Florida Statute 7.2 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.02

7.02 Baker County.—The boundary lines of Baker County are as follows: Beginning at a point at center of township four south, on range line dividing ranges eighteen and nineteen east; thence north on said range line to the Georgia line; thence easterly on said Georgia line to the St. Marys River, and then down said river, concurrent with the boundary line between the States of Georgia and Florida, to where the said river intersects with range line dividing ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east; thence south on said range line to the center line of township four south; and then west on said township line to the point of beginning.

History.—s. 1, Feb. 4, 1832; s. 1, Mar. 15, 1844; s. 3, ch. 895, 1858; ch. 1039, 1859; s. 1, ch. 1185, 1861; RS 31; GS 29; s. 1, ch. 6244, 1911; RGS 31; CGL 33.

F.S. 7.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.02

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.02

Total Results: 111

Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach

760 So. 2d 126, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 390, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 911, 2000 WL 633052

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2000 | Docket: 1695356

Cited 591 times | Published

Accordingly, the trial court concluded that section 7.2 of the Primary Declaration would not be enforceable

Montgomery v. Noga

168 F.3d 1282, 49 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1961, 51 Fed. R. Serv. 752, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3739, 1999 WL 114487

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 237401

Cited 160 times | Published

Gilson, Trademark Protection and Practice § 7.02[5], at 7-26 & n. 32 (39th rel.1998) (citing cases

Montgomery v. Noga

168 F.3d 1282

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 8976

Cited 105 times | Published

Jerome Gilson, Trademark Protection and Practice § 7.02[5], at 7-26 & Montgomery has stated a claim

Ronald Basil Hart, Jr. v. Yamaha-Parts Distributors, Inc., Yamaha International Corporation, Yamaha Motor Corporation

787 F.2d 1468, 1 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 82, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24685

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 28, 1986 | Docket: 2127156

Cited 79 times | Published

appellant failed to give notice of breach. Ala.Code § 7-2-607(3)(a) provides that the “buyer must within a

Occhicone v. State

570 So. 2d 902, 1990 WL 154228

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1990 | Docket: 405418

Cited 67 times | Published

Thus, W. LaFave & J. Israel, Criminal Procedure § 7.2(c) (1985), states: What happens if a defendant refuses

Paul L. Spain v. Brown and Williamson

363 F.3d 1183, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 355

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 29, 2004 | Docket: 213014

Cited 51 times | Published

to a four year statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 7-2-725. What was not clear, prior to the Alabama Supreme

Holley Equipment Company, a Corporation v. Credit Alliance Corporation, a Corporation

821 F.2d 1531, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9638

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 20, 1987 | Docket: 428525

Cited 49 times | Published

781 F.2d 1569, 1570 (11th Cir.1986). Ala.Code § 7-2-201(1) (1984) states in pertinent part “a contract

Byars v. Coca-Cola Co.

517 F.3d 1256, 43 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1310, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 3750, 2008 WL 466403

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 22, 2008 | Docket: 399083

Cited 46 times | Published

arising under the Plan. . . ." (R.15-216 at CC426 § 7.2(b)(2).[1]) The Committee also has the "exclusive

White v. Coca-Cola Co.

542 F.3d 848, 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2441, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19283, 2008 WL 4149706

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 10, 2008 | Docket: 923635

Cited 42 times | Published

the committee of this discretion fail. Because section 7.2(b) of the plan gives the committee discretion

CAFÉ EROTICA OF FLORIDA, INC., a FLORIDA CORPORATION, CAFÉ EROTICA / WE DARE TO BARE / ADULT TOYS / GREAT FOOD / EXIT 94, INC., a FLORIDA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-COUNTER-DEFENDANT-APPELLEES v. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, a POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT-COUNTER-CLAIMANT-APPELLANT. CAFE EROTICA/WE DARE TO BARE/ADULT TOYS/GREAT FOOD/EXIT 94, INC., a FLORIDA CORPORATION v. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, a POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

