Florida Statute 8.0001 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 8
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 8.0001

8.0001 Definitions.—In accordance with s. 8(a), Art. X of the State Constitution, the United States Decennial Census of 2020 is the official census of the state for the purposes of congressional redistricting.

(1) The following delineation of congressional districts employs areas included within official county, tract, block groups, and block boundary descriptions used by the United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, in compiling the United States Decennial Census of 2020 in this state. The populations within these census geographic units are the population figures reported in the counts of the United States Decennial Census of 2020 provided to the state in accordance with Pub. L. No. 94-171.

(2) As used in this chapter, the term:

(a) “Block” describes the smallest geographic unit for which population was tabulated in the 2020 decennial census. Blocks are nested within tracts and within block groups. A block is identified by a three-character number that is unique within a block group.

(b) “Block equivalency file” describes a list of all blocks within the state and the congressional district number designated for each block. Blocks are listed by a 15-character number that combines the five-character county-level Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) code, the six-character tract number with leading zeros and an implied decimal, the single-character block group number, and the three-character block number.

(c) “Block group” describes a cluster of blocks within the same census tract. Block groups are nested within tracts and are uniquely identified by a single-character number with a valid range of 0 through 9.

(d) “County” describes a legal governmental subdivision of the state. Boundaries of counties described in this chapter reflect those boundaries in effect as of January 1, 2020.

(e) “Geographical information systems map” describes an electronic map that represents the boundaries of the congressional districts of the state in a commonly accepted and readable format.

(f) “Tract” describes a relatively permanent statistical subdivision of a county. Tracts are nested within counties and are uniquely identified by an up-to-four-character number and a two-digit suffix.

History.—s. 1, ch. 96-192; s. 1, ch. 2002-12; s. 1, ch. 2003-1; s. 1, ch. 2012-2; s. 1, ch. 2022-265; s. 1, ch. 2023-8.

F.S. 8.0001 on Google Scholar

F.S. 8.0001 on CourtListener

Amendments to 8.0001

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 8.0001

Total Results: 133

John H. Harland Company, Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-Appellee

711 F.2d 966, 219 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 515, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25133

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 8, 1983 | Docket: 956466

Cited 258 times | Published

(3d Cir.1980); 1 J.T. McCarthy, supra, § 8.1, at 230-31. Most trade dress infringement actions

Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Osting-Schwinn

613 F.3d 1079, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16746, 2010 WL 3056606

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 2010 | Docket: 89933

Cited 214 times | Published

the other Names assume. Lloyd's Act, 1982, c. 14 § 8(1). Names purchase insurance through underwriting

Coralia Patricia Garcia v. Attorney General of the United States, Immigration and Naturalization Service

329 F.3d 1217, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8723, 2003 WL 21027214

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 13, 2003 | Docket: 54345

Cited 85 times | Published

suitable for the AWO procedure. Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 8.1(a)(7), a single member of the BIA may affirm, without

Jones v. State

998 So. 2d 573, 2008 WL 5333274

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2008 | Docket: 1340553

Cited 80 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 8.1, at 148 (2007 ed.) ("[T]he aggrieved party must

Peter Letterese & Associates, Inc. v. World Institute of Scientology Enterprises, International

533 F.3d 1287, 87 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1563, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14496, 2008 WL 2652291

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 8, 2008 | Docket: 1240267

Cited 48 times | Published

Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, 8-24, § 8.01[G] (2002) ("[F]or similarity to be *1307 substantial

Allan C. Aldridge v. Lily-Tulip, Inc. Salary Retirement Plan Benefits Committee

953 F.2d 587

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 9, 1992 | Docket: 650979

Cited 38 times | Published

provision, along with identical language in Section 8.1 of the Plan, obligates Lily to fund the Plan

Bank of New York v. Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc. (In Re Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc.)

456 F.3d 1291, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17990, 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 224

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 18, 2006 | Docket: 12794

Cited 33 times | Published

Moneys deposited with the Trustee pursuant to Section 8.01 [which dealt with the satisfaction and discharge

Rhodes v. State

986 So. 2d 501, 2008 WL 657532

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2008 | Docket: 1727990

Cited 31 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 8.1, at 148 (2007 ed.) ("The aggrieved party must obtain

Bland v. Health Care and Retirement Corp.

