Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 6.02 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 6.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 6.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 6.02

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 6.02
6.02 United States authorized to acquire lands for certain purposes.The United States may purchase, acquire, hold, own, occupy, and possess such lands within the limits of this state as they shall seek to occupy and hold as sites on which to erect and maintain forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings, or any of them, as contemplated and provided in the Constitution of the United States; such land to be acquired either by contract with owners, or in the manner hereinafter provided.
History.s. 1, ch. 25, 1845; RS 7; GS 5; RGS 5; CGL 5.

F.S. 6.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 6.02


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 6.02

Total Results: 295

Thomas B. Fullman v. Charles Graddick

739 F.2d 553, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19396

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 20, 1984 | Docket: 226938

Cited 430 times | Published

limitations grounds. The court applied Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1977), which provides for a one-year limitations

Mary Goodman v. Clayton County Sheriff Kemuel Kimbrough

718 F.3d 1325, 2013 WL 3109280, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12740

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 2013 | Docket: 667109

Cited 270 times | Published

cell checks and the midnight head count in Section 6; (2) Feemster reported having completed the 6 p

Roofing & Sheet Metal Services, Inc. v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc.

689 F.2d 982, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24657

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 21, 1982 | Docket: 652987

Cited 222 times | Published

162; Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 6(2)(d), (e); R. Leflar, American Conflicts Law § 150

Reta L. McCants as Administratrix of the Estate of Johnny L. McCants Deceased v. Ford Motor Company, Inc.

781 F.2d 855, 4 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1116, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21601

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 3, 1986 | Docket: 565540

Cited 215 times | Published

sections of the Alabama code. See Ala.Code § 6-2-39 (1977). Appellant did not plead the one

Coker v. Amoco Oil Co.

709 F.2d 1433, 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 702, 37 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 77, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25750, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,814

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 18, 1983 | Docket: 66193532

Cited 215 times | Published

statute of limitations for fraud actions, Ala.Code § 6-2-3. See Hinton v. Hobbs, 349 So.2d 28 (Ala.1977)

Jacqueline D. Henderson v. Washington National

454 F.3d 1278, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16961, 2006 WL 1867353

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 7, 2006 | Docket: 134399

Cited 190 times | Published

limitations for fraud cases, see AIa.Code § 6-2-38©, rendered Henderson’s claims time-barred. On

Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.

389 So. 2d 999

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1980 | Docket: 2513888

Cited 174 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Sanders

138 F.3d 1347, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7367

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1998 | Docket: 74598

Cited 143 times | Published

simple contract actions, see Ala.Code § 6-2-34(9), 9 and reject the Sanders’s proposed

Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Sanders

138 F.3d 1347, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7367

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1998 | Docket: 74598

Cited 143 times | Published

simple contract actions, see Ala.Code § 6-2-34(9), 9 and reject the Sanders’s proposed

McNair v. Allen

515 F.3d 1168, 2008 WL 227945

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 30, 2008 | Docket: 284257

Cited 142 times | Published

governing limitations period is two years. Ala.Code § 6-2-38; Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 876 F.2d 1480, 1483

Charles J. Piazza, Jr. v. EBSCO Industries, Inc.

273 F.3d 1341, 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1021, 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 667, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 25448, 2001 WL 1523333

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 30, 2001 | Docket: 397114

Cited 131 times | Published

limitations for negligence actions, found at Ala. Code § 6-2-38, is two years from the date the injury occurred

Richard Durham v. Business Management Associates, Somers & Altenbach, Richard Durham Merrill R. Barron Peter S. Verrill Khalid L. Khan Donald J. Gale Phillip Gilchrist Wray A. Hammer Jesse D. Hester Mamoun R. Pacha Richard G. O'Leary Samuel Staggers, Jr. Maurice F. Mc Carthy, Jr. Robert E. Hallett James B. Threlkel Wade Faulkner Shailesph P. Upadhyay Mohammed A. Mohiuddin and Timothy L. Eakes v. Business Management Associates Executive Counsel, Inc. Robert M. Fulmer Robert J. Underwood Underwood Financial Planning, Inc., and William B. Aylor, McGraw Information Systems Company, Richard Durham Merrill R. Barron Peter S. Verrill Khalid L. Khan Donald J. Gale Phillip Gilchrist Wray A. Hammer Jesse D. Hester Mamoun R. Pacha Richard G. O'Leary Samuel Staggers, Jr. Maurice F. Mc Carthy, Jr. Robert E. Hallett James B. Threlkel Wade Faulkner Shailesph P. Upadhyay Mohammed A. Mohiuddin and Timothy L. Eakes v. Business Management Associates Executive Counsel, Inc. Robert M. Fulmer Robert J. Underwood Underwood Financial Planning, Inc., and William B. Aylor, McGraw Information Systems Company

847 F.2d 1505

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 23, 1988 | Docket: 980280

Cited 110 times | Published

Alabama law. In fraud actions Alabama Code section 6-2-3 tolls the limitations period4 until the "fraud

Major Saxton, Jr., Mary Saxton v. Acf Industries, Inc.

254 F.3d 959, 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 310, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 13492, 2001 WL 682242

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 18, 2001 | Docket: 633246

Cited 99 times | Published

Cir.1999). 3 . Alabama Code § 6-2-38(1) provides: "All actions for any

Itel Capital Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Cups Coal Company, Incorporated, a Corporation and Herman Mulvehill, Cross-Appellees

707 F.2d 1253, 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1566, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26488

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 23, 1983 | Docket: 1993980

Cited 86 times | Published

limitations for fraud in Alabama is one year, Ala.Code § 6-2-39, 8 and appellants argue that the statute

Francis v. State

808 So. 2d 110, 2001 WL 1628780

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2001 | Docket: 146065

Cited 77 times | Published

§ 4209(e)(1)(r) (1995). [20] Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-102(h)(ix) (2001). [21] Accord Buckner v. State

William Aubrey Dominick, Jr. v. Dixie National Life Insurance Company, Robert Lyle Fundaburk v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Robert E. Johnson, Jr. v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., a Corporation, Lincoln National Sales Corporation of Central Alabama, a Corporation, and the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, Carlton S. & Chrystle Bone v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Lincoln National Sales Corporation of Central Alabama and the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Jerry Lee Fowler v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Russell Jeffrey Pinyan v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Milton L. Culver, Gilmer R. And Hilda E. Godfrey v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Etc., Robert Kermit Pinyan v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Julian D. Edwards v. United Presidential Life Insurance Company, a Corporation Union Central Life Insurance Company, a Corporation Milton L. Culver, Mary M. Hunt v. United Presidential Life Insurance Company, a Corporation Union Central Life Insurance Company, a Corporation Milton L. Culver, Hubert A. Grissom v. Dixie National Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Crossclaim Hoyt A. Ponder v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Lincoln National Sales Corp. Of Central Alabama & the Lincoln National Life Insurance Co., Garry Aaron Walker v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Warren N. Cook v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Lincoln National Sales Corporation of Central Alabama & the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, Burton Burdick v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., a Corporation Lincoln National Sales Corporation of Central Alabama, a Corporation and the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, Fred M. Tucker v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Lincoln National Sales Corp. Of Central Alabama & the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, James W. Spencer v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., a Corporation Lincoln National Sales Corporation of Central Alabama, a Corporation, John Haven v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Etc., Allen Daniel Washburn & Mozelle Washburn v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Barry W. McCown v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Eugene A. Polk v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Wilford R. Hitt v. Dixie National Life Insurance Co., Oscar Lee Nichols v. Atlantic American Life Insurance Company, Etc.

809 F.2d 1559

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 18, 1987 | Docket: 973181

Cited 74 times | Published

statute of limitations. 76 Section 6-2-39, Code of Alabama (1975), requires that all

Perlow v. Berg-Perlow

875 So. 2d 383, 2004 WL 583130

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2004 | Docket: 1683993

Cited 72 times | Published

impact of the divorce on, the minor child."); id. § 6.2 ("An attorney should not permit a client to contest

Joseph Richard Redner v. Charles S. Dean, Sheriff of Citrus County, Florida, Robert A. Butterworth

29 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23252, 1994 WL 419484

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 26, 1994 | Docket: 167120

Cited 72 times | Published

grant or reissue the license or permit. Section 6-2. Notice. Any notice required under this

Sturiano v. Brooks

523 So. 2d 1126, 1988 WL 26252

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1988 | Docket: 473016

Cited 72 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) In the absence of an effective choice of law by

Sturiano v. Brooks

523 So. 2d 1126, 1988 WL 26252

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1988 | Docket: 473016

Cited 72 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) In the absence of an effective choice of law by

Jones v. Dillard's, Inc.