360 F.3d 1274, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 3243

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 23, 2004 | Docket: 875166

Cited 38 times | Published

"unless fully compliant with this Code") with LDC § 7.02.01(A) (limiting on-premise ground signs to four

Panama City Medical Diagnostic Ltd. v. Williams

13 F.3d 1541, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2487

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 15, 1994 | Docket: 1028617

Cited 38 times | Published

incorporated the findings of the HCCB study. Section 7(2) of the Act contains a statement of legislative

McWane, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

783 F.3d 814, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6111, 2015 Trade Cas. (CCH) 79,134, 2015 WL 1652200

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 15, 2015 | Docket: 2649652

Cited 37 times | Published

Mangiaracina, Antitrust Law Handbook § 7:2 (2014) (“For the most part ... the [Federal Trade

United States v. Armando Benitez

741 F.2d 1312

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 5, 1984 | Docket: 828809

Cited 37 times | Published

Second, Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 7(2). It is for this reason that the mere physical

City of Tampa v. Birdsong Motors, Inc.

261 So. 2d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1972 | Docket: 1358252

Cited 36 times | Published

later *10 adopted constitutional provision, Art. V, § 7(2), which authorizes an additional County Judge in

Greater Loretta Imp. Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Boone

234 So. 2d 665, 42 A.L.R. 3d 632

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1970 | Docket: 1354077

Cited 36 times | Published

Neb.Const. Art. III, § 24; N.J.Const. Art. IV, § 7(2); and, N.Y.Const. Art. I, § 9(2). The New York amendment

United States v. Raul Freire, Antonio Maria Rubio, Jorge Mastrapa, and Hector Guillermo Pupo

710 F.2d 1515, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25332

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 1, 1983 | Docket: 956308

Cited 35 times | Published

2 W. LeFave, Search and Seizure § 7.2 (1978). The Court’s latest decision affecting

Ben Neff v. Nell Bilbro Kehoe

708 F.2d 639, 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 445, 13 Fed. R. Serv. 1147, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26230

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 30, 1983 | Docket: 772111

Cited 34 times | Published

Code of Alabama defines express warranty at section 7-2-313: (1) Express warranties by the seller are

Kilpatrick Marine Piling, a Partnership, and Savannah Bank and Trust Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company

795 F.2d 940, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27750

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 4, 1986 | Docket: 970354

Cited 29 times | Published

govern. State law provides a rate of 7%. O.C.G.A. § 7-2-4. Appellant, however, concedes that admiralty

Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation

230 F.3d 1300

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 30, 2000 | Docket: 724057

Cited 25 times | Published

43 Unless excluded or modified (Section 7-2-316), a warranty that the goods shall be merchantable

Wilson v. Ake

354 F. Supp. 2d 1298, 1 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 611, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 755, 2005 WL 281272

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2005 | Docket: 2290537

Cited 24 times | Published

opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. 1 U.S.C. § 7 [2] Florida Statutes § 741.212, Marriages between

McC Ceramic Center, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Ceramica Nuova D'agostino, S.P.A., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee

144 F.3d 1384

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 6, 1998 | Docket: 2038579

Cited 21 times | Published

Farnsorth, Farnsworth on Contracts, § 7.2 at 194 (1990). The rule does not purport to exclude

Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, Pennzoil Products Company, a Division of Pennzoil Company, Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil Company

877 F.2d 1524, 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 454, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10771, 1989 WL 73724

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 25, 1989 | Docket: 72431

Cited 21 times | Published

Article 2 “applies to transactions in goods.” § 7-2-102. The Code defines the term “goods" broadly to

National Labor Relations Board v. Malta Construction Company

806 F.2d 1009, 124 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2174, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 35011

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 22, 1986 | Docket: 798259

Cited 20 times | Published

behavior and has been held to be protected under § 7.2 “The right of employees to wear union insignia at

Cowin Equipment Company, Inc. Etc. v. General Motors Corporation, Etc.