927 So. 2d 252, 2006 WL 1235910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2006 | Docket: 2041918

Cited 26 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 8.1, at 144 (2006 ed.). Despite the absence of a specific

Adams v. Wright

403 So. 2d 391

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1981 | Docket: 1251029

Cited 26 times | Published

Proc. 59(a) (1971) (remittitur & additur); Va.Code § 8.01-383.1 (1977) (Civ.Remedies & Proc., remittitur

Blank v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation

926 F.2d 1090, 13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2007, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4308

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 19, 1991 | Docket: 829653

Cited 24 times | Published

structured as a sale of an ongoing business. Under section 8.01 of the purchase and sale agreement, Buffalo

National Labor Relations Board v. Triple a Fire Protection, Inc., Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

136 F.3d 727, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2577, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 3660

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 3, 1998 | Docket: 665067

Cited 19 times | Published

concerning the ability of employers to repudiate section 8(1) agreements. Pappas, 106 F.3d

Labmd, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n

894 F.3d 1221

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 6, 2018 | Docket: 65658287

Cited 17 times | Published

also Stephanie W. Kanwit, Federal Trade Commission § 8:1 (2017) (noting that the Commission "has held over

Keech v. Yousef

815 So. 2d 718, 2002 WL 726632

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2002 | Docket: 1681571

Cited 17 times | Published

Phillip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate *720 Practice, § 8.1, at 113 (2001-2002). The failure to preserve an

Chemical Bank v. First Trust of New York, Nat'l. Ass'n (In Re Southeast Banking Corp.)

188 B.R. 452, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 136, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1386, 27 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 821

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Aug 8, 1995 | Docket: 2517325

Cited 16 times | Published

borrowed" as used in the foregoing sentence and in Section 8.01 shall mean any obligation of the Company (and

State Ex Rel. Glynn v. McNayr

133 So. 2d 312

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1961 | Docket: 2517564

Cited 16 times | Published

Article V, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. By Section 8.01 of the Dade County Home Rule Charter the office

Jerry Cochran, Geraldine Cochran v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours, Ren Plastics, Inc., Ciba-Geigy Corporation, American Abrasive Metals Co., Devoe & Raynolds Co., Hoechst Celanese Corporation, Grow Group, Inc., Palmer International, Inc., Jerry Cochran, Geraldine Cochran v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours, Ren Plastics, Inc., Ciba-Geigy Corporation, American Abrasive Metals Co., Devoe & Raynolds Co., Hoechst Celanese Corporation, Grow Group, Inc., Palmer International, Inc.

933 F.2d 1533, 1992 A.M.C. 2599, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 12549

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 1991 | Docket: 1003304

Cited 15 times | Published

Virginia Supreme Court opinion questions whether section 8.01-249(4) should apply retroactively. Roller v

Function Junction, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach

705 F. Supp. 544, 1987 WL 49622

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1988 | Docket: 1806357

Cited 15 times | Published

derives from the Life Safety Code, chapter 8, section 8-1.3, enacted as a Daytona Beach ordinance, which

Palmer v. State

467 So. 2d 1063, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1045

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1985 | Docket: 1274970

Cited 15 times | Published

was contraband); W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.1 n. 75.2 (Supp. 1985). This is true even though the

Picchi v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, NA

521 So. 2d 1090, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 178, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 347, 1988 WL 21001

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1988 | Docket: 1348104

Cited 14 times | Published

unethical. Trawick's Florida Practice and Procedure, § 8-1, Definitions (1985) (footnotes omitted, emphasis

US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. N. Am. Steel Corp.

335 So. 2d 18, 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1976 | Docket: 2517364

Cited 13 times | Published

608, White and Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 8-1, states: "At the outset one should understand the

Behm v. Saeli

560 So. 2d 431, 1990 WL 62012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1990 | Docket: 1739582

Cited 12 times | Published

enjoy any easement appurtenant thereto. Id. at section 8.01. See also 3 R. Powell, "The Law of Real Property"

Jupiter Wreck, Inc. v. the Unidentified, Wrecked & Abandoned Sailing Vessel

691 F. Supp. 1377, 1988 A.M.C. 2705, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7271, 1988 WL 73386

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1988 | Docket: 1331292

Cited 12 times | Published

also G. Gilmore & C. Black, The Law of Admiralty § 8-1 (1975). The law of salvage can be "traced to the

Jackson v. Rupp

228 So. 2d 916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1969 | Docket: 2511034

Cited 11 times | Published

have the right of burial. 25A C.J.S. Dead Bodies § 8(1); 22 Am.Jur.2d, Dead Bodies, §§ 31, 32, 42 & 43;

City of Coral Gables v. Puiggros

376 So. 2d 281, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16025

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1979 | Docket: 1411666

Cited 10 times | Published

different determination as to the applicability of § 8.01, see Godson v. Town of Surfside, 150 Fla. 614,

Tovar v. U.S. Attorney General

646 F.3d 1300, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14698, 2011 WL 2792470

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 19, 2011 | Docket: 1888240

Cited 9 times | Published

80-81. Resolving the question, the BIA compared § 8(1) of the CSPA to § 3 of the CSPA and concluded that

3V Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc. (In Re Tousa, Inc.)

