Florida Statute 7.08 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.08

7.08 Charlotte County.—The boundary lines of Charlotte County are as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of township forty south, range twenty-seven east; thence south on range line dividing ranges twenty-seven and twenty-eight east, to the township line dividing townships forty-two and forty-three south, and Lee County; thence west on said township line to the waters of the Gulf of America; thence northerly and westerly along said Gulf of America, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the intersection therewith of the township line dividing townships forty and forty-one south; thence east on said township line to the southeast corner of township forty south, range twenty east; thence north on the range line dividing ranges twenty and twenty-one east to the northwest corner of township forty south, range twenty-one east; thence east on township line dividing townships thirty-nine and forty south to the place of beginning.

History.—s. 3, ch. 3770, 1887; s. 1, ch. 8513, 1921; CGL 62; s. 2, ch. 2025-8.

F.S. 7.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.08 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.08

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.08

Total Results: 32

State v. Hagan

387 So. 2d 943

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1980 | Docket: 1706142

Cited 63 times | Published

exactitude by resort to pertinent Florida law. See § 7.08, Fla. Stat. (1979) (delineating the boundary lines

Ranger Ins. Co. v. Travelers Indem.

389 So. 2d 272, 10 A.L.R. 4th 870, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17844

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1980 | Docket: 1281886

Cited 34 times | Published

insurer is involved." R. Keeton, Insurance Law, § 7.8(d). When there is no excess insurer, the insured

Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

432 F. Supp. 2d 1319, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98760, 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 692, 2006 WL 1495222

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 26, 2006 | Docket: 58449

Cited 26 times | Published

338, 129 So. 748 (1930) and 9A Fla. Jur., Damages § 7-8). The FUTSA, however, is not a common law cause

Brand v. Florida Power Corp.

633 So. 2d 504, 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 102, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1695, 1994 WL 64952

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1994 | Docket: 1708063

Cited 26 times | Published

handicaps[[4]] in the United States, as defined in section 7(8) [29 U.S.C.S. § 706(8)], shall, solely by reason

Prescott v. Bd. Pub. Instruction, Hardee County

32 So. 2d 731, 159 Fla. 663, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 924

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1947 | Docket: 3265897

Cited 22 times | Published

distributed or appropriated by authority of said Section 7, 8 and 9 (supra). It is a general rule of law that

Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. James D. Watkins

934 F.2d 1180, 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13217

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 27, 1991 | Docket: 315802

Cited 19 times | Published

instruction here 2 Section 7-8-317(1) reads: "No attachment or levy upon a

State v. Stepansky

761 So. 2d 1027, 2000 WL 422872

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2000 | Docket: 1300150

Cited 15 times | Published

could prosecute him for this crime. See 18 U.S.C. § 7(8) (1994); Roberts, 1 F.Supp.2d at 607-08; United

Swamy v. Caduceus Self Ins. Fund, Inc.

648 So. 2d 758, 1994 WL 502767

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1994 | Docket: 2517444

Cited 13 times | Published

contract. See R. Keeton and A. Widiss, Insurance Law, § 7.8(a), n. 9 (1988). Because it is a contract claim

Dept. of Revenue v. Morganwoods Greentree, Inc.

341 So. 2d 756

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1976 | Docket: 1724077

Cited 12 times | Published

Review and Reduction of Real Property Assessments, § 7:08 (1960).

United States v. Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) in United States Currency

590 F. Supp. 866, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15054

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1984 | Docket: 2097527

Cited 10 times | Published

process. K. Davis, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE § 7:8 at 36 (1979 & Supp.1982). Under these criteria,

White Construction Co. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

633 F. Supp. 2d 1302, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29467, 2009 WL 961135

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2009 | Docket: 1266875

Cited 8 times | Published

equipment. [38] The Court also finds persuasive Section 7.8 of the MSA, which mandates that "no act or failure

D & T Properties v. Marina Grande Assoc.

985 So. 2d 43, 2008 WL 2356855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2008 | Docket: 1673295

Cited 7 times | Published

budget estimates under Chapter 718. See Ch. 2007-80, § 7-8, Laws of Fla. Section 8 of Chapter 2007-80 added

United States v. Pizdrint

983 F. Supp. 1110, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18514, 1997 WL 722048

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1997 | Docket: 1806493

Cited 7 times | Published

makes other persuasive arguments under 18 U.S.C. § 7(8). That subsection provides that the term special

Chino Elec., Inc. v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.

