|
The 2025 Florida Statutes
|
|
|
F.S. 7.217.21 Gilchrist County.—The boundary lines of Gilchrist County are as follows: Beginning at a point where the range line between ranges sixteen and seventeen east, is intersected by the township line between townships ten and eleven south; thence west on the township line dividing townships ten and eleven south, to the range line dividing ranges fifteen and sixteen east; thence north on said range line to the northeast corner of section thirty-six, township ten south, range fifteen east; thence west to the northwest corner of said section thirty-six; thence north on the section line between sections twenty-five and twenty-six, township ten south, range fifteen east, one half mile, to the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of said section twenty-five; thence due west through the center of section twenty-six and other sections in township ten south, range fifteen east, to the range line dividing ranges fourteen and fifteen east; thence north on said range line one half mile to the northeast corner of section twenty-five, in township ten south, range fourteen east; thence due west on the north boundary line of said section twenty-five and other sections to the thread of the Suwannee River; thence northerly up the thread of the Suwannee River to the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence north and easterly up the thread of the said Santa Fe River to a point where the same is intersected by the range line dividing ranges sixteen and seventeen east; thence south on said range line to the place of beginning.History.—s. 1, ch. 11371, 1925; CGL 78.
| |
Annotations, Discussions, Cases:
Cases Citing Statute 7.21
Total Results: 6
120 F. Supp. 2d 1005, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20085, 2000 WL 1584848
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 2449329
Cited 8 times | Published
because they require separate consultation under Section 7.
[21] With respect to lighting, the Permit calls
143 F.3d 1413, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12808
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 422736
Cited 3 times | Published
(“CED”). See 16 U.S.C. § 590h(b)(5)(E); 7 C.F.R. § 7.21(b)(2). Eléven years later, in March 1994, the Alabama
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 12, 2023 | Docket: 66927273
Published
Argued: Mar 2, 2023
Newberg & Rubenstein on Class Actions
§ 7:21 (6th ed. 2022). For purposes of this appeal, we
108 F. Supp. 3d 1259, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65244, 2015 WL 2383662
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 19, 2015 | Docket: 64302340
Published
its proposed development. However, pursuant to Section 7-21 of the Code of Ordinances, no fees shall be
143 F.3d 1413
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 422735
Published
(“CED”). See 16. U.S.C. § 590h(b)(5)(E); 7 C.F.R. § 7.21(b)(2).
Eleven years later, in March 1994, the
518 So. 2d 951, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 185, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 175, 1988 WL 2624
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1988 | Docket: 64632086
Published
on appeal.” Florida Civil Practice Before Trial, § 7.21 (4th ed. 1983) (citing Hu v. Crockett, 426 So.2d