331 F.3d 1259, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10942, 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 28, 2003 WL 21250859

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 30, 2003 | Docket: 65655466

Cited 71 times | Published

enumerated specifically in the code. Ala.Code. § 6-2-38(l) (1984). On its face, the AADEA provides that

William H. Grant v. Preferred Research, Inc., a Georgia Corporation

885 F.2d 795, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 503, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15326, 1989 WL 108471

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 29, 1989 | Docket: 60078

Cited 71 times | Published

for fraud in Alabama is set out in Ala.Code Ann. § 6-2-3. 4 Under that section, a plaintiff

Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. Virginia B. Haralson

813 F.2d 370, 7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1321, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3955

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 30, 1987 | Docket: 807306

Cited 66 times | Published

effective January 9, 1985). However, under Section 6-2-3, fraud actions otherwise barred were not deemed

Samuel Jones, Jr. v. Preuit & Mauldin

763 F.2d 1250, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30695

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 1985 | Docket: 496043

Cited 65 times | Published

specifically enumerated in this section.” ALA.CODE § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1975). Since the plaintiff had filed suit

Gray v. Bryant

125 So. 2d 846

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1960 | Docket: 1274726

Cited 64 times | Published

the 1960 federal census and the operation of Section 6(2), Article V, Florida Constitution, F.S.A., may

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Roach

945 So. 2d 1160, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 840, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2877, 2006 WL 3630072

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2006 | Docket: 2582044

Cited 60 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) In the absence of an effective choice of law by

Fine v. Semet

699 F.2d 1091, 4 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1273, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29753

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 11, 1983 | Docket: 646731

Cited 55 times | Published

deceased), in accord with the provisions of Section 6.02, within sixty (60) days after the close of the

Paul L. Spain v. Brown and Williamson

363 F.3d 1183, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 355

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 29, 2004 | Docket: 213014

Cited 51 times | Published

to a two year statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 6-2-38, and that the breach of implied warranty claim

Piamba Cortes Ex Rel. Piamba Cortes v. American Airlines, Inc.

177 F.3d 1272, 1999 A.M.C. 2286, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13191

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 15, 1999 | Docket: 395372

Cited 51 times | Published

C. Most Significant Interests Under Section 6(2) Having identified both Florida and Colombia

21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1625, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936c, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 294 Harry L. Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc., Eastern Air Lines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots Trust Administrative Committee of the Eastern Airlines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots

119 F.3d 888

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 2023562

Cited 51 times | Published

benefit15 as of his effective retirement date.16 See § 6.2(e)(i) ("Lump Sum Option"). A pilot dissatisfied

Baker v. Birmingham Board of Education

531 F.3d 1336, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13353, 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,258, 103 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1255, 2008 WL 2510177

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 25, 2008 | Docket: 611097

Cited 50 times | Published

"[T]he two-year limitations period of Ala.Code § 6-2-38(l) applies to section 1983 actions in Alabama

Grupo Televisa, S.A. v. Telemundo Communications Group, Inc.

485 F.3d 1233, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11011, 2007 WL 1364320

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 10, 2007 | Docket: 398926

Cited 50 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

James D. Ray v. The Tennessee Valley Authority

677 F.2d 818, 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 240, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18706

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 4, 1982 | Docket: 158457

Cited 50 times | Published

subject to a one-year limitations period. Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5). See Rubin v. O’Koren, 621 F

LUFKIN v. McCALLUM

956 F.2d 1104, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5528

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 31, 1992 | Docket: 651570

Cited 49 times | Published

Alabama. Jones I, 763 F.2d at 1256; Ala.Code § 6-2-34(1) (1977). In reaching this conclusion, the

Benon John Trawinski, Irene Monahan Trawinski v. United Technologies, Carrier Corporation

313 F.3d 1295, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24368, 2002 WL 31687621

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 3, 2002 | Docket: 794242

Cited 47 times | Published

for personal injury actions provided by Ala. Code § 6-2-38(i) should apply. See Dumas v. Town of Mt

Avco Corporation v. Precision Air Parts, Inc.

676 F.2d 494, 216 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1086, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19218

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 17, 1982 | Docket: 484924

Cited 43 times | Published

Alabama limitations statute. Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a) (1975). 1 See also Local Trademarks

Henry Gerrard Clay v. Equifax, Inc.

762 F.2d 952, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30171

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 11, 1985 | Docket: 1009082

Cited 42 times | Published

year from the date of publication. Ala.Code 1975, § 6-2-39(a)(4); Hams v. Winter, 379 So.2d 588

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Olsen

406 So. 2d 1109

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1981 | Docket: 450030

Cited 41 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Beverly Chambless v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

481 F.3d 1345, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 6792, 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,767, 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 549, 2007 WL 865854

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 23, 2007 | Docket: 226603

Cited 40 times | Published

limitations for those torts is two years. Ala.Code § 6-2-38(¿), (n) (1975). The alleged acts that Chambless

Beverly Chambless v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

481 F.3d 1345, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 6792, 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,767, 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 549, 2007 WL 865854

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 23, 2007 | Docket: 226603

Cited 40 times | Published

limitations for those torts is two years. Ala.Code § 6-2-38(¿), (n) (1975). The alleged acts that Chambless

Kinnon v. Arcoub, Gopman & Associates, Inc.

490 F.3d 886, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15479, 2007 WL 1855057

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 29, 2007 | Docket: 398915

Cited 39 times | Published

Restatement (Third) of *891 Agency § 6.02 (“When an agent acting with actual or apparent

United States v. Jerry Lee Griffith

455 F.3d 1339, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17940, 2006 WL 1976047

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 17, 2006 | Docket: 841116

Cited 39 times | Published

338 F.3d at 1067 (quoting Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-501(b)). Characterizing that statute as a “law against

Robert McK Foster, as Personal Representative of the Estates of Almon O. Thompson, Deceased, and Doris E. Thompson, Deceased v. United States

768 F.2d 1278, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21342

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 16, 1985 | Docket: 284844

Cited 39 times | Published

the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin

876 F.2d 1480

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 20, 1989 | Docket: 820476

Cited 36 times | Published

(repealed), provided a one-year limitations period. Section 6-2-39(a)(5) was repealed after the plaintiff in

Cortes v. American Airlines, Inc.

177 F.3d 1272

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 15, 1999 | Docket: 395371

Cited 33 times | Published

C. Most Significant Interests Under Section 6(2)

Pledger v. Burnup & Sims, Inc.

432 So. 2d 1323

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1983 | Docket: 2450214

Cited 30 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Brandon, Jones, Sandall, Zeide, Kohn, Chalal & Musso, P.A. v. MedPartners, Inc.

312 F.3d 1349, 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 458, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24289

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 27, 2002 | Docket: 342653

Cited 29 times | Published

contract to invoke the arbitration requirement of section 6.2(d)(“The [allegations of breach] shall be resolved

Waters v. International Precious Metals Corp.

190 F.3d 1291, 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 300, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24281

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 30, 1999 | Docket: 395477

Cited 29 times | Published

to defendant Grosfeld. See R31-1371, § 6.2(e), at 43. The stipulation also provided that

Vera Smith, as of the Estate of Robert J. Smith, Deceased v. Duff and Phelps, Inc., a Corporation, and Claire v. Hansen

891 F.2d 1567, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 403

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 16, 1990 | Docket: 414446

Cited 29 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations period found in section 6-2-38 of the Code of Alabama applies both to the

William B. Larkin Louise Seals, as Personal Representative of Spurgeon Seals, Deceased Lillie Lofton, as Personal Representative of Edward Lofton, Deceased Jesse B. Terry, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Pullman-Standard Division, Pullman, Inc., a Corporation, Defendant- Louis Swint and Willie James Johnson, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Clyde Humphrey v. Pullman-Standard, Bessemer, Alabama United Steelworkers of America Local 1466 and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, International Association of MacHinists Louis Swint, and Willie James Johnson, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Clyde Humphrey v. Pullman-Standard, Bessemer, Alabama, United Steelworkers of America Local 1466 and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, International Association of MacHinists

854 F.2d 1549

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 21, 1988 | Docket: 816294

Cited 29 times | Published

limitations that applied to personal injury actions. Section 6-2-34(1) provided that "[a]ctions for any trespass

Roger D. Hovater, Cross-Appellant v. Equifax, Inc., Equifax Services, Inc., and Equifax Services, Ltd., Defendants- Cross-Appellees

823 F.2d 413, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10105, 56 U.S.L.W. 2085

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 30, 1987 | Docket: 261255

Cited 28 times | Published

applicable limitation period was one year. Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(4) (1975); see, e.g., Holdbrooks v.

Free v. Granger

887 F.2d 1552, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17004

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 14, 1989 | Docket: 822178

Cited 27 times | Published

former one-year statute, section 6-2-39 have been transferred to Section 6-2-38, the two-year statute

International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge No. 1688 v. Allied Products Corporation

786 F.2d 1561, 122 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2264, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24519

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 22, 1986 | Docket: 277503

Cited 27 times | Published

Cardinal would seem to require that Alabama Code § 6-2-34 (1975), 3 which provides a six year

Bancroft Investment Corp. v. City of Jacksonville

27 So. 2d 162, 157 Fla. 546, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 800

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1946 | Docket: 3276514

Cited 27 times | Published

statute listing the lands that may be acquired (Section 6.02) has the omnibus clause, "other needful buildings

Hester v. International Union Of Operating Engineers

941 F.2d 1574, 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 986, 138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2719, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22041

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 20, 1991 | Docket: 146837

Cited 26 times | Published

injury one-year statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed 1985), because Hester's claim

Marshall v. Hollywood, Inc.

236 So. 2d 114

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1970 | Docket: 456749

Cited 26 times | Published

Standards, III Florida Real Property Practice (1965), § 6.2: "The chief purpose of the act is to extinguish

Proprietors Ins. Co. v. Valsecchi

435 So. 2d 290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1983 | Docket: 1697378

Cited 25 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

City of Miami v. St. Joe Paper Co.

