Florida Statute 7.04 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.04

7.04 Bradford County.—The county lines of Bradford County are as follows: Beginning at a point where the thread of New River intersects the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence northeasterly concurrent with the east boundary of Union County following the meanderings of the said New River to where same is intersected by the middle township line of township four south, range twenty-two east; thence east on said middle township line to the range line between ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east; thence south on said range line to the southeast corner of section twelve, township nine south, range twenty-two east; thence west on the section line between section twelve and thirteen, township nine south, range twenty-two east to Santa Fe Lake; thence northwesterly following the northeast shore of Santa Fe Lake to its westernmost intersection with a line which is the prolongation of the north line of McManus Subdivision as per plat book “A,” page 117 of the public records of Alachua County; thence west along the north line of said subdivision to its intersection with the east line of government lot three of section twenty-one, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence north along said east line to the southeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said section twenty-one; thence north along the lines between the east half and the west half of the northwest quarter of said section twenty-one to the north line of said section twenty-one; thence west along the north line of said section twenty-one to the southeast corner of section seventeen, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the southwest corner of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence north to the southeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence west to the southwest corner of the east half of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence north to the northwest corner of the east half of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence west to the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence north to the half-mile corner on the south line of section eight, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the southwest corner of the east half of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of said section eight; thence north to the northwest corner of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said section eight; thence north to the northeast corner of the west half of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section five, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said section five; thence north along the west line of said section five to the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section six, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said section six; thence north to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said section six; thence west along the north line of said section six to the northwest corner of said section six; thence north along the east line of section one, township eight south, range twenty-one east to the southeast corner of section thirty-six, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north along the east line of said section thirty-six to the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said section thirty-six; thence west to the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said section thirty-six; thence north along the west line of said section thirty-six to its intersection with the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence northerly and westerly along the thread of the Santa Fe River to its intersection with the east line of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section thirty-three, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north to the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said section thirty-three; thence west to the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section thirty-two, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence west to the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said section thirty-two; thence west to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section thirty-one, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said section thirty-one; thence west to the half-mile corner on the south line of section thirty, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north on the quarter section line of said section thirty to its intersection with the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence southerly and westerly along the thread of said Santa Fe River to its intersection with the south line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section twenty-eight, township seven south, range twenty east; thence west to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of said section twenty-eight; thence north to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of said section twenty-eight; thence west to the northwest corner of said section twenty-eight; thence north along the east line of section twenty, township seven south, range twenty east to the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of said section twenty; thence west on the quarter section line of said section twenty to its intersection with the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence northerly and westerly along the thread of said Santa Fe River to the point of beginning.

History.—s. 1, Mar. 15, 1844; s. 3, ch. 895, 1858; s. 1, ch. 1039, 1859; s. 1, ch. 1185, 1861; s. 1, ch. 1300, 1861; s. 1, ch. 1765, 1870; RS 30; GS 28; RGS 20; s. 1, ch. 8516, 1921; CGL 32; s. 2, ch. 28312, 1953.

F.S. 7.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.04 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.04

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.04

Total Results: 79

George B. Buchanan, Jr. v. Hugh E. Bowman, II

820 F.2d 359, 8 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 20, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7920

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 24, 1987 | Docket: 809763

Cited 244 times | Published

plaintiffs’ investment losses. According to O.C. G. A. § 7-4-15, recovery of pre-judgment interest on liquidated

Marie Lucie Jean, Lucien Louis, Cross-Appellants, State of Florida, Intervenor-Appellant v. Alan C. Nelson, Cross-Appellees

711 F.2d 1455, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28911

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 12, 1983 | Docket: 446391

Cited 90 times | Published

and commentator. See Davis Supp. § 7.4, at 166. (Brown Express is a gold

Community State Bank v. Strong

651 F.3d 1241, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17767, 2011 WL 3715769

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 25, 2011 | Docket: 49588

Cited 85 times | Published

Ann. § 7-4-1 et seq., by charging more than 16% per annum on a loan of $3,000 or less, id. § 7-4-2(a)(2)

Robert Barnett, Cross-Appellant v. The Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, Mrs. Dorothy L. Kelly, Cross-Appellees

