Cases Citing Rule 3.211
Total Results: 108
59 F.3d 1095, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17270, 1995 WL 417614
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 17, 1995 | Docket: 1048216
Cited 161 times | Published
incompetent to stand trial under the criteria of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.211.”
The trial court denied the Rule 3
Category: Criminal Procedure
660 So. 2d 244, 1995 WL 324080
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1995 | Docket: 1639619
Cited 134 times | Published
see also § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.211(a)(1). The reports of experts are "merely
Category: Criminal Procedure
781 So. 2d 1040, 2000 WL 1424537
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2000 | Docket: 472197
Cited 67 times | Published
of an expert to develop mitigating evidence. Rule 3.211, 3.216, Fla. R.Crim. P. (1996).
Defendant's further
Category: Criminal Procedure
71 So. 3d 848, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 383, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1565, 2011 WL 2637377
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2011 | Docket: 2353993
Cited 43 times | Published
(1960)); § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (2008); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). When expert testimony regarding a
Category: Criminal Procedure
39 So. 3d 1234, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 374, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 992, 2010 WL 2517974
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2010 | Docket: 1932861
Cited 43 times | Published
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.211(e). Based on rule 3.211(e), the court granted Caraballo's motion to preclude
Category: Criminal Procedure
955 So. 2d 480, 2007 WL 63640
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2007 | Docket: 1659258
Cited 39 times | Published
894 So.2d 46, 54 (Fla.2004); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211.
Upon review of the record, with special
Category: Criminal Procedure
662 So. 2d 323, 1995 WL 424438
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1995 | Docket: 316536
Cited 36 times | Published
courtroom behavior, and testify relevantly. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.211(a)(2)(A).
[3] Defense counsel essentially
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 1169, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 521
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1986 | Docket: 2518104
Cited 32 times | Published
stand trial pursuant to the criteria set forth in Rule 3.211, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. After the
Category: Criminal Procedure
814 So. 2d 322, 2002 WL 87463
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2002 | Docket: 1368919
Cited 30 times | Published
see also § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). In situations where there is conflicting
Category: Criminal Procedure
565 So. 2d 328, 1990 WL 78965
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1990 | Docket: 379799
Cited 30 times | Published
101 S.Ct. 1866, 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981); Fla.R. Crim. P. 3.211(e). Thus, the defendant's Fifth Amendment
Category: Criminal Procedure
706 So. 2d 873, 1997 WL 709671
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1997 | Docket: 1280719
Cited 28 times | Published
understanding of the pending proceedings." The rule 3.211 standard applies to "any material stage of a
Category: Criminal Procedure
800 So. 2d 182, 2001 WL 1194326
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2001 | Docket: 401027
Cited 27 times | Published
see also § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). The reports of experts are "merely
Category: Criminal Procedure
536 So. 2d 992, 1988 WL 143602
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 2517246
Cited 27 times | Published
be submitted is designed to avoid confusion.
RULE 3.211. COMPETENCE TO PROCEED: SCOPE OF EXAMINATION
Category: Criminal Procedure
969 So. 2d 294, 2007 WL 3196491
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2007 | Docket: 1404055
Cited 26 times | Published
relevantly. See id. at 523 (relying upon Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1)).
Lawrence attempts to rely upon Jones
Category: Criminal Procedure
965 So. 2d 48, 2007 WL 1628143
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2007 | Docket: 57018
Cited 26 times | Published
report did not set out each item required by rule 3.211, Dr. Miller responded:
The report . . . when
Category: Criminal Procedure
965 So. 2d 48, 2007 WL 1628143
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2007 | Docket: 57018
Cited 26 times | Published
report did not set out each item required by rule 3.211, Dr. Miller responded:
The report . . . when
Category: Criminal Procedure
587 F.3d 1093, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24644, 2009 WL 3739244
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 10, 2009 | Docket: 399523
Cited 25 times | Published
80 S. Ct. 788, 789 (1960) (per curiam); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1).
Pardo expressly declined the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
88 So. 3d 312, 2012 WL 1520873, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6892
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2012 | Docket: 60308230
Cited 23 times | Published
understanding of the pending proceedings.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). Conclusory allegations of incompetency
Category: Criminal Procedure
894 So. 2d 46, 2004 WL 2297848
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2004 | Docket: 2527466
Cited 23 times | Published
see also § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (2003); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1), 3.851(8)(A).
