Florida Statute 6.02 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

6.02 United States authorized to acquire lands for certain purposes.—The United States may purchase, acquire, hold, own, occupy, and possess such lands within the limits of this state as they shall seek to occupy and hold as sites on which to erect and maintain forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings, or any of them, as contemplated and provided in the Constitution of the United States; such land to be acquired either by contract with owners, or in the manner hereinafter provided.

History.—s. 1, ch. 25, 1845; RS 7; GS 5; RGS 5; CGL 5.

F.S. 6.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 6.02

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 6.02

Total Results: 285 | Sort by: Relevance | Newest First

Copy

Thomas B. Fullman v. Charles Graddick, 739 F.2d 553 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 430 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19396

limitations grounds. The court applied Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1977), which provides for a one-year limitations

Copy

Mary Goodman v. Clayton Cnty. Sheriff Kemuel Kimbrough, 718 F.3d 1325 (11th Cir. 2013).

Cited 270 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2013 WL 3109280, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12740

cell checks and the midnight head count in Section 6; (2) Feemster reported having completed the 6 p

Copy

Roofing & Sheet Metal Servs., Inc. v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., 689 F.2d 982 (11th Cir. 1982).

Cited 222 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24657

162; Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 6(2)(d), (e); R. Leflar, American Conflicts Law § 150

Copy

Coker v. Amoco Oil Co., 709 F.2d 1433 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 215 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 702, 37 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 77, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25750, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33, 814

statute of limitations for fraud actions, Ala.Code § 6-2-3. See Hinton v. Hobbs, 349 So.2d 28 (Ala.1977)

Copy

Reta L. McCants as Adm'x of the Est. of Johnny L. McCants Deceased v. Ford Motor Co., Inc., 781 F.2d 855 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 215 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 4 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1116, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21601

sections of the Alabama code. See Ala.Code § 6-2-39 (1977). Appellant did not plead the one

Copy

Jacqueline D. Henderson v. Washington Nat'l, 454 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2006).

Cited 190 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16961, 2006 WL 1867353

limitations for fraud cases, see AIa.Code § 6-2-38©, rendered Henderson’s claims time-barred. On

Copy

Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co., 389 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 1980).

Cited 174 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Sanders, 138 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 143 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7367

simple contract actions, see Ala.Code § 6-2-34(9), 9 and reject the Sanders’s proposed

Copy

McNair v. Allen, 515 F.3d 1168 (11th Cir. 2008).

Cited 142 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2008 WL 227945

governing limitations period is two years. Ala.Code § 6-2-38; Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 876 F.2d 1480, 1483

Copy

Charles J. Piazza, Jr. v. EBSCO Indus., Inc., 273 F.3d 1341 (11th Cir. 2001).

Cited 131 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1021, 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 667, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 25448, 2001 WL 1523333

limitations for negligence actions, found at Ala. Code § 6-2-38, is two years from the date the injury occurred

Copy

Richard Durham v. Bus. Mgmt. Assocs., Somers & Altenbach, Richard Durham Merrill R. Barron Peter S. Verrill Khalid L. Khan Donald J. Gale Phillip Gilchrist Wray A. Hammer Jesse D. Hester Mamoun R. Pacha Richard G. O'Leary Samuel Staggers, Jr. Maurice F. Mc Carthy, Jr. Robert E. Hallett James B. Threlkel Wade Faulkner Shailesph P. Upadhyay Mohammed A. Mohiuddin & Timothy L. Eakes v. Bus. Mgmt. Assocs. Exec. Couns., Inc. Robert M. Fulmer Robert J. Underwood Underwood Fin. Plan., Inc., & William B. Aylor, McGraw Info. Sys. Co., Richard Durham Merrill R. Barron Peter S. Verrill Khalid L. Khan Donald J. Gale Phillip Gilchrist Wray A. Hammer Jesse D. Hester Mamoun R. Pacha Richard G. O'Leary Samuel Staggers, Jr. Maurice F. Mc Carthy, Jr. Robert E. Hallett James B. Threlkel Wade Faulkner Shailesph P. Upadhyay Mohammed A. Mohiuddin & Timothy L. Eakes v. Bus. Mgmt. Assocs. Exec. Couns., Inc. Robert M. Fulmer Robert J. Underwood Underwood Fin. Plan., Inc., & William B. Aylor, McGraw Info. Sys. Co., 847 F.2d 1505 (11th Cir. 1988).

Cited 110 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Alabama law. In fraud actions Alabama Code section 6-2-3 tolls the limitations period4 until the "fraud

Copy

Major Saxton, Jr., Mary Saxton v. Acf Indus., Inc., 254 F.3d 959 (11th Cir. 2001).

Cited 99 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 310, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 13492, 2001 WL 682242

Cir.1999). 3 . Alabama Code § 6-2-38(1) provides: "All actions for any

Copy

Itel Capital Corp., a Corp., Cross-Appellant v. Cups Coal Co., Inc., a Corp. & Herman Mulvehill, Cross-Appellees, 707 F.2d 1253 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 86 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1566, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26488

limitations for fraud in Alabama is one year, Ala.Code § 6-2-39, 8 and appellants argue that the statute

Copy

Francis v. State, 808 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 2001).

Cited 77 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2001 WL 1628780

§ 4209(e)(1)(r) (1995). [20] Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-102(h)(ix) (2001). [21] Accord Buckner v. State

Copy

William Aubrey Dominick, Jr. v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Robert Lyle Fundaburk v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Robert E. Johnson, Jr. v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., a Corp., Lincoln Nat'l Sales Corp. of Cent. Alabama, a Corp., & the Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., a Corp., Carlton S. & Chrystle Bone v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Lincoln Nat'l Sales Corp. of Cent. Alabama & the Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Jerry Lee Fowler v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Russell Jeffrey Pinyan v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Milton L. Culver, Gilmer R. & Hilda E. Godfrey v. The Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Etc., Robert Kermit Pinyan v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Julian D. Edwards v. United Presidential Life Ins. Co., a Corp. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co., a Corp. Milton L. Culver, Mary M. Hunt v. United Presidential Life Ins. Co., a Corp. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co., a Corp. Milton L. Culver, Hubert A. Grissom v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Defendant-Crossclaim Hoyt A. Ponder v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Lincoln Nat'l Sales Corp. Of Cent. Alabama & the Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Garry Aaron Walker v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Warren N. Cook v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Lincoln Nat'l Sales Corp. of Cent. Alabama & the Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., a Corp., Burton Burdick v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., a Corp. Lincoln Nat'l Sales Corp. of Cent. Alabama, a Corp. & the Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., a Corp., Fred M. Tucker v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Lincoln Nat'l Sales Corp. Of Cent. Alabama & the Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., James W. Spencer v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., a Corp. Lincoln Nat'l Sales Corp. of Cent. Alabama, a Corp., John Haven v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Etc., Allen Daniel Washburn & Mozelle Washburn v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Barry W. McCown v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Eugene A. Polk v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Wilford R. Hitt v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins. Co., Oscar Lee Nichols v. Atl. Am. Life Ins. Co., Etc., 809 F.2d 1559 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 74 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

statute of limitations. 76 Section 6-2-39, Code of Alabama (1975), requires that all

Copy

Perlow v. Berg-Perlow, 875 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 2004).

Cited 72 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2004 WL 583130

impact of the divorce on, the minor child."); id. § 6.2 ("An attorney should not permit a client to contest

Copy

Sturiano v. Brooks, 523 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 1988).

Cited 72 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1988 WL 26252

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) In the absence of an effective choice of law by

Copy

Joseph Richard Redner v. Charles S. Dean, Sheriff of Citrus Cnty., Florida, Robert A. Butterworth, 29 F.3d 1495 (11th Cir. 1994).

Cited 72 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23252, 1994 WL 419484

grant or reissue the license or permit. Section 6-2. Notice. Any notice required under this

Copy

William H. Grant v. Preferred Rsch., Inc., a Georgia Corp., 885 F.2d 795 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 71 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 503, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15326, 1989 WL 108471

for fraud in Alabama is set out in Ala.Code Ann. § 6-2-3. 4 Under that section, a plaintiff

Copy

Jones v. Dillard's, Inc., 331 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 71 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10942, 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 28, 2003 WL 21250859

enumerated specifically in the code. Ala.Code. § 6-2-38(l) (1984). On its face, the AADEA provides that

Copy

Fed. Sav. & Loan Ins. Corp. v. Virginia B. Haralson, 813 F.2d 370 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 66 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1321, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3955

effective January 9, 1985). However, under Section 6-2-3, fraud actions otherwise barred were not deemed

Copy

Samuel Jones, Jr. v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d 1250 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 65 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30695

specifically enumerated in this section.” ALA.CODE § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1975). Since the plaintiff had filed suit

Copy

Gray v. Bryant, 125 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 1960).

Cited 64 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...59-1005, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1959, has already acted to prescribe that there shall be one circuit judge for each 50,000 inhabitants, or major fraction thereof, in each of those circuits, according to the last census authorized by law. We have noted that Section 26.02(1), F.S.A., which pertains to the First Judicial Circuit, contains two sentences which may be contradictory....

...It seems clear that the statutory provision was intended to be an exercise of the power granted the legislature to designate the place of residence of the four judges of the circuit and was not intended to limit the number of judges therein. This is clear because the first sentence of said Section 26.02(1) fixes the number of judges in accordance with the population formula prescribed in the constitutional provision. If construed literally, the second sentence of Section 26.02(1) is in conflict with the first sentence thereof and with Section 6 (2), Article V and is therefore unconstitutional and void....

Copy

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Roach, 945 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 2006).

Cited 60 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 840, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2877, 2006 WL 3630072

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) In the absence of an effective choice of law by

Copy

Fine v. Semet, 699 F.2d 1091 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 55 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 4 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1273, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29753

...If the Participant terminates employment prior to attaining Normal Retirement Age because of death or disability, the Advisory Committee shall direct the Trustee to commence payment of the Participant's Accrued Benefit to him (or to his Beneficiary, if the Participant is deceased), in accord with the provisions of Section 6.02, within sixty (60) days after the close of the Plan Year in which the Participant's employment terminates....

Copy

Paul L. Spain v. Brown & Williamson, 363 F.3d 1183 (11th Cir. 2004).

