Florida Statute 7.07 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.07

7.07 Calhoun County.—The boundary lines of Calhoun County are as follows: Beginning at a point in the thread of the Apalachicola River where the northern boundary of township two north, range seven west, crosses said river; thence west on said township line to the thread of the Chipola River; thence southerly down the thread of the stream of the said Chipola River to a point where a line drawn through the center of township two north, crosses said river; thence west on said middle township line to the range line between ranges eleven and twelve west; thence south on said range line, concurrent with the east boundary of Bay County, to the southwest corner of section nineteen, township three south, range eleven west; thence east on the south line of said section nineteen and other sections across ranges eleven west, ten west and a portion of nine west to where said section line intersects the thread of the Apalachicola River between sections twenty-three and twenty-six, township three south, range nine west; thence follow the thread of said river to the place of beginning.

History.—s. 1, Jan. 26, 1838; s. 1, ch. 1850, 1873; s. 1, ch. 2061, 1875; RS 17; ss. 1, chs. 4576, 4577, 1897; GS 15; s. 1, ch. 6506, 1913; RGS 17; s. 1, ch. 10132, 1925; CGL 19.

F.S. 7.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.07 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.07

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.07

Total Results: 30

Johnson Enterprises of Jacksonville, Inc. v. FPL Group, Inc.

162 F.3d 1290, 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 244, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31647, 1998 WL 886794

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 18, 1998 | Docket: 333717

Cited 255 times | Published

party. See id.; Williston on Contracts § 7:7, at 88-89 (“Where an illusory promise is made, that

Thompson v. Relationserve Media, Inc.

610 F.3d 628, 2010 WL 2594844

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 30, 2010 | Docket: 1546393

Cited 127 times | Published

Hazen, Treatise on the Law of Securities Regulation § 7(7) (6th ed.) ("The issuer will not ordinarily be a

Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co., Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff v. Suave Shoe Corporation, a Florida Corporation

716 F.2d 854, 221 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 536, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16209

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 7, 1983 | Docket: 434053

Cited 68 times | Published

cf. 1 J.T. McCarthy, supra, § 7:7, at 164^66 (discussing the Adidas case and other

Williams v. State

710 So. 2d 24, 1998 WL 116170

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 1731548

Cited 31 times | Published

behavioral impairment."); The Florida Bar, supra note 3, § 7.7, at 7-6 ("Detecting the presence of a substance

In Re LaPlana

363 B.R. 259, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 230, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 329, 2007 WL 431627

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2007 | Docket: 1087246

Cited 26 times | Published

calculated in accordance with Bankruptcy Code Section 7.07(b)(2) are subtracted, and the total yields a

Allison v. Vintage Sports Plaques

136 F.3d 1443, 46 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1138, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5026, 1998 WL 119796

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 236776

Cited 17 times | Published

Rights of Privacy and Publicity at § 7.7[E]; cf. Major League Baseball Players Ass’n

Retail Credit Company v. Dade County, Florida

393 F. Supp. 577

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1975 | Docket: 1012464

Cited 14 times | Published

Home Rule Charter Dade County, Florida, art. 1, § 7.07(A) (12) (21)-(23), (B) (1957). See also, Comment

Lomelo v. Mayo

204 So. 2d 550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1967 | Docket: 1319631

Cited 13 times | Published

595, 42 So. 206. [6] 30 Fla.Jur. 98, Statutes, § 7. [7] Neal v. Bryant, (Fla. 1963) 149 So.2d 529, 97

Brooks v. Miller

158 F.3d 1230, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27881, 1998 WL 758365

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 30, 1998 | Docket: 74773

Cited 10 times | Published

Ala. Code § 17-16-36 (1995); Ark.Code Ann. § 7-7-102 (Michie 1993); Fla. Slat. Ann. § 100.061 (West

Brooks v. Miller

158 F.3d 1230, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27881, 1998 WL 758365

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 30, 1998 | Docket: 74773

Cited 10 times | Published

Ala. Code § 17-16-36 (1995); Ark.Code Ann. § 7-7-102 (Michie 1993); Fla. Slat. Ann. § 100.061 (West

Bush v. Holmes

886 So. 2d 340, 2004 WL 2566078

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2004 | Docket: 1379958

Cited 9 times | Published

to the center on the basis that it violated Section 7.07 of the city's charter, stating: "No city funds

Allison v. Vintage Sports Plaques

136 F.3d 1443

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 422491

Cited 8 times | Published

1996); McCarthy, Rights of Privacy and Publicity at § 7.7[E]; cf. Major League Baseball Players Ass’n v.