"It is the duty of the
Category: Criminal Procedure
716 So. 2d 761, 1998 WL 306613
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1998 | Docket: 424729
Cited 23 times | Published
see also § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). In situations where there is conflicting
Category: Criminal Procedure
785 So. 2d 422, 2001 WL 326697
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2001 | Docket: 1510173
Cited 22 times | Published
see also § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.211(a)(1). "The reports of experts are `merely
Category: Criminal Procedure
685 So. 2d 1253
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1996 | Docket: 1735082
Cited 22 times | Published
commitment addressing the factors set forth in rule 3.211 when applicable;
(B) copies of the reports of
Category: Criminal Procedure
889 So. 2d 721, 2004 WL 2109981
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2004 | Docket: 480033
Cited 21 times | Published
see also § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). In situations where there is conflicting
Category: Criminal Procedure
740 So. 2d 520, 1999 WL 395698
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1999 | Docket: 1456752
Cited 20 times | Published
stress of incarceration prior to trial.
Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1)(1980). In evaluating this issue when
Category: Criminal Procedure
24 So. 3d 1, 2009 WL 1792798
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2009 | Docket: 52167
Cited 19 times | Published
Ct. 788, 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960)); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1) (setting forth the same test).
*10
Category: Criminal Procedure
894 So. 2d 28, 2004 WL 2297824
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2004 | Docket: 1148022
Cited 17 times | Published
violation of the confidentiality requirement of rule 3.211(e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.[9] We
Category: Criminal Procedure
14 So. 3d 946, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 414, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1016, 2009 WL 1954796
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2009 | Docket: 1650029
Cited 14 times | Published
factors deemed relevant by the experts.
Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(2). Based on these reports, and testimony
Category: Criminal Procedure
759 F.2d 1549, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29571
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 13, 1985 | Docket: 1029001
Cited 14 times | Published
heavily on a checklist of competency criteria, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.211(a)(1), that was not adopted until four years
Category: Criminal Procedure
890 So. 2d 322, 2004 WL 3024205
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2004 | Docket: 1290731
Cited 13 times | Published
proceedings that are civil in nature are not subject to rule 3.211). Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.210(b) allows
Category: Criminal Procedure
610 So. 2d 1268, 1992 WL 289674
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1992 | Docket: 1414136
Cited 13 times | Published
proceeding given the confidentiality requirement in rule 3.211(e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Two
Category: Criminal Procedure
742 So. 2d 225, 1999 WL 462617
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1999 | Docket: 1302970
Cited 10 times | Published
proceedings and to confer with counsel. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a) (codifying Dusky v. United States, 362
Category: Criminal Procedure
1 So. 3d 262, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 41, 2009 WL 18712
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2009 | Docket: 1653516
Cited 9 times | Published
proceedings and consult with counsel. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a). If Abreu is truly competent, as he contends
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048
Cited 9 times | Published
provisions of Cchapter 916 as amended in 1985.
RULE 3.211. COMPETENCE TO PROCEED: SCOPE OF EXAMINATION
Category: Criminal Procedure
963 F.2d 1440, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12602, 1992 WL 121540
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 5, 1992 | Docket: 652992
Cited 8 times | Published
F.2d at 1574-75.
See also
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.211. Petitioner in this case has made no such
Category: Criminal Procedure
172 So. 3d 983, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12850, 2015 WL 5051125
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2015 | Docket: 60250184
Cited 7 times | Published
would be futile. Both section 916.12(2)-(4) and rule 3.211(a) state that the experts shall examine the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
26 So. 3d 534, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 629, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1948, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 629
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2009 | Docket: 1117422
Cited 7 times | Published
examinations to determine mental competency.
Rule 3.211 (Competence to Proceed: Scope of Examination
Category: Criminal Procedure
968 So. 2d 681, 2007 WL 3375230
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2007 | Docket: 1497474
Cited 7 times | Published
deemed relevant by the experts.
Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(2). Rule 3.211(a)(2)(A) indicates that the inclusion
Category: Criminal Procedure
494 So. 2d 230, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1774
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1986 | Docket: 1510824
Cited 7 times | Published
402, 80 S.Ct. 788, 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.211(a). Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3
Category: Criminal Procedure
447 So. 2d 356
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1984 | Docket: 1691203
Cited 7 times | Published
upon analysis using the factors set forth in Rule 3.211, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Similarly
Category: Criminal Procedure
403 So. 2d 1342, 7 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1956
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1981 | Docket: 1672634
Cited 7 times | Published
Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.210-3.214. Under Rule 3.211, a defendant is incompetent to stand trial if
Category: Criminal Procedure
941 So. 2d 1057, 2006 WL 1766755
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2006 | Docket: 1523621
Cited 6 times | Published
Florida); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a) (stating test for competency to stand trial). Rule 3.211(b), which
Category: Criminal Procedure
712 So. 2d 1206, 1998 WL 323491
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1998 | Docket: 1471929
Cited 6 times | Published
with the requirements of section 916.13(1) and rule 3.211, the order of commitment was vacated.
In Gentzen
Category: Criminal Procedure
573 So. 2d 87, 1991 WL 116
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1991 | Docket: 1518726
Cited 6 times | Published
his competency to stand trial. See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.211(a)(2)(vi) (defendant's capacity to testify
Category: Criminal Procedure
531 So. 2d 951, 1988 WL 89754
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1988 | Docket: 1528620
Cited 6 times | Published
him.'" Florida adopted this competency test in rule 3.211(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
743 So. 2d 1203, 1999 WL 1016319
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1999 | Docket: 1670089
Cited 5 times | Published
determining whether the defendant meets this criteria, Rule 3.211(a)(2) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
744 So. 2d 986, 1999 WL 685712
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1999 | Docket: 1721418
Cited 5 times | Published
see also § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). The reports of experts are "merely
Category: Criminal Procedure
499 So. 2d 864, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2555
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1986 | Docket: 1443764
Cited 5 times | Published
Section 916.12(1), Florida Statutes (1985); Rule 3.211(a), Fla.R. Crim.P. Pericola does not complain
Category: Criminal Procedure
117 So. 3d 778, 2013 WL 1136434, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4431
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2013 | Docket: 60232779
Cited 4 times | Published
consult counsel and assist in his defense. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211. The insanity defense focuses on the defendant’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
78 So. 3d 1045, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 3030, 2011 WL 5829543
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2011 | Docket: 1227055
Cited 4 times | Published
change]
*1064 Committee Notes
[No change]
RULE 3.211. COMPETENCE TO PROCEED: SCOPE OF EXAMINATION
Category: Criminal Procedure
864 So. 2d 1197, 2004 WL 61244
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2004 | Docket: 1426474
Cited 4 times | Published
understand the pending proceedings, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1), is not the same determination as
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 1179, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1831
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1986 | Docket: 478434
Cited 4 times | Published
counsel in preparing his defense at trial. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.211. The procedure in no way contemplates restoring
Category: Criminal Procedure
415 So. 2d 872
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1982 | Docket: 1512886
Cited 4 times | Published
J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.211 and 3.216.
Category: Criminal Procedure
864 So. 2d 1252, 2004 WL 177020
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2004 | Docket: 1425727
Cited 3 times | Published
see also § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.211(a)(1). The reports of experts are "merely
Category: Criminal Procedure
260 So. 3d 1156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2018 | Docket: 64699955
Cited 2 times | Published
understanding of the pending proceedings." Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1).
After the competency hearing, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
260 So. 3d 1156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2018 | Docket: 64699955
Cited 2 times | Published
understanding of the pending proceedings." Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1).
After the competency hearing, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
161 So. 3d 335, 2014 WL 5026425
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2014 | Docket: 1437944
Cited 2 times | Published
Hernandez-Alberto,
889 So.2d at 726; Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.211. To that end, where there is evidentiary
Category: Criminal Procedure
137 So. 3d 1133, 2014 WL 1304724, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4823
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2014 | Docket: 60240187
Cited 2 times | Published
condition is retardation or autism”); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1) (providing that the “criteria for
Category: Criminal Procedure
134 So. 3d 528, 2014 WL 836806, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2986
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2014 | Docket: 60239262
Cited 2 times | Published
court-appointed expert witnesses designated under [rule 3.211], a determination of competence to proceed, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
133 So. 3d 1101, 2014 WL 444041, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1431
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2014 | Docket: 60238677
Cited 2 times | Published
Procedure 3.211, which provides in pertinent part:
Rule 3.211. Competence to Proceed: Scope of Examination
Category: Criminal Procedure
126 So. 3d 193, 2013 WL 3334919
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2013 | Docket: 60236341
Cited 2 times | Published
see also § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (2010); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.851(g)(8)(A). Section
Category: Criminal Procedure
987 So. 2d 103, 2008 WL 2386295
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2008 | Docket: 1390960
Cited 2 times | Published
see also § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). If there is conflicting expert testimony
Category: Criminal Procedure
800 So. 2d 259, 2001 WL 1193728
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2001 | Docket: 1283234
Cited 2 times | Published
rule 3.210, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 3.211(e) specifies that the information obtained by
Category: Criminal Procedure
270 So. 3d 452
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 14865376
Cited 1 times | Published
thorough analysis of the required factors. See Fla. R. Crim. P.
