Florida Statute 7.61 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.61

7.61 Suwannee County.—The boundary lines of Suwannee County are as follows: Beginning in the thread of the Suwannee River where the section line dividing sections two and three in township two south, of range fifteen east, crosses said river; thence south on said section line across townships two, three, four and five in range fifteen east, to section line dividing sections two and eleven in township six in said range; thence on said section line due east to range line dividing ranges fifteen and sixteen; thence south to Ichetucknee Spring; thence down the thread of the Ichetucknee River to the Santa Fe River to its junction with Suwannee River; thence up the thread of said river to the point of beginning.

History.—s. 2, ch. 895, 1858; s. 1, ch. 1048, 1859; s. 1, ch. 1391, 1863; s. 1, ch. 3948, 1889; RS 28; GS 26; RGS 28; CGL 30.

F.S. 7.61 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.61 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.61

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.61

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.61.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.61

Total Results: 13

KENZIE SADLAK v. FRANK TRUJILLO

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-04-13

Snippet: section 7 61.30, Florida Statutes, and include the findings in

Moore v. Moore

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-02-06

Citation: 157 So. 3d 435, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1577, 2015 WL 484050

Snippet: conclude that construed together, sections 61.046(7), 61.30(2)(a)(3), 61.08(2)(g), 61.30(6), and 61.16(1)

McDonald v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-05-17

Citation: 957 So. 2d 605, 2007 WL 1437448

Snippet: (construing sections of chapter 61sections 61.046(7), 61.30(2)(a)(3), 61.08(2)(g), 61.30(6), and 61.16(1)

Zold v. Zold

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-09-15

Citation: 911 So. 2d 1222, 2005 WL 2230403

Snippet: conclude that construed together, sections 61.046(7), 61.30(2)(a)(3), 61.08(2)(g), 61.30(6), and 61.16(1)

Tarnawski v. Tarnawski

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-07-30

Citation: 851 So. 2d 239, 2003 WL 21749401

Snippet: earned before he voluntarily left his employment was $7.61 per hour. 636 So.2d at 814-15. In this case, the

Food Lion v. Jackson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-06-26

Citation: 712 So. 2d 800, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7584, 1998 WL 335788

Snippet: new trial on damages nor a final judgment for $7,061.80, representing the jury verdict plus the additur

Stodtko v. Stodtko

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-05-03

Citation: 636 So. 2d 814, 1994 WL 162751

Snippet: construction worker who never earned more than $7.61 an hour in his line of work. He has since moved

Durocher v. Singletary

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-08-12

Citation: 623 So. 2d 482, 1993 WL 314984

Snippet: Wolff, 443 U.S. 1306, 1312-13, 100 S.Ct. 3, 6-7, 61 L.Ed.2d 885 (1979). [6] A similar rule is in effect

United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Crews

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-03-10

Citation: 614 So. 2d 1213, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2449, 1993 WL 64599

Snippet: certain documents in USAA's claim file (numbered 7-61). We grant the petition for writ of certiorari.

Southpointe Pharmacy v. DHRS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-03-11

Citation: 596 So. 2d 106

Snippet: instead, found that the relevant rule, Rule 10C-7.061(4)(b), Florida Administrative Code, authorized the

Citrus Central v. Parker

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-12-21

Citation: 423 So. 2d 610

Snippet: various rates of pay ranging from $7.09 per hour to $7.61 per hour. In April of 1981 Parker was laid off.

UNITED FACULTY OF FLORIDA, ETC. v. Bd. of Regents

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-01-09

Citation: 365 So. 2d 1073, 100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2543

Snippet: Using the September 1 date agreed to provided a 7.61% average salary increase without additional dollar

City of Miami v. Florida Public Service Commission

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-07-16

Citation: 226 So. 2d 217, 80 P.U.R.3d 156, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2161

Snippet: rate of 7.61 per cent and additional revenue would be necessary to bring the earnings up to 7.61 per cent