734 F.2d 1581, 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1565, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20970

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 29, 1984 | Docket: 448204

Cited 18 times | Published

cited in this opinion. See Ala.Code § 7-2-302; Ohio Rev.Code Ann, § 1302.15. Consequently

Robert C. Lisk v. Lumber One Wood Preserving, LLC

792 F.3d 1331, 92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 157, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11891, 2015 WL 4139740

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 10, 2015 | Docket: 2673032

Cited 17 times | Published

bargain creates an express warranty....” Ala. Code § 7-2-313(l)(a) (1975). The complaint alleges that “Lumber

State v. Burns

661 So. 2d 842, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1942

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1995 | Docket: 1526491

Cited 17 times | Published

Thus, W. LaFave & J. Israel, Criminal Procedure § 7.2(c) (1985), states: What happens if a defendant refuses

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,026 Odessa Cowan v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc., a Corporation, and World Shoe Corporation

790 F.2d 1529, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25882

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 9, 1986 | Docket: 800267

Cited 17 times | Published

implied warranty of merchantability, Ala. Code § 7-2-314(2)(c), Cowan must establish that her shoe was

Carroll Kenworth Truck Sales, Inc., a Corporation v. Kenworth Truck Company, a Division of Paccar, Inc., Carroll Kenworth Truck Sales, Inc., a Corporation v. Kenworth Truck Company, a Division of Paccar, Inc.

781 F.2d 1520, 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1206, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22116

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 10, 1986 | Docket: 523296

Cited 16 times | Published

paragraph (1)(b) of Section 7-2-103." Sec. 8-20-3(7), Code of Alabama (1975). Section 7-2-103(1)(b) is the

Trucks, Inc. v. United States

234 F.3d 1340, 2000 WL 1807914

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 21, 2000 | Docket: 874190

Cited 15 times | Published

requirement as well. Trucks relies on Rev. Proc. 90-60 § 7.02, which requires accountable per diem allowances

In Re Managed Care Litigation

132 F. Supp. 2d 989, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19247, 2000 WL 33180826

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2000 | Docket: 2329731

Cited 15 times | Published

resolve the dispute in a non-adjudicative setting. § 7.02 provides that any dispute that is not resolved

Barker v. Board of Medical Examiners, Dept. of Prof. Reg.

428 So. 2d 720

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1983 | Docket: 1720148

Cited 15 times | Published

(quoting from 1 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, Section 7.02 at 413). [4] Although both Sections 395.0653(1)

Richard M. Hanley v. Nicholas Daniel Roy

485 F.3d 641, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9894, 2007 WL 1238537

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 2007 | Docket: 270950

Cited 14 times | Published

Guardians of my infant Children.” 5 . Section 7(2) of the Guardianship Act grants a mother the

In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor

132 So. 2d 163, 1961 Fla. LEXIS 2275

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1961 | Docket: 1382009

Cited 13 times | Published

Article V, Florida Constitution emerged. We quote Section 7(2), Article V, to point out that it is obviously

City of Punta Gorda v. Morningstar

110 So. 2d 449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1959 | Docket: 1409476

Cited 13 times | Published

Antieau, Municipal Corporation Law, Volume 1, Section 7.02 summarizes the reasoning of the various State

SNP Boat Service S.A. v. Hotel Le St. James

483 B.R. 776, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54615, 2012 WL 1355550

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2012 | Docket: 65516509

Cited 12 times | Published

Cases Under Chapter 15 of the BANKRUPTCY Code, § 7[2], at 70 (2008)). Thus, it was within the bankruptcy

Diesel "Repower", Inc. v. Islander Investments Ltd.