3.211(a)(2) (listing the factors to be considered
Category: Criminal Procedure
209 So. 3d 602, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17987
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2016 | Docket: 4550697
Cited 1 times | Published
2d 824 (1960) (emphasis added); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). Neither party has pointed us to
Category: Criminal Procedure
193 So. 3d 991, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7981, 2016 WL 3010473
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2016 | Docket: 3071392
Cited 1 times | Published
211(a) and any recommended treatment pursuant to rule 3.211(b). However, the record contains no doctor’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
185 So. 3d 679, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1745, 2016 WL 519907
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2016 | Docket: 3035158
Cited 1 times | Published
testimony of court-appointed experts designated under rule 3.211, or where the parties and the' trial court agree
Category: Criminal Procedure
162 So. 3d 1157, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6001, 2015 WL 1851542
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2015 | Docket: 60247389
Cited 1 times | Published
with section 916.12, Florida Statutes (2010) and Rule 3.211, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.”
One of
Category: Criminal Procedure
162 So. 3d 284, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3883, 2015 WL 1223667
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2015 | Docket: 2642439
Cited 1 times | Published
Ed.2d 824 (1960)); see
also
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). “A defect that impairs a defendant’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
139 So. 3d 436, 2014 WL 2199813, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8128
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2014 | Docket: 60241118
Cited 1 times | Published
consider the language and purpose of both rules.
1. Rule 3.211.
In 1980, the Florida Supreme Court adopted Florida
Category: Criminal Procedure
147 So. 3d 452, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1671, 2014 WL 2118192
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2014 | Docket: 57475
Cited 1 times | Published
appropriately in court, and “testify relevantly.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(2)(A)(vi).
In this case, Morrissey
Category: Criminal Procedure
132 So. 3d 123, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 890, 2013 WL 6500885, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2685
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2013 | Docket: 60238356
Cited 1 times | Published
proceedings without a separate order staying execution.
RULE 3.211. COMPETENCE TO PROCEED: SCOPE OF EXAMINATION
Category: Criminal Procedure
77 So. 3d 1280, 2012 WL 279672, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1320
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2012 | Docket: 60304659
Cited 1 times | Published
understanding of the pending proceedings.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). When determining a defendant’s competency
Category: Criminal Procedure
933 So. 2d 1271, 2006 WL 2088265
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 2006 | Docket: 1308314
Cited 1 times | Published
manifest appropriate courtroom behavior. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211.[1]
In Branch, which also involved a mentally
Category: Criminal Procedure
712 So. 2d 818, 1998 WL 374715
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1998 | Docket: 1471915
Cited 1 times | Published
proceedings." See § 916.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). In making a competency determination
Category: Criminal Procedure
617 So. 2d 368, 1993 WL 114774
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1993 | Docket: 1512496
Cited 1 times | Published
issues and consider the factors set forth in Rule 3.211 above, with copies to all parties. If at any
Category: Criminal Procedure
586 So. 2d 98, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9445, 1991 WL 188319
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1991 | Docket: 64661709
Cited 1 times | Published
court failed to comply with the requirements of rule 3.211 and section 916.13(1), Florida Statutes (1989)
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2025 | Docket: 70454069
Published
the ability to
testify relevantly. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(2)(A).
Based on the foregoing, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2024 | Docket: 69234595
Published
3
(quoting Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1)). “The focus of the prejudice
inquiry
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2024 | Docket: 69131362
Published
appointing experts shallmust, as
described in Rule 3.211:
(A) identify the purpose or
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2023 | Docket: 68029139
Published
below.