Cited 51 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 355

to a two year statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 6-2-38, and that the breach of implied warranty claim

Copy

Piamba Cortes Ex Rel. Piamba Cortes v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 177 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 51 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1999 A.M.C. 2286, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13191

C. Most Significant Interests Under Section 6(2) Having identified both Florida and Colombia

Copy

21 Emp. Benefits Cas. 1625, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936c, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 294 Harry L. Hunt v. Hawthorne Assocs., Inc., E. Air Lines Variable Benefit Ret. Plan for Pilots Trust Admin. Comm. of the E. Airlines Variable Benefit Ret. Plan for Pilots, 119 F.3d 888 (11th Cir. 1997).

Cited 51 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

benefit15 as of his effective retirement date.16 See § 6.2(e)(i) ("Lump Sum Option"). A pilot dissatisfied

Copy

Grupo Televisa, S.A. v. Telemundo Commc'ns Grp., Inc., 485 F.3d 1233 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 50 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11011, 2007 WL 1364320

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

James D. Ray v. The Tennessee Valley Auth., 677 F.2d 818 (11th Cir. 1982).

Cited 50 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 240, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18706

subject to a one-year limitations period. Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5). See Rubin v. O’Koren, 621 F

Copy

Baker v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ., 531 F.3d 1336 (11th Cir. 2008).

Cited 50 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13353, 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43, 258, 103 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1255, 2008 WL 2510177

"[T]he two-year limitations period of Ala.Code § 6-2-38(l) applies to section 1983 actions in Alabama

Copy

Lufkin v. Mccallum, 956 F.2d 1104 (11th Cir. 1992).

Cited 49 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5528

Alabama. Jones I, 763 F.2d at 1256; Ala.Code § 6-2-34(1) (1977). In reaching this conclusion, the

Copy

Benon John Trawinski, Irene Monahan Trawinski v. United Tech., Carrier Corp., 313 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2002).

Cited 47 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24368, 2002 WL 31687621

for personal injury actions provided by Ala. Code § 6-2-38(i) should apply. See Dumas v. Town of Mt

Copy

Avco Corp. v. Precision Air Parts, Inc., 676 F.2d 494 (11th Cir. 1982).

Cited 43 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 216 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1086, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19218

Alabama limitations statute. Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a) (1975). 1 See also Local Trademarks

Copy

Henry Gerrard Clay v. Equifax, Inc., 762 F.2d 952 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 42 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30171

year from the date of publication. Ala.Code 1975, § 6-2-39(a)(4); Hams v. Winter, 379 So.2d 588

Copy

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Olsen, 406 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1981).

Cited 41 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Beverly Chambless v. Louisiana-Pac. Corp., 481 F.3d 1345 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 40 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 6792, 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42, 767, 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 549, 2007 WL 865854

limitations for those torts is two years. Ala.Code § 6-2-38(¿), (n) (1975). The alleged acts that Chambless

Copy

Kinnon v. Arcoub, Gopman & Assocs., Inc., 490 F.3d 886 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 39 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15479, 2007 WL 1855057

...was acting in a representative capacity.”); Van D. Costas, 432 So. 2d at 658 (“Unless otherwise agreed, a person purporting to make a contract with another for a partially disclosed principal is a party to the contract.”). See also R ESTATEMENT (T HIRD) OF A GENCY § 6.02 (“When an agent acting with actual or apparent authority makes a contract on behalf of an unidentified principal ....

Copy

United States v. Jerry Lee Griffith, 455 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2006).

Cited 39 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17940, 2006 WL 1976047

338 F.3d at 1067 (quoting Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-501(b)). Characterizing that statute as a “law against

Copy

Robert McK Foster, as Pers. Rep. of the Estates of Almon O. Thompson, Deceased, & Doris E. Thompson, Deceased v. United States, 768 F.2d 1278 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 39 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21342

the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 876 F.2d 1480 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 36 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

(repealed), provided a one-year limitations period. Section 6-2-39(a)(5) was repealed after the plaintiff in

Copy

Cortes v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 177 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 33 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

C. Most Significant Interests Under Section 6(2)

Copy

Pledger v. Burnup & Sims, Inc., 432 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Cited 30 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Waters v. Int'l Precious Metals Corp., 190 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 300, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24281

to defendant Grosfeld. See R31-1371, § 6.2(e), at 43. The stipulation also provided that

Copy

William B. Larkin Louise Seals, as Pers. Rep. of Spurgeon Seals, Deceased Lillie Lofton, as Pers. Rep. of Edward Lofton, Deceased Jesse B. Terry, on Behalf of Himself & Others Similarly Situated v. Pullman-Stand. Div., Pullman, Inc., a Corp., Defendant- Louis Swint & Willie James Johnson, on Behalf of Themselves & Others Similarly Situated Clyde Humphrey v. Pullman-Stand., Bessemer, Alabama United Steelworkers of Am. Local 1466 & United Steelworkers of Am., Afl-Cio, Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists Louis Swint, & Willie James Johnson, on Behalf of Themselves & Others Similarly Situated Clyde Humphrey v. Pullman-Stand., Bessemer, Alabama, United Steelworkers of Am. Local 1466 & United Steelworkers of Am., Afl-Cio, Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists, 854 F.2d 1549 (11th Cir. 1988).

Cited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

limitations that applied to personal injury actions. Section 6-2-34(1) provided that "[a]ctions for any trespass

Copy

Brandon, Jones, Sandall, Zeide, Kohn, Chalal & Musso, P.A. v. MedPartners, Inc., 312 F.3d 1349 (11th Cir. 2002).

Cited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 458, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24289

contract to invoke the arbitration requirement of section 6.2(d)(“The [allegations of breach] shall be resolved

Copy

Vera Smith, as of the Est. of Robert J. Smith, Deceased v. Duff & Phelps, Inc., a Corp., & Claire v. Hansen, 891 F.2d 1567 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 403

two-year statute of limitations period found in section 6-2-38 of the Code of Alabama applies both to the

Copy

Roger D. Hovater, Cross-Appellant v. Equifax, Inc., Equifax Servs., Inc., & Equifax Servs., Ltd., Defendants- Cross-Appellees, 823 F.2d 413 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 28 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10105, 56 U.S.L.W. 2085

applicable limitation period was one year. Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(4) (1975); see, e.g., Holdbrooks v.

Copy

Free v. Granger, 887 F.2d 1552 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 27 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17004

former one-year statute, section 6-2-39 have been transferred to Section 6-2-38, the two-year statute

Copy

Bancroft Inv. Corp. v. City of Jacksonville, 27 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 1946).

Cited 27 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 157 Fla. 546, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 800

statute listing the lands that may be acquired (Section 6.02) has the omnibus clause, "other needful buildings

Copy

Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge No. 1688 v. Allied Prods. Corp., 786 F.2d 1561 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 27 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 122 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2264, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24519

Cardinal would seem to require that Alabama Code § 6-2-34 (1975), 3 which provides a six year

Copy

Hester v. Int'l Union Of Operating Engineers, 941 F.2d 1574 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 26 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 986, 138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2719, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22041

injury one-year statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed 1985), because Hester's claim

Copy

Marshall v. Hollywood, Inc., 236 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1970).

Cited 26 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Standards, III Florida Real Property Practice (1965), § 6.2: "The chief purpose of the act is to extinguish

Copy

City of Miami v. St. Joe Paper Co., 364 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 1978).

Cited 25 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Volume 3, Florida Real Property Practice (1965) Section 6.2 describes the nature of the act as follows: "The

Copy

Proprietors Ins. Co. v. Valsecchi, 435 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Cited 25 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Clara Nell SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.C. McCLAMMY, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees, 740 F.2d 925 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 24 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18961, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34, 639, 35 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1316

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 suit was barred by Ala.Code § 6-2-39, the one-year statute of limitations. We affirm

Copy

City of Miami v. Keton, 115 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 1959).

Cited 24 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...s: "Section 6.01 "A. A Court is hereby established, the name of which shall be the Metropolitan Court. There shall be as many judges of this Court as the Board shall deem necessary to administer promptly and expeditiously the business of the Court. "Section 6.02 "A....

...ce shall pertain to all violations hereof within Dade County, Florida, and supersedes and nullifies any and all Municipal ordinances or codes and any and all County ordinances or codes relative to the regulation and enforcement of traffic. "Section 26.02 The violation of any provision hereof shall be triable in the Metropolitan Court, which shall have exclusive original jurisdiction thereof." The ordinance of Dade County creating the metropolitan court [Ordinance 57-13], promulgated by the Board...

Copy

Judge v. Am. Motors Corp., 908 F.2d 1565 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 24 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 14373

court refers to relevant factors set forth in section 6(2)).4 39 (a) Balance of Competing

Copy

Nordson Corp. v. Joseph Plasschaert & Ranier Corp., 674 F.2d 1371 (11th Cir. 1982).

Cited 23 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19490

see also Restatement (Second) of Conflicts § 6(2) (1971). The terms of this restriction are reasonable

Copy

Anderson v. State, 276 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1973).

Cited 22 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

supra; Illinois, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 38, § 6-2(a), (b); Indiana, Hill v. State, 1969, 252 Ind.

Copy

Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 876 F.2d 1480 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 21 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 WL 67157

Alabama’s residual statute of limitations, Ala. Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed) (1985). That section contained

Copy

Palm Beach Cnty. Health Care Dist. v. Prof'l Med. Educ., Inc., 13 So. 3d 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9167, 2009 WL 1940443

costs of providing service for all users thereof", § 6(2); b) the power to "sue and be sued in its own name

Copy

State v. Steele, 921 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2006).

Cited 21 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

10.95.080 (2002)); and Wyoming (Wyo.Stat.Ann. § 6-2-102(d)(ii) (2005)). [4] These are Montana (Mont

Copy

United States v. Singletary, 649 F.3d 1212 (11th Cir. 2011).

Cited 21 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16810, 2011 WL 3566861

July 9 and 10, 2007. [15] HUD Handbook 4000.2 § 6-2, 2004 WL 5863716 (May 2004). [16] HUD Handbook

Copy

Brennan v. State, 754 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1999).

Cited 20 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1999 WL 506966

...2969 (Brennan, J. dissenting). Four states expressly set sixteen as the minimum age for capital punishment: Indiana ( see Ind.Code Ann. § 35-50-2-3 (West 1998)); Missouri ( see Mo.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 565.020 (West 1999)); Nevada ( see Nev.Rev.Stat. § 176.025 (1997)); and Wyoming ( see Wyo....