444 B.R. 613, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14019, 2011 WL 522008

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2011 | Docket: 2061629

Cited 9 times | Published

the Subsidiary Borrowers. EVENTS OF DEFAULT Section 8.1 Events of Default Each of the following events

State v. Famiglietti

817 So. 2d 901, 2002 WL 879409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2002 | Docket: 1430195

Cited 9 times | Published

to the best interest of justice. For example, section 8.01-400.2 of the Code of Virginia provides for privileged

Smith v. Knight

679 So. 2d 359, 1996 WL 525499

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1996 | Docket: 1666139

Cited 9 times | Published

subpoena. Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure, § 8-1 (1995); see, e.g., Bailey v. Crum, 120 Fla. 36,

School Board of Broward County v. Pierce Goodwin Alexander & Linville

137 So. 3d 1059, 2014 WL 1031461, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2014 | Docket: 60240150

Cited 8 times | Published

applicable standard of care was governed by section 8.1.1., which provides: To the fullest permitted

Barnett v. Destiny Owners Ass'n, Inc.

856 So. 2d 1090, 2003 WL 22358740

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2003 | Docket: 1708610

Cited 8 times | Published

the amendment, the trial court determined that section 8.1(b) of the Association's Declaration of Easements

In Re Wheat

149 B.R. 1003, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 345, 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2104

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Dec 3, 1992 | Docket: 1810520

Cited 7 times | Published

concedes that this argument is without merit. [3] Section 8.01 of the Debtor's Plan provides that earliest

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,131 Harold C. Kramer and Joan W. Kramer, His Wife v. Piper Aircraft Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation

868 F.2d 1538, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4562, 1989 WL 23787

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 5, 1989 | Docket: 498232

Cited 7 times | Published

limitations for personal injury actions, Va.Code § 8.01-243, barred *1540 the Kramers’ suit

State v. Gonzalez

467 So. 2d 723, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 845

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1985 | Docket: 1274808

Cited 7 times | Published

of his records. 2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.1, at 633-35 (1978), and authorities collected. It

World Capita Communications, Inc. v. Island Capital Management, LLC (In Re Skyway Communications Holding Corp.)

389 B.R. 801, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 394, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 1889, 2008 WL 2553308

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2008 | Docket: 1482647

Cited 6 times | Published

purchase price in the amount of $150,000.00. (Plan, § 8.1). The purchase price for the stock was to be transferred

Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians

803 F. Supp. 401, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13522, 1992 WL 213878

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1992 | Docket: 1954236

Cited 6 times | Published

a gaming enterprise. Ordinance No. 89-09-91, Section 8.1(a). The ordinance also provides an alternative

Picker International, Inc. v. Daniel W. Parten, Individually and D/B/A Ppx Imaging John Parten, D/B/A Ppx Imaging

935 F.2d 257, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14393, 1991 WL 110214

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 11, 1991 | Docket: 553715

Cited 6 times | Published

1087 (11th Cir.1990). See Ala.Code § 8-1-1(a) (1984) (“Every contract by which anyone is

Flagship Marine Services, Inc. v. Belcher Towing Co.

761 F. Supp. 792, 1992 A.M.C. 181, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5496, 1991 WL 62473

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1991 | Docket: 1273756

Cited 6 times | Published

Black, The Law of Admiralty, (2d ed. 1975), Section 8-1. At sea the person who saves property receives

Engle Irvin v. Griffin Corporation

808 F.2d 802

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 6, 1987 | Docket: 398324

Cited 6 times | Published

reformation of the release, pursuant to Code of 1975, Section 8-1-2, to express the true intention of the parties

State Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers v. Cooksey

3 So. 2d 502, 147 Fla. 337

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1941 | Docket: 3270590

Cited 6 times | Published

and (f) of paragraph 2 of Section 8 (1) of the Act. Paragraph 2 of Section 8 (1) inter alia, provides: "(2)

Estate of Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc.