United States v. Pizdrint

983 F. Supp. 1110, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18514, 1997 WL 722048

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1997 | Docket: 1806493

Cited 7 times | Published

DENIED. NOTES [1] The Government cites 18 U.S.C. § 7(7); however, it quotes the language from § 7(8). Therefore

Cedar Cove Efficiency Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. CEDAR COVE PROP. INC.

558 So. 2d 475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1990 | Docket: 1726313

Cited 5 times | Published

within the vertical boundaries of a "unit". Section 7.7 requires, as a prerequisite, a clear line of

Stickney v. Stickney

377 So. 2d 187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1979 | Docket: 423300

Cited 5 times | Published

circumstances ..." See, Trawick, Practice and Procedure § 7-7 (1975): "Many actions have proceedings subsequent

Joanne Kong v. Allied Professional Insurance Company

750 F.3d 1295, 2014 WL 1870615, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8762

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 9, 2014 | Docket: 271515

Cited 4 times | Published

Handbook on Insurance Coverage Disputes, § 7.07, at 664 (16th ed. 2012) (“[Djirect action statutes

Pier 1 Cruise Experts, Corp. v. Revelex Corp.

929 F.3d 1334

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 11, 2019 | Docket: 15905961

Cited 2 times | Published

serve as consideration." 3 Williston on Contracts § 7:7 (4th ed. 2010). So, when is a contract illusory

Estate of Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc.

637 F. Supp. 2d 1029, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46444

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2009 | Docket: 2226785

Cited 2 times | Published

means of the agent's performance of work." Id. § 7.07(3)(a). Thus, "employee" is a narrower category

MAVERICK MEDIA GROUP v. Hillsborough County, Fla.

508 F. Supp. 2d 1126, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35731, 2007 WL 1455963

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 16, 2007 | Docket: 2341633

Cited 1 times | Published

be obtained from the Administrator. See id. at § 7.07.01(A). Permit application review and time limits

Brooks v. Miller

158 F.3d 1230

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 30, 1998 | Docket: 237180

Cited 1 times | Published

See Ala. Code § 17-16-36 (1995); Ark. Code Ann. § 7-7-102 (Michie 1993); Fla. Stat. Ann. § 100.061 (West

Public Citizen, Inc. v. Zell Miller

992 F.2d 1548, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13641

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 14, 1993 | Docket: 1018119

Cited 1 times | Published

primary elections). See, e.g., Ark.Code Ann. § 7-7-304 (1987); Fla.Stat. § 100.061 (1991); Ga.Code

Mishiyev v. Davis, Beasley Media Group, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2025 | Docket: 69596386

Published

suffices to observe that the media defense under section 7[7]0.01 is not typically available for 'hyperbole

State of Georgia v. Shawn Micah Tresher Still

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 24, 2024 | Docket: 67930211

Published

enacted prior to election day.” 3 U.S.C. § 7. 7 As Congress has recognized, the Vice President

Jacob Zowie Thomas Rensel v. Centra Tech, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 29, 2021 | Docket: 60023161

Published

absence of a deadline, but there weren’t. See Newberg § 7:7 (in deciding whether to accept a late certification

Hester v. Florida Capital Group, Inc.

189 So. 3d 950, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4834, 2016 WL 1238596

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2016 | Docket: 3049200

Published

the pre-determined schedule set' forth in Section 7. 7. In the event that the necessary federal

United States v. Forest Hill Gardens East Condominium Ass'n

990 F. Supp. 2d 1344, 2014 WL 28723, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 488

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2014 | Docket: 65996629

Published

purchasers and lenders could rely upon it.9 Section 7.7 of the Forest Hill Gardens East’s declaration

Richard F. Thompson v. Relationserve Media, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 30, 2010 | Docket: 2907195

Published

Hazen, Treatise on the Law of Securities Regulation § 7(7) (6th ed.) (“The issuer will not ordinarily be a

Johnson v. Telesat Cablevision

162 F.3d 1290

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 18, 1998 | Docket: 767086

Published

either party. See id.; Williston on Contracts § 7:7, at 88-89 (“Where an illusory promise is made,

Deltona Utilities v. Edwards

502 So. 2d 514, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 542, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6764

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1987 | Docket: 64625050

Published

compensation. Florida Workers’ Compensation Practice, section 7.7 (3d ed. 1986); section 440.-49(2)(b)2.b., Florida

City of Miami Beach v. Austin Burke, Inc.

185 So. 2d 720, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1966 | Docket: 64496542

Published

any previous holder of the goods to he sold.” Section 7.7 of the ordinance set out matter pertinent to