Copy

Maryellen H. Doyle v. The Univ. of Alabama in Birmingham, 680 F.2d 1323 (11th Cir. 1982).

Cited 20 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 357, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17354, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33, 052, 29 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 777

92 S.Ct. 674, 30 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972); Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1975). Since Doyle did not bring her suit

Copy

Stallworth v. Hosp. Rentals, Inc., 515 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Cited 19 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2636

accord with the general factors set forth in section 6(2) of the Restatement.[4] *418 Our holding today

Copy

Boyd v. Cnty. of Dade, 123 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 1960).

Cited 16 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...The maximum punishment which may be given on conviction for a violation of any ordinance is $1,000 fine or one year in jail or both. In all offenses punishable by fine of more than $500 or imprisonment more than sixty days, the accused is entitled to a jury trial. Section 6.02 D Metropolitan Charter. Appeal shall be taken to the circuit court. Section 6.02 F, Metropolitan Charter....

Copy

Fine v. Semet, 699 F.2d 1091 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 16 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...If the Participant terminates employment prior to attaining Normal Retirement Age because of death or disability, the Advisory Committee shall direct the Trustee to commence payment of the Participant’s Accrued Benefit to him (or to his Beneficiary, if the Participant is deceased), in accord with the provisions of Section 6.02, within sixty (60) days after the close of the Plan Year in which the Participant’s employment terminates....

Copy

Edward C. Hester v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, 878 F.2d 1309 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 16 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2011, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11233, 1989 WL 74339

before January 9, 1985, such as Hester’s. Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed 1985).1 Cf. Ingram v. Steven

Copy

Fine v. Semet, 514 F. Supp. 34 (S.D. Fla. 1981).

Cited 16 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1103, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13705

...If the Participant terminates employment prior to attaining Normal Retirement Age because of death or disability, the Advisory Committee shall direct the Trustee to commence payment of the Participant's Accrued Benefit to him (or to his Beneficiary if the Participant is deceased), in accord with the provisions of Section 6.02, within sixty (60) days after the close of the Plan Year in which the Participant's employment terminates....

Copy

Anthony Boyd v. Warden,Holman Corr. Facility, 856 F.3d 853 (11th Cir. 2017).

Cited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2017 WL 1856071, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8238

limitations for personal injury actions. See Ala. Code § 6-2-38. Therefore, if any of Boyd’s claims accrued prior

Copy

Washington Nat'l Ins. v. Ruderman, 117 So. 3d 943 (Fla. 2013).

Cited 15 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 511, 2013 WL 3333059, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1388

Allan D. Windt, Insurance Claims and Disputes 5th § 6:2 (2012) (“[I]f a policy term is ambiguous, the court

Copy

Wright v. Sheppard, 919 F.2d 665 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 WL 187066

(1987); L. Schlueter & K. Redden, Punitive Damages § 6.2 (2d ed. 1989); Merrit v. DeLos Santos, 721 F.2d

Copy

Hudson v. State, 745 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 770614

Austin W. Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.2(d), at 29-38 (1986). The substantial step approach

Copy

Jimmie L. Peterson Alonzo Reese v. Bmi Refractories, 132 F.3d 1405 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2193, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 407, 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45, 172, 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1322, 1998 WL 9164

16 . See Ala.Code § 6-2-38(Z) (1993) (personal injury actions not specifically

Copy

Bates v. Cook, Inc., 615 F. Supp. 662 (M.D. Fla. 1984).

Cited 14 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21060

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Pens. Plan Guide P 23919j T.A. Musick & James Character v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc., 81 F.3d 136 (11th Cir. 1996).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8821, 1996 WL 161704

the two-year statute of limitations found in section 6-2-88. ConAgra, Inc. v. Adams, 638 So

Copy

Joanna Digioia, Vincent Digioia v. H. Koch & Sons, Div. of Wickes Mfg. Co., a Delaware Corp., 944 F.2d 809 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 13 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23521, 1991 WL 186529

occurrences and the parties under the principles of § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Stvartak v. Eastman Kodak Co., 945 F. Supp. 1532 (M.D. Fla. 1996).

Cited 13 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17552, 1996 WL 670640

...Indeed, the Plan Administrator acknowledged at trial that a plan participant would have to ask the Employee Benefits department in order to find out. Stvartak has proposed a sound interpretation of the plan to rival Kodak's interpretation. Stvartak proposes that STD benefits expire when a participant's employment terminates. Section 6.02 of the STD Plan (incorporated into the LTD Plan in § 2.20) supports Stvartak's interpretation: "[a]n employee's coverage under the Plan terminates when his employment terminates." DX4 at 12; DX3 at 5, § 2.20....

...ers skilled in determining LTD claims. [13] The STD Plan continues an employee's pay during absence from work because of his inability to work. DX4 at 1. An employee's coverage under the STD Plan terminates when his employment terminates. DX4 at 12, § 6.02....

Copy

Willie C. Calhoun & Mattie Calhoun v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. & Escambia Cnty. Comm'n, 705 F.2d 422 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 13 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27987

limitations for trespass on the case, Ala. Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1975), is applicable to the Calhouns’

Copy

Perret v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., 889 F. Supp. 2d 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012).

Cited 13 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126828, 2012 WL 3758036

connection with the operation of the Trust.” Section 6.2 of the Management Agreement, entitled “Expenses

Copy

Carol J. Sellers, Donald W. Sellers v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc., 715 F.2d 1559 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 12 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16406

fraudulent concealment tolling statute (Ala.Code § 6-2-3 (1975)). We affirm. FACTS Carol and

Copy

Sidney Pines v. Warnaco, Inc., 706 F.2d 1173 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 12 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26917

one-year statute of limitations contained in Ala. Code § 6-2-39 (1975). See Jefferson County v. Reach,

Copy

Da Rocha v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 451 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (S.D. Fla. 2006).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67576, 2006 WL 2619880

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Holland v. Hattaway, 438 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24436

Legal Education, Florida Real Property Practice I § 6.2 (1965). [14] Exceptions include the effect of defects

Copy

Scavella v. Fernandez, 371 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

any such applicable general law ..." Art. VIII, § 6(2), Fla. Const. of 1968 (reenacting Art. VIII, § 11(5)

Copy

The Florida Companies v. Orange Cnty., Fla., 411 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

the land. At the time of preliminary approval, section 6.2.7 of the Orange County Code provided that the

Copy

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Sys., 567 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6627, 1990 WL 126324

the Restatement (Second), Conflict of Laws, section 6(2)(a), which outlines the relevant factors we have

Copy

Crowell v. Clay Hyder Trucking Lines, 700 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 614430

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

United Paperworks Int'l, Local 395, United Paperworkers Int'l, Local 766 v. Itt Rayonier, Inc., 931 F.2d 832 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 10 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2614, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10140, 1991 WL 68745

O.C.G.A. § 9-3-24. 14 . Ala.Code § 6-2-34. 15 .We will not list the cases

Copy

At&T Commc'ns of the S. States, Inc. v. BellSouth Telecomm., Inc., 268 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2001).

Cited 9 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21756, 2001 WL 1200887

Federal Telecommunications Law § 6.2 (2d ed. 1999). 4 ."A 'tariff is a

Copy

3V Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. Off. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc. (In Re Tousa, Inc.), 444 B.R. 613 (S.D. Fla. 2011).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14019, 2011 WL 522008

...tify the Company of the Default, and the Company does not cure such Default within the time specified after receipt of such notice. Such notice must specify the Default, demand that it be remedied and state that such notice is a "Notice of Default." Section 6.02 ACCELERATION (a) If an Event of Default (other than an Event of Default specified in Section 6.01(a)(vii) or (a)(viii)), shall have occurred *625 and be continuing, the Trustee or Holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amoun...

Copy

United States v. Douglas Frank Haley, 743 F.2d 862 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17888

inapplicable to this case, see CFR § 6.2(b)(1) (1981), once again we hold that it is not

Copy

Brown v. State, 790 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2001 WL 578457

Austin W. Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law § 6.2(c), at 500 (2d ed.1986). Murder is a result-oriented

Copy

Cirelli v. Ent, 885 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2340685

Marketable Record Title Act and Uniform Title Standards, § 6.2, in III Florida Real Property Practice (1965)) (emphases

Copy

Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 230 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2000).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2000 WL 1535929

to a 2-year statute of limitations, see Ala.Code § 6-2-38, and that the breach of warranty claim is subject

Copy

Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. Weitz, 913 F.2d 1544 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 WL 135898

instance is six years, as set out in Code of Alabama § 6-2-34 (1975). Since the first payment which plaintiffs

Copy

Williams v. City of Dothan, 745 F.2d 1406 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 416

state statute to apply in this case is Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1977), which provides a one-year limitation

Copy

H & F Land v. Panama City-Bay Co. Airport, 736 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 1999).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 264, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1047, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 264

Marketable Record Title Act and Uniform Title Standards, § 6.2, in III Florida Real Property Practice (1965) (citation

Copy

Ace Am. Ins. Co. v. The Wattles Co., 930 F.3d 1240 (11th Cir. 2019).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

operations posed to Wattles'[s] property." Although section 6.2 of the relevant lease required Exide to "comply

Copy

Stanley L. Crawford v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 758 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 2014).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2014 WL 3361226

court in October 2004. See Ala.Code § 6-2-37(1). Then, on February 2, 2008, Crawford

Copy

Fisher v. Bd. of Cnty. Com'rs of Dade Cnty., 84 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 1956).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

the benefit to be received", nevertheless, in Section 6-02 of the report it is readily admitted that "no

Copy

Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 598 F. Supp. 377 (S.D. Fla. 1984).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21400

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

United Teachers of Dade v. DADE CTY. SCH. BD., 500 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 1986).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

have on the rights guaranteed by article I, section 6.[2]City of Tallahassee; See also United *511 Faculty

Copy

Vagenas v. Cont'l Gin Co., 988 F.2d 104 (11th Cir. 1993).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7475

States must be commenced." ALA.CODE § 6-2-32 (1975). Reading § 6-2-32 in light of the treaty, a Greek

Copy

Dzikowski v. Friedlander (In Re Friedlander Capital Mgmt. Corp.), 411 B.R. 434 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 8 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 1195

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) The local law of the state of incorporation will

Copy

Geoffrey West v. Comm'r, Alabama DOC, 869 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir. 2017).