609 F. Supp. 2d 1235, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56446, 2009 WL 975570

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2009 | Docket: 231129

Cited 5 times | Published

the Commonwealth of Virginia. See Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-443 (2009) (retaining the common law rule). Likewise

United States v. Myers

591 F. Supp. 2d 1312, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99384, 2008 WL 5156671

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2008 | Docket: 2448133

Cited 5 times | Published

the power vested in Congress by Article 1, section 8. 1. The Regulated Activity By its terms § 2250

Fla. Psc v. Pruitt, Humphress

587 So. 2d 561, 1991 WL 199928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1991 | Docket: 1405868

Cited 5 times | Published

generally Trawick's Florida Practice and Procedure, § 8-1, Definitions (1990). However, we urge the PSC, for

Wayne H. Coloney Co. v. US Dept. of Air Force

89 B.R. 924, 35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,543, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 1271

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1988 | Docket: 1385920

Cited 5 times | Published

not specifically identified in Exhibit A of Section 8.01 above. Exhibit "A" to the Plan was an extensive

Biscayne Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

572 F. Supp. 997, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13919

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1983 | Docket: 2158469

Cited 5 times | Published

conditions of the Agreement, as revised, e.g. Section 8.1, which the staff understands are not negotiable

Cuyahoga Wrecking Corp. v. Mastres

368 So. 2d 380

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1979 | Docket: 1723144

Cited 5 times | Published

Florida Building Code, adopted in Dade County by Section 8-1 of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County, to be

Lund v. Mathas

145 So. 2d 871

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1962 | Docket: 1286584

Cited 5 times | Published

Secretary of State, to have the Florida Statute, Section 8.01, F.S.A., the Congressional Reapportionment Act

BDO Seidman v. BANCO ESPIRITO SANTO INTERNATIONAL, LTD.

998 So. 2d 1, 2008 WL 1734148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2008 | Docket: 1701618

Cited 4 times | Published

006 (Vernon 2003) ($25 million cap); Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-676.1 (2005) ($25 million cap); W. Va.Code § 58-5-14

Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.

188 F.R.D. 667, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13574, 1999 WL 691903

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1999 | Docket: 66010438

Cited 4 times | Published

be decided by the fact finder. See Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-382 (“In any action at law or suit in equity, the

Oakwood Plaza, LP v. DOC OPTICS

708 So. 2d 959, 1998 WL 64080

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1998 | Docket: 542126

Cited 4 times | Published

costs under both a general lease provision, section 8.1, which allowed the landlord *960 "expenses (including

Pasco County v. QUAIL HOLLOW PROPERTIES

693 So. 2d 82, 1997 WL 216208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1997 | Docket: 1524377

Cited 4 times | Published

approval Trawick's Florida Practice & Procedure § 8-1, Definitions (1985)). Notices of appearance for

Dominguez v. State

616 So. 2d 506, 1993 WL 72297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1993 | Docket: 1385416

Cited 4 times | Published

found. See 3 Wayne R. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 8.1(c), at 165 (2d ed. 1987). After the consent was

State v. Abrams

548 So. 2d 820, 1989 WL 102538

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1989 | Docket: 1333414

Cited 4 times | Published

conclusion.[61] 3 W.R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.1(c) (2d ed. 1987). The cases cited in footnote 60

Irvin v. Griffin Corp.

808 F.2d 802

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 26, 1987 | Docket: 66222351

Cited 4 times | Published

general release “for value” within the meaning of section 8-1-2 of the Alabama Code. For reasons discussed

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,154 Harold C. Kramer and Joan W. Kramer, His Wife v. Piper Aircraft Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation

801 F.2d 1279, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32259

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 15, 1986 | Docket: 965361

Cited 4 times | Published

date on which the cause of action accrues. Va.Code § 8.01-243; Tyler v. R.R. Street & Co., 322

Unnamed but Identifiable Master & Crew of That Certain United States Documented Vessel Bearing Documentation No. 567135 v. Certain Unnamed Motor Vessel Bearing Florida Registration No. F15607

592 F. Supp. 1191, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24050

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1984 | Docket: 1396486

Cited 4 times | Published

Gilmore & Black, The Law of Admiralty, (2d ed. 1975), § 8-1. Thus, the fact that the Plaintiffs may have been

Christine C. Peterson v. Commissioner of IRS

827 F.3d 968, 2016 WL 3648473

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 8, 2016 | Docket: 4109119

Cited 3 times | Published

Family Pro*979gram art. VIII, § 8.1; Futures Program art. VIII, § 8.1. Effective December 1, 2008, Mary

Roger E. Freilich, D.M.D., P.A. v. Shochet

96 So. 3d 1135, 2012 WL 3964986, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2012 | Docket: 60311461

Cited 3 times | Published

legal fees. . The agreement further provided in section 8.1 that “all disputes, claims and controversies”

Canida v. Canida

751 So. 2d 647, 1999 WL 1241948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1999 | Docket: 1712566

Cited 3 times | Published

Codified Laws (1998); § 37-10-101, Tenn. Code (1998); § 8.01-43-44, Va.Code (1998); § 4.24.190, Wash. Rev.Code

Prime Motor Inns, Inc. v. First Fidelity Bank N.A. New Jersey (In Re Prime Motor Inns, Inc.)