364 So. 2d 439

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1978 | Docket: 462042

Cited 25 times | Published

Volume 3, Florida Real Property Practice (1965) Section 6.2 describes the nature of the act as follows: "The

Judge v. American Motors Corporation

908 F.2d 1565, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 14373

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 21, 1990 | Docket: 303391

Cited 24 times | Published

court refers to relevant factors set forth in section 6(2)).4 39 (a) Balance of Competing

Clara Nell SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.C. McCLAMMY, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

740 F.2d 925, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18961, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,639, 35 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1316

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 4, 1984 | Docket: 2164122

Cited 24 times | Published

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 suit was barred by Ala.Code § 6-2-39, the one-year statute of limitations. We affirm

City of Miami v. Keton

115 So. 2d 547

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1959 | Docket: 1750955

Cited 24 times | Published

and expeditiously the business of the Court. "Section 6.02 "A. The Court shall have jurisdiction to try

Nordson Corporation v. Joseph Plasschaert and Ranier Corporation

674 F.2d 1371, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19490

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 6, 1982 | Docket: 221971

Cited 23 times | Published

see also Restatement (Second) of Conflicts § 6(2) (1971). The terms of this restriction are reasonable

Anderson v. State

276 So. 2d 17

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1973 | Docket: 334427

Cited 22 times | Published

supra; Illinois, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 38, § 6-2(a), (b); Indiana, Hill v. State, 1969, 252 Ind.

United States v. Singletary

649 F.3d 1212, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16810, 2011 WL 3566861

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 15, 2011 | Docket: 1142049

Cited 21 times | Published

July 9 and 10, 2007. [15] HUD Handbook 4000.2 § 6-2, 2004 WL 5863716 (May 2004). [16] HUD Handbook

Palm Beach County Health Care District v. Professional Medical Education, Inc.

13 So. 3d 1090, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9167, 2009 WL 1940443

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 2483586

Cited 21 times | Published

costs of providing service for all users thereof", § 6(2); b) the power to "sue and be sued in its own name

State v. Steele

921 So. 2d 538

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2006 | Docket: 1658862

Cited 21 times | Published

10.95.080 (2002)); and Wyoming (Wyo.Stat.Ann. § 6-2-102(d)(ii) (2005)). [4] These are Montana (Mont

Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin

876 F.2d 1480, 1989 WL 67157

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 20, 1989 | Docket: 66245397

Cited 21 times | Published

Alabama’s residual statute of limitations, Ala. Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed) (1985). That section contained

Brennan v. State

754 So. 2d 1, 1999 WL 506966

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1999 | Docket: 471982

Cited 20 times | Published

176.025 (1997)); and Wyoming (see Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-101 (1999)). In Domingues v. State, 114 Nev. 783

Maryellen H. Doyle v. The University of Alabama in Birmingham

680 F.2d 1323, 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 357, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17354, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,052, 29 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 777

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 19, 1982 | Docket: 952709

Cited 20 times | Published

92 S.Ct. 674, 30 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972); Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1975). Since Doyle did not bring her suit

Stallworth v. Hospitality Rentals, Inc.

515 So. 2d 413, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1987 | Docket: 371740

Cited 19 times | Published

accord with the general factors set forth in section 6(2) of the Restatement.[4] *418 Our holding today

Edward C. Hester v. International Union of Operating Engineers

878 F.2d 1309, 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2011, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11233, 1989 WL 74339

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 31, 1989 | Docket: 820703

Cited 16 times | Published

before January 9, 1985, such as Hester’s. Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed 1985).1 Cf. Ingram v. Steven

Fine v. Semet

699 F.2d 1091

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 11, 1983 | Docket: 66192903

Cited 16 times | Published

deceased), in accord with the provisions of Section 6.02, within sixty (60) days after the close of the

Fine v. Semet

514 F. Supp. 34, 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1103, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13705

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1981 | Docket: 1786636

Cited 16 times | Published

deceased), in accord with the provisions of Section 6.02, within sixty (60) days after the close of the

Boyd v. County of Dade

123 So. 2d 323

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1960 | Docket: 1234491

Cited 16 times | Published

trial. Section 6.02 D Metropolitan Charter. Appeal shall be taken to the circuit court. Section 6.02 F, Metropolitan

Anthony Boyd v. Warden,Holman Correctional Facility

856 F.3d 853, 2017 WL 1856071, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8238

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 9, 2017 | Docket: 6060125

Cited 15 times | Published

limitations for personal injury actions. See Ala. Code § 6-2-38. Therefore, if any of Boyd’s claims accrued prior

Washington National Insurance v. Ruderman

117 So. 3d 943, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 511, 2013 WL 3333059, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1388

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2013 | Docket: 60232866

Cited 15 times | Published

Allan D. Windt, Insurance Claims and Disputes 5th § 6:2 (2012) (“[I]f a policy term is ambiguous, the court

Wright v. Sheppard

919 F.2d 665, 1990 WL 187066

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 18, 1990 | Docket: 66260036

Cited 15 times | Published

(1987); L. Schlueter & K. Redden, Punitive Damages § 6.2 (2d ed. 1989); Merrit v. DeLos Santos, 721 F.2d

Hudson v. State

745 So. 2d 997, 1999 WL 770614

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1999 | Docket: 20689

Cited 14 times | Published

Austin W. Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.2(d), at 29-38 (1986). The substantial step approach

Jimmie L. Peterson Alonzo Reese v. Bmi Refractories

132 F.3d 1405, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2193, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 407, 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,172, 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1322, 1998 WL 9164

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 13, 1998 | Docket: 438571

Cited 14 times | Published

16 . See Ala.Code § 6-2-38(Z) (1993) (personal injury actions not specifically

Pens. Plan Guide P 23919j T.A. Musick and James Character v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.

81 F.3d 136, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8821, 1996 WL 161704

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 23, 1996 | Docket: 2037632

Cited 14 times | Published

the two-year statute of limitations found in section 6-2-88. ConAgra, Inc. v. Adams, 638 So

Bates v. Cook, Inc.

615 F. Supp. 662, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21060

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1984 | Docket: 1643506

Cited 14 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Perret v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.

889 F. Supp. 2d 1333, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126828, 2012 WL 3758036

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2012 | Docket: 65984642

Cited 13 times | Published

connection with the operation of the Trust.” Section 6.2 of the Management Agreement, entitled “Expenses

Stvartak v. Eastman Kodak Co.

945 F. Supp. 1532, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17552, 1996 WL 670640

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1996 | Docket: 1618293

Cited 13 times | Published

when a participant's employment terminates. Section 6.02 of the STD Plan (incorporated into the LTD Plan

Joanna Digioia, Vincent Digioia v. H. Koch & Sons, Division of Wickes Manufacturing Company, a Delaware Corporation

944 F.2d 809, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23521, 1991 WL 186529

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 9, 1991 | Docket: 832965

Cited 13 times | Published

occurrences and the parties under the principles of § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Willie C. Calhoun and Mattie Calhoun v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board and Escambia County Commission

705 F.2d 422, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27987

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 16, 1983 | Docket: 452030

Cited 13 times | Published

limitations for trespass on the case, Ala. Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1975), is applicable to the Calhouns’

Willie C. Calhoun and Mattie Calhoun v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board and Escambia County Commission

705 F.2d 422, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27987

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 16, 1983 | Docket: 452030

Cited 13 times | Published

limitations for trespass on the case, Ala. Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1975), is applicable to the Calhouns’

Carol J. Sellers, Donald W. Sellers v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.

715 F.2d 1559, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16406

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 30, 1983 | Docket: 599110

Cited 12 times | Published

fraudulent concealment tolling statute (Ala.Code § 6-2-3 (1975)). We affirm. FACTS Carol and

Sidney Pines v. Warnaco, Inc.

706 F.2d 1173, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26917

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 9, 1983 | Docket: 225162

Cited 12 times | Published

one-year statute of limitations contained in Ala. Code § 6-2-39 (1975). See Jefferson County v. Reach,

Da Rocha v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.

451 F. Supp. 2d 1318, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67576, 2006 WL 2619880

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2006 | Docket: 2441265

Cited 11 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Holland v. Hattaway

438 So. 2d 456, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24436

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1983 | Docket: 1731842

Cited 11 times | Published

Legal Education, Florida Real Property Practice I § 6.2 (1965). [14] Exceptions include the effect of defects

The Florida Companies v. Orange County, Fla.

411 So. 2d 1008

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1982 | Docket: 2526212

Cited 11 times | Published

the land. At the time of preliminary approval, section 6.2.7 of the Orange County Code provided that the

Scavella v. Fernandez

371 So. 2d 535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1979 | Docket: 1786895

Cited 11 times | Published

any such applicable general law ..." Art. VIII, § 6(2), Fla. Const. of 1968 (reenacting Art. VIII, § 11(5)

Crowell v. Clay Hyder Trucking Lines

700 So. 2d 120, 1997 WL 614430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1997 | Docket: 1719583

Cited 10 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

United Paperworks International, Local 395, United Paperworkers International, Local 766 v. Itt Rayonier, Inc.

931 F.2d 832, 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2614, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10140, 1991 WL 68745

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 20, 1991 | Docket: 79746

Cited 10 times | Published

O.C.G.A. § 9-3-24. 14 . Ala.Code § 6-2-34. 15 .We will not list the cases

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems

567 So. 2d 918, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6627, 1990 WL 126324

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1990 | Docket: 1721632

Cited 10 times | Published

the Restatement (Second), Conflict of Laws, section 6(2)(a), which outlines the relevant factors we have

3V Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc. (In Re Tousa, Inc.)