Cited 7 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

injury actions applies. See Ala. Code, § 6-2-38(j) (“All actions for any injury to the person

Copy

Waters v. Int'l Precious, 190 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 7 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

would revert to defendant Grosfeld. See R31-1371, § 6.2(e), at 43. The stipulation also provided

Copy

Mukamal v. Bakes, 383 B.R. 798 (S.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96347, 2007 WL 4916729

occurrences and the parties under the principles of § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Emmart v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 659 F. Supp. 843 (S.D. Fla. 1987).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3850

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State Ins., 899 F.2d 1045 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 7 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

statute of limitations for a fraud action, ALA.CODE § 6-2-39 (1975) (repealed 1985), was one year from the

Copy

MDS (Canada), Inc. v. Rad Source Tech., Inc., 822 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (S.D. Fla. 2011).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113273, 2011 WL 4591186

including with respect to the System. Subject to section 6.2, Rad Source, its respective offices and its Affiliates

Copy

Caddis Lee Dukes v. Smitherman, Sheriff Austain Lavert Bibb Cnty. Comm'n, 32 F.3d 535 (11th Cir. 1994).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26173, 1994 WL 478597

commence an action.... See Ala.Code § 6-2-8(a) (1975) (emphasis added). It also provided that

Copy

Lufkin v. McCallum, 956 F.2d 1104 (11th Cir. 1992).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 WL 47365

in Alabama. Jones I, 763 F.2d at 1256; Ala.Code § 6-2-34(1) (1977). In reaching this conclusion, the Jones

Copy

McElvy v. Civiletti, 523 F. Supp. 42 (S.D. Fla. 1981).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14822

possession a quantity of cannabis in violation of Section 6(2) of the Drug Control Ordinance. THE WAIVER UNDER

Copy

Bobby Jean McKissick v. Donald Busby City of Millbrook, Alabama James Owens Arvil Minor Walter Hubbard, 936 F.2d 520 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15608, 1991 WL 117291

for trespass on the case, found in Alabama Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (Michie 1977). Before one year had passed

Copy

Brooks v. Watchtower Bible & Tract, 706 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 64088

...ayor ... and except those powers specifically reserved in this Charter to the electors of the City." See Charter § 2.03 (emphasis added). One of the powers specifically reserved to the electors is the power of initiative and referendum. See Charter § 6.02. The Charter of West Palm Beach provides: Except as otherwise provided by law for issuance of City bonds, the electors may approve or reject any ordinance at the polls in the manner provided in this article.... Charter § 6.02....

...ordinance authorizing the sale of a major city asset cannot be the subject of a referendum. See also City of Lake Worth v. State, 111 So.2d 433 (Fla. 1959). Appellees also argue that section 166.041(1)(a), Florida Statutes, when read in tandem with section 6.02 of the Charter, permits a referendum only when the action taken is legislative in nature, as distinguished from executive or administrative....

Copy

Edward E. Hancock, Cynthia A. Hancock v. New York Life Ins. Co., 899 F.2d 1131 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6802, 1990 WL 42193

period set forth in Ala.Code *1134 § 6-2-38. 1 The court reasoned that this cause

Copy

In Re Managed Care Litig., 143 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (S.D. Fla. 2001).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10673, 2001 WL 474300

stemming from that agreement. (Mercy Agreement, § 6.2 (stating that "any dispute or claim between the

Copy

Blue Cross v. Sanders, 138 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

limitations for simple contract actions, see Ala. Code § 6-2-34(9),9 and reject the Sanders’s 9 Other circuits

Copy

Mezroub v. Capella, 702 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 716835

invoke section 6(1). The seven principles in section 6(2) may allow for arguments in support of both Georgia

Copy

Fink v. Holt, 609 So. 2d 1333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 324724

Jr., Florida Practice and Procedure (1991 ed.), § 6.2. The applicable rule of civil procedure expressly

Copy

State v. McArthur, 296 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...Savage, 482 F.2d 1371 (9th Cir.1973); U.S. v. Cooper, 464 F.2d 648 (10th Cir.1972); U.S. v. Barson, 434 F.2d 127 (5th Cir.1970). "Virtually every circuit has now taken the position that recordation is permissive and not mandatory." 8 Moore's Federal Practice, The Grand Jury § 6.02 n....

Copy

Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Rosenberger, 699 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 374389

application of the important considerations noted in section 6(2).[7] As to the vicarious liability issue, Restatement

Copy

Cantrell v. Folsom, 332 F. Supp. 767 (M.D. Fla. 1971).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12227

...ildren, and all able-bodied male persons over the age of eighteen years who are without means of support and remain in idleness, shall be deemed vagrants, and upon conviction shall be subject to the penalty provided in § 856.03." Florida Statutes 856.02, F.S.A....

...1969), vacated in order that the district court could review its decision in light of Younger v. Harris, supra , concluded that the state statute there in question (which is the identical statute incorporated in the instant case into the city ordinances by reference), Florida Statute § 856.02, F.S.A....

...Petitioners' motion for summary judgment under Rules 56(a) and 56(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is granted. 5. It is hereby declared that the ordinance in question here, Ordinance of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida, 29-1 (incorporating by reference, Florida Statute 856.02, F.S.A.), is unconstitutional on its face and that the right of the petitioners here includes the right not to be arrested under color of such ordinance.

Copy

Holmes v. Area Glass, Inc., 117 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11761, 2013 WL 3853225

pointed to Traw-ick’s Florida Practice and Procedure, § 6-2, which states that “the names of the parties in

Copy

Rosa & Raymond Parks Inst. for Self Dev. v. Target Corp., 812 F.3d 824 (11th Cir. 2016).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1097, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7, 2016 WL 25495

on all but one of the books at issue. Ala.Code § 6-2-38(7) (1975). Alabama typically considers statutes

Copy

Christopher Brooks v. Warden, 810 F.3d 812 (11th Cir. 2016).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 860, 2016 WL 212427

Amendment claim is two years. See Ala.Code § 6-2-38 (1975) (establishing a two-year statute of limitations

Copy

Johnson v. Greaves, 366 F. App'x 976 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

F.3d 1168, 1173 (11th Cir.2008) (citing Aa.Code § 6-2-38). The limitations period begins to run when the

Copy

Default Proof Credit Card Sys., Inc. v. STATE ST. BANK & TRUST Co., 753 F. Supp. 1566 (S.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17552

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6.[2] (2) Contacts to be taken into consideration in

Copy

Ramp Operations, Inc. v. Reliance Ins. Co., a Corp., Louisiana Companies, a Licensed Surplus Line Ins. Broker, 805 F.2d 1552 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34911

in Alabama is one year. Ala.Code § 6-2-39 (1975). Under Ala.Code § 6-2-3 (1975), a fraud action must be

Copy

Est. of Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 609 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (M.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56446, 2009 WL 975570

Eleventh Circuit explained in Judge that: The section 6(2) analysis turns in large part on the balance

Copy

Husky Rose, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 19 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14922, 2009 WL 3189181

...The restaurant ran successfully in the space for the duration of the lease. When the lease came up for renewal, the parties negotiated over new terms. The final renewal lease contained a new provision requiring the tenant to maintain fire insurance with the landlord as an insured under the policy. Specifically, section 6.02 of the lease provided: "The Tenant shall at all times maintain fire insurance with extended coverage in the name of the Landlord and the Tenant, in an amount appropriate to cover the cost of replacement of all alterations, decorations, a...

Copy

Gevaerts v. TD Bank, N.A., 56 F. Supp. 3d 1335 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156529, 2014 WL 5493183

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Steele v. S. Truck Body Corp., 397 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Jian Le Lin v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 681 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 2012).

Cited 4 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2012 WL 1860686, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10430

consideration of a petitioner’s motion to reopen. 8 C.F.R. § 6.2 (1952) (stating that the departure of an alien from

Copy

Larry Wayne Whitson v. Charles Baker & Troy Howton, 755 F.2d 1406 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 4 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28502

a term less than life, does Alabama Code [1975] § 6-2-8 operate to toll the statute of limitations?” 732

Copy

Trafalgar Capital Specialized Inv. Fund v. Hartman, 878 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (S.D. Fla. 2012).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2012 WL 2579932, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93790

...37] to the Motion, including a variety of exhibits in support. In its Response, Plaintiff highlights the following additional facts. First, Plaintiff states Florida law governs the Debenture, Securities Purchase Agreement, and the Security Agreement. (See Comp. Ex. B [ECF No. 37-2]: Debenture § 6.02; Securities Purchase Agreement ¶ 9(a); Security Agreement § 8.7)....

Copy

Prater v. United Mine Workers of Am., 793 F.2d 1201 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 4 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 122 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3240, 21 Fed. R. Serv. 260, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27323

subject to a one-year limitations period. Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1975), in effect at the time this suit

Copy

Pennington v. Dye, 456 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Brandon, Jones, Sandall, Zeide, Kohn, Chalal & Musso, P.A. v. MedPartners, Inc., 203 F.R.D. 677 (S.D. Fla. 2001).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21482, 2001 WL 1349307

said party shall be deemed “the losing party.” Section 6.2(c) states: (c) Termination by MEDPARTNERS for

Copy

Martin Cnty. Conservation All. v. Martin Cnty., 73 So. 3d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17513, 2011 WL 5299370

331, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, and section 6.2 of this court’s Internal Operating Procedures

Copy

Harville v. Yarway Corp., 731 F.2d 775 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 A.M.C. 731

“after the cause of action has accrued." Ala.Code § 6-2-30(a). The Alabama Supreme Court has held that a

Copy

Larry Wayne Whitson v. Charles Baker & Troy Howton, 732 F.2d 856 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22331

construction of an Alabama tolling statute, Ala.Code § 6-2-8 (1975). Because this question of state law appears

Copy

Westgate Tabernacle, Inc. v. Palm Beach Cnty., 14 So. 3d 1027 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5431, 2009 WL 1393429

facilities are permitted in the RH zoning district. ULDC § 6.2.D.8. The code identifies three types of facilities:

Copy

Pinellas Cnty. v. Eight is Enough in Pinellas, 775 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 639326

...The County admits that the charter has been amended in the past without legislative participation but argues that those amendments were ministerial in nature. In this case, the ballot initiatives were proposed and passed in accordance with the provisions for charter initiative in section 6.02....

