Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 6.02 (2025)

United States authorized to acquire lands for certain purposes.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

6.02 United States authorized to acquire lands for certain purposes.—The United States may purchase, acquire, hold, own, occupy, and possess such lands within the limits of this state as they shall seek to occupy and hold as sites on which to erect and maintain forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings, or any of them, as contemplated and provided in the Constitution of the United States; such land to be acquired either by contract with owners, or in the manner hereinafter provided.

History.—s. 1, ch. 25, 1845; RS 7; GS 5; RGS 5; CGL 5.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 39 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1946–2022 · leading case: Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Vill. of Pinecrest, 994 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Vill. of Pinecrest, 994 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). · cites it 12× “6, § 6.02 (emphasis added). Florida law, as codified in section 101.”

Wright v. Frankel, 965 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). · cites it 4× “See Charter § 6.02. Id. at 87. If, as we held in Brooks , a suggestion of futility is not a proper basis for preventing citizens from exercising their charter right of referendum to enact ordinances, then neither is a claim of unreasonable delay.”

Archstone Palmetto Park, LLC v. Kennedy, 132 So. 3d 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). · cites it 4× “” One month after the ordinance’s passage, the appellees, a group of Boca Raton residents, collectively filed a petition, pursuant to Section 6.02 of the City’s charter, seeking a citywide referendum to determine whether Ordinance 5203 should be repealed.”

Campero USA Corp. v. STPC Partners, L.P., 410 F. Supp. 2d 1268 (S.D. Fla. 2006). · cites it 10× “For purposes of its Motion to Stay, STPC does not dispute that it defaulted in a material obligation, as required to terminate the Agreement without notice under § 6.02. However, STPC does argue that Campero did not properly provide it with notices of its default and therefore…”

Brooks v. Watchtower Bible & Tract, 706 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). · cites it 3× “See Charter § 6.02. The Charter of West Palm Beach provides: Except as otherwise provided by law for issuance of City bonds, the electors may approve or reject any ordinance at the polls in the manner provided in this article.”

Stvartak v. Eastman Kodak Co., 945 F. Supp. 1532 (M.D. Fla. 1996). · cites it 2× “DX4 at 12, § 6.02. The payment of STD benefits also terminates when his employment terminates.”

Boyd v. Cnty. of Dade, 123 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 1960). · cites it 2× “Section 6.02 D Metropolitan Charter. Appeal shall be taken to the circuit court.”

Trafalgar Capital Specialized Inv. Fund v. Hartman, 878 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (S.D. Fla. 2012). “37-2]: Debenture § 6.02; Securities Purchase Agreement ¶ 9(a); Security Agreement § 8.”

3V Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. Off. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc. (In Re Tousa, Inc.), 444 B.R. 613 (S.D. Fla. 2011). “” Section 6.02 ACCELERATION (a) If an Event of Default (other than an Event of Default specified in Section 6.”

Gulf Power Co. v. Coalsales II, L.L.C., 661 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (N.D. Fla. 2009). · cites it 3× “Coalsales also relies on Section 6.02, which provides, in relevant part: “If Seller elects to ship Source B and/or Source C tons,” and on Section 6.”

Fine v. Semet, 514 F. Supp. 34 (S.D. Fla. 1981). “If the Participant terminates employment prior to attaining Normal Retirement Age because of death or disability, the Advisory Committee shall direct the Trustee to commence payment of the Participant’s Accrued Benefit to him (or to his Beneficiary if the Participant is…”

Matheson v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 187 So. 3d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). · cites it 2× “6, § 6.02. This Court agreed with the Village of Pinecrest, stating: This proposal does both.”

Show all 39 citing cases →

— 6.02(1)(a) — 1 case

Bender v. James (In re Hintze), 525 B.R. 780 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 2015).

— 6.02(A) — 1 case

Ortiz v. Metro. Court, 25 Fla. Supp. 155 (Fla. Cir. Ct., Miami-Dade Cty. 1965).

— 6.02(B) — 1 case

Cleveland Trust Co. v. Ousley Sod Co., 351 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

— 6.02(E) — 1 case

Watson v. State, 169 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

— 6.02(d) — 1 case

State v. Hodges, 22 Fla. Supp. 44 (Fla. Cir. Ct., Miami-Dade Cty. 1963).

— 6.02(e) — 1 case

Campero USA Corp. v. STPC Partners, L.P., 410 F. Supp. 2d 1268 (S.D. Fla. 2006). “For purposes of its Motion to Stay, STPC does not dispute that it defaulted in a material obligation, as required to terminate the Agreement without notice under § 6.02. However, STPC does argue that Campero did not properly provide it with notices of its default and therefore…”

— 6.02(f) — 1 case

Cnty. of Dade v. Saffan, 173 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 1965).

— 6.02(i)(4) — 1 case

Florida Bar re Amendment to Rules, 510 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1987).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.