18457, 2003 WL 22867616
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2003 | Docket: 64827607
Published
matters relating to post-trial release under rule 9.140(h). Therefore, the petition for writ of habeas
Category: Appellate Procedure
861 So. 2d 488, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18366, 2003 WL 22849627
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2003 | Docket: 64827012
Published
transcription of any prior proceedings. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(f)(2)(A) (requiring trial counsel to file
Category: Appellate Procedure
858 So. 2d 1118, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16178, 2003 WL 22442991
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2003 | Docket: 64826390
Published
raise those issues on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2) (A) (ii).
GUNTHER, WARNER and MAY
Category: Appellate Procedure
853 So. 2d 1117, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13616, 2003 WL 22082169
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2003 | Docket: 64824933
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
853 So. 2d 1108, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13581, 2003 WL 22080738
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2003 | Docket: 64824928
Published
delay tactics.
This court has authority under rule 9.140, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure to impose
Category: Appellate Procedure
853 So. 2d 576, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13175, 2003 WL 22047845
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2003 | Docket: 64824752
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
847 So. 2d 1120, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9465, 2003 WL 21402535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2003 | Docket: 64823461
Published
his request for bond pending appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h). In the motion, appellant asserts that
Category: Appellate Procedure
845 So. 2d 236, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4882, 2003 WL 1856414
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2003 | Docket: 64822823
Published
procedure. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B); McCray, 699 So.2d at 1367-68. Rule 9.140(j)(3)(B) is the
Category: Appellate Procedure
840 So. 2d 371, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3252, 2003 WL 1088429
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2003 | Docket: 64821329
Published
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1).
DISMISSED.
VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON
Category: Appellate Procedure
839 So. 2d 839, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2577, 2003 WL 729014
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2003 | Docket: 64821226
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
833 So. 2d 870, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14, 2003 WL 18396
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2003 | Docket: 64819769
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
834 So. 2d 901, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16, 2003 WL 18401
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2003 | Docket: 64819990
Published
and denied the motion. We have jurisdiction. Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)d, Fla.R.App.P.
Rosales pled no contest
Category: Appellate Procedure
835 So. 2d 1185, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19228, 2002 WL 31875022
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2002 | Docket: 64820158
Published
ground. See § 924.051(4), Fla. Stat. (2001); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(I); Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
831 So. 2d 1267, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19046, 2002 WL 31828791
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2002 | Docket: 64819399
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
833 So. 2d 206, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19036, 2002 WL 31828461
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2002 | Docket: 64819593
Published
December 6, 2000 order denying restitution. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(M); 9.140(c)(3). Arguments advanced
Category: Appellate Procedure
833 So. 2d 182, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17811, 2002 WL 31728416
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2002 | Docket: 64819588
Published
specifically reserves the right to same. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b); § 924.06(3) Fla. Stat. (2000). See also
Category: Appellate Procedure
831 So. 2d 787, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17834, 2002 WL 31728820
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2002 | Docket: 64819243
Published
AFFIRMED.
COBB and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(B)(authoriz-ing the State to appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
830 So. 2d 944, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17156, 2002 WL 31557508
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2002 | Docket: 64819066
Published
appeal, the motion is not dispositive. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140 (b) (2) (A) (i) (2000); Brown v. State,
Category: Appellate Procedure
830 So. 2d 248, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16898, 2002 WL 31519945
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2002 | Docket: 64818968
Published
raising this *251issue on direct appeal.3 See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). Normally, this claim would be
Category: Appellate Procedure
837 So. 2d 911, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 922, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2271, 2002 WL 31426247
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2002 | Docket: 64820840
Published
is unchanged. It has simply been deleted from rule 9.140 and added to rule 9.142 so that all procedures
Category: Appellate Procedure
828 So. 2d 1040, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14585, 2002 WL 31255525
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2002 | Docket: 64818439
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
827 So. 2d 888, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 730, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1810, 2002 WL 1981372
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2002 | Docket: 64818042
Published
new rule 9.140(d). The Committee addressed the Board’s concerns and amended proposed rule 9.140(d) before
Category: Appellate Procedure
819 So. 2d 1011, 2002 WL 1401717
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2002 | Docket: 2583082
Published
effectively overruled by the promulgation of Rule 9.140(j) (now renumbered as Rule 9.141(c)) effective
Category: Appellate Procedure
815 So. 2d 789, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6596, 2002 WL 985535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 2002 | Docket: 64814897
Published
for review on direct appeal. See generally Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2); §§ 924.051(4), .06(3), Fla. Stat
Category: Appellate Procedure
816 So. 2d 230, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7200
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2002 | Docket: 64815080
Published
State, 710 So.2d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii)).
Category: Appellate Procedure
814 So. 2d 1232, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2002 | Docket: 64814704
Published
REMANDED.
THOMPSON, C.J. and SAWAYA, J., concur.
. Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
813 So. 2d 1073, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5169, 2002 WL 662726
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2002 | Docket: 64814359
Published
with his plea agreement, we affirm. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2000)
Category: Appellate Procedure
814 So. 2d 1200, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5133, 2002 WL 649112
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2002 | Docket: 64814680
Published
dismissal. This court has jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). Because we are reviewing the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
812 So. 2d 516, 2002 WL 429287
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2002 | Docket: 2547582
Published
proceedings. This order is not appealable under rule 9.140. We therefore dismiss the appeal without prejudice
Category: Appellate Procedure
810 So. 2d 882, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 121, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 167, 2002 WL 185894
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2002 | Docket: 64813225
Published
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191.” Nowhere in rule 9.140 does it provide that the *884State must obtain
Category: Appellate Procedure
805 So. 2d 44, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17826, 2001 WL 1613802
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2001 | Docket: 64811748
Published
section 924.051(4), Florida Statutes (1999)1 and rule 9.140(b)(2)(A), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
801 So. 2d 304, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17632
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2001 | Docket: 64810667
Published
Procedure, 2001 WL 1276878 (Fla. Oct. 18, 2001) (Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)); Blanco v. State, 752 So.2d 79 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
802 So. 2d 418, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17103, 2001 WL 1543159
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2001 | Docket: 64810988
Published
granting a new trial, as was its right. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(C). Pursuant to this court’s internal
Category: Appellate Procedure
798 So. 2d 909, 2001 WL 1386088
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2001 | Docket: 1668235
Published
review an order on post-trial release. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(g)(4). See also Chandler v. State, 722 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
795 So. 2d 264, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13585, 2001 WL 1148934
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2001 | Docket: 64808815
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000);
Category: Appellate Procedure
792 So. 2d 1264, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12514, 2001 WL 1007937
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2001 | Docket: 64807905
Published
which was dispositive of the case. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140 (b) (2) (A) (i).
At about 9:30 a.m. on March
Category: Appellate Procedure
793 So. 2d 115, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11511, 2001 WL 930015
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2001 | Docket: 64807960
Published
other fundamental issue, we must affirm. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Harriel v. State, 710 So.2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
791 So. 2d 1211, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11495, 2001 WL 929895
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2001 | Docket: 64807591
Published
“before trial” so that it is appeal-able under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
790 So. 2d 1232, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11264, 2001 WL 898523
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2001 | Docket: 64807285
Published
“otherwise appealable to the circuit court under rule 9.140(c), i.e., only in criminal cases. Fla. R. App
Category: Appellate Procedure
791 So. 2d 565, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11033, 2001 WL 877286
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2001 | Docket: 64807408
Published
crime. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
. The Children’s Protection
Category: Appellate Procedure
789 So. 2d 1244, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10734, 2001 WL 862622
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2001 | Docket: 64806974
Published
sentence imposed pursuant to his new plea. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)®.
BOOTH, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
789 So. 2d 517, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9710, 2001 WL 789085
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2001 | Docket: 64806723
Published
petition for belated appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j). See Funchess v. Moore, 766 So.2d 348
Category: Appellate Procedure
789 So. 2d 1043, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7717, 2001 WL 603532
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2001 | Docket: 64806884
Published
filed a timely rule 3.800(b) motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d)(pro-viding that a sentencing error may
Category: Appellate Procedure
814 So. 2d 444, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5941, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1163
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2001 | Docket: 64814488
Published
Since the adoption of rule 9.141(c) (formerly rule 9.140(j)) over four years ago, this court has on occasion
Category: Appellate Procedure
786 So. 2d 24, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5560
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2001 | Docket: 64805660
Published
State v. Gaines, 731 So.2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Rule 9.140 entitled “Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases”
Category: Appellate Procedure
783 So. 2d 1099, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2945, 2001 WL 227387
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2001 | Docket: 64805074
Published
concur.
. § 812.019(1), Fla. Stat.
. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(l)B.
. United States v. Pace, 955 F
Category: Appellate Procedure
780 So. 2d 960, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2352, 2001 WL 201530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2001 | Docket: 64804414
Published
Stat. (1999), a third degree felony.
. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2); § 924.051(4), Fla. Slat. (2000).
Category: Appellate Procedure
777 So. 2d 1218, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2124, 2001 WL 193849
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2001 | Docket: 64803653
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
792 So. 2d 496, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2162, 2001 WL 195009
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2001 | Docket: 64807681
Published
defendant’s address is unknown. We deny the motion.
Rule 9.140(c), which authorizes an appeal by the state to
Category: Appellate Procedure
776 So. 2d 1031, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 795, 2001 WL 76307
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2001 | Docket: 64803374
Published
See Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(c)(4)(A) (formerly Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(3)(A)).
BOOTH, DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ.
Category: Appellate Procedure
775 So. 2d 419, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 73, 2001 WL 10230
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2001 | Docket: 64802972
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
774 So. 2d 939, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 74, 2001 WL 9948
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2001 | Docket: 64802793
Published
court’s mandate as the notice ~ of appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(6)(D).
PETITION GRANTED.
ERVIN, BOOTH
Category: Appellate Procedure
773 So. 2d 1292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 61, 2001 WL 9838
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2001 | Docket: 64802625
Published
170, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and Rule 9.140, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure require
Category: Appellate Procedure
774 So. 2d 819, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16901, 2000 WL 1872620
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2000 | Docket: 64802766
Published
the appellant is entitled to no relief.” Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g). Accordingly, we reverse the order under
Category: Appellate Procedure
774 So. 2d 819, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16901, 2000 WL 1872620
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2000 | Docket: 64802766
Published
the appellant is entitled to no relief.” Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g). Accordingly, we reverse the order under
Category: Appellate Procedure
773 So. 2d 658, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16832, 2000 WL 1867508
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2000 | Docket: 64802450
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
774 So. 2d 808, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16834, 2000 WL 1867523
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2000 | Docket: 64802760
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
ALLEN, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
772 So. 2d 635, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16608, 2000 WL 1853916
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2000 | Docket: 64802112
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
LAWRENCE, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
773 So. 2d 1244, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16214, 2000 WL 1824414
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2000 | Docket: 64802584
Published
Mr. Adubato is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140©.
We reverse and remand for further proceedings
Category: Appellate Procedure
772 So. 2d 604, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15913, 2000 WL 1780760
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2000 | Docket: 64802081
Published
tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
BARFIELD, C.J., ERVIN and WOLF
Category: Appellate Procedure
772 So. 2d 594, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15500, 2000 WL 1759888
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2000 | Docket: 64802074
Published
jurisdiction. § 924.07(1)®, Fla. Stat.; Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(K).
The trial court’s articulated
Category: Appellate Procedure
773 So. 2d 1166, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14591, 2000 WL 1671062
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2000 | Docket: 64802530
Published
attorney to file a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(2)(F); State v. Trowell, 739 So.2d 77
Category: Appellate Procedure
770 So. 2d 217, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13712, 2000 WL 1567851
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2000 | Docket: 64801344
Published
court to be treated as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
JOANOS, WOLF and BENTON, JJ„ concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
770 So. 2d 215, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13502, 2000 WL 1532818
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 64801341
Published
not move to correct the sentence pursuant to rule 9.140(d) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
774 So. 2d 40, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13191, 2000 WL 1505000
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2000 | Docket: 64802638
Published
judgment of acquittal after a jury verdict, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E), or may cross-appeal a question
Category: Appellate Procedure
768 So. 2d 1210, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12666, 2000 WL 1459695
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2000 | Docket: 64800891
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
WOLF, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ„
Category: Appellate Procedure
768 So. 2d 1208, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12620, 2000 WL 1434681
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2000 | Docket: 64800889
Published
counsel for the appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(5)(iii)-(v). Rule 9.140(b)(5) nowhere suggests that
Category: Appellate Procedure
768 So. 2d 1207, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12618, 2000 WL 1434614
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2000 | Docket: 64800888
Published
rule of appellate procedure requires. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(5)(A)(v).