271 F.3d 1318, 2002 A.M.C. 751, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24237, 2001 WL 1397895

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 9, 2001 | Docket: 397152

Cited 10 times | Published

the district court should have applied Ala.Code § 7-2-103(l)(b) (1975). The code imposes and defines a

Coppock v. Carlson

547 So. 2d 946, 1989 WL 33997

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1989 | Docket: 1738746

Cited 10 times | Published

McGovern, Kurtz and Rein, Wills, Trusts and Estates § 7.2 (1988). At another time, when asked why his sister

Shinholster v. Graham

527 F. Supp. 1318

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1981 | Docket: 2269584

Cited 10 times | Published

and Adult Services Program Supervisors. Id. at § 7-2(c). Although the manual does not detail the monitoring

Wilson v. State

596 So. 2d 775, 1992 WL 68850

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1992 | Docket: 1296087

Cited 9 times | Published

LaFave & Jerold H. Israel, Criminal Procedure, § 7.2(c)(1982), quoting, People v. Ellis, 65 Cal.2d 529

Barndollar v. Sunset Realty Corp.

379 So. 2d 1278, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4883

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1979 | Docket: 1681267

Cited 9 times | Published

may stand with the invalid portion excised. Section 7(2) of the act is a severability clause: If any

Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

230 F.3d 1300, 2000 WL 1535929

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 64071814

Cited 8 times | Published

a 4-year statute of limitations, see Ala. Code § 7-2-725. The dispute is about when the claims arose

Farmhand, Inc. v. Brandies

327 So. 2d 76

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1976 | Docket: 1363993

Cited 8 times | Published

(1956); 1 Frumer and Friedman, Products Liability, § 7.02 (1975); See also Noel, Manufacturer's Negligence

Rommell v. Automobile Racing Club Of America

964 F.2d 1090, 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 176, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15076

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 6, 1992 | Docket: 1010903

Cited 7 times | Published

54 The relevant statute, Ala.Code Section 7-2-725 (1975), provides in pertinent part that:

State v. James

526 So. 2d 188, 1988 WL 56522

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1988 | Docket: 1679831

Cited 7 times | Published

contraband, see generally 3 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 7.2(d) (2d ed. 1987), they are inapposite to this case

Oliver v. Coca Cola Co.

497 F.3d 1181, 41 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1856, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20628

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 29, 2007 | Docket: 65658483

Cited 6 times | Published

its discretionary authority to decide claims. Id. § 7.2(b)(3). Broadspire is the Administrative Services

In Re SunCruz Casinos, LLC

298 B.R. 833, 50 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1750, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 227, 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 1177

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Sep 8, 2003 | Docket: 346212

Cited 6 times | Published

needed to be negligible. Disclosure Statement, § 7.2. The Supreme Court has rejected this type of argument:

STATE BY & THRO. STATE ATTY. v. Gen. Dev. Corp.

448 So. 2d 1074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1984 | Docket: 2547049

Cited 6 times | Published

protecting the state's natural resources, article II, section 7,[2] and we also *1076 acknowledge the efforts of

Dzikowski v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Cummings)

381 B.R. 810, 100 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7072, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94079, 2007 WL 4800642

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2007 | Docket: 1864110

Cited 5 times | Published

Disputed Claim becomes an Allowed Claim." (CP 204, § 7.2).[2] C. The Adversary Proceeding to Invalidate the

Waste Corp. of America, Inc. v. Genesis Ins. Co.

382 F. Supp. 2d 1349, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21895, 2005 WL 1981771

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2005 | Docket: 2283190

Cited 5 times | Published

ongoing enterprise." Stock Purchase Agreement, § 7.2.1. A perusal of Count II, the breach of third party

Department of Business Regulation v. Jones

474 So. 2d 359, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1985 | Docket: 1749865

Cited 5 times | Published

violation of written rules and policies including section 7-2.13, F.A.C. and sections 2M and 13F of the Division

Pinellas County Planning Council v. Smith

360 So. 2d 371, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4679

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1978 | Docket: 1474493

Cited 5 times | Published

that the act shall take effect August 1, 1974, Section 7(2) specifically provides: [N]otwithstanding the

Xerox Corp. v. SMARTECH DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT

979 So. 2d 957, 2007 WL 4179413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2007 | Docket: 1713879

Cited 4 times | Published

agreements between them (as more fully set forth in Section 7.2) outside the scope of this one-year limitation

In Re Finevest Foods, Inc.