444 B.R. 613, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14019, 2011 WL 522008

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2011 | Docket: 2061629

Cited 9 times | Published

state that such notice is a "Notice of Default." Section 6.02 ACCELERATION (a) If an Event of Default (other

At&T Communications of the Southern States, Inc. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.

268 F.3d 1294, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21756, 2001 WL 1200887

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 11, 2001 | Docket: 38077

Cited 9 times | Published

Federal Telecommunications Law § 6.2 (2d ed. 1999). 4 ."A 'tariff is a

Ace American Insurance Company v. The Wattles Company

930 F.3d 1240

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 19, 2019 | Docket: 15944047

Cited 8 times | Published

operations posed to Wattles'[s] property." Although section 6.2 of the relevant lease required Exide to "comply

Stanley L. Crawford v. LVNV Funding, LLC

758 F.3d 1254, 2014 WL 3361226

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 10, 2014 | Docket: 367721

Cited 8 times | Published

court in October 2004. See Ala.Code § 6-2-37(1). Then, on February 2, 2008, Crawford

Dzikowski v. Friedlander (In Re Friedlander Capital Management Corp.)

411 B.R. 434, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 1195

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Apr 29, 2009 | Docket: 1648223

Cited 8 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) The local law of the state of incorporation will

Cirelli v. Ent

885 So. 2d 423, 2004 WL 2340685

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2004 | Docket: 1286814

Cited 8 times | Published

Marketable Record Title Act and Uniform Title Standards, § 6.2, in III Florida Real Property Practice (1965)) (emphases

Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

230 F.3d 1300, 2000 WL 1535929

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 64071814

Cited 8 times | Published

to a 2-year statute of limitations, see Ala.Code § 6-2-38, and that the breach of warranty claim is subject

Brown v. State

790 So. 2d 389, 2001 WL 578457

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2000 | Docket: 1734359

Cited 8 times | Published

Austin W. Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law § 6.2(c), at 500 (2d ed.1986). Murder is a result-oriented

H & F Land v. Panama City-Bay Co. Airport

736 So. 2d 1167, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 264, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1047, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 264

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1999 | Docket: 1434171

Cited 8 times | Published

Marketable Record Title Act and Uniform Title Standards, § 6.2, in III Florida Real Property Practice (1965) (citation

Vagenas v. Continental Gin Company

988 F.2d 104, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7475

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 9, 1993 | Docket: 1016703

Cited 8 times | Published

States must be commenced." ALA.CODE § 6-2-32 (1975). Reading § 6-2-32 in light of the treaty, a Greek

Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. Weitz

913 F.2d 1544, 1990 WL 135898

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 10, 1990 | Docket: 66257927

Cited 8 times | Published

instance is six years, as set out in Code of Alabama § 6-2-34 (1975). Since the first payment which plaintiffs

United Teachers of Dade v. DADE CTY. SCH. BD.

500 So. 2d 508

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 1295133

Cited 8 times | Published

have on the rights guaranteed by article I, section 6.[2]City of Tallahassee; See also United *511 Faculty

Peoples Bank and Trust Co. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

598 F. Supp. 377, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21400

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1984 | Docket: 959118

Cited 8 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Williams v. City of Dothan

745 F.2d 1406, 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 416

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 5, 1984 | Docket: 66201201

Cited 8 times | Published

state statute to apply in this case is Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1977), which provides a one-year limitation

United States v. Douglas Frank Haley

743 F.2d 862, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17888

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 9, 1984 | Docket: 500600

Cited 8 times | Published

inapplicable to this case, see CFR § 6.2(b)(1) (1981), once again we hold that it is not

Fisher v. Board of County Com'rs of Dade County

84 So. 2d 572

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1956 | Docket: 1094746

Cited 8 times | Published

the benefit to be received", nevertheless, in Section 6-02 of the report it is readily admitted that "no

Geoffrey West v. Commissioner, Alabama DOC

869 F.3d 1289

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 6, 2017 | Docket: 6148560

Cited 7 times | Published

injury actions applies. See Ala. Code, § 6-2-38(j) (“All actions for any injury to the person

Mukamal v. Bakes

383 B.R. 798, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96347, 2007 WL 4916729

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2007 | Docket: 1082048

Cited 7 times | Published

occurrences and the parties under the principles of § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Waters v. International Precious

190 F.3d 1291

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 30, 1999 | Docket: 395481

Cited 7 times | Published

would revert to defendant Grosfeld. See R31-1371, § 6.2(e), at 43. The stipulation also provided

First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State Insurance

899 F.2d 1045

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 27, 1990 | Docket: 66252936

Cited 7 times | Published

statute of limitations for a fraud action, ALA.CODE § 6-2-39 (1975) (repealed 1985), was one year from the

Emmart v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

659 F. Supp. 843, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3850

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 7, 1987 | Docket: 1781493

Cited 7 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

MDS (Canada), Inc. v. Rad Source Technologies, Inc.

822 F. Supp. 2d 1263, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113273, 2011 WL 4591186

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2011 | Docket: 1995405

Cited 6 times | Published

including with respect to the System. Subject to section 6.2, Rad Source, its respective offices and its Affiliates

In Re Managed Care Litigation

143 F. Supp. 2d 1371, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10673, 2001 WL 474300

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2001 | Docket: 2301044

Cited 6 times | Published

stemming from that agreement. (Mercy Agreement, § 6.2 (stating that "any dispute or claim between the

Blue Cross v. Sanders

138 F.3d 1347

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1998 | Docket: 1118740

Cited 6 times | Published

limitations for simple contract actions, see Ala. Code § 6-2-34(9),9 and reject the Sanders’s 9 Other circuits

Blue Cross v. Sanders

138 F.3d 1347

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1998 | Docket: 1118740

Cited 6 times | Published

limitations for simple contract actions, see Ala. Code § 6-2-34(9),9 and reject the Sanders’s 9 Other circuits

Brooks v. WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT

706 So. 2d 85, 1998 WL 64088

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1998 | Docket: 1682419

Cited 6 times | Published

power of initiative and referendum. See Charter § 6.02. The Charter of West Palm Beach provides: Except

Caddis Lee Dukes v. Smitherman, Sheriff Austain Lavert Bibb County Commission

32 F.3d 535, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26173, 1994 WL 478597

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 21, 1994 | Docket: 1036403

Cited 6 times | Published

commence an action.... See Ala.Code § 6-2-8(a) (1975) (emphasis added). It also provided that

Lufkin v. McCallum

956 F.2d 1104, 1992 WL 47365

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 31, 1992 | Docket: 66270459

Cited 6 times | Published

in Alabama. Jones I, 763 F.2d at 1256; Ala.Code § 6-2-34(1) (1977). In reaching this conclusion, the Jones

Bobby Jean McKissick v. Donald Busby City of Millbrook, Alabama James Owens Arvil Minor Walter Hubbard

936 F.2d 520, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15608, 1991 WL 117291

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 22, 1991 | Docket: 554098

Cited 6 times | Published

for trespass on the case, found in Alabama Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (Michie 1977). Before one year had passed

Edward E. Hancock, Cynthia A. Hancock v. New York Life Insurance Company

899 F.2d 1131, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6802, 1990 WL 42193

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 1990 | Docket: 506236

Cited 6 times | Published

period set forth in Ala.Code *1134 § 6-2-38. 1 The court reasoned that this cause

Edward E. Hancock, Cynthia A. Hancock v. New York Life Insurance Company

899 F.2d 1131, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6802, 1990 WL 42193

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 1990 | Docket: 506236

Cited 6 times | Published

period set forth in Ala.Code *1134 § 6-2-38. 1 The court reasoned that this cause

McElvy v. Civiletti

523 F. Supp. 42, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14822

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1981 | Docket: 2144005

Cited 6 times | Published

possession a quantity of cannabis in violation of Section 6(2) of the Drug Control Ordinance. THE WAIVER UNDER

McElvy v. Civiletti

523 F. Supp. 42, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14822

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1981 | Docket: 2144005

Cited 6 times | Published

possession a quantity of cannabis in violation of Section 6(2) of the Drug Control Ordinance. THE WAIVER UNDER

Christopher Brooks v. Warden

810 F.3d 812, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 860, 2016 WL 212427

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 19, 2016 | Docket: 3029321

Cited 5 times | Published

Amendment claim is two years. See Ala.Code § 6-2-38 (1975) (establishing a two-year statute of limitations

Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. Target Corporation

812 F.3d 824, 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1097, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7, 2016 WL 25495

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 4, 2016 | Docket: 3025511

Cited 5 times | Published

on all but one of the books at issue. Ala.Code § 6-2-38(7) (1975). Alabama typically considers statutes

Holmes v. Area Glass, Inc.

117 So. 3d 492, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11761, 2013 WL 3853225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2013 | Docket: 60232699

Cited 5 times | Published

pointed to Traw-ick’s Florida Practice and Procedure, § 6-2, which states that “the names of the parties in

Johnson v. Greaves

366 F. App'x 976

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 25, 2010 | Docket: 65731421

Cited 5 times | Published

F.3d 1168, 1173 (11th Cir.2008) (citing Aa.Code § 6-2-38). The limitations period begins to run when the

Estate of Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc.