707 F.2d 1571, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26375

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 27, 1983 | Docket: 612918

Cited 84 times | Published

defendants to rely upon the grievance procedures of Section 7.4 of the Personnel Policy? Yes. 7

American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus, Georgia, a Georgia Corp. v. United States Fire Company, and Boston Old Colony Insurance Company

885 F.2d 826, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15341, 1989 WL 108478

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 10, 1989 | Docket: 109613

Cited 65 times | Published

not award prejudgment interest. Under O.C.G.A. § 7-4-15, a claimant is entitled to statutory interest

Alliant Tax Credit 31, Inc. v. M. Vincent Murphy, III

924 F.3d 1134

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 15, 2019 | Docket: 15569117

Cited 63 times | Published

interest from the time of the demand." O.C.G.A. § 7-4-15 (2018). "[T]he sole prerequisite for an award

In Re Patterson

967 F.2d 505, 27 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 475, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17448, 23 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 407

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 29, 1992 | Docket: 562728

Cited 58 times | Published

day after it receives the check. See Ala.Code § 7-4-104(1)(h) (1975) (the "midnight deadline rule")

Alphamed, Inc. v. B. Braun Medical, Inc.

367 F.3d 1280, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8555, 2004 WL 916005

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 2004 | Docket: 693549

Cited 55 times | Published

885 F.2d 826, 835-36 (11th Cir.1989). Section 7-4-2(a)(l)(A) fixes the legal rate of interest for

Watts v. Singletary

87 F.3d 1282, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17840

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 18, 1996 | Docket: 1081205

Cited 55 times | Published

acquittal. ABA Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards § 7-4.1(c) & commentary (2d ed. 1986). . Both of these

Byars v. Coca-Cola Co.

517 F.3d 1256, 43 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1310, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 3750, 2008 WL 466403

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 22, 2008 | Docket: 399083

Cited 46 times | Published

"own occupation" *1270 benefits. See Ga.Code Ann. § 7-4-12 (establishing Georgia's post-judgment interest

GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corp. v. Maitland Hotel Associates

218 F. Supp. 2d 1355, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17861, 2002 WL 596216

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 15, 2002 | Docket: 2260976

Cited 42 times | Published

enforceable. C. Late Charges and Interest Ga.Code § 7-4-18(a) sets out the criminal penalty for usury and

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Adler

137 F.3d 1325, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6002

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 27, 1998 | Docket: 422494

Cited 34 times | Published

Securities Fraud & Commodities Fraud, § 7.4(600), at 7:159, 7:160.14 (1996) (ultimately concluding

Smith v. American International Life Assurance Co. of New York

50 F.3d 956, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9443, 1995 WL 152680

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 24, 1995 | Docket: 1389351

Cited 28 times | Published

interest rate of 12% per annum based on O.C.G.A. § 7-4-12, which establishes Georgia’s post-judgment interest

Kenneth M. Henson v. Columbus Bank & Trust Company

770 F.2d 1566, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23187

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 17, 1985 | Docket: 267382

Cited 26 times | Published

1(a), recodified at Ga. Code Ann. § 7-4-3 (repealed 1983). 2 . Section 57-119

Johnnie L. Johnson, Barbara Ann Johnson, William L. Mance, Mary L. Mance, Waralene Hopkins and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Fleet Finance, Inc., Fleet Finance, Inc. Of Ga., Tower Financial Services, Inc., Mortgage Equity Services and Donnetta Lowe, D/B/A Lowe and Associates, Johnnie J. Johnson, Barbara Ann Johnson, William L. Mance, Mary L. Mance, John Mance, Waralene Hopkins and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fleet Finance, Inc., Fleet Finance, Inc. Of Georgia, Mortgage Equity Services, and Donnetta Lowe, D/B/A Lowe and Associates, Tower Financial Services, Inc.