123 B.R. 104, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2580

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 18, 1990 | Docket: 1495997

Cited 3 times | Published

there shall occur an `Event of Default' under . . . § 8.1(c) of the Loan Agreement [between the Authority

Blank v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

758 F. Supp. 697, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18957, 1991 WL 24898

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1990 | Docket: 1385320

Cited 3 times | Published

Steel and Buffalo Tank Corporation. Article 8, section 8.01(f) of the sale agreement directed Bethlehem

State v. Cross

535 So. 2d 282, 1988 WL 4023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1988 | Docket: 1306017

Cited 3 times | Published

of property... ." W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.1(c) (1987). See also Luxenburg v. State, 384 So.2d

Ferrer v. State

113 So. 3d 860, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9211, 2012 WL 2052775

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2012 | Docket: 60231623

Cited 2 times | Published

(1980); see also 4 Wayne R. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 8.1(c), at 32 (4th ed. 2004) (“[Cjonsent should be construed

Mead v. United States (In Re Mead)

374 B.R. 296, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 549, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2532, 2007 WL 2137795

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2007 | Docket: 1638121

Cited 2 times | Published

recorded do not evidence compliance with Va.Code § 8.01-465.3.[14] Plaintiff asserts that each defendant

In Re Apache Products Co.

293 B.R. 545, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 126, 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 531, 2003 WL 21289973

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 19, 2003 | Docket: 1860506

Cited 2 times | Published

Debtor points out that the Lease Agreement, section 8.1, "Default" does not reference any other agreement

Stivers v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

777 So. 2d 1023, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16890, 2000 WL 1872986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2000 | Docket: 462078

Cited 2 times | Published

general public health or safety"); Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-420.01 (Michie Supp.2000) (dealing with protective

Goodman v. Kendall Gate-Investco., Inc.

395 So. 2d 240, 1981 CCH OSHD 25,236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1981 | Docket: 1692970

Cited 2 times | Published

it is plaintiff's position that since: (1) Section 8-1 of the Metropolitan Dade County Code has, by

Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Medica Healthcare Plans, Inc.

376 F. Supp. 3d 1298

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2019 | Docket: 64324097

Cited 1 times | Published

written document signed by all the parties. (DE# 9-2, § 8.1) (emphasis added). Baptist Hospitals' interpretation

Sean Patrick Mahoney v. Virginia Colby Mahoney

251 So. 3d 977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2018 | Docket: 7387545

Cited 1 times | Published

Adoption, Paternity, and Other Family Practice, § 8-1 (Fla. Bar CLE 12th ed. 2017) (citations omitted)

Dale Lee Norman v. State of Florida

215 So. 3d 18, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 239, 2017 WL 823613, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 448

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2017 | Docket: 4612631

Cited 1 times | Published

United States Constitution, nor article I, section 8, 1. As of January 31, 2017, the State had

Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-Dade

208 So. 3d 724, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2016 | Docket: 4423581

Cited 1 times | Published

amendment is presently codified in Section 8.01 of the Charter. Section 8.01, titled Initiative, Referendum

Chapman v. DePuy Orthopedics, Inc.

760 F. Supp. 2d 1310, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4510, 2011 WL 149329

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2011 | Docket: 2338265

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations bars Chapman's action.[4] Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-243(A). Under Virginia law, the cause of action

Mazon v. Tardif

387 B.R. 641, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34618, 2008 WL 1897596

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2008 | Docket: 1703447

Cited 1 times | Published

the developer to designated unit owners. (Id. at § 8.1.) The exclusive right to use a limited common element

Cheshire v. State

969 So. 2d 458, 2007 WL 3375001

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2007 | Docket: 1725923

Cited 1 times | Published

See Phillip J. Padovano, Fla. Appellate Practice § 8.1 (2007 ed.) ("[T]he aggrieved party must obtain an

Lawler v. Kulik (In Re Kulik)

400 B.R. 313, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 611, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4203, 2007 WL 4322442

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2007 | Docket: 1388692

Cited 1 times | Published

the Commonwealth of Virginia pursuant *320 to Section 8.01-329 of the Code of Virginia.[22] The statutory

In Re Celotex Corp.

377 B.R. 345, 2006 WL 4847510

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2006 | Docket: 1103610

Cited 1 times | Published

2(e)(ii) of the Trust Agreement, as referenced in § 8.1 quoted above, provides that the "Trustees shall

Johnston v. Meredith

840 So. 2d 315, 2003 WL 289514

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2003 | Docket: 1748364

Cited 1 times | Published

like manner as if it were incorporated." Va.Code § 8.01-15.

Johnson v. Mortham

926 F. Supp. 1540, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7199, 1996 WL 226904

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: May 24, 1996 | Docket: 2167564

Cited 1 times | Published

The legislation provides in pertinent part: Section 8. (1) The qualifying period in 1996 for persons seeking

Cochran v. E.I. duPont de Nemours

933 F.2d 1533, 1991 WL 91098

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 1991 | Docket: 66264486

Cited 1 times | Published

the person or his agent by a physician. Va.Code § 8.01-249(4) (1985). Using this provision, Cochran argues

Gillis v. United States

722 F. Supp. 713, 1989 WL 113229

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1989 | Docket: 241000

Cited 1 times | Published

practice or specialty in [Virginia]." Va. Code Ann. § 8-01-581.20. II. No Breach of Duty Some facts are not

Meristem Valley Nursery, Inc. v. METRO. DADE COUNTY

428 So. 2d 726, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18863

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1983 | Docket: 1375305

Cited 1 times | Published

certificate of use and occupancy in violation of Section 8-1 and Section 33-8 of the Code of Metropolitan

Gong v. Kirk

278 F. Supp. 133, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7403

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1967 | Docket: 66044929

Cited 1 times | Published

The plaintiffs seek a declaration that Fla.Stat. § 8.01, F.S.A., is unconstitutional,' an injunction against

Luis Pedraza v. the City of Miramar, Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2025 | Docket: 69630529

Published

follows: • City of Miramar Code of Ordinances section 8-1 provides: “All general laws of the state

Byrd, The Florida Senate v. Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute, Inc., Equal Ground Education Fund, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2023 | Docket: 68057214

Published

compiling the” 2020 census numbers for the State. § 8.0001(1), Fla. Stat. (2022). 7 Official electronic maps

Alberta S. Ellison v. Randy Willoughby

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2023 | Docket: 67938299

Published

see also 2 Philip J. Padovano, Fla. App. Prac. § 8:1 (2023 ed.) (“A legal argument must be raised initially

SEVEN KINGS HOLDINGS, INC. v. MARINA GRANDE RIVIERA BEACH CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2023 | Docket: 67515878

Published

Jr., The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land § 8.01 (1988)). Because an easement appurtenant attaches

SEVEN KINGS HOLDINGS, INC. v. MARINA GRANDE RIVIERA BEACH CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2023 | Docket: 67515878

Published

Jr., The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land § 8.01 (1988)). Because an easement appurtenant attaches

GSE Consulting, Inc. v. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 8, 2023 | Docket: 66797212

Published

Intel- lectual Property.” Similarly, Section 8.1 of the Plan provides that each party

ALDO DISORBO v. AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2023 | Docket: 66698563

Published

alternatively determined to be a distribution, section 8.1 (governing how distributions of net cash flow

12550 BISCAYNE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. NRD INVESTMENTS, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2021 | Docket: 60858295

Published

common 7 See also, § 8:1. In general, 1 Law of Condominium Operations § 8:1: In order to

Richard Lee Brown v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 14, 2021 | Docket: 60056613

Published

the termination notice, then under Virginia Code § 8.01-126, Brown would provide the General District

PERFORMANCE AIR MECHANICAL, INC. v. MILLER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2020 | Docket: 17314102

Published

the Virginia Uniform Arbitration Act, Va. Code § 8.01-581.01 et seq., is similar to the Federal Arbitration

LABMD, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

891 F.3d 1286

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 6, 2018 | Docket: 7068418

Published

Kanwit, Federal Trade Commission § 8:1 (2017) (noting that the Commission "has held over

Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-Dade

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2016 | Docket: 4423920

Published

amendment is presently codified in Section 8.01 of the Charter. Section 8.01, titled Initiative, Referendum

2D14-4561 / Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP. v. Colina

202 So. 3d 94, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2016 | Docket: 4422989

Published

injunction prohibiting Dr. Colina from violating Section 8.1 of the Partner Professional Services Agreement

Christine C. Peterson v. Commissioner of IRS

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 24, 2016 | Docket: 3066692

Published

period this Agreement is in effect. NSD Agreement § 8.1, 8.2, 8.10 (emphasis added). NSDs generally no longer

& SC13-1959 Lucious Boyd v. State of Florida & Lucious Boyd v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

200 So. 3d 685

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2015 | Docket: 3022134

Published

by service of disqualified juror); Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-352(B) (2014) (new trial will not be granted unless

Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP v. Ramon E. Colina, M.D.

192 So. 3d 491, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16611, 2015 WL 6874913

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2015 | Docket: 3010568

Published

made generally available to the public. Section 8.1 of the Partner Professional Services Agreement

Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP v. Ramon E. Colina, M.D.

170 So. 3d 946, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11556, 2015 WL 4605677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2015 | Docket: 2680244

Published

made generally available to the public. Section 8.1 of the Partner Professional Services Agreement

Joe Taylor v. City of Gadsden

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 16, 2014 | Docket: 1272931

Published

17 1945 Ala. Acts 734, 744 § 8(1)(b). 18 1965 Ala. Acts 468, 476

Santizo-Perez v. Genaro's Corp.

138 So. 3d 1148, 2014 WL 2041817, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7596

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2014 | Docket: 60240510

Published

1 Lex K. Larson, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation § 8.01 (rev. ed. 2013). . This case presents a classic

In re Sagamore Partners, Ltd.

512 B.R. 296, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24499, 2014 WL 794333

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2014 | Docket: 65516811

Published

written notice or invoice therefor; Id. at 84, § 8.1(a)(i). Any notice to Saga-more “required or permitted”

Hillsborough County School Board v. Kubik

110 So. 3d 928, 2013 WL 614183, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2777

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2013 | Docket: 60230522

Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 8.1 (2013 ed.) (“A legal argument must be raised initially

Property Damage Advisory Committee v. Celotex Asbestos Settlement Trust (In re Celotex Corp.)

497 F. App'x 896

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 16, 2012 | Docket: 65710685

Published

of the Committee under the Trust Agreement. Section 8.1, which is entitled, “Formation; Duties,” identifies

Jackson v. State

93 So. 3d 395, 2012 WL 2470128, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10583

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2012 | Docket: 60310568

Published

and Philip J. Padovano, Flonda Appellate Practice § 8.1, at 148 (2007 ed.))). On remand, if Jackson wishes

Israel Medina Tovar v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 19, 2011 | Docket: 2906110

Published

80–81. Resolving the question, the BIA compared § 8(1) of the CSPA to § 3 of the CSPA and concluded that

A.L.T. v. State

63 So. 3d 855, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2011 | Docket: 60301184

Published

suspect?” 4 Wayne R. LaFave, SEARCH and SeizuRE § 8.1(c) (4th ed. 2010) (internal footnotes omitted).

Alt v. State

63 So. 3d 855, 2011 WL 2200793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2011 | Docket: 2364346

Published

suspect?" 4 WAYNE R. LAFAVE, SEARCH AND SEIZURE § 8.1(c) (4th ed. 2010) (internal footnotes omitted).

Avisena, Inc. v. Santalo

65 So. 3d 14, 32 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 439, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6355, 2011 WL 2028625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2011 | Docket: 60301678

Published

requirement. I The Agreement First, I think that Section 8.1 of the agreement unambiguously so provides. It

Rich Capitol, LLC v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (In Re Rich Capitol, LLC)

436 B.R. 224

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Sep 15, 2010 | Docket: 2073087

Published

Mortgage addresses various remedial actions. Section 8.1 of the Mortgage permits acceleration of the debt

Underwriters of Lloyd's v. Carol Osting-Schwinn

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 2010 | Docket: 2907004

Published

the other Names assume. Lloyd’s Act, 1982, c. 14 § 8(1). Names purchase insurance through underwriting

World Capita Communications, Inc. v. Island Capital Management, LLC (In Re Skyway Communications Holding Corp.)

415 B.R. 859, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 59, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2924, 2009 WL 3018090

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 18, 2009 | Docket: 1084407

Published

as the Reorganized Debtor." (Main Case Doc. 420, § 8.1). Finally, § 8.2 of the Plan, entitled "Continued

Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

377 B.R. 345, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 4423

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2006 | Docket: 65783323

Published

2(e)(ii) of the Trust Agreement, as referenced in § 8.1 quoted above, provides that the “Trustees shall

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 10, 2004 | Docket: 3256489

Published

2000-477, Laws of Fla. 2 Section 3, supra. 3 Section 8(1), supra. 4 Chapter 97-256, Laws of Fla. 5 See

Florida Police Benevolent Ass'n v. State

818 So. 2d 584, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4788, 2002 WL 553399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2002 | Docket: 64815703

Published

action. P.B.A. argued in the complaint that Section 8.1.A(1) of the 2000-2001 General *586Appropriation

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851, 3.852 & 3.993

772 So. 2d 488, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 285, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 774, 2000 WL 381496

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2000 | Docket: 64802041

Published

the dual-track scheme followed by Virginia. Section 8.01-654.1, Code of Virginia, provides in pertinent

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 10, 1998 | Docket: 3255424

Published

Section 7(3)(a), Ch. 96-519, Laws of Fla. 6 Section 8(1), Ch. 96-519, Laws of Fla. 7 Section 7(3)(e)

Shipston Associates v. Esselte Pendaflex Corp.

74 F.3d 1126, 1996 WL 30573

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 12, 1996 | Docket: 2034163

Published

for damages, costs, or attorneys’ fees because section 8.01(d) of the security deed shielded the Bank from

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 19, 1993 | Docket: 3257692

Published

audit of the library district. Question Four Section 8(1), Ch. 85-376, Laws of Florida, authorizes the

Aldridge v. Lily-tulip, Inc. Salary Retirement Plan Benefits Committee

953 F.2d 587, 1992 WL 10832

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 12, 1992 | Docket: 66270256

Published

provision, along with identical language in Section 8.1 of the Plan, obligates Lily to fund the Plan

Blank v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

926 F.2d 1090, 1991 WL 25771

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 19, 1991 | Docket: 66260928

Published

structured as a sale of an ongoing business. Under section 8.01 of the purchase and sale agreement, Buffalo

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Cornutt

907 F.2d 1085

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 2, 1990 | Docket: 66255497

Published

209, 210 (Ala.1988) (citing cases). . Ala.Code § 8-1-1 (a). . Livingston v. Dobbs, 559 So.2d 569 (Ala

Robertson v. State

559 So. 2d 434, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2520, 1990 WL 43124

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1990 | Docket: 64649555

Published

nor sealed. See W.R. LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 8.1(c) (2nd ed.1987). The consensual search is circumscribed

Southeast Aluminum Supply Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County

540 So. 2d 241, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 779, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1982, 1989 WL 28446

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1989 | Docket: 64641171

Published

the South Florida Building Code, adopted by Section 8-1 of the Metropolitan Dade County Code, and (2)

Jones v. Preuit

822 F.2d 998

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 24, 1987 | Docket: 66227315

Published

faith in carrying out the sale (under Ala.Code § 8-1-100 which forbids arranged bidding) is unrelated

City Federal Savings Bank v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

657 F. Supp. 477, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2998

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1987 | Docket: 66170702

Published

law substantiate this position. See Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-184 (1986 Cum.Supp.) (Power to issue declaratory

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 27, 1978 | Docket: 3255428

Published

accept petitions filed by tenants pursuant to Section 8(1) of the Act. In light of the answer to question

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 20, 1977 | Docket: 3258098

Published

of the act (s. 83.780[1]). AS TO QUESTION 4: Section 8(1) of the act (s. 83.784[1]) provides for invoking

Worth v. Beal

310 So. 2d 778, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14080

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1975 | Docket: 64545570

Published

construction placed thereon by the court; but Section 8.01, according to the brief of appellee at pages

R.I.D.C. Industrial Development Fund v. Snyder

387 F. Supp. 466, 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1324, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14432

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1975 | Docket: 66102518

Published

rights of stockholders. See 9 Collier in Bankruptcy, § 8.01 at 155 (14th ed. 1940). . . . Thus, a Chapter X

City of Miami Beach v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance

239 So. 2d 272, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5775

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1970 | Docket: 64516537

Published

unincorporated areas of Dade County, Florida. See § 8-1, Code of Metropolitan Dade County. The trial court

Gong v. Bryant

230 F. Supp. 917, 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7008

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 11, 1964 | Docket: 66026717

Published

Congress, within the State of Florida, by virtue of Section 8.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. is unconstitutional

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Benedict Pineapple Co.

52 Fla. 165

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1906 | Docket: 60405803

Published

authorities cited in note 1; Gould’s Pl. 430, section 8; 1 Saunders’ Pl. & Ev. 951; Powdick v. Lyon, 11