Copy

Hunt v. Am. Bank & Trust Co. of Baton Rouge, 783 F.2d 1011 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

of one year for the state claims, see Ala.Code. § 6-2-39 (repealed Jan. 9, 1985),1 and two years for the

Copy

Laspro Consultores LTDA. v. Alinia Corp. (In re Massa Falida Do Banco Cruzeiro Do Sul S.A.), 567 B.R. 212 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2017).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Cnty. of Dade v. Saffan, 173 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 1965).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Helen Saffan, appellee, was convicted in the Dade County Metropolitan Court for violation of a county ordinance. She appealed to the circuit court, which court dismissed the appeal on the ground that appellee failed to file the notice of appeal within the 20-day period prescribed by Section 6.02(f) Article VI of the Home Rule Charter of Dade County....

...within the exclusive orbit of Section 11, Article VIII * * *." The jurisdiction, i.e., power and authority, of the circuit court to hear appeals from the Metro Court exists solely by reason of the adoption of the Home Rule Charter, and specifically Section 6.02 thereof....

Copy

Airplanes of Boca, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. Fed. Aviation Admin., 254 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (S.D. Fla. 2003).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10257

Safety is not a luxury! Take action! AIM, Chapter 6, § 6-2(b). As a general rule, the ordinary rules of negligence

Copy

Red-Eyed Jack, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach, 165 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (M.D. Fla. 2001).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21588, 2001 WL 1044897

a special use operation are set forth in Art. 4 § 6.2 and require, in part, public hearings by the Planning

Copy

Archstone Palmetto Park, LLC v. Kennedy, 132 So. 3d 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 305086, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1017

...Although Ordinance 5203 was styled as an amendment, the parties stipulated that it was a “local government development order.” One month after the ordinance’s passage, the appellees, a group of Boca Raton residents, collectively filed a petition, pursuant to Section 6.02 of the City’s charter, seeking a citywide referendum to determine whether Ordinance 5203 should be repealed. Although not specifically addressing development orders, Section 6.02 1 conferred upon the City’s residents a general power of referendum with regard to the passage of city ordinances, providing as follows: The qualified voters of the city shall have the power by petition to require reconsideration by th...

...In its order, the trial court found that, through the passage of the 2012 Amendment, “the Legislature intended for the referendum process to be permitted for Development Orders, where ... the City Charter provided for this prior to June, 2011.” Accordingly, since Section 6.02’s general provision “for the referendum process on any Ordinances” impliedly included development orders, the trial court reasoned “the 2012 Amendment supported] the referendum process in th[e instant] case.” To support its rul...

...nt’s blanket prohibition. Nevertheless, the trial court interpreted the statute’s inclusion of the phrase “development orders” to evidence the Legislature’s intent to expand the referendum process to all general charter provisions, such as Section 6.02, which inferentially, although not directly, apply to development orders....

Copy

Erkins v. United Steelworkers, 723 F.2d 837 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2540

statute of limitations for tort actions, Ala. Code § 6-2-39(a) (1975), and that the constitution of Steelworkers

Copy

Hunt v. Hawthorne Assocs., Inc., 119 F.3d 888 (11th Cir. 1997).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1625, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 20761, 1997 WL 437161

benefit15 as of his effective retirement date.16 See § 6.2(e)© (“Lump Sum Option”). A pilot dissatisfied with

Copy

Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 833 F.3d 1274 (11th Cir. 2016).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 46 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20141, 82 ERC (BNA) 2220, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14877, 2016 WL 4254892

and compensatory mitigation, is provided in Section 6.2.2. The activities authorized by this NWP, including

Copy

Mississippi Valley Title Ins. Co. v. J. Garrison Thompson, 802 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir. 2015).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17140, 2015 WL 5693118

principal-agent relationships set forth in Ala.Code § 6-2-6 applied and did not bar Mississippi Valley’s suit

Copy

Hester v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, 941 F.2d 1574 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

injury one-year statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed 1985), because Hester’s claim

Copy

Leinhart v. Jurkovich, 882 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 1933560

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 363 F.3d 1183 (11th Cir. 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

to a two year statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 6-2-38, and that the breach of implied warranty claim

Copy

Tolz v. Quad/Graphics, Inc. (In Re Deer Creek Prods.), 325 B.R. 913 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2005).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15485, 2005 WL 1431656

security interest under the principles stated in § 6. (2) In the absence of an effective choice of law by

Copy

Judy N. Brock v. Resurgent Capital Servs., L.P., 823 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2016).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2016 WL 2996372

overdue debt is six years. See Ala. Code § 6-2-34. Judy Brock also filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy

Copy

N. Brevard v. Fla. Pub. Emp. Rel. Com'n, 392 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...to the Commission for purposes of requesting a representation election and shall register with the Commission by filing therewith: (1) two copies of said adopted constitution and by-laws; (2) two copies of an annual financial report, as described in Section 6.02 hereof, which report shall reflect the financial condition of the employee organization which existed either at the time of its original creation or at the end of its most recently concluded fiscal year, whichever date is more recent;..." 8H-1.10: "Registered Employee Organization....

Copy

Johnson v. Pullman, Inc., 845 F.2d 911 (11th Cir. 1988).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1988 WL 41331

to the fraud. Ala.Code § 6-2-39 (1975), repealed, and replaced by Ala.Code § 6-2-38 (Supp. 1987) (providing

Copy

Alexis, Inc. v. Pinellas Cnty., Florida, 194 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (M.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13794, 2002 WL 509261

Alcohol and Nudity Ordinance, Pinellas County Code § 6-2 (hereinafter, collectively, "ordinances"). In 1998

Copy

Beaubrum v. State, 595 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 43204

rule of the Florida Constitution, Article III, section 6, 2) the trial court erred in giving the jury the

Copy

The Home Indem. Co., Cross-Appellee v. Ball-Co Contractors, Inc., Cross-Appellant, 819 F.2d 1053 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7844

tions for actions on open accounts. Ala. Code § 6-2-37,645 F.Supp. 25 (S.D.Ala.1986). We express

Copy

Acoff v. Abston, 762 F.2d 1543 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 54 U.S.L.W. 2029

Federal courts in the past have applied ALA.CODE § 6-2-34 (1975) to Section 1983 claims. Beard v. Stephens

Copy

Florida Bar re Amendment to Rules, 510 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1987).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2483, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 412

foreign attorneys. (7) A member exempted under section 6.02(i)(4) and (5) shall not be subject to the provisions

Copy

Hendricks v. Smartvideo Tech., Inc., 511 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (M.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 25 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1056, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5878, 2007 WL 220160

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transp., 239 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 2001).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

abuse of discretion. 4 Alabama Code § 6-2-38(l) provides: “All actions for any injury to the

Copy

White v. State of Alabama, 74 F.3d 1058 (11th Cir. 1996).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1996 WL 23457

...appellate level, a Supreme Court, a Court of Criminal Appeals, and a Court of Civil Appeals. Ala. Const. amend. 328, § 6.01(a). The Supreme Court consists of "one chief justice and such number of associate justices as may be prescribed by law." Id. § 6.02(a)....

Copy

Burgess v. Prince, 25 So. 3d 705 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 405, 2010 WL 199422

trust based on contract construction rules). Section 6.2 of the Trust provides that a beneficiary may

Copy

Watson v. State, 169 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...edings consistent herewith and as provided for under Criminal Rule No. 1. Reversed and remanded. NOTES [1] At the time the trial occurred in 1959, a public defender for Dade County was provided by § 2.21 of the Dade County Code, enacted pursuant to § 6.02(E) of the Home Rule Charter for Metropolitan Dade County....

Copy

State Ex Rel. Pettigrew v. Kirk, 243 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 1970).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

appoint additional circuit judges as prescribed in Section 6(2), Article V, State Constitution, pursuant to

Copy

Mvw Mgmt., LLC v. Regalia Beach Developers, LLC, 230 So. 3d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

or the Manager sooner resigns or is removed.” Section 6.2, titled “Initial Manager,” states that “[t]he

Copy

Gulf Power Co. v. Coalsales II, L.L.C., 661 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (N.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95949, 2009 WL 3190459

...B, and several others directly contradict Coalsales' sole source interpretation. [22] Of the thirty-two provisions referenced *1277 by Coalsales, only six seem to support Coalsales' position: Sections 2.05, 5.02, and 9.01; Section 5.08; and Sections 6.02 and 7.02....

...those sources. However, the presence in the contract of greater detail regarding particular sources does not preclude other sources, nor does it detract from the plain language obligating Coalsales to supply coal. Finally, Coalsales argues Sections 6.02 and 7.02 indicate that the parties "anticipated" Coalsales would supply a blend of coal from Source A and Source B....

...but could choose between the approved sources. [26] The right to choose between the approved sources did not give Coalsales the right to refuse to supply coal at all, when only one of the approved sources became unavailable. Coalsales also relies on Section 6.02, which provides, in relevant part: "If Seller elects to ship Source B and/or Source C tons," and on Section 6.05, which provides Coalsales with the right to defer a test burn of Source C....

...des: "Seller agrees to sell and deliver to Buyer and Buyer agrees to purchase and accept from Seller coal of the quantity and quality, at the price, and subject to the applicable terms and conditions hereinafter set forth." Gulf Power also refers to Section 6.02, "Annual Quality," which provides, in part: "Except as otherwise provided, Seller shall supply to Buyer and Buyer shall purchase from Seller under the terms of this Coal Supply Agreement 1,900,000 Tons of coal per Year...." [19] Section...

...were capable of clearly and unambiguously stating their intentions within the contract. [21] Coalsales identifies these thirty-two provisions as Sections 2.05, 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 2.12, 2.16, 2.20, 2.22, 2.23, 2.27, 2.28, 2.30, 2.34, 5.02, 5.03, 5.08, 6.02, 6.04, 6.05, 7.01, 7.02, 8.01, 8.02, 9.01, 9.04, 9.06, 9.07, 11.01, 14.02, 14.06, 15.01, and 19.01....

...do not mention Source A or Source B. Coalsales also refers to Sections 6.04, which describes Source C, and 6.05, which describes "other sources," as support for its sole source interpretation. Finally, Coalsales refers to Sections 2.22, 2.23, 2.30, 6.02, 7.01, 7.02, 9.07 and 15.01, which either mention sources other than Source A and Source B directly or refer to Sections 6.04 and 6.05....