159 B.R. 972, 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 261, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1405, 1993 WL 385709

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1993 | Docket: 1104249

Cited 4 times | Published

therewith. [emphasis added] Sections 7.1.2 and § 7.2.2. state in pertinent part as follows: 7.1.2 Accuracy

David L. Shavers and Sam David Shavers, Cross-Appellants v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., a Corporation, and Massey Ferguson Credit Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-Appellees. Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp. v. David L. Shavers, Sam David Shavers, and Virginia Shavers, Defendants

834 F.2d 970

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 26, 1988 | Docket: 812999

Cited 4 times | Published

constitute "special circumstances" under Ala.Code Section 7-2-714(2) (1975),4 so that the rental value of the

State v. Langer

516 So. 2d 310, 1987 WL 2296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1987 | Docket: 1677888

Cited 4 times | Published

some intensity... ." 3 La Fave, Search and Seizure § 7.2(c) (2d ed. 1987). The search of Langer's automobile

Univeristy of Miami, School of Medicine v. Ruiz

164 So. 3d 758, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7980, 2015 WL 3390092

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2015 | Docket: 2659833

Cited 3 times | Published

1 Modern Tort Law: Liability and Litigation § 7:2 (2d ed.) (footnotes omitted). The doctrine

Panama City Medical Diagnostic Ltd. v. Williams

13 F.3d 1541, 1994 WL 23231

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 15, 1994 | Docket: 64016022

Cited 3 times | Published

incorporated the findings of the HCCB study. Section 7(2) of the Act contains a statement of legislative

Oxford Furniture Companies, Inc. v. Drexel Heritage Furnishings, Inc.

984 F.2d 1118, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 3436

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 14, 1993 | Docket: 340447

Cited 3 times | Published

subject only to reasonable notice. See Ala.Code § 7-2-309(2), (3) (1984). 15 We

Southwest Gulfcoast, Inc. v. Allan

513 So. 2d 219, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1987 | Docket: 1689551

Cited 3 times | Published

merely as "cf." by the Lingle majority. [6] Section 7.02 of the labor agreement provides that the "functions

Bowdoin v. Showell Growers, Inc.

817 F.2d 1543, 3 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1366, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6963

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 2, 1987 | Docket: 66225278

Cited 3 times | Published

similarly does not protect NEAPCO. . Ala. Code § 7-2-316(2) (1984). . R. Anderson, 3 Uniform Commercial

Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n v. Colony Lender, LLC (In re Colony Beach & Tennis Club, Inc.)

508 B.R. 468

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2014 | Docket: 65786141

Cited 2 times | Published

to borrow for the limited purposes stated in Section 7.2 of its Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership;

Kozak v. Hillsborough Public Transportation Commission

695 F. Supp. 2d 1285, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13241

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2010 | Docket: 2231130

Cited 2 times | Published

§ 3(5); Dkt. 119, ¶ 4(1); see also Ch. 2001-299 § 7(2). Having acquired a certificate, a person must then

Preferred Care Partners Holding Corp. v. Humana, Inc.

258 F.R.D. 684, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107977, 2009 WL 982449

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2009 | Docket: 66038283

Cited 2 times | Published

501 F.Supp.2d at 805; Attorney-Client Privilege § 7.2.1 (“Because of the ease with which e-mail technology

Oliver v. Coca-Cola Co.

546 F.3d 1353

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 29, 2007 | Docket: 2032410

Cited 2 times | Published

its discretionary authority to decide claims. Id. § 7.2(b)(3). Broadspire is the Administrative Services

Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

363 F.3d 1183

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 1242296

Cited 2 times | Published

to a four year statute of limitations, Ala.Code § 7-2-725. What was not clear, prior to the Alabama Supreme

20th Century Fox Film Corp. v. M.V. Ship Agencies, Inc.

992 F. Supp. 1423, 1998 A.M.C. 2514, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21842, 1997 WL 820936

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1997 | Docket: 66021183

Cited 2 times | Published

Local Admiralty and Maritime Rules state that Section 7.02(a) “codifies- the governing law of this circuit

Abreau v. Cobb

670 So. 2d 1010, 1996 WL 60838

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1996 | Docket: 1245651

Cited 2 times | Published

lacked the requisite number of signatures. See § 7.02(2), Art. 7, Dade County Charter. In November, 1994

Matheson v. Miami-Dade County

187 So. 3d 221, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7998, 2015 WL 3390177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2015 | Docket: 2659839

Cited 1 times | Published

that amending the Master Plan is possible.2 Section 7.02, “Restrictions and Exceptions,” of Article 7

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—REPORT NO. 2013-05

153 So. 3d 192, 2014 WL 6977938

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2014 | Docket: 2613862

Cited 1 times | Published

enumerated controlled substance in § 893.135(1), Fla. Stat.)7, 2. The defendant actually [sold] [purchased]

Zucker v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In Re NetBank, Inc.)

459 B.R. 801, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 6322

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2010 | Docket: 165761

Cited 1 times | Published

Plan (the "Confirmation Date"). See Plan at p. 30, § 7.2. The Tax Sharing Agreement was not included on Exhibit

Gulf Power Co. v. Coalsales II, L.L.C.

661 F. Supp. 2d 1270, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95949, 2009 WL 3190459

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2009 | Docket: 2281928

Cited 1 times | Published

Source B (Section 6.04) 900,000 tons." Similarly, Section 7.02 provides, in relevant part: "It is anticipated

University Community Hospital, Inc. v. Wilson

1 So. 3d 206, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 18052, 2008 WL 5070230

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2008 | Docket: 60224690

Cited 1 times | Published

“Determination of Clinical Privileges,” and section 7.2-2 is specifically titled “Basis for Privileges

MAVERICK MEDIA GROUP v. Hillsborough County, Fla.

508 F. Supp. 2d 1126, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35731, 2007 WL 1455963

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 16, 2007 | Docket: 2341633

Cited 1 times | Published

obscene, pornographic, [or] immoral character. See § 7.02.02 (emphasis added). Also prohibited was any sign

Campero USA Corp. v. STPC Partners, L.P.

410 F. Supp. 2d 1268, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4087, 2006 WL 166571

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2006 | Docket: 1877553

Cited 1 times | Published

notices of default. C. Arbitration Provision Section 7.02.(d) of the Agreement exempts from arbitration

Barley v. S. FLA. WATER MANAGEMENT DIST.

823 So. 2d 73, 2002 WL 534597

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2002 | Docket: 458651

Cited 1 times | Published

pursuant to the policy of the state in Article II, Section 7. (2) The Everglades Sugar Fee shall expire twenty-five

State v. Menna

793 So. 2d 1029, 2001 WL 788001

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2001 | Docket: 1677951

Cited 1 times | Published

Thus, W. LaFave & J. Israel, Criminal Procedures § 7.2(c) (1985), states: What happens if a defendant refuses

Florida Board of Bar Examiners

676 So. 2d 372, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 122, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 442, 1996 WL 108536

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1996 | Docket: 64766074

Cited 1 times | Published

the study of law as specified in Article V, Section 7 2, the filing fee shall be $60.00 $75.00. Section

Huntsville Hospital v. Mortara Instrument

57 F.3d 1043

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 12, 1995 | Docket: 72935

Cited 1 times | Published

Cir.1989). According to Ala.Code § 7-2-601(a), if goods do not conform to a contract, the

Rommell v. Automobile Racing Club of America, Inc.

