Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 15
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-12-12T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: 1529 Lower Tribunal No. 07-58-A-P _______________
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-01-04T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 211 So. 3d 221, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 50
Snippet: a $25 million punitive damages award that bore a 7.58 to 1 ratio to the $3.3 million compensatory damages
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-12-30T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 181 So. 3d 1260, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19431, 2015 WL 9487590
Snippet: Hillsborough County Jail until February 15, 2005, at 7:58 p.m., when the State initiated commitment proceedings
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-11-04T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 178 So. 3d 487, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16577
Snippet: .3d 1060, 1071-72 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (approving a 7.58 to 1 ratio); Owens-Corning Fiberglas v. Ballard,
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-08-28T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 146 So. 3d 1143, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 519, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 2581, 2014 WL 4257733
Snippet: of technology resulted in a cost per customer of $7.58; FPL’s cost per customer for billing expenses is
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-09-04T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 123 So. 3d 67, 2013 WL 4734565, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14155
Snippet: punitive to compensatory damages award ratio of 7.58 to 1); Campbell, 538 U.S. at 424-25, 123 S.Ct. 1513…million punitive damages award even with a ratio of 7.58 to 1 to compensatory damages in the amount of $3.3
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-06-22T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 126 So. 3d 1155, 2012 WL 2361748, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10122
Snippet: affirmed a punitive-to-compensatory damages ratio of 7.58 to 1: We find the $25 million award here is not …to mitigate RJR’s future liability. Finally, the 7.58 to 1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages does
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-02-14T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 90 So. 3d 307
Snippet: damages. See Liggett Group, 60 So.3d at 1078. . The 7.58 to 1 ratio referenced in Martin was based on the
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-12-14T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 53 So. 3d 1060, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19008, 2010 WL 5074839
Snippet: fact. The punitive-to-compensatory ratio here is 7.58 to 1. Yet the trial court denied RJR's motion…mitigate RJR's future liability. Finally, the 7.58 to 1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages does
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2001-07-12T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 789 So. 2d 982
Snippet: at 5:35 p.m.; (2) 12/15/96, not at residence at 7:58 a.m.; (3) 12/22/96, not at residence at 5:25 p.m
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-02-27T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 780 So. 2d 949
Snippet: the money was used in a drug transaction. See $7,058.84 in U.S. Currency v. State, 30 S.W.3d 580, 588… to believe that the money was contraband. See $7,058.84 in U.S. Currency, 30 S.W.3d at 588. The state
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-07-11T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 658 So. 2d 134, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7344, 1995 WL 405278
Snippet: Co., 439 U.S. 96, 102 n. 7 [99 S.Ct. 403, 408 n. 7, 58 L.Ed.2d 361] (1978); and Fireside Nissan, Inc. v
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1960-05-26T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 120 So. 2d 832, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2573
Snippet: HORTON, C. J.,' and PEARSON, J., concur. . § 7(58.05, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. provides: “A railroad company
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-10-17T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 106 So. 2d 577
Snippet: That’s all the questions. “ (The jury retired at 7:58.) “(The jury returned at 8:02.) “The Court: I find
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1922-01-23T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 83 Fla. 66, 90 So. 821
Snippet: Lauderdale Mercantile Company Five Hundred Thirty-seven, 58/100 Dollars at The Fort Lauderdale State Bank,