...d not only to the source of the coal but to other terms, such as shipping points. For example, Section 11.01 contains a billing formula which refers to a number of terms, such as the Outbound Loading Point, which are variable rather than fixed. [23] Section 6.02 provides, in relevant part: "It is anticipated that the approximate Annual Quality under this Agreement from Source A (Section 6.04) will be 1,000,000 Tons and from Source B (Section 6.04) 900,000 tons." Similarly, Section 7.02 provides,...

Copy

Cleveland Trust Co. v. Ousley Sod Co., 351 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...The relation-back provision of Section 713.07(2), Florida Statutes (1975), protects mechanic lienors from encumbrances or interest acquired in the property after the notice of commencement has been recorded. See 1 Rakusin, Florida Mechanics' Lien Manual, § 6.02(B) (1974)....

Copy

Wright v. Frankel, 965 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2847951

...r . . . and except those powers specifically reserved in this Charter to the electors of the City. " See Charter § 2.03 (emphasis added). One of the powers specifically reserved to the electors is the power of initiative and referendum. See Charter § 6.02....

...The city charter entitles them to vote on these issues, regardless of their failure to propose these ordinances at some earlier point. Moreover, as the Committee points out, the City passed resolutions, instead of ordinances, to effectuate their plans for relocation. The thirty-day limitation for repealing ordinances, under section 6.02 of the City Charter, thus does not apply....

...ness of the project as it relates to the prejudice element, I would conclude that there has been enough work done on the project to support the trial court's conclusion of prejudice to City. The trial court could also consider, and find instructive, section 6.02 in determining what constitutes an unreasonable delay....

...Although City, properly, passed this project through resolutions rather than by ordinance, the time limitation provision in the charter evinces an intent that objections be lodged to the actions of City within a brief period of time. Though I am mindful of the difference between an ordinance and a resolution, section 6.02 is of sufficiently like character to guide the court in weighing the equity of laches as it applies to an unreasonable delay in effectively seeking to repeal the three years of resolutions....

Copy

Pamela Sue Jones v. Dillard's, Inc., 368 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

enumerated specifically in the code. Ala.Code. § 6-2-38(l) (1984). 49 On its face

Copy

Matheson v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 187 So. 3d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7998, 2015 WL 3390177

...The appellees further argued the ballot summary was misleading because it failed to advise voters that it curtailed their right to establish their own system. Id. The provision of the Charter which the appellees claimed the County fatally failed to mention in the ballot summary was the following: SECTION 6.02 MUNICIPAL POWERS Each municipality shall have the authority to exercise all powers relating to its local affairs not inconsistent with this charter....

...Each municipality may provide for higher standards of zoning, service and regulation than those provided by the Board of County Commissioners in order that its individual character and standards may be preserved for citizens. Miami-Dade County, Fla., Charter art. 6, § 6.02. This Court agreed with the Village of Pinecrest, stating: This proposal does both....

Copy

Watts v. Nat'l Ins. Underwriters, 540 F. Supp. 488 (S.D. Fla. 1982).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14160

the parties under the principles as stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Dalack v. Vill. of Tequesta, Florida, 434 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (S.D. Fla. 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33214, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 654

...sist any effort or movement from any source which seeks to subvert or destroy the same or any part thereof, and I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States and of the State of Texas. Id. at 555 (citing Tx. Election Code, § 6.02)....

Copy

Arthur v. Comm'r, Alabama Dep't of Corr., 680 F. App'x 894 (11th Cir. 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

1303 (11th Cir. 2011) (per curiam); Ala. Code § 6-2-38. At issue is when that statute of limitations

Copy

Fed. Sav. & Loan Ins. v. Haralson, 813 F.2d 370 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1321

Code Ann. § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed effective January 9, 1985). However, under Section 6-2-3, fraud actions

Copy

Green v. State, 878 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21145944

LaFave & Gerold H. Israel, Criminal Procedure § 6.2(c). Of particular significance is whether Miranda

Copy

Durham v. Bus. Mgmt. Assocs., 847 F.2d 1505 (11th Cir. 1988).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 713, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8601

under Alabama law. In fraud actions Alabama Code section 6-2-3 tolls the limitations period4 until the “fraud

Copy

Jones Ex Rel. Est. of Hill v. Hill Dev. Co. (In Re Hill), 265 B.R. 296 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 902, 2001 WL 849350

the Partnership without substitution pursuant to § 6.2." Thus the terms of the partnership agreement provide

Copy

United Servs. Auto. Ass'n v. Gillen, 280 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7815

the parties under the principles stated in Section 6. "(2) In the absence of an effective choice of law

Copy

First Maryland Leasecorp. v. M/V Golden Egret, 764 F.2d 749 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 600

of limitations is six years pursuant to Ala.Code § 6-2-34(9) in view of the present version of Ala.Code

Copy

Campero USA Corp. v. STPC Partners, L.P., 410 F. Supp. 2d 1268 (S.D. Fla. 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4087, 2006 WL 166571

...e ADA will be deemed terminated." Finally, Campero again extended the deadline to June 28, 2005. STPC failed to submit the Revised Development Schedule by June 28, 2005. B. Methods For Termination The Agreement provides two methods for termination, "6.02....

...Termination Without Prior Notice," which does not require a 30-day written notice and opportunity to cure, and "6.03. Termination After Notice," which does require 30-day written notice and opportunity to cure. Campero alleges that it terminated the Agreement pursuant to § 6.02(e). Section 6.02e provides: Termination Without Prior Notice....

...(e) If [STPC] defaults in any material obligation in respect *1271 of which [STPC] twice previously within the preceding 12 months has received a notice of default from [Campero] with respect to the same or similar breach. Campero alleges that it properly terminated the Agreement under section 6.02.(e) because: (1) STPC defaulted in a material obligation under the Agreement by "fail[ing] to comply with the Development Schedule, having only three (3) operative Unit Franchise Agreements by August 5, 2004, while under the Development...

...4 constitute the required notices of default. C. Arbitration Provision Section 7.02.(d) of the Agreement exempts from arbitration "[a]ny dispute for which [Campero] is entitled to terminate this Agreement without prior notice under the provisions of section 6.02 of this Agreement." Campero filed this action in this District Court, rather than pursuing arbitration, based on its assertion that it terminated the Agreement pursuant to section 6.02.(e). For purposes of its Motion to Stay, STPC does not dispute that it defaulted in a material obligation, as required to terminate the Agreement without notice under § 6.02....

...(citations omitted). Here, the parties' agreement expressly contemplates a dual dispute resolution system under which some disputes may be litigated while others are arbitrated. See, § 7.02. Pursuant to the Agreement, disputes permitting termination under § 6.02 are to be litigated, whereas disputes permitting termination under § 6.03 must be arbitrated. In its complaint, Campero seeks a declaration that the "STPC-ADA has been terminated" pursuant to § 6.02....

...Campero is therefore seeking a declaration from the Court that it properly terminated the Agreement pursuant to a section that permits litigation. STPC's argument that arbitration must be compelled because Campero did not properly terminate the Agreement under § 6.02 based of alleged notice defects therefore goes to the merits of the underlying dispute. At this stage, the only issue for the Court is whether the parties intended to submit Campero's claim regarding its alleged proper termination under § 6.02 to arbitration or litigation....

Copy

In Re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia on December 20, 24 F. Supp. 2d 1340 (S.D. Fla. 1998).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Barton v. Hertz Corp., 35 F. Supp. 2d 1377 (M.D. Fla. 1999).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1618, 1999 WL 80351

and the parties under the principals stated in Section 6. 2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Medina v. State, 226 So. 3d 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12366, 2017 WL 3721822

Wyoming Statutes section 6-2-503(b)(i) (2003). Dunsmore, 153 P.3d at 277. Under section 6-2-503(b)(i),

Copy

Cohen v. Implant Innovations, Inc., 259 F.R.D. 617 (S.D. Fla. 2008).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64144, 2008 WL 3927223

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Mazon v. Tardif, 387 B.R. 641 (M.D. Fla. 2008).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34618, 2008 WL 1897596

non-exclusive right to use the common elements." (Id. at § 6.2(E).) The limited common elements included the exclusive

Copy

Tubbs v. Hudec, 8 So. 3d 1194 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3436, 2009 WL 1066297

occurred that entitled it to indemnification under Section 6.2 hereof (other than matters covered by subsection

Copy

Donaldson v. United States, 634 F. Supp. 735 (S.D. Fla. 1986).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26414

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Geoffrey West v. Comm'r, Alabama DOC (11th Cir. 2017).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

personal injury actions applies. See Ala. Code. § 6-2-38(j) (“All actions for any injury to the person

Copy

Larkin v. Pullman-Stand. Div., Pullman, Inc., 854 F.2d 1549 (11th Cir. 1988).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1500, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12916, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38, 337, 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1732

limitations that applied to personal injury actions. Section 6-2-34(1) provided that “[ajctions for any trespass

Copy

State of Florida Dep't of Revenue v. Davis (In Re Davis), 465 B.R. 309 (M.D. Fla. 2011).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103311, 2011 WL 4055598

payments: "[T]here's a provision in the plan, Section 6.2, that says that failure to file a claim by the

Copy

Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr., Inc. v. State, Dep't of Health, 123 So. 3d 86 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 4859092

sufficient facilities and personnel. See Ch. 90-284, § 6(2)(d), Laws of Fla.; § 395.0335(2)(d), Fla. Stat.

Copy

Luani Plaza, Inc. v. Burton, 149 So. 3d 712 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15637, 2014 WL 5012990

withdrawal.” Restatement (Third) of Prop.: Servitudes § 6.2 (2000). The recorded Declaration provides that

Copy

Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Vill. of Pinecrest, 994 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 16969, 2008 WL 4756654

...ot summary is misleading because it fails to advise voters that it curtails their right to establish their own system. The provision of the Charter which the appellees claim the County fatally fails to mention in the ballot summary reads as follows: SECTION 6.02 MUNICIPAL POWERS Each municipality shall have the authority to exercise all powers relating to its local affairs not inconsistent with this charter....

