Florida Statute 7.53 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.53

7.53 Polk County.—The boundary lines of Polk County are as follows: Beginning at a point where the range line between ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east is intersected by the township line between townships thirty-two and thirty-three south; thence east on said township line to the west bank of Central and South Florida Flood Control District Canal C-38 (Kissimmee River); thence northerly along said west bank to Lake Kissimmee; thence northerly and westerly along the west shore of Lake Kissimmee to the west bank of Central and South Florida Flood Control District Canal C-37; thence northerly along said west bank of canal to Lake Hatchineha; thence westerly, northerly and easterly along the west and north shore of Lake Hatchineha, to the thread of the stream of Dead River; thence northerly along the thread of the stream of Dead River and Reedy Creek to the west shore of Lake Cypress; run thence northerly along said west shore of Lake Cypress to the township line between townships twenty-seven and twenty-eight south; thence west on said line to the range line dividing ranges twenty-eight and twenty-nine east; thence north along the range line to the southeast corner of section twelve township twenty-seven south, range twenty-eight east; thence west along section lines to the southwest corner of section nine, township twenty-seven south, range twenty-eight east; thence north along section lines to the southwest corner of section twenty-one, township twenty-six south, range twenty-eight east; thence northwesterly through respective section and quarter section corners to the southeast corner of township twenty-five south, range twenty-seven east; thence west on the township line to the range line between ranges twenty-six and twenty-seven east; thence north on said range line to the township line between townships twenty-four and twenty-five south; thence west on said township line to the section line between sections thirty-four and thirty-five, township twenty-four south, range twenty-five east; thence north on said section line to the northeast corner of said section thirty-four; thence west on the north line of said section thirty-four and the sections to the west of it to the range line between ranges twenty-four and twenty-five east; thence south on said range line to the township line between townships twenty-four and twenty-five south; thence west on said township line to the range line between ranges twenty-three and twenty-four east; thence south on said range line to the thread of the Withlacoochee River; thence southerly and westerly following the thread of said river to where same is intersected by the range line between ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east; thence south on said range line to the township line dividing townships twenty-five and twenty-six south; thence west on said township line to the section line dividing sections three and four in township twenty-six south, range twenty-two east; thence south along the section lines to the township line dividing townships twenty-six and twenty-seven south; thence east along said township line to the range line dividing ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east; thence south on said range line to the place of beginning. The shorelines of Lakes Kissimmee and Hatchineha shall be as physically present unless and until the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund shall establish bulkhead lines along the said lake shores; in which event, the said shorelines shall be the said bulkhead lines to the extent they are so established.

History.—s. 2, ch. 1201, 1861; s. 1, ch. 1622, 1866; ch. 1848, 1871; ss. 3, 6, ch. 1998, 1874; s. 2, ch. 3177, 1879; s. 1, ch. 3471, 1883; s. 1, ch. 3932, 1889; s. 1, ch. 4066, 1891; RS 48; GS 46; RGS 51; CGL 53; s. 2, ch. 25440, 1949; s. 2, ch. 67-592; ss. 27, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 7.53 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.53 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.53

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.53

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.53.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.53

Total Results: 13

& SC15-2005 Nelson Serrano v. State of Florida and Nelson Serrano v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-05-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 225 So. 3d 737

Snippet: -5- December 3, 1997. On December 3, 1997, at 7:53 a.m., Serrano called Penaherrera from Atlanta and

Ralph Daniel Wright, Jr. v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-05-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 221 So. 3d 512, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 587, 2017 WL 1954977, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1066

Snippet: Starbucks near the base, dated July 6, 2007, at 7:53 a.m. Over the next few days, Detective Sauer…Wright’s car proved that he was at the Starbucks at 7:53 a.m. Answer Brief of Appellee at 62-63, Wright …a.m. and 6:15 a.m. and been at the Starbucks at 7:53 a.m. does not mean that there is “direct evidence…otherwise, to show where Wright was between 2 a.m. and 7:53 a.m. that morning. The State also claims

Serrano v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2011-03-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 64 So. 3d 93, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 108, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 619, 2011 WL 904071

Snippet: car for December 3, 1997. On December 3, 1997, at 7:53 a.m., Serrano called Penaherrera from Atlanta and

Waddy v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-10-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 661 So. 2d 351, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10401, 1995 WL 581686

Snippet: , 432 U.S. 161,169 n. 7, 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2227 n. 7, 53 L.Ed.2d 187, 196 n. 7 (1977)). Accord State v. Poland

Smith v. Rose Auto Stores

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-04-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 596 So. 2d 809, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4262, 1992 WL 74906

Snippet: ordered employer and carrier to pay Margaret Smith $7,053.24 to satisfy the past claims for compensation,

Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. Judy

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-08-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 566 So. 2d 537

Snippet: the value by assigning an inflationary index of 7.53 percent annually. In doing so he described the attendant

Fumigation Dept. v. Pearson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-09-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 559 So. 2d 587

Snippet: inflationary index to the cost over the next 47 years of 7.53% annually. The sum total of this recovery, after

Lightsey v. Williams

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-06-10T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 526 So. 2d 764

Snippet: COWART, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Sections 7.49 and 7.53, Florida Statutes (1987). [2] Section 47.071, Florida

BD. OF TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL v. Walker Ranch

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-08-21T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 496 So. 2d 153

Snippet: 1985), which describes Osceola County, and section 7.53, Florida Statutes (1985), which describes Polk County…conjunction with the provisions of sections 7.49 and 7.53, describing the counties and providing for the establishment…Water Law 1980 at 750. [4] Both sections 7.49 and 7.53 provide: The shorelines of Lakes Kissimmee and

Lund v. Mathas

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1962-10-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 145 So. 2d 871

Snippet: § 2a (1958). [7] Wood v. Broom, 287 U.S. 1, 6-7, 53 S.Ct. 1, 77 L.Ed. 131 (1932). [8] D.C., 208 F.

Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Simpson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-04-05T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 128 So. 2d 420

Snippet: Insurance Law and Practice, § 4185, at p. 722 (1942). [7] 53 Am.Jur., Trial, § 271; 22 Appleman, Insurance Law

Seabreeze Industries, Inc. v. Phily

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1960-02-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 118 So. 2d 54

Snippet: E. 45th Street in the City of Fort Lauderdale at 7:53 a. m., seven min■utes before he was to report for

Peninsula Terminal Co. v. Zaring, Et Ux.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-12-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 151 So. 514, 113 Fla. 87, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1679

Snippet: Company, repay to the contracting parties the sum of $7,053.34 representing moneys advanced to the defendant