609 F. Supp. 2d 1235, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56446, 2009 WL 975570

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2009 | Docket: 231129

Cited 5 times | Published

Eleventh Circuit explained in Judge that: The section 6(2) analysis turns in large part on the balance

Mezroub v. Capella

702 So. 2d 562, 1997 WL 716835

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1997 | Docket: 460273

Cited 5 times | Published

invoke section 6(1). The seven principles in section 6(2) may allow for arguments in support of both Georgia

Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Rosenberger

699 So. 2d 713, 1997 WL 374389

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1997 | Docket: 1321562

Cited 5 times | Published

application of the important considerations noted in section 6(2).[7] As to the vicarious liability issue, Restatement

Fink v. Holt

609 So. 2d 1333, 1992 WL 324724

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1992 | Docket: 1738057

Cited 5 times | Published

Jr., Florida Practice and Procedure (1991 ed.), § 6.2. The applicable rule of civil procedure expressly

Default Proof Credit Card System, Inc. v. STATE ST. BANK & TRUST COMPANY

753 F. Supp. 1566, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17552

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1990 | Docket: 666680

Cited 5 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6.[2] (2) Contacts to be taken into consideration in

Ramp Operations, Inc. v. Reliance Insurance Company, a Corporation, Louisiana Companies, a Licensed Surplus Line Insurance Broker

805 F.2d 1552, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34911

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 19, 1986 | Docket: 805085

Cited 5 times | Published

in Alabama is one year. Ala.Code § 6-2-39 (1975). Under Ala.Code § 6-2-3 (1975), a fraud action must be

State v. McArthur

296 So. 2d 97

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1974 | Docket: 1754616

Cited 5 times | Published

mandatory." 8 Moore's Federal Practice, The Grand Jury § 6.02 n. 24 (1973). See 1 Wright, Federal Practice and

Cantrell v. Folsom

332 F. Supp. 767, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12227

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1971 | Docket: 1660823

Cited 5 times | Published

circumstances. See Federal Habeas Corpus, Sokol, § 6.2; United States v. Martin, 242 F.2d 701 (2d Cir.

Gevaerts v. TD Bank, N.A.

56 F. Supp. 3d 1335, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156529, 2014 WL 5493183

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2014 | Docket: 64298097

Cited 4 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Trafalgar Capital Specialized Investment Fund v. Hartman

878 F. Supp. 2d 1274, 2012 WL 2579932, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93790

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2012 | Docket: 65983290

Cited 4 times | Published

Agreement. (See Comp. Ex. B [ECF No. 37-2]: Debenture § 6.02; Securities Purchase Agreement ¶ 9(a); Security

Jian Le Lin v. U.S. Attorney General

681 F.3d 1236, 2012 WL 1860686, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10430

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 23, 2012 | Docket: 751792

Cited 4 times | Published

consideration of a petitioner’s motion to reopen. 8 C.F.R. § 6.2 (1952) (stating that the departure of an alien from

Husky Rose, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.

19 So. 3d 1085, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14922, 2009 WL 3189181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2009 | Docket: 928296

Cited 4 times | Published

as an insured under the policy. Specifically, section 6.02 of the lease provided: "The Tenant shall at

Prater v. United Mine Workers of America

793 F.2d 1201, 122 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3240, 21 Fed. R. Serv. 260, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27323

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 18, 1986 | Docket: 66216910

Cited 4 times | Published

subject to a one-year limitations period. Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (1975), in effect at the time this suit

Larry Wayne Whitson v. Charles Baker and Troy Howton

755 F.2d 1406, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28502

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 22, 1985 | Docket: 996454

Cited 4 times | Published

a term less than life, does Alabama Code [1975] § 6-2-8 operate to toll the statute of limitations?” 732

Steele v. Southern Truck Body Corp.

397 So. 2d 1209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1981 | Docket: 1706578

Cited 4 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Laspro Consultores LTDA. v. Alinia Corp. (In re Massa Falida Do Banco Cruzeiro Do Sul S.A.)

567 B.R. 212

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Mar 23, 2017 | Docket: 65789656

Cited 3 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

833 F.3d 1274, 46 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20141, 82 ERC (BNA) 2220, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14877, 2016 WL 4254892

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 12, 2016 | Docket: 4119247

Cited 3 times | Published

and compensatory mitigation, is provided in Section 6.2.2. The activities authorized by this NWP, including

Archstone Palmetto Park, LLC v. Kennedy

132 So. 3d 347, 2014 WL 305086, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2014 | Docket: 60238430

Cited 3 times | Published

collectively filed a petition, pursuant to Section 6.02 of the City’s charter, seeking a citywide referendum

Martin County Conservation Alliance v. Martin County

73 So. 3d 856, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17513, 2011 WL 5299370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2011 | Docket: 60303495

Cited 3 times | Published

331, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, and section 6.2 of this court’s Internal Operating Procedures

Westgate Tabernacle, Inc. v. Palm Beach County

14 So. 3d 1027, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5431, 2009 WL 1393429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2009 | Docket: 1161067

Cited 3 times | Published

facilities are permitted in the RH zoning district. ULDC § 6.2.D.8. The code identifies three types of facilities:

Westgate Tabernacle, Inc. v. Palm Beach County

14 So. 3d 1027, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5431, 2009 WL 1393429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2009 | Docket: 1161067

Cited 3 times | Published

facilities are permitted in the RH zoning district. ULDC § 6.2.D.8. The code identifies three types of facilities:

Airplanes of Boca, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. Federal Aviation Administration

254 F. Supp. 2d 1304, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10257

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2003 | Docket: 2378422

Cited 3 times | Published

Safety is not a luxury! Take action! AIM, Chapter 6, § 6-2(b). As a general rule, the ordinary rules of negligence

Brandon, Jones, Sandall, Zeide, Kohn, Chalal & Musso, P.A. v. MedPartners, Inc.

203 F.R.D. 677, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21482, 2001 WL 1349307

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2001 | Docket: 66015211

Cited 3 times | Published

said party shall be deemed “the losing party.” Section 6.2(c) states: (c) Termination by MEDPARTNERS for

Red-Eyed Jack, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach

165 F. Supp. 2d 1322, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21588, 2001 WL 1044897

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2001 | Docket: 2385575

Cited 3 times | Published

a special use operation are set forth in Art. 4 § 6.2 and require, in part, public hearings by the Planning

Pinellas County v. Eight is Enough in Pinellas

775 So. 2d 317, 2000 WL 639326

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2000 | Docket: 1667848

Cited 3 times | Published

with the provisions for charter initiative in section 6.02. This section does not limit the topics that

Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc.

119 F.3d 888, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1625, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 20761, 1997 WL 437161

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 766056

Cited 3 times | Published

benefit15 as of his effective retirement date.16 See § 6.2(e)© (“Lump Sum Option”). A pilot dissatisfied with

Hunt v. American Bank & Trust Co. of Baton Rouge

783 F.2d 1011

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 3, 1986 | Docket: 66214009

Cited 3 times | Published

of one year for the state claims, see Ala.Code. § 6-2-39 (repealed Jan. 9, 1985),1 and two years for the

Pennington v. Dye

456 So. 2d 507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1984 | Docket: 1731989

Cited 3 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Larry Wayne Whitson v. Charles Baker and Troy Howton

732 F.2d 856, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22331

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 21, 1984 | Docket: 713005

Cited 3 times | Published

construction of an Alabama tolling statute, Ala.Code § 6-2-8 (1975). Because this question of state law appears

Harville v. Yarway Corp.

731 F.2d 775, 1986 A.M.C. 731

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 7, 1984 | Docket: 66196849

Cited 3 times | Published

“after the cause of action has accrued." Ala.Code § 6-2-30(a). The Alabama Supreme Court has held that a

Erkins v. United Steelworkers

723 F.2d 837, 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2540

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 23, 1984 | Docket: 66194372

Cited 3 times | Published

statute of limitations for tort actions, Ala. Code § 6-2-39(a) (1975), and that the constitution of Steelworkers

County of Dade v. Saffan

173 So. 2d 138

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1965 | Docket: 1680967

Cited 3 times | Published

appeal within the 20-day period prescribed by Section 6.02(f) Article VI of the Home Rule Charter of Dade

Judy N. Brock v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.

823 F.3d 1334, 2016 WL 2996372

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 24, 2016 | Docket: 3066691

Cited 2 times | Published

overdue debt is six years. See Ala. Code § 6-2-34. Judy Brock also filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy

Mississippi Valley Title Insurance Company v. J. Garrison Thompson

802 F.3d 1248, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17140, 2015 WL 5693118

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 29, 2015 | Docket: 2862791

Cited 2 times | Published

principal-agent relationships set forth in Ala.Code § 6-2-6 applied and did not bar Mississippi Valley’s suit

Burgess v. Prince

25 So. 3d 705, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 405, 2010 WL 199422

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 2010 | Docket: 1661204

Cited 2 times | Published

trust based on contract construction rules). Section 6.2 of the Trust provides that a beneficiary may

Hendricks v. Smartvideo Technologies, Inc.