4 F.3d 946, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27069

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 19, 1993 | Docket: 1025118

Cited 25 times | Published

of Georgia adopted the same construction of section 7-4-18 as did the district court in this case. We

Garcia v. Stewart

906 So. 2d 1117, 2005 WL 1226127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2005 | Docket: 1774775

Cited 24 times | Published

redemption. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF PROP.: MORTGAGES § 7.4 (1997). A comment to this section explains that

Ray Shipes v. The Hanover Insurance Company, Ray Shipes v. Hanover Insurance Company

884 F.2d 1357, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14690

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 29, 1989 | Docket: 502319

Cited 15 times | Published

23) plus 7% annual interest pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 7-4-2. 2 . On July 11, 1988, the district

Richard M. Hanley v. Nicholas Daniel Roy

485 F.3d 641, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9894, 2007 WL 1238537

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 2007 | Docket: 270950

Cited 14 times | Published

guardianship rights. Guardianship of Infants Act of 1964, § 7(4), (5). As noted by the district court, in Ireland

Bates v. Cook, Inc.

615 F. Supp. 662, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21060

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1984 | Docket: 1643506

Cited 14 times | Published

Business Organizations, MILGRIM, TRADE SECRETS § 7.04[2] at 7-36, 7-37. In view of these authorities

Milton Wolfe v. Gerald Coleman, Sheriff Pinellas County Florida and Jim Smith, Attorney General of the State of Florida

681 F.2d 1302, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16920

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 2, 1982 | Docket: 222964

Cited 14 times | Published

Criminal Justice, Function of the Trial Judge § 7.4. Notice of what the judge considered contemptuous

Lewis J. McDermott III and Criterion Mills, Inc. v. Middle East Carpet Company, Associated

811 F.2d 1422, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2906

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 6, 1987 | Docket: 155113

Cited 11 times | Published

percent interest rate provided by Ga.Code Ann. § 7-4-2 (Supp.1985). This error was not corrected by the

City of Winter Park v. Jones

392 So. 2d 568, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17292

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1980 | Docket: 2444799

Cited 10 times | Published

to register his boat annually with the City. Section 7-4 of the ordinances provides for annual registration

Walton Motor Sales, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. F.H. Ross, Jr., and Ernest Schleussener, Sr., Cross-Appellees

736 F.2d 1449, 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1937, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20368

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 462913

Cited 9 times | Published

bound to pay them ____” Off. Code Ga. Ann. § 7-4-15 (1982). A debt is “liquidated” if it is

Whildon L. Moyer v. Citicorp Homeowners, Inc.

799 F.2d 1445

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 24, 1986 | Docket: 965107

Cited 8 times | Published

required by section 501(c) of DIDM-CA. O.C.G.A. § 7-4-3 (Supp.1985). If the contract does not include

In Re Wheat

149 B.R. 1003, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 345, 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2104

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Dec 3, 1992 | Docket: 1810520

Cited 7 times | Published

in the Patterson plan (see footnote *1006 # 4), § 7.04 of the Debtor's Plan also imposes "[a] restriction

State v. Francois

863 So. 2d 1288, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2004 | Docket: 1431968

Cited 6 times | Published

the array." LA-FAVE, ET AL., CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 7.4(e) (2d ed.1999) (quoting ALI Model Code of Pre Arraignment

SEC v. Adler

137 F.3d 1325, 1998 WL 138770

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 27, 1998 | Docket: 422495

Cited 6 times | Published

Lowenfels, Securities Fraud & Commodities Fraud, § 7.4(600), at 7:159, 7:160.14 (1996) (ultimately concluding

Richard Doyle v. Southern Guaranty Corporation, Jimmy E. Wood v. Fort Wayne Mortgage Co.

795 F.2d 907, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27236

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 18, 1986 | Docket: 969374

Cited 6 times | Published

applying to usury actions contained in O.C. G.A. § 7-4-10(d) applies here as well. 17 The

Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. LITTLE RIVER BANK & TR. CO.

228 So. 2d 412, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 4954

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1969 | Docket: 1527922

Cited 5 times | Published

X's cross-claim." In 2A Moore's Federal Practice § 7.04, at 1539 it is reported: "No reply is mandatory

Sterling Crest, Ltd. v. Blue Rock Partners Realty Group, LLC

164 So. 3d 1273, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8924, 2015 WL 3631608

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2015 | Docket: 60247924

Cited 3 times | Published

Partnership Agreement (particularly noted in Section 7.4), and also without giving me, the representative

Miller v. U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Services Agency

143 F.3d 1413, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12808

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 422736

Cited 3 times | Published

the Secretary. See 16 U.S.C. § 590h(b); 7 C.F.R. § 7.4. These state committees are “responsible for carrying

In Re Today's Woman of Florida, Inc.

