Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 8.0001 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 8.0001 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 8.0001 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 8.0001

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 8
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS
View Entire Chapter
8.0001 Definitions.In accordance with s. 8(a), Art. X of the State Constitution, the United States Decennial Census of 2020 is the official census of the state for the purposes of congressional redistricting.
(1) The following delineation of congressional districts employs areas included within official county, tract, block groups, and block boundary descriptions used by the United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, in compiling the United States Decennial Census of 2020 in this state. The populations within these census geographic units are the population figures reported in the counts of the United States Decennial Census of 2020 provided to the state in accordance with Pub. L. No. 94-171.
(2) As used in this chapter, the term:
(a) “Block” describes the smallest geographic unit for which population was tabulated in the 2020 decennial census. Blocks are nested within tracts and within block groups. A block is identified by a three-character number that is unique within a block group.
(b) “Block equivalency file” describes a list of all blocks within the state and the congressional district number designated for each block. Blocks are listed by a 15-character number that combines the five-character county-level Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) code, the six-character tract number with leading zeros and an implied decimal, the single-character block group number, and the three-character block number.
(c) “Block group” describes a cluster of blocks within the same census tract. Block groups are nested within tracts and are uniquely identified by a single-character number with a valid range of 0 through 9.
(d) “County” describes a legal governmental subdivision of the state. Boundaries of counties described in this chapter reflect those boundaries in effect as of January 1, 2020.
(e) “Geographical information systems map” describes an electronic map that represents the boundaries of the congressional districts of the state in a commonly accepted and readable format.
(f) “Tract” describes a relatively permanent statistical subdivision of a county. Tracts are nested within counties and are uniquely identified by an up-to-four-character number and a two-digit suffix.
History.s. 1, ch. 96-192; s. 1, ch. 2002-12; s. 1, ch. 2003-1; s. 1, ch. 2012-2; s. 1, ch. 2022-265; s. 1, ch. 2023-8.

F.S. 8.0001 on Google Scholar

F.S. 8.0001 on CourtListener

Amendments to 8.0001


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 8.0001

Total Results: 133  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

John H. Harland Co., Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-Appellee, 711 F.2d 966 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 258 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 219 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 515, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25133

(3d Cir.1980); 1 J.T. McCarthy, supra, § 8.1, at 230-31. Most trade dress infringement actions
Copy

Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Osting-Schwinn, 613 F.3d 1079 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 214 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16746, 2010 WL 3056606

the other Names assume. Lloyd's Act, 1982, c. 14 § 8(1). Names purchase insurance through underwriting
Copy

Coralia Patricia Garcia v. Attorney Gen. of the United States, Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 329 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 85 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8723, 2003 WL 21027214

suitable for the AWO procedure. Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 8.1(a)(7), a single member of the BIA may affirm, without
Copy

Jones v. State, 998 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 2008).

Cited 80 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2008 WL 5333274

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 8.1, at 148 (2007 ed.) ("[T]he aggrieved party must
Copy

Peter Letterese & Assocs., Inc. v. World Inst. of Scientology Enter., Int'l, 533 F.3d 1287 (11th Cir. 2008).

Cited 48 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 87 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1563, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14496, 2008 WL 2652291

Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, 8-24, § 8.01[G] (2002) ("[F]or similarity to be *1307 substantial
Copy

Allan C. Aldridge v. Lily-Tulip, Inc. Salary Ret. Plan Benefits Comm., 953 F.2d 587 (11th Cir. 1992).

Cited 38 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

provision, along with identical language in Section 8.1 of the Plan, obligates Lily to fund the Plan
Copy

Bank of New York v. Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc. (In Re Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc.), 456 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2006).

Cited 33 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17990, 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 224

Moneys deposited with the Trustee pursuant to Section 8.01 [which dealt with the satisfaction and discharge
Copy

Rhodes v. State, 986 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 2008).

Cited 31 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2008 WL 657532

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 8.1, at 148 (2007 ed.) ("The aggrieved party must obtain
Copy

Bland v. Health Care & Ret. Corp., 927 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Cited 26 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 1235910

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 8.1, at 144 (2006 ed.). Despite the absence of a specific
Copy

Adams v. Wright, 403 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1981).

Cited 26 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Proc. 59(a) (1971) (remittitur & additur); Va.Code § 8.01-383.1 (1977) (Civ.Remedies & Proc., remittitur
Copy

Blank v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 926 F.2d 1090 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 24 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2007, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4308

structured as a sale of an ongoing business. Under section 8.01 of the purchase and sale agreement, Buffalo
Copy

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Triple a Fire Prot., Inc., Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669, Afl-Cio, Intervenor, 136 F.3d 727 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 19 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2577, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 3660

concerning the ability of employers to repudiate section 8(1) agreements. Pappas, 106 F.3d
Copy

Labmd, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 894 F.3d 1221 (11th Cir. 2018).