511 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 25 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1056, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5878, 2007 WL 220160

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2007 | Docket: 145359

Cited 2 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Tolz v. Quad/Graphics, Inc. (In Re Deer Creek Products)

325 B.R. 913, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15485, 2005 WL 1431656

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: May 3, 2005 | Docket: 1176780

Cited 2 times | Published

security interest under the principles stated in § 6. (2) In the absence of an effective choice of law by

Leinhart v. Jurkovich

882 So. 2d 456, 2004 WL 1933560

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2004 | Docket: 1686421

Cited 2 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Alexis, Inc. v. Pinellas County, Florida

194 F. Supp. 2d 1336, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13794, 2002 WL 509261

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2002 | Docket: 2475840

Cited 2 times | Published

Alcohol and Nudity Ordinance, Pinellas County Code § 6-2 (hereinafter, collectively, "ordinances"). In 1998

Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transportation

239 F.3d 1209

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 2001 | Docket: 238310

Cited 2 times | Published

abuse of discretion. 4 Alabama Code § 6-2-38(l) provides: “All actions for any injury to the

Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

363 F.3d 1183

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 1242296

Cited 2 times | Published

to a two year statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 6-2-38, and that the breach of implied warranty claim

White v. State of Alabama

74 F.3d 1058, 1996 WL 23457

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 1996 | Docket: 419137

Cited 2 times | Published

associate justices as may be prescribed by law.” Id. § 6.02(a). The courts of appeals consist of "such number

Beaubrum v. State

595 So. 2d 254, 1992 WL 43204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1992 | Docket: 1204194

Cited 2 times | Published

rule of the Florida Constitution, Article III, section 6, 2) the trial court erred in giving the jury the

Hester v. International Union of Operating Engineers

941 F.2d 1574

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 20, 1991 | Docket: 66266415

Cited 2 times | Published

injury one-year statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed 1985), because Hester’s claim

Johnson v. Pullman, Inc.

845 F.2d 911, 1988 WL 41331

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 20, 1988 | Docket: 66234681

Cited 2 times | Published

to the fraud. Ala.Code § 6-2-39 (1975), repealed, and replaced by Ala.Code § 6-2-38 (Supp. 1987) (providing

Florida Bar re Amendment to Rules

510 So. 2d 585, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2483, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 412

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1987 | Docket: 64628648

Cited 2 times | Published

foreign attorneys. (7) A member exempted under section 6.02(i)(4) and (5) shall not be subject to the provisions

The Home Indemnity Company, Cross-Appellee v. Ball-Co Contractors, Inc., Cross-Appellant

819 F.2d 1053, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7844

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 22, 1987 | Docket: 972340

Cited 2 times | Published

tions for actions on open accounts. Ala. Code § 6-2-37,645 F.Supp. 25 (S.D.Ala.1986). We express

Acoff v. Abston

762 F.2d 1543, 54 U.S.L.W. 2029

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 12, 1985 | Docket: 66207103

Cited 2 times | Published

Federal courts in the past have applied ALA.CODE § 6-2-34 (1975) to Section 1983 claims. Beard v. Stephens

N. Brevard v. Fla. Pub. Emp. Rel. Com'n

392 So. 2d 556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1980 | Docket: 1268666

Cited 2 times | Published

an annual financial report, as described in Section 6.02 hereof, which report shall reflect the financial

N. Brevard v. Fla. Pub. Emp. Rel. Com'n

392 So. 2d 556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1980 | Docket: 1268666

Cited 2 times | Published

an annual financial report, as described in Section 6.02 hereof, which report shall reflect the financial

State Ex Rel. Pettigrew v. Kirk

243 So. 2d 147

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1970 | Docket: 539898

Cited 2 times | Published

appoint additional circuit judges as prescribed in Section 6(2), Article V, State Constitution, pursuant to

Watson v. State

169 So. 2d 887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1964 | Docket: 1689635

Cited 2 times | Published

21 of the Dade County Code, enacted pursuant to § 6.02(E) of the Home Rule Charter for Metropolitan Dade

Mvw Management, LLC v. Regalia Beach Developers, LLC

230 So. 3d 108

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2017 | Docket: 6148133

Cited 1 times | Published

or the Manager sooner resigns or is removed.” Section 6.2, titled “Initial Manager,” states that “[t]he

Medina v. State

226 So. 3d 1018, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12366, 2017 WL 3721822

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2017 | Docket: 6145446

Cited 1 times | Published

Wyoming Statutes section 6-2-503(b)(i) (2003). Dunsmore, 153 P.3d at 277. Under section 6-2-503(b)(i),

Arthur v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections

680 F. App'x 894

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 24, 2017 | Docket: 65964555

Cited 1 times | Published

1303 (11th Cir. 2011) (per curiam); Ala. Code § 6-2-38. At issue is when that statute of limitations

Matheson v. Miami-Dade County

187 So. 3d 221, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7998, 2015 WL 3390177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2015 | Docket: 2659839

Cited 1 times | Published

mention in the ballot summary was the following: SECTION 6.02 MUNICIPAL POWERS Each municipality shall have

Gulf Power Co. v. Coalsales II, L.L.C.

661 F. Supp. 2d 1270, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95949, 2009 WL 3190459

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2009 | Docket: 2281928

Cited 1 times | Published

became unavailable. Coalsales also relies on Section 6.02, which provides, in relevant part: "If Seller

Tubbs v. Hudec

8 So. 3d 1194, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3436, 2009 WL 1066297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2009 | Docket: 1654122

Cited 1 times | Published

occurred that entitled it to indemnification under Section 6.2 hereof (other than matters covered by subsection

Cohen v. Implant Innovations, Inc.

259 F.R.D. 617, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64144, 2008 WL 3927223

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2008 | Docket: 66038738

Cited 1 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Mazon v. Tardif

387 B.R. 641, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34618, 2008 WL 1897596

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2008 | Docket: 1703447

Cited 1 times | Published

non-exclusive right to use the common elements." (Id. at § 6.2(E).) The limited common elements included the exclusive

Wright v. Frankel

965 So. 2d 365, 2007 WL 2847951

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2007 | Docket: 1509002

Cited 1 times | Published

power of initiative and referendum. See Charter § 6.02. Id. at 87. If, as we held in Brooks, a suggestion

Dalack v. VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA

434 F. Supp. 2d 1336, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33214, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 654

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 25, 2006 | Docket: 2300417

Cited 1 times | Published

of Texas. Id. at 555 (citing Tx. Election Code, § 6.02). The legislative proviso immediately following

Campero USA Corp. v. STPC Partners, L.P.

410 F. Supp. 2d 1268, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4087, 2006 WL 166571

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2006 | Docket: 1877553

Cited 1 times | Published

alleges that it terminated the Agreement pursuant to § 6.02(e). Section 6.02e provides: Termination Without

Green v. State

878 So. 2d 382, 2003 WL 21145944

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2004 | Docket: 1353914

Cited 1 times | Published

LaFave & Gerold H. Israel, Criminal Procedure § 6.2(c). Of particular significance is whether Miranda

Pamela Sue Jones v. Dillard's, Inc.

368 F.3d 1278

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 30, 2003 | Docket: 76122

Cited 1 times | Published

enumerated specifically in the code. Ala.Code. § 6-2-38(l) (1984). 49 On its face

Jones Ex Rel. Estate of Hill v. Hill Development Co. (In Re Hill)

265 B.R. 296, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 902, 2001 WL 849350

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2001 | Docket: 1470940

Cited 1 times | Published

the Partnership without substitution pursuant to § 6.2." Thus the terms of the partnership agreement provide

Barton v. Hertz Corp.

35 F. Supp. 2d 1377, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1618, 1999 WL 80351

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1999 | Docket: 2359151

Cited 1 times | Published

and the parties under the principals stated in Section 6. 2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

In Re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia on December 20

24 F. Supp. 2d 1340

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1998 | Docket: 2351444

Cited 1 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Durham v. Business Management Associates

847 F.2d 1505, 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 713, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8601

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 23, 1988 | Docket: 66234833

Cited 1 times | Published

under Alabama law. In fraud actions Alabama Code section 6-2-3 tolls the limitations period4 until the “fraud

Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Haralson

813 F.2d 370, 7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1321

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 30, 1987 | Docket: 66224307

Cited 1 times | Published

Code Ann. § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed effective January 9, 1985). However, under Section 6-2-3, fraud actions

Donaldson v. United States

634 F. Supp. 735, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26414

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1986 | Docket: 1500085

Cited 1 times | Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

First Maryland Leasecorp. v. M/V Golden Egret

764 F.2d 749, 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 600

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 1, 1985 | Docket: 66207833

Cited 1 times | Published

of limitations is six years pursuant to Ala.Code § 6-2-34(9) in view of the present version of Ala.Code

Watts v. National Insurance Underwriters

540 F. Supp. 488, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14160

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 26, 1982 | Docket: 1233908

Cited 1 times | Published

the parties under the principles as stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Cleveland Trust Co. v. Ousley Sod Co.