578 So. 2d 320, 1991 WL 40069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1991 | Docket: 2546951

Cited 6 times | Published

F. Harper, F. James & O. Gray, The Law of Torts § 7.8 (2d ed. 1986); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 542

In Re Estate of Kavcic

341 So. 2d 278

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1977 | Docket: 1393146

Cited 6 times | Published

Wills and Administration *281 of Estates in Florida § 7.08 (4th ed. 1968). And American Law Reports states

Estate of Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc.

609 F. Supp. 2d 1235, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56446, 2009 WL 975570

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2009 | Docket: 231129

Cited 5 times | Published

for doing so.[7]See 9 Oklahoma Practice Series § 7:8 (2008). C. Ohio Law Under Ohio law, tort liability

US Fire Ins. v. Morrison Assur.

600 So. 2d 1147, 1992 WL 102456

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1992 | Docket: 1527854

Cited 5 times | Published

2d 862 (1976), citing, R. Keeton Insurance Law, § 7.8(d). In the decision by the Minnesota court, upon

In Re Bauknight

14 F.2d 674, 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1390

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1926 | Docket: 1558027

Cited 3 times | Published

within 10 days after adjudication, as required by section 7 (8), being Comp. St. § 9591. I do not find this

Estate of Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc.

637 F. Supp. 2d 1029, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46444

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2009 | Docket: 2226785

Cited 2 times | Published

should be applied to the current issue. [7] Section 7.08 of the Restatement (Third) deals specifically

Lloyd v. Professional Realty Services, Inc.

734 F.2d 1428, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21207

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 22, 1984 | Docket: 66197530

Cited 2 times | Published

until the actual delivery of the security. Ala.Code § 7-8-301(1) (1977). . It is undisputed that the Lloyds

MAVERICK MEDIA GROUP v. Hillsborough County, Fla.

508 F. Supp. 2d 1126, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35731, 2007 WL 1455963

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 16, 2007 | Docket: 2341633

Cited 1 times | Published

may display a non-commercial message." See id. at § 7.08.00. C. A brief review of the procedural history

Rectory Park, L.C. v. City of Delray Beach

208 F. Supp. 2d 1320, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10770, 2002 WL 1292016

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 7, 2002 | Docket: 2428560

Cited 1 times | Published

damage. Douglas W. Kmiec, ZONING & PLANNING DESKBOOK § 7.8 (2d ed.2001). According to Professor Kmiec, "surrounding

Stepansky v. State

707 So. 2d 877, 1998 WL 95280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1998 | Docket: 1772075

Cited 1 times | Published

the United States Congress enacted 18 U.S.C.A. § 7(8), which purported to extend the country's maritime

Landcastle Acquisition Corp. v. Renasant Bank

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 12, 2023 | Docket: 66719224

Published

agent “defrauds a third party.” See id. § 7.08 cmt. c(2); see also id. § 6.11(1) (“When

United States v. Corrine Brown

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 9, 2020 | Docket: 16673291

Published

Judicial Ctr., Benchbook for U.S. District Judges § 7.08, at 269 (6th ed. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 453

United States v. Corrine Brown

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 9, 2020 | Docket: 16672666

Published

Judicial Ctr., Benchbook for U.S. District Judges § 7.08, at 269 (6th ed. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 453

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 21, 2005 | Docket: 3255610

Published

to a showing of good faith under Article X, section 7[.]"8 In a 1964 Attorney General's Opinion released

Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Watkins

934 F.2d 1178

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 27, 1991 | Docket: 66265040

Published

certificates as required under Alabama Code § 7-8-317.2 The policy behind § 7-8-317, protecting good faith purchasers

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 6, 1989 | Docket: 3256881

Published

authority not pertinent to the questions at hand. 11 Section 7(8), Ch. 63-1247, Laws of Florida. 12 Section 8(2)

Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Amendment of Rules Relating to Admissions to the Bar (25-Month Rule)

462 So. 2d 463, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 53, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 2851

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1985 | Docket: 64609425

Published

5. .... Section §,6. .... Section 6, 7. .... Section 7, 8. .... Section 8, 9. .... Section 9, 10. ...

Jones v. Hendrickson

341 So. 2d 278, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15076

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1977 | Docket: 64556622

Published

Wills and Administration *281of Estates in Florida § 7.08 (4th ed. 1968). And American Law Reports states

Wade v. Murrhee

75 Fla. 494, 78 So. 536

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1918 | Docket: 60408435

Published

of the erroneous leaving off of the figures Section 7, 8 & 17, which said omission does not affect the