Florida Statute 7.35 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.35

7.35 Lake County.—The boundary lines of Lake County are as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the range line dividing ranges twenty-three and twenty-four east with the township line dividing townships twenty-four and twenty-five south; thence east on said township line to the range line dividing ranges twenty-four and twenty-five east; thence north on said range line to the section line dividing sections thirty and thirty-one, in township twenty-four south, range twenty-five east; thence east on the north line of sections thirty-one, thirty-two, thirty-three and thirty-four in said township twenty-four south, range twenty-five east, to the northeast corner of said section thirty-four; thence south on the east line of said section thirty-four to the township line dividing townships twenty-four and twenty-five south; thence east on said township line to the range line dividing ranges twenty-six and twenty-seven east; thence north to the south shore of Lake Apopka; thence north across the waters of Lake Apopka, taking in all islands and peninsulas along the west shore of said lake to the north shore of Lake Apopka where it is intersected by the range line dividing ranges twenty-six and twenty-seven east; thence north on said range line to the township line dividing townships nineteen and twenty south; thence east on said township line to the Wekiva River; thence north along the thread of the said Wekiva River to the St. Johns River; thence in a northerly and northwesterly direction through the thread of the St. Johns River to the southwest shore of Lake George; thence north along the west shore of Lake George to the range line dividing ranges twenty-six and twenty-seven east; thence south on said range line to the township line dividing townships seventeen and eighteen south; thence west on the said township line to the range line dividing ranges twenty-three and twenty-four east; thence south on the said range line to the place of beginning; and all of township twenty south, of range twenty-seven east, bounded on the south and east by the waters of Lake Beauclaire, shall be and are declared to be a part of the territory of Lake County.

History.—s. 1, ch. 3771, 1887; s. 1, ch. 3944, 1889; s. 1, ch. 4066, 1891; RS 42; GS 40; RGS 44; CGL 46.

F.S. 7.35 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.35 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.35

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.35

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.35.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.35

Total Results: 20

Warwick Corp. v. Turetsky

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-08-16

Citation: 227 So. 3d 621, 2017 WL 3500336

Snippet: 000; the value of the Fort Lauder-dale hotel was $7,035,000; the value of the Deerfield Beach hotel was

THE WARWICK CORPORATION v. LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-08-16

Snippet: 000; the value of the Fort Lauderdale hotel was $7,035,000; the value of the Deerfield Beach hotel

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2009-04-23

Snippet: inspection and copying). 19 Cf. Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 07-35 (2007), concluding that members of a commission

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2008-02-26

Snippet: Law.4 This office, in Attorney General Opinion 07-35, concluded that members of a commission may exchange

BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS v. Colby

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-01-25

Citation: 976 So. 2d 31, 2008 WL 199888

Snippet: has failed to satisfy his public records request.[7] *35 As mandated by the public records law, the circuit

Wainer v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-10-03

Citation: 965 So. 2d 1240, 2007 WL 2848147

Snippet: forms, references Wainer's "guidelines" range as 28.7-35.8 years. However, it also includes a scoresheet

Brye v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-04-07

Citation: 927 So. 2d 78, 2006 WL 995843

Snippet: Schwab observed Mr. Chang and two other males around 7:35 on a November evening, standing in front of a vacant

Chavez v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-11-21

Citation: 832 So. 2d 730, 2002 WL 31642373

Snippet: maintained that Chavez was taken into custody at 7:35 p.m. on December 6. Detective Estopinan testified

Brim v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-10-11

Citation: 779 So. 2d 427, 2000 WL 1568741

Snippet: indicates that other probes exist, such as TBQ-7.[35] *441 We describe this step in some detail because

State v. Chang

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-01-16

Citation: 668 So. 2d 207, 1996 WL 12611

Snippet: at the suppression hearing that at approximately 7:35 p.m. on November 11, 1994, he observed Appellee

Western Auto v. Moore

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-10-02

Citation: 567 So. 2d 972, 1990 WL 146908

Snippet: January 15, 1988, his hourly wage increased to $7.35 per hour. At the time of the hearing, the E/C submitted

Morris v. NN Investors Life Ins. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-12-12

Citation: 553 So. 2d 1306, 1989 WL 149633

Snippet: Fla.Bar Code Prof.Resp., EC 7-22, 7-25 to 7-26, 7-35 to 7-39, which were contained in the previous Code

Stockton v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-06-30

Citation: 529 So. 2d 739, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1532, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2882, 1988 WL 68089

Snippet: recessed for thirty minutes until approximately 7:35 p.m., at which time the jury returned. The court’s

Haynes v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-02-16

Citation: 502 So. 2d 507, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 518

Snippet: call from a confidential informant at approximately 7:35 P.M. on July 26, 1985. According to Lewis, the confidential

Novo v. Scott

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-26

Citation: 438 So. 2d 477

Snippet: Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547, 585-586 [12 S.Ct. 195, 206-07, 35 L.Ed. 1110] (1892); State ex rel. Hough v. Popper

Armstrong v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-06-15

Citation: 399 So. 2d 953

Snippet: Another witness for the state drove by the house at 7:35 that morning and saw a car parked beside the road

Enmund v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-04-16

Citation: 399 So. 2d 1362

Snippet: Another witness for the state drove by the house at 7:35 that morning and saw a car parked beside the road

Spenkelink v. Wainwright

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-05-25

Citation: 372 So. 2d 927

Snippet: respondent. PER CURIAM. Petitioner in this cause filed at 7:35 a.m. today a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Myers v. Hawkins

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-09-14

Citation: 362 So. 2d 926

Snippet: equivalent of an ouster. See 238 So.2d at 406-07. [35] "[The resign-to-run statute] is not a burden

Race v. Moseley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-02-19

Citation: 308 So. 2d 137, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14492

Snippet: requested an order pursuant to the provisions of § 7.35.04 of the Laws of Florida 1949. That section was