First, subdivisions (b) and (c) of rule 3.211 are amended with
language from the statutory
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2023 | Docket: 63322235
Published
standard of review. In
2
See also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(2), which provides:
In considering
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2023 | Docket: 66738078
Published
property as
opposed to alimony. Michigan Court Rule 3.211(D)(1) states that a
Uniform Support Order “must
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2021 | Docket: 61574146
Published
States, 362 U.S. 402,
402 (1960)); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). Factors to be considered
when evaluating
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2021 | Docket: 60858240
Published
case. See § 916.12, Fla. Stat. (2020); Fla R. Crim. P. 3.211-3.212.
These provisions do not require additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2021 | Docket: 60688689
Published
Notes
[NO CHANGE]
RULE 3.211. COMPETENCE TO PROCEED: SCOPE OF
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2021 | Docket: 60680655
Published
Notes
[NO CHANGE]
RULE 3.211. COMPETENCE TO PROCEED: SCOPE OF
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 2020 | Docket: 18690045
Published
understanding of the pending
proceedings.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). Trial judges are permitted to question
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2020 | Docket: 18430290
Published
the pending proceedings.’” Id. (citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1)).
“In order to establish prejudice
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2020 | Docket: 17292972
Published
competency
pursuant to the criteria set for in rule 3.211(a), Florida Rules of Criminal
Procedure. Both
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2020 | Docket: 16955828
Published
understanding of the pending
proceedings.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1). Conclusory
allegations of
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2019 | Docket: 16338049
Published
competency inquiry.
Even if the hearing was a rule 3.211 hearing, the defendant did not object
to the
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2019 | Docket: 16068376
Published
the pending proceedings.’” Id. (quoting Fla. R. Crim. P.
3.211(a)(1)). “‘[N]either low intelligence, mental
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 2019 | Docket: 15928486
Published
settings. See § 916.12(4), Fla. Stat. (2018); Fla. R.
Crim. P. 3.211(b)(3).
Category: Criminal Procedure
260 So. 3d 1156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2018 | Docket: 64699956
Published
understanding of the pending proceedings." Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1).
After the competency hearing, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2018 | Docket: 8454711
Published
of the pending proceedings.” Fla. R. Crim. P.
3.211(a)(1).
After the competency hearing
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2018 | Docket: 7913118
Published
incompetent to
proceed under the standard codified in rule 3.211) and prejudice (facts "that create a
real
Category: Criminal Procedure
250 So. 3d 183
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2018 | Docket: 7225317
Published
competency report those factors enumerated
in rule 3.211(a)(2).1 The expert shall submit a written report
Category: Criminal Procedure
230 So. 3d 934
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2017 | Docket: 6223858
Published
testimony of court-appointed experts designated under rule 3.211, or where the parties and the trial court agree
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2017 | Docket: 6219529
Published
894 So.2d 46, 54 (Fla. 2004)); see also
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1) (setting forth the factors an expert
Category: Criminal Procedure
219 So. 3d 760
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2017 | Docket: 6058577
Published
understanding of the pending proceedings.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211(a)(1).
Hampton was evaluated for competency
Category: Criminal Procedure
196 So. 3d 513, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10872, 2016 WL 3766558
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2016 | Docket: 4111230
Published
testimony of court-appointed experts designated under rule 3.211, or where the parties and the trial court agree
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2015 | Docket: 2646458
Published
Hernandez-Alberto, 889 So. 2d at 726; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.211. To that end, where
there is evidentiary
Category: Criminal Procedure
794 So. 2d 457, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2556, 2000 WL 1637548
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2000 | Docket: 64808411
Published
overlooked the need for a provision similar to rule 3.211(d), which specifies the written findings that
Category: Criminal Procedure
578 So. 2d 1137, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3640, 1991 WL 60860
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1991 | Docket: 64658521
Published
witness in direct violation of the provisions of Rule 3.211(e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 25, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 209, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6200
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1987 | Docket: 64624857
Published
issue of defendant’s competency pursu*26ant to Rule 3.211 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. As
Category: Criminal Procedure
440 So. 2d 638, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24081
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1983 | Docket: 64600678
Published
understanding of the proceedings against him. Rule 3.211 requires that each of these issues be specifically
Category: Criminal Procedure
438 So. 2d 396, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24423
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1983 | Docket: 64599810
Published
Ct. 788, 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960). Also see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.211(a). Certainly, the trial court is not absolutely
Category: Criminal Procedure
389 So. 2d 610, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4378
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1980 | Docket: 64578555
Published
This section should be read in conjunction with Rule 3.211 which requires the experts to submit their report
Category: Criminal Procedure