195 B.R. 506, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 368, 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 536, 1996 WL 268095

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1996 | Docket: 1745976

Cited 3 times | Published

Robert D. Martin, Bankruptcy: Text, Statutes, Rules § 7.04[a] (1994); Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice 2d

Middle Georgia Neurological Specialists, P.C., Cross-Appellants v. Southwestern Life Insurance Company, Cross-Appellee

946 F.2d 776, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26135, 1991 WL 208975

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 4, 1991 | Docket: 1005661

Cited 3 times | Published

granted prejudgment interest pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 7-4-15 (1989), which provides that all liquidated demands

Moore v. Comfed Savings Bank

908 F.2d 834, 1990 WL 102861

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 9, 1990 | Docket: 66255548

Cited 3 times | Published

by the borrowers and were authorized by O.C.G.A. § 7-4-2. B. Appellees (1) Appellees contend that the trial

Billie v. State

963 So. 2d 837, 2007 WL 2254517

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2007 | Docket: 433182

Cited 2 times | Published

Supreme Court Comm. On Standard Jury Instructions, § 7.4 (May 2006). Billie argues that the trial court erred

Community State Bank v. Strong

651 F.3d 1241, 2011 WL 3715769

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 27, 2007 | Docket: 525248

Cited 2 times | Published

Statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-2(a)(2); the Georgia Criminal Usury Statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18(a); the Georgia

Bankwest, Inc. v. Thurbert E. Baker

411 F.3d 1289

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 10, 2005 | Docket: 398323

Cited 2 times | Published

loans of $8,000 or less is 16%. See Ga. Code Ann. § 7-4-2(a)(2).2 This means that a payday store is' limited

Premier Medical Management, Ltd. v. Salas

830 So. 2d 959, 2002 WL 31641528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 2002 | Docket: 1516793

Cited 2 times | Published

created hereby shall be unwound pursuant to Section 7.4 hereof. If the parties cannot agree whether this

Glinton v. And R, Inc.

173 F.3d 1352

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1999 | Docket: 1157839

Cited 2 times | Published

Georgia's criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. The pawnbrokers moved to dismiss the complaints

Glinton v. And R, Inc.

173 F.3d 1352, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8228

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1999 | Docket: 2037237

Cited 2 times | Published

violated Georgia’s criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations

Bar-Ram Irrigation Products v. Phenix-Girard Bank, Shalom Irrigation, Inc.

779 F.2d 1501, 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 937, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21741

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 13, 1986 | Docket: 561125

Cited 2 times | Published

IFTRIC. In so doing, the court relied on Ala.Code § 7-4-103(5) (1975), which.provides that: The measure

Knight v. State

398 So. 2d 908

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1981 | Docket: 1696315

Cited 2 times | Published

and Seizure, A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, § 7.4 at 86 (Supp. 1981), where the author recognizes

Duke's Steakhouse Ft. Myers, Inc. v. G5 Properties, LLC

106 So. 3d 12, 2013 WL 191922, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2013 | Docket: 60228123

Cited 1 times | Published

this rule.) SFWMD correctly concluded that BOR section 7.4 did not apply because the G5 project included

MAVERICK MEDIA GROUP v. Hillsborough County, Fla.

508 F. Supp. 2d 1126, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35731, 2007 WL 1455963

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 16, 2007 | Docket: 2341633

Cited 1 times | Published

official in determining whether an exemption applies: § 7.04.02(A) (permitting the County Administrator to determine

Hanley v. Roy

432 F. Supp. 2d 1297, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30924, 2006 WL 1302449

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 5, 2006 | Docket: 2286436

Cited 1 times | Published

the surviving parent does object, then under section 7(4), it is up the testamentary guardian to go to

Bird v. Eastman Kodak Co.