964 F.2d 1090, 1992 WL 134140

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 6, 1992 | Docket: 66274354

Cited 1 times | Published

580 (Ala.1989). The relevant statute, Ala.Code Section 7-2-725 (1975), provides in pertinent part that:

Carroll Kenworth Truck Sales, Inc. v. Kenworth Truck Co.

781 F.2d 1520, 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1206

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 10, 1986 | Docket: 66213327

Cited 1 times | Published

paragraph (l)(b) of Section 7-2-103.” § 8-20-3(7), Code of Alabama (1975). Section 7-2-103(l)(b) is the

Gordon v. Leatherman

325 F. Supp. 494, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14072

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1971 | Docket: 66069466

Cited 1 times | Published

the charges or fail as being unconstitutional. Section 7.02 fails to provide for notice of the charges and

J. E. J. v. S. A. B.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2025 | Docket: 70761142

Published

Maureen A. Sullivan, Limited Liability Companies § 7:2 (2024) (“The LLC statutes do not mandate distributions

Michael Chapman v. Jefferson Dunn

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 25, 2025 | Docket: 69194054

Published

Redish, Summary Judgment: Federal Law and Practice § 7.2 (2023). But the 10-day rule was superseded

Randy Mcllenan, Kayla Mcllenan, and Charles Williams v. Cypress Chase North Condominium No. 4 Association, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2024 | Docket: 68829290

Published

DCA 2008)). The association argues that Section 7.2 of the Declaration, which obligates the association

Wadley Crushed Stone Company, LLC v. Positive Step, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 24, 2022 | Docket: 63334910

Published

limitations under the UCC is four years. See Ala. Code § 7- 2-725(1); O.C.G.A. § 11-2-725. Starting with

Amy v. Carnival Corp.

360 F. Supp. 3d 1345

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2018 | Docket: 64322798

Published

2000, D.E. 58-2. D.E. 47-13 at 1. Id. at 13 (§ 7.2.2.4.6.3). Id. at 2. Id. at 3. See Deposition

University of Miami, School of Medicine v. Ruiz

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2015 | Docket: 2633385

Published

” 1 Modern Tort Law: Liability and Litigation § 7:2 (2d ed.) (footnotes omitted). The doctrine

Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n v. Colony Beach & Tennis Club, Inc. (In Re Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n)

423 B.R. 690, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 297, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 148, 2010 WL 286615

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 2010 | Docket: 1638474

Published

responsibilities of such Unit Owners. (Ex. 16 at § 7.2.) A similar provision is in the Bylaws of the Association

In Re Maison Grande Condominium Ass'n, Inc.

425 B.R. 684, 72 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 575, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 257, 63 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 872, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 185, 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 197

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jan 13, 2010 | Docket: 2557905

Published

buildings have certain parking available. Moreover, Section 7-2 D. of the ordinance provides that "no existing

Jerry Bodie v. Purdue Pharma Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 1, 2007 | Docket: 398956

Published

with respect to goods of that kind.” Ala. Code § 7-2-314 (1975). “Merchantability” refers to a product’s

Black v. Orange County

888 So. 2d 156, 2004 WL 2776033

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2004 | Docket: 1697195

Published

reversion. See, Chapter 59-1658 of Laws of Florida, Section 7(2)(g). The Court also takes judicial notice of

Ranieri v. Paincare Holdings, Inc.

889 So. 2d 106, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17811, 2004 WL 2623950

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2004 | Docket: 64834971

Published

language, “Any other termination” as used in Section 7.2 of the Agreement is plain and unambiguous and

Café Erotica of Florida, Inc. v. St. Johns County

360 F.3d 1274

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 23, 2004 | Docket: 212951

Published

“unless fully compliant with this Code”) with LDC § 7.02.01(A) (limiting on-premise ground signs to four

Godwin v. Solutia, Inc.