351 So. 2d 58

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1977 | Docket: 1246718

Cited 1 times | Published

See 1 Rakusin, Florida Mechanics' Lien Manual, § 6.02(B) (1974). However, if the mechanic's claim of

United Services Automobile Association v. Gillen

280 So. 2d 52, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7815

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1973 | Docket: 1687401

Cited 1 times | Published

the parties under the principles stated in Section 6. "(2) In the absence of an effective choice of law

Martha Martinez-Lara v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 6, 2025 | Docket: 71040623

Published

“narrowly,” 1 Hickman & Pierce, supra, § 6.2, and the Supreme Court has held that immigration-court

Michael Chapman v. Jefferson Dunn

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 25, 2025 | Docket: 69194054

Published

which, in Alabama, is two years, see Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l). Federal law, though, determines when

Marken Leger v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 20, 2024 | Docket: 67993862

Published

Argued: Nov 9, 2023

61-8B-5(a)(i) (1993) (four years); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-304(a)(i) (1995) (four years). 8

PRN Real Estate & Investments, Ltd. v. William W. Cole, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 2, 2023 | Docket: 67058606

Published

Argued: Mar 21, 2023

requires courts to consider seven factors listed in § 6(2). Florida has a statute on point

John S. Lowman, IV v. Federal Aviation Administration

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 12, 2023 | Docket: 67233691

Published

Argued: Apr 25, 2023

preparing [EAs].”); see also FAA Order 1050.1F § 6-2.2(g) (“Circulation of a draft EA for public

PATIENT DEPOT, LLC v. ACADIA ENTERPRISES, INC., RYAN O'CONNOR and LORI ANN O'CONNOR

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2023 | Docket: 67270674

Published

trade secrets as confidential information. Section 6.2 also included the following nondisclosure provision:

Grant Sunny Iriele v. Richard Carroll Griffin

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 17, 2023 | Docket: 66922605

Published

Argued: Mar 2, 2023

limitations for tort claims, Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l), and we have construed this limitation

LEXINGTON PLACE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION NOT FOR PROFIT vs MICHELLE FLINT AND KEVIN FLINT

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2022 | Docket: 68035394

Published

Declaration when proposed by the association. Under Section 6.2, if the Board wishes to amend the Declaration

A.M. Samara v. Thomas Keith Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 14, 2022 | Docket: 63383464

Published

on which the cause of action arises. ALA. CODE § 6-2-33(2); see also Pinto Credit Union v. Brown, 535

Estate of Jeffrey West v. Robert DeFrancisco

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 20, 2021 | Docket: 60224301

Published

(quotation omitted)); 42 U.S.C. § 1988; Alabama Code § 6-2-38 (setting two-year statute of limitations for

Laura Goodloe v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 2021 | Docket: 60000768

Published

determination of the particular issue.” Id. at § 6(2).

CITY OF MIAMI v. YESID ORTIZ AND REYNALDO IRIAS

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2021 | Docket: 59719224

Published

expressly covered by its terms. Id. at 277. Section 6.2 of the Agreement defines “grievance” as “any

Keith Cooper v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 6, 2020 | Docket: 17323183

Published

six years after the last payment. See Ala. Code § 6-2-34(5); Ex parte HealthSouth Corp., 974 So. 2d 288

Angela Henderson Williamson v. Travelport, LP

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 27, 2020 | Docket: 17019708

Published

compensation and months of service. See D.E. 4-1 at § 6.02 (“Participant’s Monthly Normal Benefit shall be

SCOTT LYDAY & TAMMY LYDAY v. MYAKKA VALLEY RANCHES IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. & VIVIAN ZABIK

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2019 | Docket: 14717609

Published

Title Act and Uniform Title Standards, Volume 3, § 6.2, Florida Real Property Practice (1965)); see also

Asa College v. Dezer Intracoastal Mall

250 So. 3d 731

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2018 | Docket: 7225321

Published

parking of vehicles, subject to Section 6.2; and (3) circulation, passage and

Geoffrey West v. Commissioner, Alabama DOC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 6, 2017 | Docket: 6148993

Published

personal injury actions applies. See Ala. Code. § 6-2-38(j) (“All actions for any injury to the person

Arthur v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections

857 F.3d 1157, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 9159, 2017 WL 2305461

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 25, 2017 | Docket: 65662529

Published

1303 (11th Cir. 2011) (per curiam); Ala. Code § 6-2-38. To be clear, Mr. Arthur has not requested that

Ward v. Morlock

218 So. 3d 981, 2017 WL 1788020, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6362

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2017 | Docket: 6061252

Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Portillo v. State

211 So. 3d 1135, 2017 WL 697729, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2348

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2017 | Docket: 4608343

Published

7; Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.44.020; Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-312.

Mukamal v. D.R. Horton, Inc. (In re Majorca Isles Master Ass'n)

560 B.R. 824, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 179, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 3797

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 21, 2016 | Docket: 65789302

Published

Assessments to the Local Associations (PI. Ex. 1 at section 6.2). Pursuant to that authority, the Master Association

Ottoniel Cruz and Luz M. Cruz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, etc.

199 So. 3d 992, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9272, 2016 WL 3342651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2016 | Docket: 3078548

Published

Receiver’s deed or Receiver’s bill of sale.” Section 6.2 obligates the FDIC to deliver assets, including

Ottoniel Cruz and Luz M. Cruz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2016 | Docket: 3046941

Published

Receiver’s deed or Receiver’s bill of sale.” Section 6.2 obligates the FDIC to deliver assets, including

Glasswall, LLC v. Monadnock Construction, Inc.

187 So. 3d 248, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2016 | Docket: 3031224

Published

for later proceedings. [[Image here]] § 6.2 BINDING DISPUTE RESOLUTION For any claim subject

Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. Target Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 4, 2016 | Docket: 3025600

Published

on all but one of the books at issue. Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l) (1975). Alabama typically considers statutes

Conservation Alliance v. United States Department of Transportation

145 F. Supp. 3d 1198, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157599, 2015 WL 7351544

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2015 | Docket: 64305408

Published

of the boundary of the SPSP.). As detailed in Section 6.2 of the FEIS (Avoidance alternatives), Section

Conservation Alliance v. United States Department of Transportation

145 F. Supp. 3d 1198, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157599, 2015 WL 7351544

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2015 | Docket: 64305408

Published

of the boundary of the SPSP.). As detailed in Section 6.2 of the FEIS (Avoidance alternatives), Section

Tobinick v. Novella

108 F. Supp. 3d 1299, 43 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1803, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72467, 2015 WL 3540053

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2015 | Docket: 64302345

Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Bender v. James (In re Hintze)

525 B.R. 780

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2015 | Docket: 65787231

Published

Transactions Under the Uniform Commercial Code § 6.02(1)(a) (3d ed.2011). . Of course, if the Debtors

Luani Plaza, Inc. v. Burton

149 So. 3d 712, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15637, 2014 WL 5012990

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2014 | Docket: 1432365

Published

withdrawal.” Restatement (Third) of Prop.: Servitudes § 6.2 (2000). The recorded Declaration provides that

Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc. v. State, Department of Health

123 So. 3d 86, 2013 WL 4859092

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2013 | Docket: 60235253

Published

sufficient facilities and personnel. See Ch. 90-284, § 6(2)(d), Laws of Fla.; § 395.0335(2)(d), Fla. Stat.

Chiles v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

923 F. Supp. 2d 1330, 2013 WL 539891, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29170

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2013 | Docket: 65988752

Published

the parties under the principles stated in Section 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

State of Florida Department of Revenue v. Davis (In Re Davis)

465 B.R. 309, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103311, 2011 WL 4055598

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2011 | Docket: 2053720

Published

payments: "[T]here's a provision in the plan, Section 6.2, that says that failure to file a claim by the

United States v. Robert D. Singletary

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 15, 2011 | Docket: 2905933

Published

the 15 HUD Handbook 4000.2 § 6-2, 2004 WL 5863716 (May 2004). 16

Russo v. Lorenzo

67 So. 3d 1165, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12477, 2011 WL 3476922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2011 | Docket: 60301941

Published

normal retirement date and thereafter dies. Section 6.02 addresses the retirement benefit in the event

Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n v. Colony Beach & Tennis Club, Inc. (In Re Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n)

423 B.R. 690, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 297, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 148, 2010 WL 286615

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 2010 | Docket: 1638474

Published

under the Lease was $153,000. (Ex. 15 at § 6.1.) Section 6.2 of the Lease provides that the rent is subject

Miami-Dade County v. Village of Pinecrest

994 So. 2d 456, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 16969, 2008 WL 4756654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2008 | Docket: 64856739

Published

mention in the ballot summary reads as follows: SECTION 6.02 MUNICIPAL POWERS Each municipality shall have

KAROLEWICZ v. Drummond Press, Inc.

553 F. Supp. 2d 1339, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21451, 2008 WL 754745

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2008 | Docket: 2360717

Published

Robert L. Harmon, Patents and the Federal Circuit § 6.2 (8th ed. 2007). The words "magnetic," "core," "non-magnetic"

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 4, 2005 | Docket: 3258673

Published

2 Section 5(1), Ch. 00-477, Laws of Fla. 3 Section 6(2), Ch. 00-477, Laws of Fla. 4 Section 2(3), Ch

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 3, 2003 | Docket: 3255647

Published

municipal and a county government.7 In addition, section 6.02 of Chapter 92-341 states that the mayor is a

Godwin v. Solutia, Inc.