390 F. Supp. 2d 1117, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28415, 2005 WL 1054450

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2005 | Docket: 37349

Cited 1 times | Published

31, 1997), vol. II, tab 3 ("1997 Plan Doc."), § 7.04(b) [EK00116].) The Plan also allowed John Bird

In Re Turner

261 B.R. 767, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 390, 2001 WL 455580

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2001 | Docket: 1740531

Cited 1 times | Published

Code. 26 U.S.C.A. § 457(g). See Article VII, Section 7.04 of the Deferred Compensation Plan provided by

Florida Panthers Hockey Club, Ltd. Ex Rel. Florida Panthers Hockey Club, Inc. v. Miami Sports & Exhibition Authority

939 F. Supp. 855, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14233, 1996 WL 550103

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1996 | Docket: 1046145

Cited 1 times | Published

and limited under the Miami Arena Contract. Section 7.4 of the Miami Arena Contract provides, in pertinent

Johnson v. Fleet Finance, Inc.

4 F.3d 946, 1993 WL 387239

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 19, 1993 | Docket: 64014842

Cited 1 times | Published

the Georgia criminal usury statute, Ga.Code Ann. § 7-4-18 (Case No. 92-8352); and whether a loan broker’s

Adderly v. Wainwright

58 F.R.D. 389, 17 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 845, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11164

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1972 | Docket: 66067312

Cited 1 times | Published

257, 5 Stat. 539; Act of March 2, 1833, ch. 57, § 7, 4 Stat. 634. When several of the earlier habeas corpus

Goodman v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

240 So. 2d 496, 75 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2552, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1970 | Docket: 64517173

Cited 1 times | Published

interest of his employer (except as modified by Section 7.4 below) the amount then standing to the credit

State of Georgia v. Shawn Micah Tresher Still

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 24, 2024 | Docket: 67930211

Published

the 1st Monday in November . . . .” 2 U.S.C. § 7. 4 The Electoral Count Reform and Presidential

SAM SHRIVASTAVA, VENN THERAPEUTICS, LLC AND SANDIP PATEL v. CAC PHARMA INVESTMENTS LLC, AND C & J HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2024 | Docket: 68034190

Published

determination of whether cause exists under Section 7.4 . . . or Section 10.3 . . . shall arise between

SAM SHRIVASTAVA, VENN THERAPEUTICS, LLC AND SANDIP PATEL v. CAC PHARMA INVESTMENTS LLC, AND C & J HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2024 | Docket: 68024814

Published

determination of whether cause exists under Section 7.4 . . . or Section 10.3 . . . shall arise between

THE MACDOUGALD FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LLP v. RAYS BASEBALL CLUB, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2023 | Docket: 67800052

Published

determination of whether cause exists under Section 7.4 [Resignation, Removal, Death, or Disability

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 19, 2022 | Docket: 64905491

Published

interest from the time of the demand. O.C.G.A. § 7–4–15. This law compensates the creditor for the de-

MARQUIS VALENTINE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2020 | Docket: 18620291

Published

4th DCA 2004) (quoting LaFave, et al., Crim. P. § 7.4(e) (2d ed. 1999)). “Photographs used in lineups

MARQUIS VALENTINE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2020 | Docket: 18488453

Published

4th DCA 2004) (quoting LaFave, et al., Crim. P. § 7.4(e) (2d ed. 1999)). “Photographs used in lineups

Caradigm USA LLC v. Pruithealth, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 10, 2020 | Docket: 17338430

Published

borrower or debtor. Ga. Code Ann. § 7-4-2 (emphasis added). Section 7-4-2 suggests that compound contractual

Lizzie Davis v. Oasis Legal Finance Operating Company, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 28, 2019 | Docket: 16125431

Published

G.A. § 7-3-1 et seq., and usury laws, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. The Oasis lenders removed the suit to federal

Malleiro v. Mori

182 So. 3d 5, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14475, 2015 WL 5714701

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2015 | Docket: 2863182

Published

David T. Smith, Florida Estates Practice Guide, § 7.04(5) (2015). A treatise that surveyed the practices

Community State Bank v. James Strong

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 25, 2011 | Docket: 2905879

Published

Ann. § 7-4-1 et seq., by charging more than 16% per annum on a loan of $3,000 or less, id. § 7-4-2(a)(2)

