Florida Statute 7.16 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.16

7.16 Duval County.—The boundary lines of Duval County are as follows: Beginning at the mouth of the Nassau River; thence up the thread of the main stream of said river to the run of Thomas Swamp; thence up the run of said swamp to where same would intersect the prolongation of a line drawn from the southwest corner of township one north, of range twenty-five east, to the southwest corner of township two south, of range twenty-three east; thence on said last-mentioned line in a southwesterly direction to where its extension would intersect the range line dividing ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east; thence south on said range line, concurrent with the Baker County line, to the dividing line between townships three and four south; thence east on said township line, concurrent with the north boundary of Clay County, to its intersection with the easterly limited access right-of-way line of U.S. 17, said point being located south 88°33′33″ west 2.37 feet of the southwest corner of Lot 12, Block 11 of Island View Subdivision, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 6, page 10, Public Records of Duval County, Florida; thence, along the limited access boundary of State Road 9-A, north 08°45′26″ east 119.74 feet; thence north 38°21′40″ east 165.23 feet; thence north 49°31′32″ east 101.97 feet, thence north 64°29′41″ east 145.12 feet; thence north 83°23′50″ east 290.48 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the south and having a radius of 22,768.31 feet; thence, from a tangent bearing of south 89°51′51″ east, run easterly 1,466.89 feet along said curve through a central angle of 03°41′29″ to the end of said curve; thence south 86°10′22″ east 891.45 feet; thence south 86°49′27″ east 228.51 feet; thence north 87°54′15″ east 816.30 feet, thence south 86°49′27″ east, to the west margin of the main channel of the St. Johns River; thence southerly along the west margin of the main channel of said river, concurrent with the east boundary of Clay County, to a point where a line drawn due west from the mouth of Julington Creek would intersect said western margin of the main channel of the St. Johns River; thence, concurrent with the north boundary of St. Johns County, due east to the mouth of Julington Creek; thence along the thread of said Julington Creek to the south bank of Durbin Creek; thence eastwardly along the south bank of said Durbin Creek to a point where the range line dividing ranges twenty-seven and twenty-eight east intersects said south bank; thence south on said range line to the southwest corner of township four south, range twenty-eight east; thence east on the township line dividing townships four and five south to the southeast corner of township four south, range twenty-eight east; thence north on twenty-nine east to a point where an extension of the section line between sections eight and seventeen and sections nine and sixteen, township three south, range twenty-nine east, would intersect said section line; thence east on said section line to the Atlantic Ocean; thence northward along the Atlantic coast, including the waters of said ocean within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the point of beginning. Excluding from Duval County the following described parcel of land. Begin at the intersection of the north line of township four south with the easterly right-of-way line of State Road 21, also known as Blanding Boulevard, said east right-of-way line bearing north 00°02′42″ west; thence north 52°48′22″ east 2,239.0 feet; thence north 40°33′35″ west 301.54 feet; thence north 24°10′22″ east 40.18 feet to an intersection with the southerly limited access right-of-way line of State Road 9-A, also known as Interstate 295; thence along the southerly and easterly right-of-way line of said State Road 9-A the following 6 courses; thence south 66°10′44″ east 1,883.20 feet to the point of curvature of a curve concave northerly and having a radius of 5,879.578 feet; thence southeasterly 2,592.53 feet along and around said curve through a central angle of 25°15′50″ to the point of tangency of said curve; thence north 88°33′33″ east 3,540.04 feet; thence south 78°13′41″ east 219.09 feet; thence south 61°03′20″ east 233.15 feet; thence south 52°38′29″ east 379.68 feet to an intersection with the northerly line of said township four south; thence departing said right-of-way line, run thence west along said north line of township four south to the point of beginning.

History.—s. 1, Aug. 12, 1822; s. 7, Dec. 29, 1824; s. 5, Nov. 23, 1828; s. 1, ch. 920, 1859; s. 1, ch. 1039, 1859; s. 1, ch. 1185, 1861; s. 1, ch. 2068, 1875; RS 33; GS 31; RGS 33; CGL 35; s. 2, ch. 76-17; s. 2, ch. 80-9.

F.S. 7.16 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.16 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.16

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.16

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.16.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.16

Total Results: 20

In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar - Chapter 3

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-19

Snippet: 13 (Incapacity Not Related to Misconduct), and 3-7.16 (Limitation on Time to Open Investigation). The

In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar - Chapter 3

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-05

Snippet: 13 (Incapacity Not Related to Misconduct), and 3-7.16 (Limitation on Time to Open Investigation). The

Sherley Joseph v. The State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-14

Snippet: affected by the proceeding. Fla. JEAC Ops. 08-06; 07-16; 06-26; 98-20. A different conclusion has

U.S. Bancorp, etc. v. Taharra Assets 5545, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-01-24

Snippet: the lis pendens was filed. See Tr. No. 602W0 Dated 7/16/15, Dema Invs., LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 207

The Florida Bar v. Jonathan Stephen Schwartz & The Florida Bar v. Jonathan Stephen Schwartz

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-01-18

Snippet: under the “Safe Harbor” provisions of Bar Rule 4-7.16 (Presumptively Valid Content). 3 Turning

In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar - Chapters 3 and 14

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-09-28

Snippet: Revocation of Admission to The Florida Bar), 3-7.16 (Limitation on Time to Open Investigation), 14-

In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar – Chapters 3 and 14

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-09-07

Snippet: Revocation of Admission to The Florida Bar), 3-7.16 (Limitation on Time to Open Investigation), 14-

In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar - Subchapter 4-7 Information About Legal Services

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-06-22

Snippet: 4-7.14 (Potentially Misleading Advertisements), 4-7.16 (Presumptively Valid Content), 4-7.18 (Direct Contact

MANWANI HOLDING COMPANY, LLC v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-11-16

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Tr. No. 602W0 Dated 7/16/15, Dema Invs., LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 207

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Regulate Marijuana in a Manner Similar to Alcohol to Establish Age, Licensing, and Other Restrictions

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-06-17

Snippet: amendment’s true effect,” Armstrong v. Harris, 773 So. 2d 7, 16 (Fla. 2000), and are not “clearly and conclusively

Arch Insurance Company v. Kubicki Draper, LLP

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-06-03

Snippet: (Fla. 2014). -7- 16 Couch on Insurance § 222:2 (3d ed. 2005) (“Subrogation

The Florida Bar v. Charles Paul-Thomas Phoenix

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-01-28

Snippet: diligence, should have been discovered.” Bar Rule 3-7.16(a)(1). Phoenix’s misconduct occurred from 2005

Florida Department of Health, Office of Medical Marijuana Use, Courtney Coppola, in her official capacity as Director of the Office of Medical Marijuana Use v. Florigrown, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and Voice of Freedom, Inc., d/b/a Florigrown

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-08-27

Snippet: marijuana. See Armstrong v. Harris, 773 So. 2d 7, 16 (Fla. 2000) (“A ballot title and summary cannot

Ramon Pichirilo v. American Airlines and Sedgwick CMS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-06-04

Snippet: Accidents: 12/9/2011; 4/13/2015; 6/25/2015; 8/2/2015; 7/16/2016; 9/19/2016; 5/15/2017; 8/3/2017; 8/28/2017

VALENCIA GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC. v. COMMUNITY RESOURCE SERVICES, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-05-22

Citation: 272 So. 3d 850

Snippet: Country Club. In addition, article VII, section 7.16 of the Master Declaration asserts that Orangetree

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR-SUBCHAPTER 4-7 (LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES).

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-03-08

Citation: 238 So. 3d 164

Snippet: (Deceptive and Inherently Misleading Advertisements); 4-7.16 (Presumptively Valid Content); 4-7.17 (Payment for

The Florida Bar v. Robert Joseph Ratiner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-02-22

Citation: 238 So. 3d 117

Snippet: requisite time limitation. See Bar Rule 3-7.16(a) ("Inquiries raised or complaints presented by

PNC Bank v. MDTR, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-01-29

Citation: 243 So. 3d 456

Snippet: a “purchaser pendente lite.” Tr. No. 602W0 Dated 7/16/15, Dema Invs., LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 207

In Re: Amendments to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (Biennial Petition) – Corrected Opinion

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-01-25

Snippet: News and on the Bar’s website. Bar Rule 3-7.16 (Limitation on Time to Bring Complaint) is renamed

Black Point Assets, Inc. v. Ventures Trust 2013-I-H-R

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-01-05

Citation: 236 So. 3d 1134

Snippet: the awarded sums of money1 and was comprised of $7,016.68 for "Attorney Fees & Cost" and $5,824.93 for