. As this court has no record
Category: Appellate Procedure
767 So. 2d 1249, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11793, 2000 WL 1298838
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2000 | Docket: 64800628
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(A).
WEBSTER, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
767 So. 2d 607, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11698, 2000 WL 1283795
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2000 | Docket: 64800497
Published
the circuit court appellate division. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(3); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.670; Robinson v
Category: Appellate Procedure
768 So. 2d 1169, 2000 WL 1283744
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2000 | Docket: 1525581
Published
denial must be reversed and the case remanded. Rule 9.140(i), Fla. R.App. P. Remand is for the trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
765 So. 2d 306, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11213, 2000 WL 1234285
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2000 | Docket: 64799732
Published
tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
765 So. 2d 306, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11213, 2000 WL 1234285
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2000 | Docket: 64799732
Published
tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
764 So. 2d 941, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10998, 2000 WL 1224703
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 64799541
Published
tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
775 So. 2d 339, 2000 WL 1224773
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 430291
Published
not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(1); see also Amendments to the Florida
Category: Appellate Procedure
766 So. 2d 391, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10167, 2000 WL 1114682
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2000 | Docket: 64800179
Published
court to be treated as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(jX5)(D).
BOOTH, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
764 So. 2d 840, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10098, 2000 WL 1109019
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2000 | Docket: 64799481
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
764 So. 2d 839, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10192, 2000 WL 1087534
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2000 | Docket: 64799478
Published
court to be treated as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
BOOTH, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
761 So. 2d 495, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8525, 2000 WL 905007
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2000 | Docket: 64798375
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); Bertolotti v. Dugger, 514 So.2d 1095, 1096 (Fla.1987);
Category: Appellate Procedure
763 So. 2d 1264, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8447, 2000 WL 889852
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2000 | Docket: 64799272
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If Dailey qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
758 So. 2d 1276, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6873, 2000 WL 726516
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2000 | Docket: 64797618
Published
1999); see also § 985.234, Fla. Stat. (1999); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(m) and 9.145.
DISMISSED.
KLEIN
Category: Appellate Procedure
763 So. 2d 1220, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6636, 2000 WL 702239
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2000 | Docket: 64799233
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j) (3) (A).
ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
763 So. 2d 1222, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6642, 2000 WL 703334
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2000 | Docket: 64799239
Published
to be treated as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
JOANOS, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
763 So. 2d 1221, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6635, 2000 WL 701482
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2000 | Docket: 64799237
Published
for treatment as a'notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
JOANOS, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
763 So. 2d 1221, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6635, 2000 WL 701482
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2000 | Docket: 64799237
Published
for treatment as a'notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
JOANOS, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
765 So. 2d 104, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6588, 2000 WL 690472
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2000 | Docket: 64799667
Published
9.200(a)(1) applies only to civil cases.
Florida Rule 9.140(e)(1) requires that in criminal appeals,
Category: Appellate Procedure
757 So. 2d 1260, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5796, 2000 WL 628717
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 64797297
Published
sentence for violation of probation. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j).
GUNTHER, STONE, and POLEN, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
765 So. 2d 98, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5772, 2000 WL 628015
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 64799656
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
765 So. 2d 101, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5761, 2000 WL 628014
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 64799660
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
772 So. 2d 512, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 395, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2566, 2000 WL 718451
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 64802042
Published
clerk serves copies of the record pursuant to rule 9.140(e)(4).
(4) Duties of Defense Counsel and Prosecuting
Category: Appellate Procedure
757 So. 2d 588, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5504, 2000 WL 560266
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2000 | Docket: 64797174
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
JOANOS, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
757 So. 2d 1245, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5507, 2000 WL 560166
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2000 | Docket: 64797294
Published
to be *1246treated as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d)(6)(D).
PETITION GRANTED.
JOANOS, LAWRENCE
Category: Appellate Procedure
755 So. 2d 833, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5200, 2000 WL 553959
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2000 | Docket: 64796803
Published
review by a motion to withdraw the plea. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(ii); Harriel v. State, 710 So.2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
756 So. 2d 261, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5249, 2000 WL 525607
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2000 | Docket: 64796939
Published
does not conclusively refute his claim, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i), we reverse and remand for an evidentiary
Category: Appellate Procedure
756 So. 2d 1090, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5157, 2000 WL 526818
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2000 | Docket: 64797054
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
WOLF, KAHN and LAWRENCE, JJ.,
Category: Appellate Procedure
760 So. 2d 214, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4987, 2000 WL 502517
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2000 | Docket: 64797921
Published
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Maynard F. Swanson
Category: Appellate Procedure
755 So. 2d 199, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4572, 2000 WL 390389
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2000 | Docket: 64796630
Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). As we are unable to say that the record
Category: Appellate Procedure
772 So. 2d 488, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 285, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 774, 2000 WL 381496
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2000 | Docket: 64802041
Published
clerk serves copies of the record pursuant to rule 9.140(e)(4).
(4) Duties of Defense Counsel and Prosecuting
Category: Appellate Procedure
754 So. 2d 825, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3958, 2000 WL 346110
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2000 | Docket: 64796331
Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). As we are unable to say that the record
Category: Appellate Procedure
753 So. 2d 788, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3712, 2000 WL 313772
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2000 | Docket: 64796007
Published
conclusively refute the appellant’s claims. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
756 So. 2d 1034, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3551, 2000 WL 305140
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2000 | Docket: 64797032
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(A).
JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
756 So. 2d 1034, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3551, 2000 WL 305140
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2000 | Docket: 64797032
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(A).
JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
753 So. 2d 783, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3554, 2000 WL 305333
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2000 | Docket: 64795999
Published
appeal if no previous notice has been filed. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
793 So. 2d 4, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3540, 2000 WL 305750
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2000 | Docket: 64807920
Published
or evidence in limine at trial.” Additionally, rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
752 So. 2d 1280, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2921, 2000 WL 282575
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2000 | Docket: 64795760
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
ALLEN, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK,
Category: Appellate Procedure
752 So. 2d 1258, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2634, 2000 WL 266309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2000 | Docket: 64795739
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
ERVIN, BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
754 So. 2d 65, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2219, 2000 WL 256202
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2000 | Docket: 64796129
Published
not to change defendant’s sentence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
754 So. 2d 65, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2219, 2000 WL 256202
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2000 | Docket: 64796129
Published
not to change defendant’s sentence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
753 So. 2d 144, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1327, 2000 WL 158605
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2000 | Docket: 64795786
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
MINER, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
750 So. 2d 164, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1154, 2000 WL 145184
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2000 | Docket: 64794545
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(8)(B).
MINER, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
750 So. 2d 160, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1053, 2000 WL 140181
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2000 | Docket: 64794538
Published
conclusively refute defendant’s claim, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i), we remand for an evidentiary hearing
Category: Appellate Procedure
764 So. 2d 623, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 493, 2000 WL 60906
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2000 | Docket: 64799386
Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d). The judgment and sentence are affirmed
Category: Appellate Procedure
750 So. 2d 727, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 449, 2000 WL 51891
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2000 | Docket: 64794741
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
750 So. 2d 727, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 452, 2000 WL 51900
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2000 | Docket: 64794742
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
ALLEN, WOLF and BENTON, JJ„ concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
747 So. 2d 1072, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 344, 2000 WL 35865
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2000 | Docket: 64793601
Published
remand the cause for an evidentiary hearing. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(f).
Reversed and remanded.
Category: Appellate Procedure
750 So. 2d 127, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 346, 2000 WL 35864
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2000 | Docket: 64794511
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(6)(B).
ERVIN, DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
747 So. 2d 486, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 348, 2000 WL 35863
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2000 | Docket: 64793338
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
747 So. 2d 1057, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 94, 2000 WL 6233
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2000 | Docket: 64793589
Published
petition seeking a belated appeal pursuant to rule 9.140(j) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
746 So. 2d 1246, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17256, 1999 WL 1259916
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1999 | Docket: 64792992
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
746 So. 2d 1227, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17026, 1999 WL 1244427
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1999 | Docket: 64792983
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
745 So. 2d 1151, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17021, 1999 WL 1244432
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1999 | Docket: 64792732
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
745 So. 2d 1131, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16885, 1999 WL 1188813
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1999 | Docket: 64792720
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
746 So. 2d 1206, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16847, 1999 WL 1191462
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1999 | Docket: 64792970
Published
court. § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 9.140(d).
STONE, POLEN, and STEVENSON, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
745 So. 2d 540, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16482, 1999 WL 1112516
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1999 | Docket: 64792495
Published
to consider a claim for a belated appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(l) (requiring petitions seeking belated
Category: Appellate Procedure
748 So. 2d 343, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16551, 1999 WL 1115426
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1999 | Docket: 64793815
Published
preserving the issue in the lower tribunal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B). Because appellant has not preserved
Category: Appellate Procedure
744 So. 2d 592, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15217, 1999 WL 1037833
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1999 | Docket: 64792101
Published
Beginning in January 1997, the effective date of Rule 9.140® and the return of jurisdiction to district courts
Category: Appellate Procedure
744 So. 2d 1241, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15140, 1999 WL 1036567
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1999 | Docket: 64792243
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
745 So. 2d 1060, 1999 WL 1014933
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1999 | Docket: 1294865
Published
and also implemented a two year time limit but rule 9.140(j)(3)(C) provides that "[t]ime periods under
Category: Appellate Procedure
744 So. 2d 561, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14637, 1999 WL 1000052
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1999 | Docket: 64792079
Published
after the rendition date of sentence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3). We therefore dismiss the appeal from
Category: Appellate Procedure
742 So. 2d 865, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14607, 1999 WL 992987
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1999 | Docket: 64791520
Published
defendant may not appeal the judgment or sentence.” Rule 9.140 outlines specific appealable issues when a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
745 So. 2d 1049, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14317, 1999 WL 979179
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1999 | Docket: 64792676
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(A).
ANTOON, C.J., W. SHARP, and HARRIS, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
743 So. 2d 1188, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14340, 1999 WL 979172
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1999 | Docket: 64791933
Published
treated as Crocton’s notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P 9.140(j)(5)(D).
PETITION GRANTED.
ANTOON, C.J.
Category: Appellate Procedure
743 So. 2d 1188, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14340, 1999 WL 979172
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1999 | Docket: 64791933
Published
treated as Crocton’s notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P 9.140(j)(5)(D).
PETITION GRANTED.
ANTOON, C.J.
Category: Appellate Procedure
743 So. 2d 1182, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14144, 1999 WL 973584
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1999 | Docket: 64791926
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
JOANOS, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
744 So. 2d 549, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14147, 1999 WL 973556
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1999 | Docket: 64792060
Published
attachments to any of the foregoing.” See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(f). The appellate court does not have access
Category: Appellate Procedure
747 So. 2d 978, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14006
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1999 | Docket: 64793548
Published
prior disposi-tive order in the case, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(1999), “[a]n issue is disposi-tive
Category: Appellate Procedure
741 So. 2d 647, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13400, 1999 WL 821112
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1999 | Docket: 64791113
Published
tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
741 So. 2d 639, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13151, 1999 WL 781595
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1999 | Docket: 64791098
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(B). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
748 So. 2d 303, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13149, 1999 WL 781578
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1999 | Docket: 64793792
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(B). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
739 So. 2d 746, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12512, 1999 WL 777655
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1999 | Docket: 64790362
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
739 So. 2d 740, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12396, 1999 WL 743587
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1999 | Docket: 64790348
Published
tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
BARFIELD, C.J., ERVIN and WOLF
Category: Appellate Procedure
739 So. 2d 714, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12026, 1999 WL 718486
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1999 | Docket: 64790313
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
WEBSTER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK
Category: Appellate Procedure
739 So. 2d 1274, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11847, 1999 WL 682927
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1999 | Docket: 64790526
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
742 So. 2d 398, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11708, 1999 WL 674570
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1999 | Docket: 64791385
Published
conclusively refute defendant’s claim, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i), and we return the matter to the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
741 So. 2d 1159, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11626, 1999 WL 651940
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1999 | Docket: 64791216
Published
v. State, 699 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1997); see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3).
DAUKSCH, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
742 So. 2d 397, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11619, 1999 WL 651980
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1999 | Docket: 64791384
Published
1998), and deny it as untimely filed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(A); Russell v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly
Category: Appellate Procedure
743 So. 2d 569, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11640, 1999 WL 652481
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1999 | Docket: 64791740
Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). It is not clear from the face of the
Category: Appellate Procedure
739 So. 2d 169, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11150, 1999 WL 629725
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1999 | Docket: 64790165
Published
right to file a timely petition, pursuant to rule 9.140(j), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, seeking
Category: Appellate Procedure
739 So. 2d 167, 1999 WL 623457
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1999 | Docket: 64790162
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979).
Category: Appellate Procedure
737 So. 2d 653, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10636, 1999 WL 595258
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1999 | Docket: 64789499
Published
1999, in Clay County case number 98-697-CF. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
737 So. 2d 648, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10579, 1999 WL 569756
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1999 | Docket: 64789488
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
BARFIELD, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
737 So. 2d 648, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10579, 1999 WL 569756
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1999 | Docket: 64789488
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
BARFIELD, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
739 So. 2d 150, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10438, 1999 WL 560858
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 1999 | Docket: 64790152
Published
the same relief afforded to Butler. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h). On remand the trial court is directed
Category: Appellate Procedure
735 So. 2d 1291, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10066, 1999 WL 542578
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1999 | Docket: 64789035
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(ii); Velez v. State, 725 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 4th
Category: Appellate Procedure
740 So. 2d 582, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10057, 1999 WL 534295
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1999 | Docket: 64790670
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
736 So. 2d 158, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9634, 1999 WL 510630
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1999 | Docket: 64789089
Published
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A), without prejudice for Kim-bel to seek relief
Category: Appellate Procedure
735 So. 2d 615, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9528, 1999 WL 533602
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1999 | Docket: 64788920
Published
treat this order as a notice of appeal. See, Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
PETERSON, J., concurs.
GRIFFIN
Category: Appellate Procedure
734 So. 2d 606, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9098, 1999 WL 454425
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1999 | Docket: 64788627
Published
Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B).
JOANOS, PADOVANO and BROWNING,
Category: Appellate Procedure
734 So. 2d 1205, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9079, 1999 WL 454471
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1999 | Docket: 64788769
Published
See § 924.051(4), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
734 So. 2d 604, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9104, 1999 WL 454449
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1999 | Docket: 64788624
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
734 So. 2d 604, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9106, 1999 WL 454483
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1999 | Docket: 64788623
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
734 So. 2d 606, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9108, 1999 WL 454494
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1999 | Docket: 64788628
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
PETITION GRANTED.
BARFIELD, C.J
Category: Appellate Procedure
740 So. 2d 567, 1999 WL 436576
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1999 | Docket: 2541292
Published
ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim via a rule 9.140(j) petition, he filed *568 motions alternately
Category: Appellate Procedure
737 So. 2d 587, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8544, 1999 WL 420448
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1999 | Docket: 64789446
Published
his argument.
To obtain a belated appeal under Rule 9.140(j), the petition must allege that petitioner
Category: Appellate Procedure
750 So. 2d 654, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8495
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1999 | Docket: 64794714
Published
rule 9.145, appeals in delinquency cases follow rule 9.140, except as modified by rule 9.145. Rule 9.145(b)
Category: Appellate Procedure
736 So. 2d 1241, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8318, 1999 WL 452168
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1999 | Docket: 64789380
Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.” Fla. R.'App. P. 9.140(i). The order should be reversed and the
Category: Appellate Procedure
733 So. 2d 605, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8279, 1999 WL 410339
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1999 | Docket: 64788426
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
BOOTH, MINER and VAN NORTWICK
Category: Appellate Procedure
740 So. 2d 55, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7889, 1999 WL 391864
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1999 | Docket: 64790570
Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). The record now before us does not conclusively
Category: Appellate Procedure
736 So. 2d 728, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7856, 1999 WL 391497
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1999 | Docket: 64789220
Published
sections 924.051(3) and (4), Florida Statutes. Under rule 9.140(d), a sentencing error can only be heard on direct
Category: Appellate Procedure
732 So. 2d 1223, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7575, 1999 WL 371320
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1999 | Docket: 64788347
Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). As the record now before us does not
Category: Appellate Procedure
732 So. 2d 1223, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7585, 1999 WL 371323
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1999 | Docket: 64788348
Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(f). Here, the defendant has filed a sworn
Category: Appellate Procedure
732 So. 2d 513, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7290, 1999 WL 346126
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1999 | Docket: 64788242
Published
this court to seek a belated appeal. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(3).
POLEN, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
740 So. 2d 1180, 1999 WL 346131
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1999 | Docket: 2568892
Published
without merit. We accordingly affirm. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i) (requiring reversal unless record conclusively
Category: Appellate Procedure
732 So. 2d 501, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6896, 1999 WL 360189
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1999 | Docket: 64788233
Published
treat this order as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
PETITION GRANTED.
W. SHARP, GOSHORN
Category: Appellate Procedure
737 So. 2d 559, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6496, 1999 WL 313267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1999 | Docket: 64789432
Published
preserved; or
(v) as otherwise provided by law.
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B). See also Robinson v. State, 373
Category: Appellate Procedure
732 So. 2d 1206, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6409, 1999 WL 312253
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1999 | Docket: 64788317
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(A).
DAVIS, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
732 So. 2d 459, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6338, 1999 WL 303419
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1999 | Docket: 64788202
Published
County Circuit Court case number 96-4625. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
730 So. 2d 864, 1999 WL 286296
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1999 | Docket: 2551100
Published
court's mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
732 So. 2d 439, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5671, 1999 WL 270396
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1999 | Docket: 64788182
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b); Williams v. State, 691 So.2d 484 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
Category: Appellate Procedure
731 So. 2d 823, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5656, 1999 WL 270459
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1999 | Docket: 64788015
Published
conduct other appropriate proceedings. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(f).
Reversed and remanded.
Category: Appellate Procedure
735 So. 2d 518, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5496, 1999 WL 253429
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1999 | Docket: 64788860
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
WOLF, KAHN and LAWRENCE, JJ.,
Category: Appellate Procedure
730 So. 2d 849, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5418, 1999 WL 247185
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1999 | Docket: 64787686
Published
cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140®.
The defendant in this case was convicted
Category: Appellate Procedure
729 So. 2d 520, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4666, 1999 WL 202382
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1999 | Docket: 64787183
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
ERVIN, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
746 So. 2d 478, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4547, 1999 WL 199501
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1999 | Docket: 64792827
Published
Procedure, nor does it fall within the parameters of rule 9.140(b)(1)(c) which permits an appeal from an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
730 So. 2d 806, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4319, 1999 WL 187294
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1999 | Docket: 64787655
Published
may not, therefore, be raised on appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d). State v. Henriquez, 717 So.2d 1087 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
731 So. 2d 57, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3410, 1999 WL 156065
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1999 | Docket: 64787801
Published
illegal; hence, the State could not appeal. See Fla. R’App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(j)-(k)(limiting the State’s right
Category: Appellate Procedure
728 So. 2d 821, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3318, 1999 WL 147711
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1999 | Docket: 64786930
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
MINER, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ.
Category: Appellate Procedure
730 So. 2d 761, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3322, 1999 WL 147375
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1999 | Docket: 64787640
Published
preserve the asserted error for appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Maddox
Category: Appellate Procedure
728 So. 2d 332, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2557, 1999 WL 123722
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1999 | Docket: 64786804
Published
and failure to call an alibi witness. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d); Wilcox v.
Category: Appellate Procedure
731 So. 2d 722, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2561, 1999 WL 123733
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1999 | Docket: 64787971
Published
the specific intent crime of burglary. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). I would remand for further proceedings
Category: Appellate Procedure
726 So. 2d 864, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2407, 1999 WL 105268
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1999 | Docket: 64786340
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
KAHN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
726 So. 2d 862, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2207, 1999 WL 95047
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1999 | Docket: 64786335
Published
prejudice to file a petition which conforms with Rule 9.140(j).
DISMISSED.
GRIFFIN, C.J., PETERSON and THOMPSON
Category: Appellate Procedure
725 So. 2d 1280, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1467, 1999 WL 71604
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1999 | Docket: 64786075
Published
from considering it on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B) and 9.140(d); § 924.051(4), Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
735 So. 2d 506, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1379, 1999 WL 77746
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1999 | Docket: 64788855
Published
718 So.2d 260, 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), “that Rule 9.140(d) cannot be applied to limit juvenile appeals
Category: Appellate Procedure
727 So. 2d 279, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1159, 1999 WL 68924
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1999 | Docket: 64786478
Published
address this issue on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii); Robinson v. State, 373 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
724 So. 2d 1263, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 820, 1999 WL 35279
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1999 | Docket: 64785860
Published
this order was entered in a civil proceeding, rule 9.140(j) is inapplicable, and we therefore deny the
Category: Appellate Procedure
727 So. 2d 981, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 478, 1999 WL 22263
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1999 | Docket: 64786612
Published
within 30 days of rendition of the sentence. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
722 So. 2d 983, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 320, 1999 WL 18416
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1999 | Docket: 64785027
Published
pending appeal, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.691(c); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(g)(4); Wise v. State, 528 So.2d 507, 508
Category: Appellate Procedure
741 So. 2d 517, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 293, 1999 WL 13343
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1999 | Docket: 64791050
Published
virtually identical, as is Florida Appellate Rule 9.140(b)(1) in its application here. It thus appears
Category: Appellate Procedure
723 So. 2d 365, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16292, 1998 WL 896403
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1998 | Docket: 64785109
Published
request because it lacked jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j). However, we treated the request as a
Category: Appellate Procedure
722 So. 2d 935, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15971, 1998 WL 883211
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1998 | Docket: 64785002
Published
days. We treated this appeal as a petition under rule 9.140(j), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, and
Category: Appellate Procedure
721 So. 2d 1216, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15853, 1998 WL 874972
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1998 | Docket: 64784812
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
722 So. 2d 926, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15607, 1998 WL 852658
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1998 | Docket: 64784996
Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d).
Affirmed.
PATTERSON and SALCINES, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
722 So. 2d 250, 1998 WL 852647
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1998 | Docket: 2564512
Published
addresses only a rule 3.800(a) or rule 3.850 motion, rule 9.140(i) provides that the sole issue presented on
Category: Appellate Procedure
722 So. 2d 253, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15647, 1998 WL 853077
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1998 | Docket: 64784909
Published
Appellate jurisdiction is proper pursuant to rule 9.140(c) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
720 So. 2d 622, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14790, 1998 WL 821838
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1998 | Docket: 64784239
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
BARFIELD, C.J., and ALLEN and WEBSTER
Category: Appellate Procedure
720 So. 2d 314, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14554, 1998 WL 796498
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1998 | Docket: 64784128
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
720 So. 2d 296, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14177, 1998 WL 777255
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1998 | Docket: 64784106
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
BARFIELD, C.J., and JOANOS and
Category: Appellate Procedure
720 So. 2d 297, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14178, 1998 WL 777256
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1998 | Docket: 64784107
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
BARFIELD, C.J., and JOANOS and
Category: Appellate Procedure
719 So. 2d 1016, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13889, 1998 WL 765417
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1998 | Docket: 64783858
Published
that appellant is entitled to no relief. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). The disposition sheet attached to the
Category: Appellate Procedure
719 So. 2d 383, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13509, 1998 WL 736844
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1998 | Docket: 64783610
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
718 So. 2d 1289, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13435, 1998 WL 729679
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1998 | Docket: 64783477
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
JOANOS, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ.
Category: Appellate Procedure
720 So. 2d 584, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12846, 1998 WL 712807
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1998 | Docket: 64784222
Published
appeal. See § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d)(2).
*585The sole point on appeal concerns
Category: Appellate Procedure
719 So. 2d 38, 1998 WL 646595
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1998 | Docket: 1704932
Published
appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3) (defendant wishing to appeal "a final
Category: Appellate Procedure
742 So. 2d 805, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11990, 1998 WL 646594
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1998 | Docket: 64791493
Published
if no previous notice has been filed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
718 So. 2d 909, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11989, 1998 WL 646591
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1998 | Docket: 64783402
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
JOANOS, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
717 So. 2d 183, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11774, 1998 WL 633967
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1998 | Docket: 64782688
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
JOANOS, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
717 So. 2d 140, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11512, 1998 WL 597855
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1998 | Docket: 64782650
Published
appellant’s right to file a timely petition pursuant to rule 9.140(j), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, seeking
Category: Appellate Procedure
717 So. 2d 119, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 1998 WL 567970
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1998 | Docket: 64782625
Published
the issue is not preserved for appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d); Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th
Category: Appellate Procedure
717 So. 2d 128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11502
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1998 | Docket: 64782641
Published
subsection (a) that appeal proceedings “shall be as in rule 9.140 except as modified by this rule.” Rule 9.145
Category: Appellate Procedure
718 So. 2d 268, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11313, 1998 WL 558883
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 64783175
Published
See § 921.051 (effective July 1, 1996); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b). Hubbard v. State, 691 So.2d 645 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
718 So. 2d 260, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11301
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 64783171
Published
prohibits appellant from raising any of these issues. Rule 9.140(d) provides:
A sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
715 So. 2d 1177, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11001, 1998 WL 542812
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1998 | Docket: 64782211
Published
State, 707 So.2d 943 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(l)
COBB
Category: Appellate Procedure
715 So. 2d 1170, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11023, 1998 WL 543360
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1998 | Docket: 64782198
Published
State, 710 So.2d 766 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j).
AFFIRMED.
W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
779 So. 2d 278, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9508, 1998 WL 422185
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1998 | Docket: 64804073
Published
appeal his sentence. The time limitations of rule 9.140(j)(3) do not become effective until January 1
Category: Appellate Procedure
714 So. 2d 617, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9082
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1998 | Docket: 64781871
Published
orders on review are not appealable pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure,
Category: Appellate Procedure
712 So. 2d 845, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8568, 1998 WL 390634
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1998 | Docket: 64781445
Published
Affirmed. See § 924.051(4), Fla. Stat. (1997), Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902
Category: Appellate Procedure
718 So. 2d 203, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8514, 1998 WL 390857
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1998 | Docket: 64783154
Published
until the record is filed, in conformance with Rule 9.140(b)(5)(A)(v), which states that:
In publicly-funded
Category: Appellate Procedure
713 So. 2d 1064, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8145, 1998 WL 377777
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1998 | Docket: 64781758
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If appellant qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
711 So. 2d 646, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7486, 1998 WL 323505
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1998 | Docket: 64781170
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
718 So. 2d 822, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7176, 1998 WL 314636
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 64783380
Published
ineffective assistance of trial counsel, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i), the order under review is reversed and
Category: Appellate Procedure
718 So. 2d 822, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7176, 1998 WL 314636
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 64783380
Published
ineffective assistance of trial counsel, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i), the order under review is reversed and
Category: Appellate Procedure
710 So. 2d 1386, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7182, 1998 WL 325158
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 64781021
Published
sentence requiring remand for correction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); Harriel v. State, 710 So.2d 102 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
710 So. 2d 1380, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7156, 1998 WL 316637
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1998 | Docket: 64781009
Published
previous *1381notice has been filed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
MICKLE, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
714 So. 2d 526, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6660, 1998 WL 307493
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1998 | Docket: 64781847
Published
in part and denied in part Fedor’s motion. See Rule 9.140(e)(1)(B), Fla. R.App. P.; §§ 924.07, 071, Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
713 So. 2d 1029, 1998 WL 288396
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1998 | Docket: 782494
Published
this order as the notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). The record is unclear as to whether
Category: Appellate Procedure
712 So. 2d 433, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6167, 1998 WL 281332
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1998 | Docket: 64781318
Published
800(b), this appeal must be dismissed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d).
BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and NORTHCUTT
Category: Appellate Procedure
711 So. 2d 236, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6016, 1998 WL 271327
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1998 | Docket: 64781089
Published
court to serve as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Category: Appellate Procedure
710 So. 2d 766, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6018, 1998 WL 271330
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1998 | Docket: 64780913
Published
attached appear to meet all of the requirements of rule 9.140(j)(2) to obtain such relief. And we note, the
Category: Appellate Procedure
710 So. 2d 757, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5933, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1298
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1998 | Docket: 64780891
Published
writ of habe-as corpus filed in this court. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j) (1997).
However, for the sake of judicial
Category: Appellate Procedure
710 So. 2d 743, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5579, 1998 WL 251467
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1998 | Docket: 64780877
Published
Procedure, 685 So.2d 773 (Fla.1996). See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(l), (petitions seeking belated appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
709 So. 2d 655, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5580, 1998 WL 251488
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1998 | Docket: 64780277
Published
appeal as a petition for belated appeal under rule 9.140(j) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
709 So. 2d 203, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5292, 1998 WL 236221
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1998 | Docket: 64780169
Published
Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b); § 924.051(3)
Category: Appellate Procedure
707 So. 2d 970, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3753, 1998 WL 166428
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1998 | Docket: 64779752
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d).
COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
709 So. 2d 592, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3215, 1998 WL 148721
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1998 | Docket: 64780227
Published
conclusively refutes and therefore we reverse. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); see also Brye v. State, 677 So.2d 1357
Category: Appellate Procedure
716 So. 2d 269, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 180, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 603
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1998 | Docket: 64782357
Published
delinquency cases shall be as in rule 9.140 except as modified by this rule.”
Rule 9.140 governs appeal proceedings
Category: Appellate Procedure
708 So. 2d 1017, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3137, 1998 WL 145147
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1998 | Docket: 64780037
Published
remanded for an evidentiary hearing. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i).
Category: Appellate Procedure
740 So. 2d 1, 1999 WL 169659
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1998 | Docket: 64790543
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(jX5)(D).
ALLEN, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK
Category: Appellate Procedure
707 So. 2d 943, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2643, 1998 WL 191143
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 64779725
Published
State, 373 So.2d 898, 902-03 (Fla.1979); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii). We thus affirm the appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
708 So. 2d 974, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 766
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 541974
Published
in McCray. *976 Petition denied.[2]
NOTES
[1] Rule 9.140(j) imposes a time limit of two years for seeking
Category: Appellate Procedure
708 So. 2d 974, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 766
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 541974
Published
in McCray. *976 Petition denied.[2]
NOTES
[1] Rule 9.140(j) imposes a time limit of two years for seeking
Category: Appellate Procedure
705 So. 2d 147, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1381, 1998 WL 64027
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1998 | Docket: 64778668
Published
Jensen’s Point I on appeal does not fit within rule 9.140(b)(2)(B). Thus we strike Jensen’s Point I on
Category: Appellate Procedure
705 So. 2d 711, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1194, 1998 WL 55982
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1998 | Docket: 64778756
Published
AFFIRMED. § 924.051, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d).
GRIFFIN, C.J., and COBB and THOMPSON
Category: Appellate Procedure
705 So. 2d 711, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1195, 1998 WL 55683
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1998 | Docket: 64778757
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d).
PETERSON, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
704 So. 2d 1156, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 933, 1998 WL 44681
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1998 | Docket: 64778465
Published
for a belated appeal in this court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j).
AFFIRMED without prejudice
W. SHARP
Category: Appellate Procedure
705 So. 2d 1024, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 932, 1998 WL 44551
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1998 | Docket: 64778832
Published
constituted ineffective assistance of counsel); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j).
PETITION DENIED.
PETERSON, J., concurs
Category: Appellate Procedure
704 So. 2d 226, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 446, 1998 WL 20681
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1998 | Docket: 64778289
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
702 So. 2d 617, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14065, 1997 WL 770549
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1997 | Docket: 64777302
Published
and was not supported by a factual basis. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii); Robinson v. State, 373 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
701 So. 2d 1251, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13610, 1997 WL 749255
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1997 | Docket: 64777025
Published
695 So.2d 949 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding that rule 9.140(j) provides that petitions seeking belated appeals
Category: Appellate Procedure
701 So. 2d 1233, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13361, 1997 WL 741168
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1997 | Docket: 64777018
Published
received the order.
There is no such requirement in rule 9.140(j), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the
Category: Appellate Procedure
701 So. 2d 914, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13383, 1997 WL 740726
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1997 | Docket: 64776861
Published
be raised for the first time on appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800; § 924.051(3)
Category: Appellate Procedure
701 So. 2d 365, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12218, 1997 WL 679098
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1997 | Docket: 64776730
Published
filing a motion to withdraw his plea. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii).
Notwithstanding, we strike
Category: Appellate Procedure
700 So. 2d 420, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10879, 1997 WL 594105
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1997 | Docket: 64776176
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d).
GOSHORN, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
697 So. 2d 1289, 1997 WL 464779
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1997 | Docket: 1777528
Published
habeas corpus do not apply in this case. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(j)(3). Further, the fact that we could not
Category: Appellate Procedure
697 So. 2d 1289, 1997 WL 464779
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1997 | Docket: 1777528
Published
habeas corpus do not apply in this case. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(j)(3). Further, the fact that we could not
Category: Appellate Procedure
697 So. 2d 1014, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9188, 1997 WL 464156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1997 | Docket: 64775339
Published
failure to timely file an appeal as requested. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j) (1997).
STONE, C.J., and WARNER and POLEN
Category: Appellate Procedure
696 So. 2d 1366, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8505, 1997 WL 414300
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1997 | Docket: 64775100
Published
days from the date of this opinion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j) and accompanying Committee Note (1996
Category: Appellate Procedure
696 So. 2d 514, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7714, 1997 WL 370365
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1997 | Docket: 64774750
Published
may file a petition for a belated appeal under rule 9.140(j) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
695 So. 2d 949, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7538, 1997 WL 363000
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1997 | Docket: 64774395
Published
to appeal the resulting resentencing.
Because rule 9.140(j), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure (1997)
Category: Appellate Procedure
695 So. 2d 923, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7195, 1997 WL 346071
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1997 | Docket: 64774383
Published
court denied the motion and this appeal ensued.
Rule 9.140 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure provides
Category: Appellate Procedure
703 So. 2d 1065, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6992, 1997 WL 340230
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1997 | Docket: 64777893
Published
such appeals, was changed. The amended rule, now Rule 9.140(i), provides in pertinent part: “no briefs .
Category: Appellate Procedure
703 So. 2d 1065, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6992, 1997 WL 340230
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1997 | Docket: 64777893
Published
such appeals, was changed. The amended rule, now Rule 9.140(i), provides in pertinent part: “no briefs .
Category: Appellate Procedure
693 So. 2d 141, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5405, 1997 WL 255309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1997 | Docket: 64773360
Published
express reservation of his right to appeal. Fla. R.Crim. P. 9.140(b); Jones v. State, 636 So.2d 835 (Fla.
Category: Appellate Procedure
691 So. 2d 1151, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3973, 1997 WL 180220
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1997 | Docket: 64772528
Published
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(A) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the State appeals
Category: Appellate Procedure
690 So. 2d 674, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3073, 1997 WL 133257
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1997 | Docket: 64772173
Published
v. Fagan, 568 So.2d 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Rule 9.140(g)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure,
Category: Appellate Procedure
689 So. 2d 1217, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2357, 1997 WL 108981
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1997 | Docket: 64771817
Published
cannot be reviewed under the summary procedure in rule 9.140(f) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
688 So. 2d 5, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1545, 1997 WL 78364
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1997 | Docket: 64771186
Published
claims from the trial court to this court. See rule 9.140(j)(l), Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
687 So. 2d 915, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 363, 1997 WL 35004
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1997 | Docket: 64771073
Published
cause remanded for an evi-dentiary hearing.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(g).
Defendant-appellant Phillips contends
Category: Appellate Procedure
683 So. 2d 1097, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12236, 1996 WL 670190
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 64769443
Published
924.06(l)(d), Florida Statutes (1995). See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898
Category: Appellate Procedure
682 So. 2d 671, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11635, 1996 WL 637651
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1996 | Docket: 64768756
Published
trial court. § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1); Nettles v. State, 673 So.2d 547 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
678 So. 2d 1285, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 344, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1511, 1996 WL 490378
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1996 | Docket: 64767066
Published
No conflict exists between rule 2.050(h) and rule 9.140(b)(4)(A). • Additionally, chief judges generally
Category: Appellate Procedure
677 So. 2d 412, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8068, 1996 WL 431175
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1996 | Docket: 64766328
Published
State, 419 So.2d 725 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b). Further, her allegations are unsworn
Category: Appellate Procedure
677 So. 2d 1316, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7972, 1996 WL 425687
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1996 | Docket: 64766549
Published
that appellant is entitled to no relief. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(g).3
. Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
677 So. 2d 932, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7612, 1996 WL 397275
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1996 | Docket: 64766476
Published
order entered after final judgment pursuant to rule 9.140(b)(1)(C), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
670 So. 2d 1173, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3315, 1996 WL 148848
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1996 | Docket: 64763526
Published
the appellant is entitled to no relief_” Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(g); see also Sentencing Guidelines Scoresheet
Category: Appellate Procedure
662 So. 2d 998, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11651, 1995 WL 653286
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1995 | Docket: 64760128
Published
out in our original opinion in Schenck. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g); Davis v. State, 648 So.2d 1249 (Fla.
Category: Appellate Procedure
659 So. 2d 722, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9328, 1995 WL 518816
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1995 | Docket: 64758477
Published
evidentiary hearing on these two specific issues. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g). In all other respects, the order denying
Category: Appellate Procedure
657 So. 2d 54, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7298, 1995 WL 386995
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1995 | Docket: 64757513
Published
motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing. Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(g).
Lipford was charged with several offenses
Category: Appellate Procedure
657 So. 2d 54, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7298, 1995 WL 386995
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1995 | Docket: 64757513
Published
motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing. Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(g).
Lipford was charged with several offenses
Category: Appellate Procedure
657 So. 2d 897, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 283, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 982, 1995 WL 355581
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1995 | Docket: 64757627
Published
However, consideration of the proposed change to Rule 9.140 will be deferred until the Court considers other
Category: Appellate Procedure
650 So. 2d 1136, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2302, 1995 WL 94403
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1995 | Docket: 64754470
Published
lawyer had not prevented his testimony. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(g). On remand, appellant is also entitled
Category: Appellate Procedure
651 So. 2d 1221, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2051, 1995 WL 84660
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1995 | Docket: 64755027
Published
first-degree murder against Donald Lee. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). On cross-appeal, Lee contends that
Category: Appellate Procedure
650 So. 2d 1056, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1199, 1995 WL 51152
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1995 | Docket: 64754442
Published
order relating to posttrial release. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(e)(4). He has not supplied this court with
Category: Appellate Procedure
645 So. 2d 1107, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11526, 1994 WL 668260
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1994 | Docket: 64752370
Published
1991). See § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1989); Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1).
WEBSTER, WOLF and MICKLE, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
644 So. 2d 149, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10392, 1994 WL 577393
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1994 | Docket: 64751603
Published
appropriate attachments supporting denial. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g); Hall v. State, 603 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st
Category: Appellate Procedure
643 So. 2d 1197, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10142, 1994 WL 576109
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64751515
Published
which refute the defendant’s claims. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(g).
REVERSED and REMANDED with directions
Category: Appellate Procedure
643 So. 2d 1198, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10115, 1994 WL 576111
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64751516
Published
DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1)(C).
. We decible to address on appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
642 So. 2d 1126, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9002, 1994 WL 510845
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1994 | Docket: 64751025
Published
civil case. See § 27.54(3), Fla.Stat. (1993); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d); Shuman v. State, 358 So.2d 1333 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
641 So. 2d 914, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7228, 1994 WL 380051
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1994 | Docket: 64750511
Published
demonstrating that he is not entitled to relief. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g). Therefore, we reverse and remand to the
Category: Appellate Procedure
639 So. 2d 205, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7220, 1994 WL 380050
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1994 | Docket: 64749590
Published
that Brown is not entitled to relief. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g). Therefore, we reverse and remand to the
Category: Appellate Procedure
640 So. 2d 97, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6896, 1994 WL 330174
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1994 | Docket: 64749890
Published
from this order that the State appeals. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(e)(1)(A). This case presents us with the
Category: Appellate Procedure
639 So. 2d 76, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4996, 1994 WL 201550
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1994 | Docket: 64749511
Published
step must be an evidentiary hearing. See, Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) (“unless the record shows conclusively
Category: Appellate Procedure
635 So. 2d 133, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3371, 1994 WL 122355
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1994 | Docket: 64747685
Published
We affirm without briefs or oral argument. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
AFFIRMED.
ZEHMER, C.J., and KAHN, J.
Category: Appellate Procedure
634 So. 2d 763, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3064, 1994 WL 106227
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1994 | Docket: 64747414
Published
section 924.-07(1), Florida Statutes, and Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(e)(l)(I), on the ground that the sentence
Category: Appellate Procedure
634 So. 2d 755, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2875, 1994 WL 101082
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1994 | Docket: 64747411
Published
after the judgment and original sentence. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2). We agree, however, that the effort
Category: Appellate Procedure
633 So. 2d 94, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1690, 1994 WL 60837
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1994 | Docket: 64746799
Published
PER CURIAM.
We consider this appeal pursuant to rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The
Category: Appellate Procedure
630 So. 2d 1141, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11158, 1993 WL 452211
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1993 | Docket: 64746002
Published
is to be done if the state appeals.2 Appellate rule 9.140(e)(2) is the only rule precisely governing bail
Category: Appellate Procedure
630 So. 2d 1133, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8886, 1993 WL 331428
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1993 | Docket: 64745988
Published
the police, Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla.Const.; Fla. R.Crim.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B), this court has no jurisdiction
Category: Appellate Procedure
622 So. 2d 131, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7978, 1993 WL 288715
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 1993 | Docket: 64698026
Published
plea claim. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(a), (d); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g); State v. Weeks, 166 So.2d 892, 897 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
621 So. 2d 529, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7310, 1993 WL 247116
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1993 | Docket: 64697658
Published
courts. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(1) and (2). Rule 9.140(c) enumerates the appeals permitted the state
Category: Appellate Procedure
621 So. 2d 752, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7071
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1993 | Docket: 64697795
Published
evidence obtained by search and seizure.
Pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), we conclude that the state may appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
618 So. 2d 762, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5226, 1993 WL 152517
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1993 | Docket: 64696429
Published
an order suppressing breath test results under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
618 So. 2d 305, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4764, 1993 WL 136602
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1993 | Docket: 64696245
Published
200 and not an abbreviated record pursuant to Rule 9.140(g), as was done in this case. Much of the confusion
Category: Appellate Procedure
613 So. 2d 577, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1518, 1993 WL 30644
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1993 | Docket: 64693992
Published
appeal must be commenced, in accordance with Rule 9.140(c)(2), by filing of the notice of appeal within
Category: Appellate Procedure
610 So. 2d 64, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12509, 1992 WL 361238
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1992 | Docket: 64692729
Published
otherwise appealable to the circuit court pursuant to rule 9.140(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See
Category: Appellate Procedure
605 So. 2d 1304, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10446, 1992 WL 267223
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1992 | Docket: 64670498
Published
appellate paperwork. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.111(e); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(3).2 We see no reason why this concept
Category: Appellate Procedure
604 So. 2d 36, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9265, 1992 WL 206373
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1992 | Docket: 64669434
Published
under two of his claims, we reverse. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
Randall claims that he was prejudiced
Category: Appellate Procedure
602 So. 2d 628, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7822, 1992 WL 153983
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1992 | Docket: 64668990
Published
850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and rule 9.140 does not authorize an appeal from the order denying
Category: Appellate Procedure
600 So. 2d 46, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7241
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1992 | Docket: 64667908
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Category: Appellate Procedure
600 So. 2d 543, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6549, 1992 WL 131894
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1992 | Docket: 64668019
Published
not required. Appellant apparently relies on Rule 9.140(g), which provides that in an appeal from an
Category: Appellate Procedure
599 So. 2d 751, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5828, 1992 WL 115791
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1992 | Docket: 64667744
Published
post-trial release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.140(e)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Category: Appellate Procedure
598 So. 2d 135, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4282
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1992 | Docket: 64667094
Published
that the defendant is not entitled to relief (Rule 9.140(g)); on the contrary it affirmatively indicates
Category: Appellate Procedure
591 So. 2d 1099, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 86, 1992 WL 885
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1992 | Docket: 64664438
Published
Procedure 9.140. This is not a criminal case and Rule 9.140 is not applicable, but in our opinion the rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
590 So. 2d 968, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11948, 1991 WL 253373
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1991 | Docket: 64663928
Published
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Mattox appeals, pursuant to rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the
Category: Appellate Procedure
590 So. 2d 480, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11950, 1991 WL 253376
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1991 | Docket: 64663721
Published
raised this issue by way of a cross-appeal, see Rule 9.140(c)(l)(I), Fla. R.App.P. (the state may appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
588 So. 2d 311, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10939, 1991 WL 225479
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1991 | Docket: 64662714
Published
denied the motion and Acevedo has appealed.
Under Rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, “Unless
Category: Appellate Procedure
589 So. 2d 326, 1991 WL 213252
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1991 | Docket: 1730707
Published
declares the ordinance unconstitutional. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c).
The state also appeals the trial court's
Category: Appellate Procedure
586 So. 2d 1173, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9081
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1991 | Docket: 64662115
Published
follows:
Except to the extent of conflict with Rule 9.140 governing appeals in criminal cases, this rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
584 So. 2d 221, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8154, 1991 WL 158588
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1991 | Docket: 64660879
Published
not appeal the county court’s order pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
591 So. 2d 945, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8046, 1991 WL 152499
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1991 | Docket: 64664399
Published
indigent for purposes of appeal and, pursuant to Rule 9.140(d), filed a Statement of Judicial Acts to be
Category: Appellate Procedure
583 So. 2d 701, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5890, 1991 WL 109691
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1991 | Docket: 64660634
Published
resulted in an illegal sentence appealable under Rule 9.140(c)(l)(I). Restitution is a mandatory part of
Category: Appellate Procedure
578 So. 2d 481, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3714, 1991 WL 61763
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1991 | Docket: 64658278
Published
order specifically suppressing evidence. See Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Rules of Appellate Procedure. However
Category: Appellate Procedure
575 So. 2d 1320, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1264, 1991 WL 18234
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1991 | Docket: 64657048
Published
JJ., concur.
. We have jurisdiction under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(C).
Category: Appellate Procedure
573 So. 2d 92, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8, 1991 WL 123
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1991 | Docket: 64655865
Published
motion to review bond pending appeal pursuant to rule 9.140(e)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Category: Appellate Procedure
571 So. 2d 562, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9588, 1990 WL 208860
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1990 | Docket: 64655089
Published
jurisdiction to review this case pursuant to Rule 9.140(c)(1)(C) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
569 So. 2d 1386, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8963, 1990 WL 181841
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1990 | Docket: 64654597
Published
direct appeal. § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1989); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
570 So. 2d 423, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8899, 1990 WL 181567
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1990 | Docket: 64654674
Published
during appeal. See Fla. Stat. § 903.132(2) and Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(e). Accordingly, we hereby deny the petition
Category: Appellate Procedure
569 So. 2d 1345, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8607, 1990 WL 175081
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1990 | Docket: 64654572
Published
C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
. Rule 9.140 APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
[[Image
Category: Appellate Procedure
567 So. 2d 533, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7310, 1990 WL 140919
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1990 | Docket: 64653388
Published
order suppressing evidence, as is permitted by Rule 9.140, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. On May
Category: Appellate Procedure
566 So. 2d 75, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6606, 1990 WL 126320
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1990 | Docket: 64652669
Published
charged with attempted escape. Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1), an appeal may not be taken from a
Category: Appellate Procedure
564 So. 2d 1222, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5763, 1990 WL 110303
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1990 | Docket: 64652016
Published
pleadings in support of their response.
. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(2).
. The court continues its long-standing
Category: Appellate Procedure
559 So. 2d 1279, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2684, 1990 WL 48623
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1990 | Docket: 64649777
Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701.
Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1). Only the last two circumstances pertain
Category: Appellate Procedure
560 So. 2d 1255, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2496, 1990 WL 41683
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1990 | Docket: 64650351
Published
Fifth Circuit, challenging those rulings. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
While the cause was pending here
Category: Appellate Procedure
559 So. 2d 705, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2367, 1990 WL 41575
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1990 | Docket: 64649640
Published
require the expenditure of public funds.” Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(3)(A)(ii). We further note that appellant
Category: Appellate Procedure
558 So. 2d 90, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1337, 1990 WL 19934
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1990 | Docket: 64648756
Published
of the transcript. This not only contravened Rule 9.140(b)(3)(A)(iv), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
556 So. 2d 480, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 612, 1990 WL 8612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1990 | Docket: 64647979
Published
the State to continue to hold Mundi. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(e)(2). Therefore, we grant Mundi’s Petition
Category: Appellate Procedure
554 So. 2d 31, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7300, 1989 WL 154976
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1989 | Docket: 64647141
Published
otherwise appeal-able to the circuit court under rule 9.140(c) which the county court has certified to be
Category: Appellate Procedure
548 So. 2d 868, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2151, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4980, 1989 WL 104144
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1989 | Docket: 64644845
Published
18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
We note, contrary to Rule 9.140, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
546 So. 2d 56, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1569, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3577, 1989 WL 69202
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1989 | Docket: 64643579
Published
reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g). The transcript attached to the state’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
545 So. 2d 954, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1563, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3610, 1989 WL 68950
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1989 | Docket: 64643442
Published
the State could obtain appellate review under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
876 F.2d 1470, 1989 WL 67165
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 1989 | Docket: 66245395
Published
that might have been presented to the court. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(f) requires that “[i]n capital cases, the
Category: Appellate Procedure
544 So. 2d 313, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1350, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3077, 1989 WL 57225
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1989 | Docket: 64642889
Published
proper appeal may be taken. Id. See also Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(l)(J) (state may appeal sentence imposed
Category: Appellate Procedure
543 So. 2d 869, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1306, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2974, 1989 WL 55347
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1989 | Docket: 64642727
Published
a response from the State before ruling.
Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) (emphasis added). The state further concedes
Category: Appellate Procedure
540 So. 2d 234, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 753, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1607, 1989 WL 28211
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1989 | Docket: 64641167
Published
departure order against the trial testimony.”
Rule 9.140(d), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, provides
Category: Appellate Procedure
550 So. 2d 1122, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 683, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1369
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1989 | Docket: 64645799
Published
9.140 does not apply to juvenile cases. “Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c) concerns only appeals from orders in ‘criminal
Category: Appellate Procedure
539 So. 2d 577, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 620, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1184
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1989 | Docket: 64640876
Published
The state appeals the suppression order. Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
The affidavit for search warrant
Category: Appellate Procedure
530 So. 2d 479, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2070, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3834, 1988 WL 89745
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1988 | Docket: 64636726
Published
State v. Meyer, 430 So.2d 440 (Fla.1983); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(3). In this case, trial counsel filed
Category: Appellate Procedure
523 So. 2d 1197, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 825, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1306, 1988 WL 26743
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1988 | Docket: 64634291
Published
require that his conviction be reversed. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(f). We find merit only in the appellant’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
522 So. 2d 482, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 699, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1040, 1988 WL 22177
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1988 | Docket: 64633671
Published
appellee that this order is not reviewable under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), which requires that the evidence be
Category: Appellate Procedure
522 So. 2d 84, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 678, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 966
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1988 | Docket: 64633566
Published
also has prosecuted two appeals pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), neither of which was successful. See
Category: Appellate Procedure
521 So. 2d 295, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 582, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5867, 1988 WL 18121
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1988 | Docket: 64633154
Published
characterized as a motion for review pursuant to Rule 9.140(e)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure)
Category: Appellate Procedure
518 So. 2d 403, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 11074
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1988 | Docket: 64631988
Published
cases were overdue in excess of 8 months (see Rule 9.140(b)(5), Florida Appellate Rules, mandating that
Category: Appellate Procedure
525 So. 2d 907, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 20, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11750, 1987 WL 3379
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1987 | Docket: 64634985
Published
Specifically, we hold that the only provision of Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) relied upon by the state, that which
Category: Appellate Procedure
513 So. 2d 1372, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2472, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12331
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1987 | Docket: 64630266
Published
not the 15 day period imposed upon the state in rule 9.140(c)(2). The consideration underlying our conclusion
Category: Appellate Procedure
519 So. 2d 9, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2263, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10317, 1987 WL 686
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1987 | Docket: 64632161
Published
Hillsbor-ough county judgment is not yet final. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(2).
Category: Appellate Procedure
510 So. 2d 361, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1818, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9505
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1987 | Docket: 64628575
Published
juvenile proceedings are not appealable under Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(c) since juvenile proceedings are not “criminal”
Category: Appellate Procedure
512 So. 2d 960, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1521, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8908
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1987 | Docket: 64629580
Published
state is permitted an interlocutory appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). Generally, however, such orders
Category: Appellate Procedure
509 So. 2d 276, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2684, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 286
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1987 | Docket: 64628186
Published
brief in appeals under Rule 9.110, Rule 9.130, or Rule 9.140, or after service of the answer brief if a cross
Category: Appellate Procedure
507 So. 2d 1170, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1348, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8515
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1987 | Docket: 64627476
Published
suppressing evidence obtained by search and seizure. Rule 9.140(c)(2) provides that such appeals are commenced
Category: Appellate Procedure
508 So. 2d 1257, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1087, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7826
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1987 | Docket: 64628112
Published
trial court’s denial of recognizance release. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(e)(4). We affirm the trial court’s ruling
Category: Appellate Procedure
505 So. 2d 1109, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1056, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7687
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1987 | Docket: 64626541
Published
grand theft case. We have jurisdic*1110tion. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). The basis for the trial judge’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
501 So. 2d 39, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 179, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11467
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1986 | Docket: 64624383
Published
the “body bug” evidence was appeal-able under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
499 So. 2d 36, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 128, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11019
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1986 | Docket: 64623782
Published
Procedure 9.140(c)(1)(F), and therefore, under Rule 9.140(c)(2), the notice was required to be filed within
Category: Appellate Procedure
495 So. 2d 1235, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2232, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10235
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1986 | Docket: 64622306
Published
State, 469 So.2d 150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
Reversed and remanded.
Category: Appellate Procedure
492 So. 2d 755, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1686, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9149
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1986 | Docket: 64621015
Published
jurisdiction and that appeal is dismissed. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(2); Guzman v. State, 364 So.2d 523 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
492 So. 2d 1190, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1552, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1986 | Docket: 64621118
Published
State, 463 So.2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
Remanded.
Category: Appellate Procedure
490 So. 2d 1019, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1375, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8398
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1986 | Docket: 64620348
Published
witness is not appeal-able by the State under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) nor any other provision of that rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
488 So. 2d 645, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1163, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7840
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1986 | Docket: 64619372
Published
suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
The first order appealed relates
Category: Appellate Procedure
484 So. 2d 652, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 682, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6914
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1986 | Docket: 64617889
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
485 So. 2d 849, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6829
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1986 | Docket: 64618278
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
483 So. 2d 504, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6448
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1986 | Docket: 64617472
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
483 So. 2d 101, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 447, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6375
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1986 | Docket: 64617385
Published
06(3), Fla.Stat.; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Stinson v. State, 448 So.2d 1240 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
482 So. 2d 562, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 375, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6250
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1986 | Docket: 64617145
Published
1986, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2).
The record on appeal also contains
Category: Appellate Procedure
480 So. 2d 200, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16958
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1985 | Docket: 64616261
Published
concur.
. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1)(A).
Category: Appellate Procedure
478 So. 2d 1166, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2646, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17045
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1985 | Docket: 64615738
Published
section 39.14, and not chapter 924, after which rule 9.140(b)(1) was fashioned, affords a juvenile defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
478 So. 2d 419, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2479, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16642
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1985 | Docket: 64615489
Published
conclusively that Stephens is entitled to no relief. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g). By failing to consider the merits of
Category: Appellate Procedure
478 So. 2d 402, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2471, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16658
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1985 | Docket: 64615483
Published
release. Reading Rule 3.691(c) in pari materia with Rule 9.140(e)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure,
Category: Appellate Procedure
476 So. 2d 304, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2309, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16257
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1985 | Docket: 64614526
Published
years of probation to start after her jail term.
Rule 9.140(b), Florida Rules of Appelate Procedure, and
Category: Appellate Procedure
478 So. 2d 359, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2221, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15958
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1985 | Docket: 64615461
Published
not begin until after the record is filed. See Rule 9.140(b)(4)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
475 So. 2d 983, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2153, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15817
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1985 | Docket: 64614326
Published
for further proceedings under Rule 3.850. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(g).
Reversed and remanded.
Category: Appellate Procedure
475 So. 2d 967, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2099, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15773
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1985 | Docket: 64614317
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
476 So. 2d 144, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 435, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3672
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1985 | Docket: 64614500
Published
or information or any count thereof.” See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). I would therefore hold that the
Category: Appellate Procedure
471 So. 2d 194, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1513, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14644
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1985 | Docket: 64612679
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
471 So. 2d 130, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14597
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1985 | Docket: 64612661
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
469 So. 2d 164, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1177, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14149
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1985 | Docket: 64612139
Published
motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure (1985)
Category: Appellate Procedure
472 So. 2d 475, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1012, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13479
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1985 | Docket: 64613024
Published
would not consider its argument on that point. Rule 9.140(c)(1)(H), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
467 So. 2d 386, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 775, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15252
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1985 | Docket: 64611352
Published
such reservation, we have no jurisdiction. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(1); S.C. v. State, 388 So.2d 643 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
465 So. 2d 573, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 647, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12912
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1985 | Docket: 64610687
Published
judgment and sentence based on a guilty plea, Rule 9.140(b), Fla.R.App.P., and because appellant failed
Category: Appellate Procedure
469 So. 2d 148, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 705, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12897
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1985 | Docket: 64612136
Published
Willie Earl Lane filed this appeal pursuant to Rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, following
Category: Appellate Procedure
464 So. 2d 608, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 547, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12661
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1985 | Docket: 64610327
Published
a judgment entered on a guilty plea. See Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b); Sec. 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1983).
The
Category: Appellate Procedure
463 So. 2d 1248, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14408, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 475
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1985 | Docket: 64610047
Published
appealable as a dismissal of the information under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(A). See Anders, Alvarez, Evans, Hamilton
Category: Appellate Procedure
462 So. 2d 1217, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 421, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12371
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1985 | Docket: 64609634
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
462 So. 2d 871, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 288, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12148
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1985 | Docket: 64609557
Published
appellant’s motion was legally insufficient. Rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, provides:
Category: Appellate Procedure
459 So. 2d 1176, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16036
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1984 | Docket: 64608501
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(vi), § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat
Category: Appellate Procedure
460 So. 2d 447, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2480, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16388
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1984 | Docket: 64608621
Published
participation on behalf of the State pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
. In 1982, the legislature transferred
Category: Appellate Procedure
457 So. 2d 1136, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2220, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15403
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1984 | Docket: 64607524
Published
within 10 days of service of the notice of appeal.
Rule 9.140(c)(1)(H), Fla.R.App.P., permits the State to
Category: Appellate Procedure
457 So. 2d 568, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2151, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15387
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1984 | Docket: 64607405
Published
COBB, C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur.
. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
. § 860.01(2), Fla.Stat. (1981)
Category: Appellate Procedure
455 So. 2d 1341, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15162
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1984 | Docket: 64606866
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
463 So. 2d 1114, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 127, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 127, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3392
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1984 | Docket: 64610016
Published
orders in criminal cases shall be as prescribed by Rule 9.140.
(3) Review of non-final orders of lower tribunals
Category: Appellate Procedure
453 So. 2d 934, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1793, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14660
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1984 | Docket: 64606251
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
453 So. 2d 926, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1735, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14543
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1984 | Docket: 64606244
Published
co-conspirators. Such an order is not ap-pealable under rule 9.140(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. We
Category: Appellate Procedure
454 So. 2d 38, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14558
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1984 | Docket: 64606347
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
453 So. 2d 483, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14192
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1984 | Docket: 64606110
Published
including the issues of guilt or innocence. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv). The record
Category: Appellate Procedure
449 So. 2d 988, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13038
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1984 | Docket: 64604571
Published
DCA 1983); § 924.-06(3), Fla.Stat. (1981); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1). This dismissal is without prejudice
Category: Appellate Procedure
444 So. 2d 1126, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11722
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1984 | Docket: 64602593
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
443 So. 2d 443, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11327
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1984 | Docket: 64602015
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
443 So. 2d 414, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11208
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1984 | Docket: 64602002
Published
State, 384 So.2d 736 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g). We remand with directions that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
442 So. 2d 1070, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25249
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1983 | Docket: 64601821
Published
of the motion without an evidentiary hearing.
Rule 9.140(g), Fla.R.App.P., governs this appeal and under
Category: Appellate Procedure
443 So. 2d 972, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3182
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1983 | Docket: 64602139
Published
Committee recommends an emergency amendment to Rule 9.140. That statute and Criminal Rule 3.710 authorize
Category: Appellate Procedure
442 So. 2d 376, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24518
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1983 | Docket: 64601522
Published
State, 428 So.2d 703 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) (in particular see Committee Note 1977
Category: Appellate Procedure
442 So. 2d 324, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24544
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1983 | Docket: 64601507
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
439 So. 2d 1047, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23458
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1983 | Docket: 64600334
Published
vacate sentence. The appeal is pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), which requires that this court reverse
Category: Appellate Procedure
439 So. 2d 1038, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23600
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1983 | Docket: 64600327
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
438 So. 2d 1082, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22709
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1983 | Docket: 64600083
Published
State, 427 So.2d 812 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1). This dismissal is without prejudice
Category: Appellate Procedure
438 So. 2d 1029, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22483
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1983 | Docket: 64600051
Published
Judge.
This appeal is dismissed because Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(1) prohibits a direct appeal from a judgment
Category: Appellate Procedure
437 So. 2d 245, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23521
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1983 | Docket: 64599394
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED.
See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1).
DAUKSCH, FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and SHARP, JJ.
Category: Appellate Procedure
438 So. 2d 440, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24433
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1983 | Docket: 64599821
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
438 So. 2d 440, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24433
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1983 | Docket: 64599821
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
439 So. 2d 255, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24573
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1983 | Docket: 64600189
Published
State, 348 So.2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g). Obviously, the absence of the remedy
Category: Appellate Procedure
433 So. 2d 616, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20089
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1983 | Docket: 64597840
Published
state would be permitted to appeal pursuant to Rule 9.140(c)(1)(E), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
432 So. 2d 763, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19571
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1983 | Docket: 64597458
Published
judgment and sentence based on a guilty plea, Rule 9.140(b), Fla.R.App.P., and because appellant failed
Category: Appellate Procedure
433 So. 2d 572, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19469
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1983 | Docket: 64597821
Published
(1981); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(d)(2)(iv), (g); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(l)(2).1 For the reasons which follow we
Category: Appellate Procedure
433 So. 2d 564
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1983 | Docket: 64597818
Published
appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c); State v. Wilcox, 351 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
431 So. 2d 1009
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1983 | Docket: 1512038
Published
from which the state may take an appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). In all other respects, the dissenting
Category: Appellate Procedure
449 So. 2d 280, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18931
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1983 | Docket: 64604414
Published
and 924.-071 Florida Statutes (1977), and Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(c)”), and by the obvious unacceptability
Category: Appellate Procedure
427 So. 2d 1125, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27946
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1983 | Docket: 64595553
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
427 So. 2d 309, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27940
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1983 | Docket: 64595276
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
436 So. 2d 142, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22607
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1983 | Docket: 64598961
Published
conclusively refute Lofton’s allegation. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g); Payne v. State, 362 So.2d 688 (Fla. 2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
425 So. 2d 217, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21552
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1983 | Docket: 64594677
Published
hearing. This appeal therefore proceeds under Rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
We
Category: Appellate Procedure
425 So. 2d 198, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27864
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1983 | Docket: 64594668
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
424 So. 2d 980, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18729
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1983 | Docket: 64594543
Published
circumstances summary appeal is available by means of Rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, rather
Category: Appellate Procedure
424 So. 2d 177, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27903
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1983 | Docket: 64594407
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
424 So. 2d 177, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27902
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1983 | Docket: 64594409
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
424 So. 2d 177, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27901
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1983 | Docket: 64594408
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
423 So. 2d 607, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29110
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1982 | Docket: 64594013
Published
CURIAM.
The appellant seeks review pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) of the summary denial of his motion for
Category: Appellate Procedure
425 So. 2d 575, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21946
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1982 | Docket: 64594723
Published
for an evidentiary hearing as contemplated by Rule 9.140(g). We have not since the critical facts relied
Category: Appellate Procedure
433 So. 2d 991, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21787
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1982 | Docket: 64597977
Published
post-conviction relief was filed on August 10, 1982. Under Rule 9.140(b)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure,
Category: Appellate Procedure
424 So. 2d 50, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28765
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1982 | Docket: 64594361
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
421 So. 2d 1118, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28206
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1982 | Docket: 64593329
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
422 So. 2d 984, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29148
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1982 | Docket: 64593739
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
421 So. 2d 809, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28185
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1982 | Docket: 64593180
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
420 So. 2d 387, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29071
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1982 | Docket: 64592542
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
420 So. 2d 388, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29072
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1982 | Docket: 64592544
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
419 So. 2d 821, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21269
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1982 | Docket: 64592200
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
418 So. 2d 1232, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28906
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1982 | Docket: 64591951
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
419 So. 2d 1118, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21681
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1982 | Docket: 64592232
Published
instructions to hold an evidentiary hearing. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(g).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
LETTS, C. J.,
Category: Appellate Procedure
419 So. 2d 1118, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21681
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1982 | Docket: 64592232
Published
instructions to hold an evidentiary hearing. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(g).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
LETTS, C. J.,
Category: Appellate Procedure
418 So. 2d 368, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28891
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1982 | Docket: 64591782
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
417 So. 2d 1096, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20893
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1982 | Docket: 64591636
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
417 So. 2d 310, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28850
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1982 | Docket: 64591371
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
417 So. 2d 314, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28855
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1982 | Docket: 64591378
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
418 So. 2d 299, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28890
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1982 | Docket: 64591766
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
416 So. 2d 1228, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28786
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1982 | Docket: 64591279
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
416 So. 2d 862
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1982 | Docket: 64591153
Published
reached its decision and its rationale. Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(e)(3); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.691(b). Accordingly
Category: Appellate Procedure
416 So. 2d 844, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21017
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1982 | Docket: 64591136
Published
to suppress is granted, to appeal that order (Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure)
Category: Appellate Procedure
416 So. 2d 50, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28578
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1982 | Docket: 64590936
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
415 So. 2d 834, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29046
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1982 | Docket: 64590717
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
415 So. 2d 834, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29047
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1982 | Docket: 64590716
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
415 So. 2d 803, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20387
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1982 | Docket: 64590696
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R-App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
415 So. 2d 76
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1982 | Docket: 1512921
Published
constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel. See Rule 9.140(b)(3), Fla.R.App.P., (requiring counsel to either
Category: Appellate Procedure
414 So. 2d 281, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20692
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1982 | Docket: 64590103
Published
granting petitions for writ of habeas corpus and Rule 9.140(c)(l)(I) authorizes appeals from an alleged illegal
Category: Appellate Procedure
414 So. 2d 39, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20108
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1982 | Docket: 64590040
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
413 So. 2d 846, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20065
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1982 | Docket: 64589864
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
413 So. 2d 847, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28840
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1982 | Docket: 64589866
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
414 So. 2d 233, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20013
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1982 | Docket: 64590075
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), has taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
413 So. 2d 108, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28817
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1982 | Docket: 64589588
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
412 So. 2d 950, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29211
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1982 | Docket: 64589367
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
412 So. 2d 420, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29194
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1982 | Docket: 64589255
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
411 So. 2d 987, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29343
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1982 | Docket: 64588886
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
411 So. 2d 345
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1982 | Docket: 64588664
Published
CURIAM.
This is an appeal (see Florida Appellate Rule 9.140(g)) from an order summarily denying Cronce’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
411 So. 2d 318, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19638
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1982 | Docket: 64588653
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
410 So. 2d 661, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28947
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1982 | Docket: 64588306
Published
Petitioner Harold Curington, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
409 So. 2d 1176, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29247
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1982 | Docket: 64587985
Published
CURIAM.
Petitioner Michael Swain, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
409 So. 2d 205, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19172
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1982 | Docket: 64587495
Published
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), the petitioner has appealed from an order which, apart
Category: Appellate Procedure
408 So. 2d 827, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29335
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1982 | Docket: 64587353
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
407 So. 2d 1093, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18922
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1982 | Docket: 64587131
Published
Petitioner Hubert S. Turnbull, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
407 So. 2d 334, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28169
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1981 | Docket: 64586778
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
407 So. 2d 626, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28177
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1981 | Docket: 64586870
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
406 So. 2d 539, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21652
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1981 | Docket: 64586309
Published
and independent ground for appellate reversal. Rule 9.140(f) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
404 So. 2d 801, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28037
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1981 | Docket: 64585502
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
404 So. 2d 180, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28028
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1981 | Docket: 64585243
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
401 So. 2d 1371, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1981 | Docket: 64584517
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
401 So. 2d 1169, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28301
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1981 | Docket: 64584350
Published
appeal is untimely and therefore dismissed.1 Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2).
ORFINGER, COBB and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH
Category: Appellate Procedure
402 So. 2d 473, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28242
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1981 | Docket: 64584647
Published
CURIAM.
Petitioner Stephen Mackey, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
401 So. 2d 1149, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28308
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1981 | Docket: 64584342
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken these appeals from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
400 So. 2d 1048, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20544
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1981 | Docket: 64583829
Published
evidence seized pursuant to a defective warrant. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b). The trial court, with the respective
Category: Appellate Procedure
400 So. 2d 831, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28079
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1981 | Docket: 64583707
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
400 So. 2d 566, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28078
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1981 | Docket: 64583589
Published
State, 380 So.2d 487 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
Category: Appellate Procedure
402 So. 2d 18, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20393
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1981 | Docket: 64584525
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), appeals from the summary denial of his motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
399 So. 2d 1105, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28300
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1981 | Docket: 64583349
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
402 So. 2d 428, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20137
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1981 | Docket: 64584641
Published
record, there has been no appeal from either. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1) and § 924.06, Fla.Stat. (1979).
Appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
399 So. 2d 64, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28273
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1981 | Docket: 64582940
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
399 So. 2d 47, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19903
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1981 | Docket: 64582928
Published
jurisdiction to consider it at this time. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1); R.J.B. v. State, 394 So.2d 126 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
398 So. 2d 492, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19888
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1981 | Docket: 64582656
Published
appeal all matters relating to the judgment. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv). The^ record
Category: Appellate Procedure
403 So. 2d 1002, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28060
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 64585102
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
399 So. 2d 16, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19868
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 64582916
Published
defendant appeals his judgment of conviction.” Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(H). See Sands v. State, 328 So.2d 563
Category: Appellate Procedure
397 So. 2d 1041
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1981 | Docket: 938612
Published
Section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (1979); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
397 So. 2d 1036, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28099
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1981 | Docket: 64582400
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from an order denying
Category: Appellate Procedure
397 So. 2d 1233, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28108
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1981 | Docket: 64582473
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
398 So. 2d 920, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 27968
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1981 | Docket: 64582812
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
397 So. 2d 1175, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20523
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1981 | Docket: 64582441
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
396 So. 2d 864, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 27986
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1981 | Docket: 64581584
Published
Petitioner, Kenneth Wayne Davis, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
402 So. 2d 1189, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19197
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1981 | Docket: 64584808
Published
and discharged the defendant on the ground that rule 9.140(c)(2), Florida Appellate Rules, requires the
Category: Appellate Procedure
397 So. 2d 934, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19095
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1981 | Docket: 64582371
Published
appealable.
See § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1979); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
408 So. 2d 579, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19096
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1981 | Docket: 64587290
Published
appealable.
See § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1979); Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
395 So. 2d 1265, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 27994
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1981 | Docket: 64581332
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
395 So. 2d 1265, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 27995
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1981 | Docket: 64581333
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
395 So. 2d 293, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18946
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1981 | Docket: 64581031
Published
06(3), Fla.Stat. (1979); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172; Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b). See Wells v. State, 390 So.2d 808 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
395 So. 2d 581, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18940
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1981 | Docket: 64581135
Published
GREEN, OLIVER L., Associate Judge, concur.
. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(E).
. On the contrary, it has been
Category: Appellate Procedure
395 So. 2d 289, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 27991
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1981 | Docket: 64581028
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
394 So. 2d 564, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19581
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1981 | Docket: 64580649
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
394 So. 2d 534, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19574
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1981 | Docket: 64580633
Published
Petitioner, Everett E. Hill, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
394 So. 2d 464, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19547
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1981 | Docket: 64580603
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
393 So. 2d 66, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19423
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1981 | Docket: 64580013
Published
evidentiary rulings appears inappropriate. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c).
Category: Appellate Procedure
392 So. 2d 609, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20459
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1981 | Docket: 64579647
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
392 So. 2d 340, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18863
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1981 | Docket: 64579598
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
392 So. 2d 46, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17971
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1980 | Docket: 64579508
Published
have jurisdiction to review the judgment. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b). This court does have jurisdiction to
Category: Appellate Procedure
392 So. 2d 46, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17971
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1980 | Docket: 64579508
Published
have jurisdiction to review the judgment. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b). This court does have jurisdiction to
Category: Appellate Procedure
394 So. 2d 436, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17969
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1980 | Docket: 64580595
Published
“State’s Motion to Strike C-4 Motion is DENIED.” Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(cXl)(A)-
Category: Appellate Procedure
392 So. 2d 949, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18324
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1980 | Docket: 64579823
Published
Petitioner, Julian Jesus Perez, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
391 So. 2d 384, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18258
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1980 | Docket: 64579289
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
391 So. 2d 720, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18269
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1980 | Docket: 64579372
Published
interlocutory and therefore not reviewable under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b) (1978). In Interest of R. J. B., 394 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
391 So. 2d 335, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18243
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1980 | Docket: 64579258
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
391 So. 2d 335, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18244
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1980 | Docket: 64579259
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
390 So. 2d 813, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17751
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1980 | Docket: 64579025
Published
of the written order imposing sentence. Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2). Rendition of a written order is delayed
Category: Appellate Procedure
390 So. 2d 804, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18166
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1980 | Docket: 64579018
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
391 So. 2d 694, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17645
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1980 | Docket: 64579364
Published
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
. Rule 9.140(g), Fla.R.App.P.