Fretwell v. Kansas City Life Insurance

643 F. Supp. 2d 1317, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68685

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2009 | Docket: 2475035

Published

before the date of death. Policy 2597589 at 10 § 7.4 (document 94-2 at 11). 5. Applying the Misstated-Age

Community State Bank v. Strong

485 F.3d 597, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9577, 2007 WL 1225343

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 27, 2007 | Docket: 65657969

Published

Statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-2(a)(2); the Georgia Criminal Usury Statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18(a); the Georgia

Thompson v. State

944 So. 2d 546, 2006 WL 3780742

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2006 | Docket: 1649929

Published

an evil intent." Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) § 7.4 (5th ed. 2005). Here, there was competent substantial

In Re Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

356 B.R. 813, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 202, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3260, 2006 WL 3543154

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2006 | Docket: 1809016

Published

(xii) Cure of Defaults. (11 U.S.C. § 1123(d)). Section 7.4 of the Plan provides for the satisfaction of

Glinton v. And R, Inc.

211 F.3d 586, 2000 WL 524826

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 2000 | Docket: 64068719

Published

violated Georgia’s criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. The pawnbrokers moved to dismiss the complaints

Ohunene O. Lawal Glinton v. And R, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, Michael Darby, and Those Persons Similarly Situated With Mr. Darby, Plaintiff v. Cobb Center Pawn and Jewelry Brokers, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, N.Y. Diamond Corporation, Etc., Susan Walker, and All Persons Similarly Situated With Walker v. Mike Horton Cash Express, Inc.

211 F.3d 586, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8611

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 2000 | Docket: 692833

Published

violated Georgia's criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. The pawnbrokers moved to dismiss the complaints

Glinton v. And R, Inc.

173 F.3d 1352

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1999 | Docket: 2037238

Published

2 statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. The pawnbrokers moved to dismiss the complaints

Glinton v. And R, Inc.

173 F.3d 1352

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1999 | Docket: 2037230

Published

violated Georgia’s criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18(a), and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt

horizon/cms Healthcare v. Southern Oaks

732 So. 2d 1156, 1999 WL 218410

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1999 | Docket: 1513351

Published

shall be dissolved and terminated pursuant to Section 7.4 of this Agreement by written notice to the Defaulter

Miller v. USDA Farm Services Agency

143 F.3d 1413

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 422735

Published

the Secretary. See 16 U.S.C. § 590h(b); 7 C.F.R. § 7.4. These state committees are “responsible for carrying

Middle Georgia Neurological Specialists, P.C., Cross-Appellants v. Southwestern Life Insurance Company, Cross-Appellee

967 F.2d 536, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17558, 1992 WL 164852

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 3, 1992 | Docket: 1011135

Published

prejudgment interest be determined pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 7-4-15 in that circumstance? The Supreme Court

B.F. Goodrich Employees Federal Credit Union v. Patterson (In re Patterson)

141 B.R. 505, 967 F.2d 505

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 29, 1992 | Docket: 65213200

Published

banking day after it receives the check. See Ala.Code § 7-4-104(l)(h) (1975) (the “midnight deadline rule”)

National Companies Health Benefit Plan v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta, Inc.

929 F.2d 1558

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 1991 | Docket: 66262923

Published

one-half percent per month, pursuant to Ga. Code Ann. § 7-4-16 (1989), for their unpaid bills; this equals eighteen

McCurry v. Eppolito

506 So. 2d 1110, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1166, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8169

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1987 | Docket: 64627005

Published

06(1), Florida Statutes. See also Leiby, supra, § 7.04; and 2 Rakusin, supra, Ch. 14, p. 4. Thus, as long

Payne v. Block

721 F.2d 741

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 19, 1983 | Docket: 66194241

Published

States, supra. Cf. K. Davis, Administrative Law, § 7:4, p. 167 (1982 Supp.) (legal effect of a Treasury

Hill v. Virgin

359 So. 2d 918, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1978 | Docket: 64564959

Published

amended by Laws of Florida, Chapter 74-382, Section 7(4)(a), which provided that in an action for professional

Harris v. Sklarew

166 So. 2d 164, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1964 | Docket: 64490121

Published

Boyer in “Florida Real Estate Transactions” at § 7.04 dealing with deeds of the type here discussed says: