Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 7.19 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 7.19 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 7.19

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 7.19
7.19 Franklin County.The boundary lines of Franklin County are as follows: Beginning at a point on the Apalachicola River, known as the mouth of Black or Owl Creek; thence northerly up the western bank of said creek to where the same intersects the middle section line of section twenty-six, township five south, range eight west; thence due east on the middle section line to the thread of the Ochlockonee River; thence south and easterly following the thread of said river, and the thread of such channel thereof as may be necessary to include the islands in said river; to a point directly south of the southernmost point of Grass Island; thence along a straight line to the center point of the U.S. 98 (State Road 30) bridge across Ochlockonee Bay; thence east-southeast to a point directly north of the easternmost point of James Island; thence easterly to the boundary line of the State of Florida; thence south and westerly along said boundary line, including the waters of the Gulf of Mexico within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the Forbes line, produced southerly; thence following the Forbes line to the Jackson River; thence follow the Jackson River until it joins the Apalachicola River; thence northerly along the Apalachicola River to the mouth of the Brothers River; thence follow the Brothers River until it intersects the stream known as Brickyard Cutoff; thence follow Brickyard Cutoff to the Apalachicola River; thence northerly along the thread of said river to the place of beginning.
History.s. 1, Feb. 8, 1832; s. 1, ch. 412, 1851; s. 1, ch. 3624, 1885; RS 18; GS 16; RGS 18; CGL 20; s. 1, ch. 72-119; s. 1, ch. 86-288.

F.S. 7.19 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.19 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.19


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.19
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.19.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.19

Total Results: 20

The Florida Bar v. Jonathan Stephen Schwartz & The Florida Bar v. Jonathan Stephen Schwartz

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-01-18

Snippet: for review by the Bar as required by Bar Rule 4-7.19(a). The referee rejected Schwartz’s argument that

In Re: Amendments to Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-7.19

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-09-23

Snippet: REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 4-7.19. September 9, 2021

In Re: Amendments to Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-7.19

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-09-23

Snippet: TO RULE REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 4-7.19 DOCKET NO.: SC21-775 OPINION FILED: September

In Re: Amendments to Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-7.19

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-09-09

Snippet: REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 4-7.19. September 9, 2021 PER

Gary Michael Hilton v. State of Florida & Gary Michael Hilton v. Mark S. Inch, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-08-26

Snippet: at 319- 20 (citing Singer v. State, 109 So. 2d 7, 19 (Fla. 1959), (finding

In Re: COVID-19 Emergency Measures Relating to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and Amendment to Rule Regulating The Florida Bar 1-12.1

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-04-09

Snippet: advertisements under Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-7.19 (Evaluation of Advertisements). Those time periods

In Re: COVID-19 Emergency Measures Relating to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-03-20

Snippet: advertisements under Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-7.19 (Evaluation of Advertisements). CANADY, C.J.,

Nationstar Mortgage v. Silva

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-03-07

Citation: 239 So. 3d 782

Snippet: Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Milam, 177 So. 3d 7, 19 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). The evidence from the

Michael L. King v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-26

Citation: 211 So. 3d 866, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 67, 2017 WL 372081, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 191

Snippet: 96-97 (Fla. 2004); Singer v. State, 109 So. 2d 7, 19 (Fla. 1959)). By comparison, a defendant

G. B., Z.L., through his guardian K.L. v. Agency For Persons With Disabilities

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-07-30

Citation: 143 So. 3d 454

Snippet: See Fla. Admin. Code R. 65G-4.0210(3), (7), (19), 65G-4.0212. This independent review process involved

In re Amendments to the Rules Regulating Florida Bar-Subchapter 4-7

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-01-31

Citation: 108 So. 3d 609, 2013 WL 388185

Snippet: 18 (Direct Contact with Prospective Clients); 4-7.19 (Evaluation of Advertisements); 4-7.20 (Exemptions

Florida Department of Children & Families v. Adoption of X.X.G.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-09-22

Citation: 45 So. 3d 79, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14014, 61 A.L.R. 6th 621

Snippet: Response 9; Fla. Admin. Code rr. 65C-16.005; 65C16.007. 19. Before DCF or its agents approve an applicant

Hill v. Deering Bay Marina Ass'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-06-25

Citation: 985 So. 2d 1162, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9441

Snippet: use of the marina facilities. Appier Agreement §§ 7,19. Following execution of this agreement, Kings Bay

Hill v. DEERING BAY MARINA ASS'N, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-06-25

Citation: 985 So. 2d 1162, 2008 WL 2511348

Snippet: use of the marina facilities. Appler Agreement §§ 7, 19. Following execution of this agreement, Kings Bay

Sierra v. Associated Marine Institutes, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-06-18

Citation: 850 So. 2d 582, 2003 WL 21393941

Snippet: escape and that he should be closely watched. At 7:19 p.m. on the second day after the altercation between

Maxwell v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-06-08

Citation: 785 So. 2d 1277, 2001 WL 627598

Snippet: Rusty Maxwell. King recalled that at approximately 7:19 p.m., while he was patrolling the Florida Turnpike

Riverside Roof Truss v. Board of Zoning

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-05-28

Citation: 734 So. 2d 1139

Snippet: minimum distance required pursuant to Section 27-7.19.5, the board of Zoning Appeals shall grant a variance

Emro Marketing v. Jones

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-04-09

Citation: 671 So. 2d 237, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515, 1996 WL 160791

Snippet: benefits. The first such Notice of Denial is dated 07/19/94 and states: “Per both Dr. MacMillan and Dr. Magana

Showell Farms v. Carter

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-02-23

Citation: 633 So. 2d 477, 1994 WL 51079

Snippet: permanent total disability; (2) compensation from 7/19/90, and continuing; (3) reimbursement for all underpayments;

Zundell v. Dade County School Bd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-12-15

Citation: 609 So. 2d 1367, 1992 WL 379421

Snippet: injury is held accidental." 1A Larson, § 38.00 at 7-19 (emphasis added). The any-exertion rule, applicable