215 F. Supp. 2d 1291, 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2449, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16332, 2002 WL 1837851

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2002 | Docket: 2370896

Published

benefits under the Plan is determined under section 7.2 of the Plan. This is dependant upon the employee's

Trucks, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 11, 2000 | Docket: 238223

Published

requirement as well. Trucks relies on Rev. Proc. 90-60 § 7.02, which requires accountable per diem allowances

Paul L. Spain v. Brown and Williamson

363 F.3d 1183

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 1242299

Published

a 4-year statute of limitations, see Ala. Code § 7-2-725. The dispute is about when the claims arose

horizon/cms Healthcare v. Southern Oaks

732 So. 2d 1156, 1999 WL 218410

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1999 | Docket: 1513351

Published

addition to the causes for dissolution set forth in Section 7.2(c)[[2]], the Partnership shall be dissolved in

MCC - Marble v. Ceramica Nuova

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 29, 1998 | Docket: 422721

Published

E. Allen Farnsworth, Farnsworth on Contracts, § 7.2 at 194 (1990). The rule does not purport to exclude

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General

681 So. 2d 1124, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 394, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1630

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1996 | Docket: 64768531

Published

pursuant to the policy of the state in Article II, Section 7. (2) The Everglades Sugar Fee shall expire twenty-five

Oxford Furniture Companies v. Drexel Heritage Furnishings, Inc.

984 F.2d 1118, 1993 WL 35901

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 14, 1993 | Docket: 66280214

Published

subject only to reasonable notice. See Ala.Code § 7-2-309(2), (3) (1984). We review the grant or denial

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 5, 1992 | Docket: 3257608

Published

requirements of Part I, Ch. 287, F.S. AS TO QUESTION 3: Section 7(2)(b), Ch. 92-277, Laws of Florida,12 provides:

Connors v. Ryan's Coal Co.

923 F.2d 1461, 1991 WL 11496

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 6, 1991 | Docket: 66260405

Published

the use of the property.” Uniform Partnership Act § 7(2). Therefore, the fact that Ms. Simmons “shared”

State v. Perez

564 So. 2d 263, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5273, 1990 WL 102684

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1990 | Docket: 64651669

Published

DCA 1984); 3 LaFave, Search and Seizure (2d Ed.), § 7.2(d), p. 56.

Shavers v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.

834 F.2d 970, 9 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 984

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 30, 1987 | Docket: 66231234

Published

constitute “special circumstances” under Ala.Code Section 7-2-714(2) (1975),4 so that the rental value of the

In re GAC Corp.

64 B.R. 345, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21146

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1986 | Docket: 63691927

Published

period of time as said Trustee as in office. Section 7.2(8) details the trustees’ powers as follows: Specific

State ex rel. State Attorney for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit v. General Development Corp.

448 So. 2d 1074, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1984 | Docket: 64604295

Published

protecting the state’s natural resources, article II, section 7,2 and we also *1076acknowledge the efforts of the

Greene v. City of Sunrise

323 So. 2d 30, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1975 | Docket: 64550815

Published

ordinance in the City of Sunrise Charter, Article VII, § 7.02, which reads in part: “Any police officer of the

McClaskey v. Leatherman

261 So. 2d 137, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3783

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1972 | Docket: 64525531

Published

challenge the validity on constitutional grounds of § 7.02 of the Dade County Home Rule Charter which provides

Lalor v. Dade County

258 So. 2d 843, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1972 | Docket: 64524731

Published

calling for an election in Dade County pursuant to section 7.02 of the Charter of Metropolitan Dade County,

Winter Park Pines Development Co. v. Kohloss

244 So. 2d 493, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 7020

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1971 | Docket: 64518947

Published

of the trial court. Initially, Chapter 59-1658, § 7(2) (g), is at best vague as to the interest acquired

Dade County v. Wiseheart

198 So. 2d 94, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4745

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1967 | Docket: 64500705

Published

1943). . 1 Antieau, Municipal Corporation Law § 7.02. . See City of Miami v. Walker, Fla.App. 1964