...The fire and rescue protection services of those cities may be transferred to the county as provided in Section 1.01(a)(18). (emphasis added). The County would have us believe that despite the fact the proposed Charter Amendment, if approved, will directly follow section 6.02, it nevertheless does not modify or curtail the rights granted therein to municipalities to provide for “higher standards of ... service” than those provided by the County. § 6.02. The County contends section 6.02 merely allows a municipality to which it provides its required service to contract with the Fire and Rescue District for delivery of additional fire and rescue services, as authorized elsewhere in the County Code. See Miami-Dade County, Fla., Code § 18-31 (2007). That is not so. With regard to fire and rescue services, section 6.02 must — and does — mean municipalities have a right to provide services independently of those services provided by the County....

...entity). The County advances three arguments to justify the ballot question: (1) the County has complete power to control municipalities under the Charter’s provisions, and to preempt any municipal action with which the County does not agree; (2) section 6.02 of the Charter does not provide for an “opt-out” of the uniform, countywide fire district that has been in existence for almost thirty years; and (3) the ballot question is not misleading....

...at 473 , thirty years of history has demonstrated that there exists no need to collectivize the provision of fire and rescue services. See also City of Coral Gables v. Burgin, 143 So.2d 859, 861 (Fla.1962) (regulation of plumbing trade not so peculiarly local as to justify city adopting, pursuant to a prior version of section 6.02, higher standards for plumber licensure within its borders than prescribed by county)....

...municipalities an unfettered right to opt out of the County Fire and Rescue District. See Miami-Dade County, Fla., Ordinance Resolution 107-07 (passed and adopted July 24, 2007). 4 The County misses the point. The issue before us is not just whether section 6.02 of the Charter provides municipalities with the right to “opt-out” of the Fire and Rescue District....

...Dade County Ordinance 80-86 was passed and adopted by the Dade County Commission on September 2, 1980. The proposal was approved by a majority vote of the citizens of Dade County at a special election held on September 9, 1980. . A determination as to the definition of the phrase “higher standard” in the context of section 6.02 is not necessary here because it is clear section 6.02 affords municipalities with the right to provide some alternative level of independent services....

...on, voted unanimously to opt out. The decision by the County Commission to propose the Charter Amendment which generated this appeal followed trial court rulings in that litigation indicating that the Villages might nevertheless have the right under section 6.02 of the Charter to provide their own fire and rescue services. . Although the County spiritedly argues here that its proposed Charter Amendment does not curtail any rights of municipalities under section 6.02 of the Charter, it was not so sanguine about this point below....

Copy

Mukamal v. D.R. Horton, Inc. (In re Majorca Isles Master Ass'n), 560 B.R. 824 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 179, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 3797

Assessments to the Local Associations (PI. Ex. 1 at section 6.2). Pursuant to that authority, the Master Association

Copy

Paul L. Spain v. Brown & Williamson, 363 F.3d 1183 (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

a 2-year statute of limitations, see Ala. Code § 6-2-38, and that the breach of warranty claim is subject

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1991).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

Section 6(1), Ch. 90-412, Laws of Florida. 15 Section 6(2)(b), Ch. 90-412, Laws of Florida. 16 Section

Copy

John S. Lowman, IV v. Fed. Aviation Admin. (11th Cir. 2023).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Argued: Apr 25, 2023

preparing [EAs].”); see also FAA Order 1050.1F § 6-2.2(g) (“Circulation of a draft EA for public

Copy

Conservation All. v. United States Dep't of Transp., 145 F. Supp. 3d 1198 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157599, 2015 WL 7351544

of the boundary of the SPSP.). As detailed in Section 6.2 of the FEIS (Avoidance alternatives), Section

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2003).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

municipal and a county government.7 In addition, section 6.02 of Chapter 92-341 states that the mayor is a

Copy

Int'l Bus. Machines Corp. v. Vaughn, 98 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 1957).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Section 192.06, Florida Statutes 1951, and F.S.A., which was enacted to implement Section 1, Article IX, supra, carries the simple provision for the exemption from taxation of property, real and personal, of the United States. Since the enactment of Chapter 25, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1845, now designated as Sections 6.02 and 6.04, Florida Statutes 1955, and F.S.A., provision has existed for deeds of cession from the Governor to the United States saving to the United States exemption from state taxation of the property of the United States....

...e of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings * * The words italicized by us are substantially the same as those recited in the deed of cession. They also appear in Section 6.02, supra....

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1997).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

advisory committee for the authority? In sum: Section 6(2), Chapter 96-449, Laws of Florida, does not authorize

Copy

PRN Real Est. & Investments, Ltd. v. William W. Cole, Jr. (11th Cir. 2023).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Argued: Mar 21, 2023

requires courts to consider seven factors listed in § 6(2). Florida has a statute on point

Copy

Free v. Granger, 887 F.2d 1552 (11th Cir. 1989).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 WL 86482

personal injury statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed). Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin,

Copy

Ward v. Morlock, 218 So. 3d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1788020, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6362

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2005).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

2 Section 5(1), Ch. 00-477, Laws of Fla. 3 Section 6(2), Ch. 00-477, Laws of Fla. 4 Section 2(3), Ch

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1988).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

members of the Gainesville City Commission. 10 Section 6(2), Ch. 85-376, Laws of Florida. And see, s. 5(2)

Copy

Arthur v. Comm'r, Alabama Dep't of Corr., 857 F.3d 1157 (11th Cir. 2017).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 9159, 2017 WL 2305461

1303 (11th Cir. 2011) (per curiam); Ala. Code § 6-2-38. To be clear, Mr. Arthur has not requested that

Copy

Lawn ex rel. Lawn v. Wasserman, 248 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6557

The requested Florida Standard Jury Instruction § 6.2 was not actually given. Our sister appellate courts

Copy

Foster v. Bd. of Sch. Commissioners of Mobile Cnty., 872 F.2d 1563 (11th Cir. 1989).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7143, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39, 057, 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1397

six-year limitations period provided in Ala.Code § 6-2-34(1) applies to section 1983 actions arising in

Copy

North Brevard Cnty. Hosp. Dist., Inc. v. Florida Pub. Employees Relations Comm'n, 392 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2534, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18309

Copy

Marken Leger v. U.S. Attorney Gen. (11th Cir. 2024).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Argued: Nov 9, 2023

61-8B-5(a)(i) (1993) (four years); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-304(a)(i) (1995) (four years). 8

Copy

Marshall v. Hollywood, Inc., 236 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1970).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2729

Standards, III Florida Real Property Practice (1965), § 6.2: “The chief purpose of the act is to extinguish

Copy

Angela Henderson Williamson v. Travelport, LP (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...d benefits pension plan and is a “pension plan” within the meaning of ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(2)(A). It provides monthly retirement benefits to participants based on their final average compensation and months of service. See D.E. 4-1 at § 6.02 (“Participant’s Monthly Normal Benefit shall be determined as follows: 1.6% of his Final Average Compensation MULTIPLIED BY: Months of Benefit Service / [DIVIDED BY] 12.”)....

Copy

Ottoniel Cruz & Luz M. Cruz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

Receiver’s deed or Receiver’s bill of sale.” Section 6.2 obligates the FDIC to deliver assets, including

Copy

KAROLEWICZ v. Drummond Press, Inc., 553 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (M.D. Fla. 2008).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21451, 2008 WL 754745

Robert L. Harmon, Patents and the Federal Circuit § 6.2 (8th ed. 2007). The words "magnetic," "core," "non-magnetic"

Copy

Scott Lyday & Tammy Lyday v. Myakka Valley Ranches Improvement Ass'n, Inc. & Vivian Zabik (Fla. 2d DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

Title Act and Uniform Title Standards, Volume 3, § 6.2, Florida Real Property Practice (1965)); see also

Copy

City of Miami v. Yesid Ortiz & Reynaldo Irias (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

expressly covered by its terms. Id. at 277. Section 6.2 of the Agreement defines “grievance” as “any

Copy

Tobinick v. Novella, 108 F. Supp. 3d 1299 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 43 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1803, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72467, 2015 WL 3540053

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Lampliter Dinner Theater, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Insurace, 792 F.2d 1036 (11th Cir. 1986).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26623

year within which to commence an action.3 Ala.Code § 6-2-3, however, operates as a “saving clause” by tolling

Copy

Lexington Place Condo. Ass'n, Inc., a Florida Corp. Not for Profit Vs Michelle Flint & Kevin Flint (Fla. 5th DCA 2022).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

Declaration when proposed by the association. Under Section 6.2, if the Board wishes to amend the Declaration

Copy

Laura Goodloe v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD. (11th Cir. 2021).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

determination of the particular issue.” Id. at § 6(2).

Copy

Asa Coll. v. Dezer Intracoastal Mall, 250 So. 3d 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

parking of vehicles, subject to Section 6.2; and (3) circulation, passage and

Copy

Ottoniel Cruz & Luz M. Cruz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n, etc., 199 So. 3d 992 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9272, 2016 WL 3342651

Receiver’s deed or Receiver’s bill of sale.” Section 6.2 obligates the FDIC to deliver assets, including

Copy

A.M. Samara v. Thomas Keith Taylor (11th Cir. 2022).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

on which the cause of action arises. ALA. CODE § 6-2-33(2); see also Pinto Credit Union v. Brown, 535

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1975).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

those engaged in contracting in Pinellas County. Section 6(2), Part II, Ch. 73-595. The act is clear that

Copy

Keith Cooper v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc. (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

six years after the last payment. See Ala. Code § 6-2-34(5); Ex parte HealthSouth Corp., 974 So. 2d 288

Copy

Jean v. Meissner, 90 F.R.D. 658 (S.D. Fla. 1981).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 32 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1570, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14887

circumstances. See Federal Habeas Corpus, Sokol, § 6.2; United States v. Martin, 242 F.2d 701 (2d Cir.

Copy

Godwin v. Solutia, Inc., 215 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (N.D. Fla. 2002).

Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2449, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16332, 2002 WL 1837851

employee benefit plan governed by ERISA. Under section 6.2(e)(i) of the Plan, an employee over the age of

Copy

Sch. Bd. of Palm Beach Cnty. v. Winchester, 565 So. 2d 1350 (Fla. 1990).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 418, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 971, 1990 WL 107464

charter which may be pertinent to this issue is section 6.2 which states that “adoption of this Home Rule

Copy

Vinsant Painting & Decorating, Inc. v. Koppers Co., 822 F.2d 1022 (11th Cir. 1987).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9903

facts giving rise to the fraud claim. Ala.Code § 6-2-3 (1975); Papastefan v. B & L Construction Co.,

Copy

Rosa & Raymond Parks Inst. for Self Dev. v. Target Corp. (11th Cir. 2016).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

on all but one of the books at issue. Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l) (1975). Alabama typically considers statutes

Copy

Glasswall, LLC v. Monadnock Constr., Inc., 187 So. 3d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1010

for later proceedings. [[Image here]] § 6.2 BINDING DISPUTE RESOLUTION For any claim subject

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1978).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

Laws of Florida, is held unconstitutional. Section 6(2) of the act [s. 83.780(2), F. S.] authorizes

Copy

Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transp., 239 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 2001).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

(11th Cir. 1999). 3 Alabama Code § 6-2-38(l) provides: “All actions for any injury to the

Copy

Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transp., 239 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 2001).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 48 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 829, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 907, 2001 WL 58737

abuse of discretion. 3 .Alabama Code § 6-2-38(1) provides; "All actions for any injury to the

Copy

Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transp., 239 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 2001).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

for abuse of discretion. 3 Alabama Code § 6-2-38(1) provides: "All actions for any injury

Copy

White v. State of Alabama, 74 F.3d 1058 (11th Cir. 1996).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Copy

Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n v. Colony Beach & Tennis Club, Inc. (In Re Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n), 423 B.R. 690 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2010).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 297, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 148, 2010 WL 286615

under the Lease was $153,000. (Ex. 15 at § 6.1.) Section 6.2 of the Lease provides that the rent is subject

Copy

Peterson v. BMI Refractories (11th Cir. 1998).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

February 2, 1995, 16 See Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l) (1993) (personal injury actions not specifically

Copy

Peterson v. BMI Refractories (11th Cir. 1998).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

two year statute of 16 See Ala.Code § 6-2-38(l ) (1993) (personal injury actions not specifically

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1987).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

or before June 1 of each year, . . ." (e.s.) Section 6(2), Ch. 80-606, supra, further provides in pertinent

Copy

Chiles v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., 923 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (M.D. Fla. 2013).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2013 WL 539891, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29170

the parties under the principles stated in Section 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Michael Chapman v. Jefferson Dunn (11th Cir. 2025).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

which, in Alabama, is two years, see Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l). Federal law, though, determines when

Copy

Carlson v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 24 F. Supp. 2d 1340 (S.D. Fla. 1998).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17510

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Portillo v. State, 211 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 697729, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2348

7; Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.44.020; Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-312.

Copy

Dominick v. Dixie Nat'l Life Ins., 809 F.2d 1559 (11th Cir. 1987).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2348

they were barred by the statute of limitations. Section 6-2-39, Code of Alabama (1975), requires that all

Copy

Anderson v. George H. Lanier Mem'l Hosp., 982 F.2d 1513 (11th Cir. 1993).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2161, 1993 WL 15910

the act, omission or failure complained of____ Section 6-2-3 of the Alabama Statutes sets out the statute

Copy

Bender v. James (In re Hintze), 525 B.R. 780 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 2015).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida

...etical judicial lien creditor from the date of the filing of the bankruptcy petition). "The strong-arm clause is the ultimate Article 9 enforcer.” Barkley Clark & Barbara Clark, The Law of Secured Transactions Under the Uniform Commercial Code § 6.02(1)(a) (3d ed.2011)....

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1979).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

...it is assumed that the local government regulates master and journeyman craftsmen or tradesmen under presumptively and prima facie valid local ordinances consonant with municipal home rule or county governmental authority. See, e.g ., ss. 125.01 , 166.021 (3)(c), and 166.221 , F....

Copy

Martin v. Kavanagh, 773 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16362, 2000 WL 1836777

Arthur Gaudio, The American Law of Real Property § 6.02[5](b) (1994); 11 Thompson on Real Property § 351

Copy

Herman v. Reinecke Agency, 37 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (M.D. Fla. 1998).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22030, 1998 WL 965995

monthly reports that the Trustees received. Section 6.2 of the Plan Agreement and Declaration of Trust

Copy

Saffan v. Cnty. of Dade, 159 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

...The circuit court dismissed petitioner’s appeal from a conviction of a traffic violation in the Metropolitan Court. The petition alleges that the dismissal of the appeal was in violation of the essential requirements of law. The circuit court, basing its action on § 6.02 of the Metro Charter, 1 dismissed petitioner’s appeal because it was filed more than twenty days after the entry of the judgment in the Metropolitan Court....

...2 Respondent-County sets out that the determination of the time in which appeals may be taken is a legislative function. Ramagli Realty Co. v. Craver, Fla.1960, 121 So.2d 648 ; In re Wartman’s Estate, Fla.1961, 128 So.2d 600, 603 . It urges that the Dade County Home Rule Charter (of which § 6.02 is quoted in footnote 1) is an exercise of such' legislative function pursuant to art....

...l to the circuit court was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the judgment appealed. 'Therefore, the circuit judge was entirely correct in his order dismissing the appeal and the petition for certiorari is denied. It is so ordered. . “Sec. 6.02....

Copy

Michigan Abrasive Co. v. Poole, 805 F.2d 1001 (11th Cir. 1986).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

796 (1964). . Appellant contends that Ala.Code § 6-2-39 (1977), which was arguably in effect at all times

Copy

Martha Martinez-Lara v. U.S. Attorney Gen. (11th Cir. 2025).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

“narrowly,” 1 Hickman & Pierce, supra, § 6.2, and the Supreme Court has held that immigration-court

Copy

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Jackson, 738 F.2d 401 (11th Cir. 1984).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

PER CURIAM: CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA PURSUANT TO ALABAMA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE VI, AMENDMENT NO. 328, SECTION 6.02(b), ALABAMA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 18....

Copy

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Jerry W. Jackson, 738 F.2d 401 (11th Cir. 1984).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19825

...Before TJOFLAT and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges, and GARZA * , Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA PURSUANT TO ALABAMA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE VI, AMENDMENT NO. 328, SECTION 6.02(b), ALABAMA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 18....

Copy

Hunt v. Hawthorn Assocs., Inc. (11th Cir. 1997).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

annuity option, and the deferred payment option. See § 6.2 (“Available Forms of Payment”). There also was a

Copy

Murray Indus., Inc. v. Norwest Bank Minneapolis, N.A. (In re Murray Indus., Inc.), 105 B.R. 96 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1989).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1557

benefit of each participant in the Plan. Pursuant to § 6.2 of the Plan, a participant under the Plan is entitled

Copy

Eight is Enough in Pinellas v. Ruggles, 678 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8906, 1996 WL 476129

provision concerning citizen initiative states: Section 6.02 Charter Initiative Amendments to the Charter

Copy

Judge v. Am. Motors Corp., 908 F.2d 1565 (11th Cir. 1990).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 WL 110118

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Copy

Est. of Jeffrey West v. Robert DeFrancisco (11th Cir. 2021).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

(quotation omitted)); 42 U.S.C. § 1988; Alabama Code § 6-2-38 (setting two-year statute of limitations for

Copy

United States v. Robert D. Singletary (11th Cir. 2011).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the 15 HUD Handbook 4000.2 § 6-2, 2004 WL 5863716 (May 2004). 16

Copy

Russo v. Lorenzo, 67 So. 3d 1165 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12477, 2011 WL 3476922

...�other than on retirement.” See City of N. Miami Beach, Fla., Ordinance 89-18 (Mar. 15, 1990). Section 6.01 addresses the retirement benefit payable to an officer and his beneficiary if he retires at his normal retirement date and thereafter dies. Section 6.02 addresses the retirement benefit in the event the officer takes early retirement and thereafter dies....

Copy

Vagenas v. Cont'l Gin Co., 988 F.2d 104 (11th Cir. 1993).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 WL 83509

States must be commenced.” Ala.Code § 6-2-32 (1975). Reading § 6-2-32 in light of the treaty, a Greek

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1986).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

sediment and water columns of the lake. (e.s.) Section 6(2) of Ch. 85-148, supra, further makes an appropriation

Copy

Patient Depot, LLC v. Acadia Enter., Inc., Ryan O'connor & Lori Ann O'connor (Fla. 4th DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

trade secrets as confidential information. Section 6.2 also included the following nondisclosure provision:

Copy

State v. Florida Police Benevolent Ass'n, 653 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4356, 1995 WL 236790

Appropriations Act to be invalid under article I, section 6. 2. After reviewing the matter, the case was remanded

Copy

City of Miami Beach v. Breitbart, 358 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15884

with this opinion. Reversed and remanded. .Section 6-2, Zoning Ordinance, No. 1891, City of Miami Beach

Copy

Musick v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber (11th Cir. 1996).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the two-year statute of limitations found in section 6-2-38. ConAgra, Inc. v. Adams, 638

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1975).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

contributions . . . . (Emphasis supplied.) [Section 6(2), Ch. 74-362 (s. 943.35[2], F.S. [1974 Supp.])]

Copy

State ex rel. Roundtree v. Johnson, 247 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 1971).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3761

circuit to an additional seventh judge pursuant to Section 6(2), Article V, State Constitution, which provides

Copy

Grant Sunny Iriele v. Richard Carroll Griffin (11th Cir. 2023).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Argued: Mar 2, 2023

limitations for tort claims, Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l), and we have construed this limitation

Copy

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Jackson, 757 F.2d 1220 (11th Cir. 1985).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...ole issue turned upon an unresolved question of Alabama state law, the court certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Alabama pursuant to the certification provision of the Alabama Constitution, Ala. Const, art. VI, amend. *1221 328, § 6.02(b)(3), and Rule 18 of the Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure: Whether Kenneth Ivey, at the time of his death, was ‘a person insured’ under the liability provisions of the policies in question in accordance with the holding in State Farm Automobile Insurance Company v....

Copy

Blake v. Partyka, 731 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 176468

...*751 The city manager shall be the chief administrative officer of the city. He shall be responsible to the commission for the administration of all city affairs placed in his charge by or under this Charter. ARTICLE VI. ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS. * * * Section 6.02....

...The mayor has a unique role on this city commission. He or she acts as its leader but lacks some of the power given to an ordinary commissioner in that voting, other than by veto, is allowed only when the commissioners' votes result in a tie. The grant to the mayor in section 6.02 of the power to appoint the city attorney amounts to nothing more than the power to nominate, since the appointment must be approved by the city commission....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.