. The rules provide a complete
Category: Appellate Procedure
390 So. 2d 104, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18085
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1980 | Docket: 64578786
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
390 So. 2d 755, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17509
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1980 | Docket: 64578989
Published
that the appellant is entitled to no relief,” Rule 9.140(g), Fla.R.App.P., I believe the matter ought
Category: Appellate Procedure
389 So. 2d 1069, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 7735
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1980 | Docket: 64578653
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
389 So. 2d 10, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17810
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1980 | Docket: 64578402
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
389 So. 2d 5, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23190
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1980 | Docket: 64578390
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 654, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23597
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1980 | Docket: 64578275
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
394 So. 2d 1022, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18340
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1980 | Docket: 64580799
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 655, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23598
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1980 | Docket: 64578276
Published
Charlton Scott a/k/a Len C. Scott pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 655
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1980 | Docket: 64578277
Published
Charlton Scott a/k/a Len C. Scott pursuant to Fla.R.App.P., 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 1295, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17297
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1980 | Docket: 64578363
Published
of conviction entered upon a plea of guilty, Rule 9.140(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, except
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 643, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17295
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1980 | Docket: 64578269
Published
specifically identified order of the trial court. Rule 9.140(b)(1), Fla.R. App.P.1
There was no reservation
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 348, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23588
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1980 | Docket: 64578190
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 348, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23587
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1980 | Docket: 64578189
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 320, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17182
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1980 | Docket: 64578181
Published
Wilcher has filed a timely appeal pursuant to Rule 9.140(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The
Category: Appellate Procedure
394 So. 2d 126, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17169
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1980 | Docket: 64580458
Published
will lie.
We hold that it is not and dismiss.
Rule 9.140(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, governs
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 34, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17991
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1980 | Docket: 64578076
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 33, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17988
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1980 | Docket: 64578073
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
386 So. 2d 855, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16962
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1980 | Docket: 64577657
Published
petition, and we dismiss it sua sponte. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2), 9.020(g); Guzman v. State, 364 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
388 So. 2d 583, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16952
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1980 | Docket: 64578249
Published
review is by motion, not by separate appeal. Rule 9.140(e)(4) Fla.R.App.P.
On the merits, the motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
386 So. 2d 324, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17245
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1980 | Docket: 64577512
Published
an evidentiary hearing on that point. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
Category: Appellate Procedure
386 So. 2d 590, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23528
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1980 | Docket: 64577604
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
386 So. 2d 1250, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17472
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1980 | Docket: 64577755
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
385 So. 2d 171, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17017
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1980 | Docket: 64576908
Published
Petitioner, Robert Lee Douglas, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
385 So. 2d 163, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16648
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1980 | Docket: 64576900
Published
reservation of a right to appeal as required under Rule 9.140(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See
Category: Appellate Procedure
384 So. 2d 952, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23574
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1980 | Docket: 64576700
Published
Defendant/appellant takes this appeal pursuant to Rule 9.140(g), Fla.R.App.P., following the denial of his
Category: Appellate Procedure
384 So. 2d 272, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23560
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1980 | Docket: 64576477
Published
CURIAM.
Petitioner Kirk Newman pursuant to Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
384 So. 2d 244, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16876
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1980 | Docket: 64576466
Published
under review. § 59.081, Fla.Stat. (1979); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2). We, accordingly, entered an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
384 So. 2d 47, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16865
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1980 | Docket: 64576399
Published
Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Rule 9.140(b), Fla.R.Appellate P. Having waived his right
Category: Appellate Procedure
384 So. 2d 44, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23548
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1980 | Docket: 64576392
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
383 So. 2d 769, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23260
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1980 | Docket: 64576109
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
383 So. 2d 320, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23257
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1980 | Docket: 64576016
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
383 So. 2d 319, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23733
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1980 | Docket: 64576015
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
383 So. 2d 319
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1980 | Docket: 762104
Published
BASKIN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
382 So. 2d 1372, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23687
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1980 | Docket: 64575819
Published
Petitioner, David J. Smith, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
382 So. 2d 885, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23674
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1980 | Docket: 64575700
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
382 So. 2d 777, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23660
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1980 | Docket: 64575643
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
382 So. 2d 780, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23661
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1980 | Docket: 64575645
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
382 So. 2d 361, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15712
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1980 | Docket: 64575538
Published
to being eligible for post-trial release. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(e)(1) allows the lower court to entertain
Category: Appellate Procedure
380 So. 2d 567, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16053
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1980 | Docket: 64574715
Published
Garcia, a/k/a Ralph Angel Lopez, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
379 So. 2d 1011, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23346
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1980 | Docket: 64574269
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
379 So. 2d 449, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23332
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1980 | Docket: 64574121
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
379 So. 2d 187, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23316
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1980 | Docket: 64574034
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
379 So. 2d 169, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23312
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1980 | Docket: 64574015
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
379 So. 2d 669, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23338
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1980 | Docket: 64574173
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
378 So. 2d 1328, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23230
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1980 | Docket: 64573822
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
381 So. 2d 256, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15416
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1980 | Docket: 64575063
Published
such an order under the express provisions of Rule 9.140(c)(2), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure,
Category: Appellate Procedure
378 So. 2d 1301, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16306
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1979 | Docket: 64573792
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
378 So. 2d 1302, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21010
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1979 | Docket: 64573793
Published
Thompson, a/k/a Edward Thompson pursuant to Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
378 So. 2d 894, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16283
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1979 | Docket: 64573725
Published
when, as here, the normal appeal processes, Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(H), may not provide timely relief.
Category: Appellate Procedure
378 So. 2d 1283, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16300
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1979 | Docket: 64573785
Published
and 924.-071, Florida Statutes (1977), and Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(c), nevertheless, insofar as such doors do
Category: Appellate Procedure
377 So. 2d 832, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 20943
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1979 | Docket: 64573138
Published
Petitioner, Michael P. Moore, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
377 So. 2d 833, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 20944
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1979 | Docket: 64573139
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken the appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
377 So. 2d 834, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 20946
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1979 | Docket: 64573141
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
377 So. 2d 771, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 20938
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1979 | Docket: 64573116
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
377 So. 2d 771, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 20939
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1979 | Docket: 64573117
Published
CURIAM.
Petitioner, Wentz Smith, pursuant to Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
377 So. 2d 236, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16146
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1979 | Docket: 64573014
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
377 So. 2d 48, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 20923
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1979 | Docket: 64572923
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
376 So. 2d 485, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21093
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1979 | Docket: 64572642
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
376 So. 2d 844, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4836
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1979 | Docket: 64572694
Published
dissent.
FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
RULE 9.140
APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
(b) Appeals
Category: Appellate Procedure
376 So. 2d 440, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21081
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1979 | Docket: 64572607
Published
(Fla.1967). The appeal is without merit. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
AFFIRMED.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Acting
Category: Appellate Procedure
376 So. 2d 292
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1979 | Docket: 64572534
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
375 So. 2d 1161, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21264
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1979 | Docket: 64572382
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
375 So. 2d 356, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15843
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1979 | Docket: 64572051
Published
Petitioner, Larry Frank Troy, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
375 So. 2d 54, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15815
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1979 | Docket: 64571984
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
374 So. 2d 1164, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15528
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1979 | Docket: 64571929
Published
Florida Statutes (Supp.1976), and Florida Appellate Rule 9.140(b), both of which state that a defendant may
Category: Appellate Procedure
375 So. 2d 46, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15812
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1979 | Docket: 64571978
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
373 So. 2d 91, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15494
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1979 | Docket: 64571165
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
373 So. 2d 73, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15203
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1979 | Docket: 64571153
Published
from the judgment entered on a guilty plea. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b). The appeal is DISMISSED.
MILLS, C. J
Category: Appellate Procedure
372 So. 2d 996, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15400
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1979 | Docket: 64570982
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
372 So. 2d 996, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15399
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1979 | Docket: 64570981
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
375 So. 2d 10, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15797
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1979 | Docket: 64571965
Published
from the order revoking Wood’s probation. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1)(C). The allegations in Wood’s 3.850
Category: Appellate Procedure
372 So. 2d 551, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15382
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1979 | Docket: 64570886
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
372 So. 2d 550, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15381
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1979 | Docket: 64570885
Published
Petitioner Robert Oliver Gilliard, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
372 So. 2d 1152, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15453
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1979 | Docket: 64571082
Published
The appellant seeks review, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), of the summary denial of his motion for
Category: Appellate Procedure
372 So. 2d 213, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21184
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1979 | Docket: 64570798
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
371 So. 2d 721, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15261
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1979 | Docket: 64570502
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
371 So. 2d 1070, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15288
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1979 | Docket: 64570607
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
371 So. 2d 582, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15127
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1979 | Docket: 64570420
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
370 So. 2d 444, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14952
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1979 | Docket: 64569993
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
370 So. 2d 441, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14948
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1979 | Docket: 64569986
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
376 So. 2d 236, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1979 | Docket: 64572512
Published
specifically alleged and the motion sworn to.”
. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b); McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410, 411
Category: Appellate Procedure
370 So. 2d 91, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14903
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1979 | Docket: 64569920
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
369 So. 2d 652, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14782
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1979 | Docket: 64569610
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
371 So. 2d 150, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14385
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1979 | Docket: 64570254
Published
without expressly reserving the right to appeal. Rule 9.140, Fla.R.App.P., provides:
“A defendant may not
Category: Appellate Procedure
368 So. 2d 671, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1979 | Docket: 64569087
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
368 So. 2d 101, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14576
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1979 | Docket: 64568839
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
367 So. 2d 1114
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1979 | Docket: 64568731
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
368 So. 2d 606
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1979 | Docket: 2572560
Published
allegations of the use of perjured testimony. See Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(g) and Bogan v. State, supra.
Affirmed in
Category: Appellate Procedure
366 So. 2d 1258
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1979 | Docket: 64568345
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
367 So. 2d 1058, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14150
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1979 | Docket: 64568713
Published
must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b) sets forth those appeals permitted by
Category: Appellate Procedure
366 So. 2d 164
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1979 | Docket: 64567963
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
366 So. 2d 824, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14318
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1979 | Docket: 64568192
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken these appeals from the denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
365 So. 2d 1084, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14127
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1979 | Docket: 64567851
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
365 So. 2d 812, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14070
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1979 | Docket: 64567748
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
365 So. 2d 453, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16996
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1978 | Docket: 64567686
Published
transmit the *454record in accordance with Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).
The prayer of the petition is GRANTED
Category: Appellate Procedure
365 So. 2d 782, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17163
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1978 | Docket: 64567737
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
365 So. 2d 227
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1978 | Docket: 64567504
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
364 So. 2d 848, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17075
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1978 | Docket: 64567257
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
363 So. 2d 1137
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1978 | Docket: 64566858
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
363 So. 2d 205, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16773
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1978 | Docket: 64566581
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
362 So. 2d 715, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16620
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1978 | Docket: 64566177
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
362 So. 2d 699, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16401
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1978 | Docket: 64566169
Published
C. J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.
. Rule 9.140(c)(1) of the new Appellate Rules which became
Category: Appellate Procedure
362 So. 2d 473
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1978 | Docket: 64566026
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
362 So. 2d 160
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1978 | Docket: 64565911
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
360 So. 2d 1307, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16337
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1978 | Docket: 64565498
Published
PER CURIAM
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
360 So. 2d 1158, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16312
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1978 | Docket: 64565433
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
360 So. 2d 1158, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16311
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1978 | Docket: 64565432
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
360 So. 2d 480, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22435
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1978 | Docket: 64565261
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
360 So. 2d 159, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16219
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1978 | Docket: 64565153
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
360 So. 2d 159, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16218
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1978 | Docket: 64565152
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
360 So. 2d 120, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16198
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1978 | Docket: 64565135
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary
Category: Appellate Procedure
358 So. 2d 1165, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15640
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1978 | Docket: 64564565
Published
untrue. With respect to this situation, Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(g) provides in part that “Unless the record
Category: Appellate Procedure
358 So. 2d 878, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15915
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1978 | Docket: 64564462
Published
court, and the court proceeding pursuant to Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(g) finds that the record shows conclusively
Category: Appellate Procedure
358 So. 2d 117, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1978 | Docket: 64564255
Published
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial
Category: Appellate Procedure
357 So. 2d 267, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15672
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1978 | Docket: 64563837
Published
Crim.P. 3.850 being presented pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) and the court having considered the record
Category: Appellate Procedure