215 F. Supp. 2d 1291, 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2449, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16332, 2002 WL 1837851

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2002 | Docket: 2370896

Published

employee benefit plan governed by ERISA. Under section 6.2(e)(i) of the Plan, an employee over the age of

Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transportation

239 F.3d 1209

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 2001 | Docket: 238311

Published

(11th Cir. 1999). 3 Alabama Code § 6-2-38(l) provides: “All actions for any injury to the

Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transportation

239 F.3d 1209, 48 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 829, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 907, 2001 WL 58737

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 2001 | Docket: 2038364

Published

abuse of discretion. 3 .Alabama Code § 6-2-38(1) provides; "All actions for any injury to the

Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transportation

239 F.3d 1209

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 2001 | Docket: 238297

Published

for abuse of discretion. 3 Alabama Code § 6-2-38(1) provides: "All actions for any injury

Martin v. Kavanagh

773 So. 2d 1250, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16362, 2000 WL 1836777

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2000 | Docket: 64802587

Published

Arthur Gaudio, The American Law of Real Property § 6.02[5](b) (1994); 11 Thompson on Real Property § 351

Paul L. Spain v. Brown and Williamson

363 F.3d 1183

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 1242299

Published

a 2-year statute of limitations, see Ala. Code § 6-2-38, and that the breach of warranty claim is subject

Blake v. Partyka

731 So. 2d 749, 1999 WL 176468

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1999 | Docket: 1733776

Published

ARTICLE VI. ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS. * * * Section 6.02. City Attorney. There shall be a city attorney

Herman v. Reinecke Agency

37 F. Supp. 2d 1338, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22030, 1998 WL 965995

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1998 | Docket: 2371932

Published

monthly reports that the Trustees received. Section 6.2 of the Plan Agreement and Declaration of Trust

Carlson v. American Airlines, Inc.

24 F. Supp. 2d 1340, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17510

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1998 | Docket: 64293188

Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

Peterson v. BMI Refractories

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 13, 1998 | Docket: 74482

Published

February 2, 1995, 16 See Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l) (1993) (personal injury actions not specifically

Peterson v. BMI Refractories

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 13, 1998 | Docket: 211878

Published

two year statute of 16 See Ala.Code § 6-2-38(l ) (1993) (personal injury actions not specifically

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 24, 1997 | Docket: 3258227

Published

advisory committee for the authority? In sum: Section 6(2), Chapter 96-449, Laws of Florida, does not authorize

Hunt v. Hawthorn Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 74098

Published

annuity option, and the deferred payment option. See § 6.2 (“Available Forms of Payment”). There also was a

Eight is Enough in Pinellas v. Ruggles

678 So. 2d 898, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8906, 1996 WL 476129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1996 | Docket: 64766908

Published

provision concerning citizen initiative states: Section 6.02 Charter Initiative Amendments to the Charter

Musick v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 23, 1996 | Docket: 69915

Published

the two-year statute of limitations found in section 6-2-38. ConAgra, Inc. v. Adams, 638

White v. State of Alabama

74 F.3d 1058

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 1996 | Docket: 419174

Published

justices as may be prescribed by law." Id. § 6.02(a). The courts of appeals consist of "such

State v. Florida Police Benevolent Ass'n

653 So. 2d 1124, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4356, 1995 WL 236790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1995 | Docket: 64755792

Published

Appropriations Act to be invalid under article I, section 6. 2. After reviewing the matter, the case was remanded

Vagenas v. Continental Gin Co.

988 F.2d 104, 1993 WL 83509

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 9, 1993 | Docket: 66280394

Published

States must be commenced.” Ala.Code § 6-2-32 (1975). Reading § 6-2-32 in light of the treaty, a Greek

Anderson v. George H. Lanier Memorial Hospital

982 F.2d 1513, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2161, 1993 WL 15910

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 12, 1993 | Docket: 66280095

Published

the act, omission or failure complained of____ Section 6-2-3 of the Alabama Statutes sets out the statute

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 16, 1991 | Docket: 3258201

Published

Section 6(1), Ch. 90-412, Laws of Florida. 15 Section 6(2)(b), Ch. 90-412, Laws of Florida. 16 Section

Judge v. American Motors Corp.

908 F.2d 1565, 1990 WL 110118

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 21, 1990 | Docket: 66255572

Published

and the parties under the principles stated in § 6. (2) Contacts to be taken into account in applying

School Board of Palm Beach County v. Winchester

565 So. 2d 1350, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 418, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 971, 1990 WL 107464

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1990 | Docket: 64652630

Published

charter which may be pertinent to this issue is section 6.2 which states that “adoption of this Home Rule

Free v. Granger

887 F.2d 1552, 1989 WL 86482

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 14, 1989 | Docket: 66248475

Published

personal injury statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 6-2-39(a)(5) (repealed). Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin,

Murray Industries, Inc. v. Norwest Bank Minneapolis, N.A. (In re Murray Industries, Inc.)

105 B.R. 96, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1557

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1989 | Docket: 65779877

Published

benefit of each participant in the Plan. Pursuant to § 6.2 of the Plan, a participant under the Plan is entitled

Foster v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County

872 F.2d 1563, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7143, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,057, 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1397

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 23, 1989 | Docket: 66244083

Published

six-year limitations period provided in Ala.Code § 6-2-34(1) applies to section 1983 actions arising in

Larkin v. Pullman-Standard Division, Pullman, Inc.

854 F.2d 1549, 12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1500, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12916, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,337, 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1732

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 21, 1988 | Docket: 66237891

Published

limitations that applied to personal injury actions. Section 6-2-34(1) provided that “[ajctions for any trespass

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 26, 1988 | Docket: 3257763

Published

members of the Gainesville City Commission. 10 Section 6(2), Ch. 85-376, Laws of Florida. And see, s. 5(2)

Vinsant Painting & Decorating, Inc. v. Koppers Co.

822 F.2d 1022, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9903

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 27, 1987 | Docket: 66227319

Published

facts giving rise to the fraud claim. Ala.Code § 6-2-3 (1975); Papastefan v. B & L Construction Co.,

Dominick v. Dixie National Life Insurance

809 F.2d 1559, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2348

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 18, 1987 | Docket: 66222438

Published

they were barred by the statute of limitations. Section 6-2-39, Code of Alabama (1975), requires that all

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Feb 9, 1987 | Docket: 3256649

Published

or before June 1 of each year, . . ." (e.s.) Section 6(2), Ch. 80-606, supra, further provides in pertinent

Michigan Abrasive Co. v. Poole

805 F.2d 1001

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 10, 1986 | Docket: 66221401

Published

796 (1964). . Appellant contends that Ala.Code § 6-2-39 (1977), which was arguably in effect at all times

Lampliter Dinner Theater, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurace

792 F.2d 1036, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26623

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 30, 1986 | Docket: 66216837

Published

year within which to commence an action.3 Ala.Code § 6-2-3, however, operates as a “saving clause” by tolling

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Apr 9, 1986 | Docket: 3256232

Published

sediment and water columns of the lake. (e.s.) Section 6(2) of Ch. 85-148, supra, further makes an appropriation

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Jackson

757 F.2d 1220

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 16, 1985 | Docket: 66205648

Published

Constitution, Ala. Const, art. VI, amend. *1221328, § 6.02(b)(3), and Rule 18 of the Alabama Rules of Appellate

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Jackson

738 F.2d 401

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 6, 1984 | Docket: 66198785

Published

CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE VI, AMENDMENT NO. 328, SECTION 6.02(b), ALABAMA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Jerry W. Jackson

738 F.2d 401, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19825

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 6, 1984 | Docket: 431060

Published

CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE VI, AMENDMENT NO. 328, SECTION 6.02(b), ALABAMA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE

Jean v. Meissner

90 F.R.D. 658, 32 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1570, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14887

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1981 | Docket: 66079202

Published

circumstances. See Federal Habeas Corpus, Sokol, § 6.2; United States v. Martin, 242 F.2d 701 (2d Cir.

North Brevard County Hospital District, Inc. v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission

392 So. 2d 556, 108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2534, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18309

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1980 | Docket: 64579636

Published

an annual financial report, as described in Section 6.02 hereof, which report shall reflect the financial

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 21, 1979 | Docket: 3259017

Published

as a prerequisite to practicing in Florida. Section 6(2), Ch. 79-200. To be licensed, a person must be

City of Miami Beach v. Breitbart

358 So. 2d 564, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15884

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1978 | Docket: 64564342

Published

with this opinion. Reversed and remanded. .Section 6-2, Zoning Ordinance, No. 1891, City of Miami Beach

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 27, 1978 | Docket: 3255428

Published

Laws of Florida, is held unconstitutional. Section 6(2) of the act [s. 83.780(2), F. S.] authorizes

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 8, 1975 | Docket: 3255473

Published

those engaged in contracting in Pinellas County. Section 6(2), Part II, Ch. 73-595. The act is clear that

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Apr 21, 1975 | Docket: 3257513

Published

contributions . . . . (Emphasis supplied.) [Section 6(2), Ch. 74-362 (s. 943.35[2], F.S. [1974 Supp.])]

Lawn ex rel. Lawn v. Wasserman

248 So. 2d 548, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1971 | Docket: 64520590

Published

The requested Florida Standard Jury Instruction § 6.2 was not actually given. Our sister appellate courts

State ex rel. Roundtree v. Johnson

247 So. 2d 54, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3761

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1971 | Docket: 64519945

Published

circuit to an additional seventh judge pursuant to Section 6(2), Article V, State Constitution, which provides

Marshall v. Hollywood, Inc.

236 So. 2d 114, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2729

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1970 | Docket: 64514914

Published

Standards, III Florida Real Property Practice (1965), § 6.2: “The chief purpose of the act is to extinguish

Saffan v. County of Dade

159 So. 2d 102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1963 | Docket: 60217634

Published

of law. The circuit court, basing its action on § 6.02 of the Metro Charter,1 dismissed petitioner’s appeal

International Business Machines Corp. v. Vaughn

98 So. 2d 747

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1957 | Docket: 64489834

Published

in the deed of cession. They also appear in Section 6.02, supra. A following statute, Section 6.04, supra