Cited 17 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

also Stephanie W. Kanwit, Federal Trade Commission § 8:1 (2017) (noting that the Commission "has held over
Copy

Keech v. Yousef, 815 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

Cited 17 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 726632

Phillip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate *720 Practice, § 8.1, at 113 (2001-2002). The failure to preserve an
Copy

State Ex Rel. Glynn v. McNayr, 133 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1961).

Cited 16 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Article V, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. By Section 8.01 of the Dade County Home Rule Charter the office
Copy

Chem. Bank v. First Trust of New York, Nat'l. Ass'n (In Re Se. Banking Corp.), 188 B.R. 452 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1995).

Cited 16 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 136, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1386, 27 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 821

borrowed" as used in the foregoing sentence and in Section 8.01 shall mean any obligation of the Company (and
Copy

Function Junction, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach, 705 F. Supp. 544 (M.D. Fla. 1988).

Cited 15 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1987 WL 49622

derives from the Life Safety Code, chapter 8, section 8-1.3, enacted as a Daytona Beach ordinance, which
Copy

Palmer v. State, 467 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1045

was contraband); W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.1 n. 75.2 (Supp. 1985). This is true even though the
Copy

Picchi v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, NA, 521 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 1988).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 178, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 347, 1988 WL 21001

unethical. Trawick's Florida Practice and Procedure, § 8-1, Definitions (1985) (footnotes omitted, emphasis
Copy

US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. N. Am. Steel Corp., 335 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1343

608, White and Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 8-1, states: "At the outset one should understand the
Copy

Behm v. Saeli, 560 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 62012

enjoy any easement appurtenant thereto. Id. at section 8.01. See also 3 R. Powell, "The Law of Real Property"
Copy

Jupiter Wreck, Inc. v. the Unidentified, Wrecked & Abandoned Sailing Vessel, 691 F. Supp. 1377 (S.D. Fla. 1988).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1988 A.M.C. 2705, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7271, 1988 WL 73386

also G. Gilmore & C. Black, The Law of Admiralty § 8-1 (1975). The law of salvage can be "traced to the
Copy

Jackson v. Rupp, 228 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

have the right of burial. 25A C.J.S. Dead Bodies § 8(1); 22 Am.Jur.2d, Dead Bodies, §§ 31, 32, 42 & 43;
Copy

City of Coral Gables v. Puiggros, 376 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16025

different determination as to the applicability of § 8.01, see Godson v. Town of Surfside, 150 Fla. 614,
Copy

Smith v. Knight, 679 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 525499

subpoena. Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure, § 8-1 (1995); see, e.g., Bailey v. Crum, 120 Fla. 36,
Copy

State v. Famiglietti, 817 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 879409

to the best interest of justice. For example, section 8.01-400.2 of the Code of Virginia provides for privileged
Copy

Tovar v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 646 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2011).

Cited 9 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14698, 2011 WL 2792470

80-81. Resolving the question, the BIA compared § 8(1) of the CSPA to § 3 of the CSPA and concluded that
Copy

3V Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. Off. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc. (In Re Tousa, Inc.), 444 B.R. 613 (S.D. Fla. 2011).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14019, 2011 WL 522008

the Subsidiary Borrowers. EVENTS OF DEFAULT Section 8.1 Events of Default Each of the following events
Copy

Barnett v. Destiny Owners Ass'n, Inc., 856 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 22358740

the amendment, the trial court determined that section 8.1(b) of the Association's Declaration of Easements
Copy

Sch. Bd. of Broward Cnty. v. Pierce Goodwin Alexander & Linville, 137 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 1031461, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3916

applicable standard of care was governed by section 8.1.1., which provides: To the fullest permitted
Copy

State v. Gonzalez, 467 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 845

of his records. 2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.1, at 633-35 (1978), and authorities collected. It
Copy

In Re Wheat, 149 B.R. 1003 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1992).

Cited 7 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 345, 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2104

concedes that this argument is without merit. [3] Section 8.01 of the Debtor's Plan provides that earliest
Copy

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,131 Harold C. Kramer & Joan W. Kramer, His Wife v. Piper Aircraft Corp., a Pennsylvania Corp., 868 F.2d 1538 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 7 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4562, 1989 WL 23787

limitations for personal injury actions, Va.Code § 8.01-243, barred *1540 the Kramers’ suit
Copy

State Bd. of Funeral Directors & Embalmers v. Cooksey, 3 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 1941).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 147 Fla. 337

and (f) of paragraph 2 of Section 8 (1) of the Act. Paragraph 2 of Section 8 (1) inter alia, provides: "(2)
Copy

Engle Irvin v. Griffin Corp., 808 F.2d 802 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

reformation of the release, pursuant to Code of 1975, Section 8-1-2, to express the true intention of the parties
Copy

Picker Int'l, Inc. v. Daniel W. Parten, Individually & D/B/A Ppx Imaging John Parten, D/B/A Ppx Imaging, 935 F.2d 257 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14393, 1991 WL 110214

1087 (11th Cir.1990). See Ala.Code § 8-1-1(a) (1984) (“Every contract by which anyone is
Copy

Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 803 F. Supp. 401 (S.D. Fla. 1992).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13522, 1992 WL 213878

a gaming enterprise. Ordinance No. 89-09-91, Section 8.1(a). The ordinance also provides an alternative
Copy

World Capita Commc'ns, Inc. v. Island Capital Mgmt., LLC (In Re Skyway Commc'ns Holding Corp.), 389 B.R. 801 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2008).

Cited 6 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 394, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 1889, 2008 WL 2553308

purchase price in the amount of $150,000.00. (Plan, § 8.1). The purchase price for the stock was to be transferred
Copy

Flagship Marine Servs., Inc. v. Belcher Towing Co., 761 F. Supp. 792 (S.D. Fla. 1991).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1992 A.M.C. 181, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5496, 1991 WL 62473

Black, The Law of Admiralty, (2d ed. 1975), Section 8-1. At sea the person who saves property receives
Copy

Biscayne Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Fed. Home Loan Bank Bd., 572 F. Supp. 997 (S.D. Fla. 1983).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13919

conditions of the Agreement, as revised, e.g. Section 8.1, which the staff understands are not negotiable
Copy

Fla. Psc v. Pruitt, Humphress, 587 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 199928

generally Trawick's Florida Practice and Procedure, § 8-1, Definitions (1990). However, we urge the PSC, for
Copy

Lund v. Mathas, 145 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1962).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Secretary of State, to have the Florida Statute, Section 8.01, F.S.A., the Congressional Reapportionment Act
Copy

Cuyahoga Wrecking Corp. v. Mastres, 368 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

Florida Building Code, adopted in Dade County by Section 8-1 of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County, to be
Copy

United States v. Myers, 591 F. Supp. 2d 1312 (S.D. Fla. 2008).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99384, 2008 WL 5156671

the power vested in Congress by Article 1, section 8. 1. The Regulated Activity By its terms § 2250
Copy

Wayne H. Coloney Co. v. US Dept. of Air Force, 89 B.R. 924 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 1988).

Cited 5 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | 35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75, 543, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 1271

not specifically identified in Exhibit A of Section 8.01 above. Exhibit "A" to the Plan was an extensive
Copy

Est. of Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 609 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (M.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56446, 2009 WL 975570

the Commonwealth of Virginia. See Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-443 (2009) (retaining the common law rule). Likewise
Copy

State v. Abrams, 548 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 102538

conclusion.[61] 3 W.R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.1(c) (2d ed. 1987). The cases cited in footnote 60
Copy

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,154 Harold C. Kramer & Joan W. Kramer, His Wife v. Piper Aircraft Corp., a Pennsylvania Corp., 801 F.2d 1279 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 4 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32259

date on which the cause of action accrues. Va.Code § 8.01-243; Tyler v. R.R. Street & Co., 322
Copy

Oakwood Plaza, LP v. DOC OPTICS, 708 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 64080

costs under both a general lease provision, section 8.1, which allowed the landlord *960 "expenses (including
Copy

Pasco Cnty. v. Quail Hollow Props., 693 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 216208

approval Trawick's Florida Practice & Procedure § 8-1, Definitions (1985)). Notices of appearance for
Copy

Dominguez v. State, 616 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 72297

found. See 3 Wayne R. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 8.1(c), at 165 (2d ed. 1987). After the consent was
Copy

Irvin v. Griffin Corp., 808 F.2d 802 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 4 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

general release “for value” within the meaning of section 8-1-2 of the Alabama Code. For reasons discussed
Copy

Unnamed but Identifiable Master & Crew of That Certain United States Documented Vessel Bearing Documentation No. 567135 v. Certain Unnamed Motor Vessel Bearing Florida Reg. No. F15607, 592 F. Supp. 1191 (S.D. Fla. 1984).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24050

Gilmore & Black, The Law of Admiralty, (2d ed. 1975), § 8-1. Thus, the fact that the Plaintiffs may have been
Copy

Allapattah Servs., Inc. v. Exxon Corp., 188 F.R.D. 667 (S.D. Fla. 1999).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13574, 1999 WL 691903

be decided by the fact finder. See Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-382 (“In any action at law or suit in equity, the
Copy

Bdo Seidman v. Banco Espirito Santo Int'l, Ltd., 998 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 1734148

006 (Vernon 2003) ($25 million cap); Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-676.1 (2005) ($25 million cap); W. Va.Code § 58-5-14
Copy

Roger E. Freilich, D.M.D., P.A. v. Shochet, 96 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 3964986, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15322

legal fees. . The agreement further provided in section 8.1 that “all disputes, claims and controversies”
Copy

Prime Motor Inns, Inc. v. First Fid. Bank N.A. New Jersey (In Re Prime Motor Inns, Inc.), 123 B.R. 104 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2580

there shall occur an `Event of Default' under . . . § 8.1(c) of the Loan Agreement [between the Authority
Copy

Christine C. Peterson v. Comm'r of IRS, 827 F.3d 968 (11th Cir. 2016).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2016 WL 3648473

Family Pro*979gram art. VIII, § 8.1; Futures Program art. VIII, § 8.1. Effective December 1, 2008, Mary
Copy

Blank v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 758 F. Supp. 697 (M.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18957, 1991 WL 24898

Steel and Buffalo Tank Corporation. Article 8, section 8.01(f) of the sale agreement directed Bethlehem
Copy

State v. Cross, 535 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 4023

of property... ." W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.1(c) (1987). See also Luxenburg v. State, 384 So.2d
Copy

Canida v. Canida, 751 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 1241948

Codified Laws (1998); § 37-10-101, Tenn. Code (1998); § 8.01-43-44, Va.Code (1998); § 4.24.190, Wash. Rev.Code
Copy

In Re Apache Prods. Co., 293 B.R. 545 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2003).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 126, 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 531, 2003 WL 21289973

Debtor points out that the Lease Agreement, section 8.1, "Default" does not reference any other agreement
Copy

Mead v. United States (In Re Mead), 374 B.R. 296 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 549, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2532, 2007 WL 2137795

recorded do not evidence compliance with Va.Code § 8.01-465.3.[14] Plaintiff asserts that each defendant
Copy

Goodman v. Kendall Gate-Investco., Inc., 395 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1981 CCH OSHD 25, 236

it is plaintiff's position that since: (1) Section 8-1 of the Metropolitan Dade County Code has, by
Copy

Ferrer v. State, 113 So. 3d 860 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9211, 2012 WL 2052775

(1980); see also 4 Wayne R. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 8.1(c), at 32 (4th ed. 2004) (“[Cjonsent should be construed
Copy

Stivers v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 777 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16890, 2000 WL 1872986

general public health or safety"); Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-420.01 (Michie Supp.2000) (dealing with protective
Copy

Miami-Dade Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-Dade, 208 So. 3d 724 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14069

amendment is presently codified in Section 8.01 of the Charter. Section 8.01, titled Initiative, Referendum
Copy

Lawler v. Kulik (In Re Kulik), 400 B.R. 313 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 611, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4203, 2007 WL 4322442

the Commonwealth of Virginia pursuant *320 to Section 8.01-329 of the Code of Virginia.[22] The statutory
Copy

Cheshire v. State, 969 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 3375001

See Phillip J. Padovano, Fla. Appellate Practice § 8.1 (2007 ed.) ("[T]he aggrieved party must obtain an
Copy

Johnson v. Mortham, 926 F. Supp. 1540 (N.D. Fla. 1996).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7199, 1996 WL 226904

The legislation provides in pertinent part: Section 8. (1) The qualifying period in 1996 for persons seeking
Copy

In Re Celotex Corp., 377 B.R. 345 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 2006 WL 4847510

2(e)(ii) of the Trust Agreement, as referenced in § 8.1 quoted above, provides that the "Trustees shall
Copy

Dale Lee Norman v. State of Florida, 215 So. 3d 18 (Fla. 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 239, 2017 WL 823613, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 448

United States Constitution, nor article I, section 8, 1. As of January 31, 2017, the State had
Copy

Meristem Valley Nursery, Inc. v. METRO. DADE Cnty., 428 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18863

certificate of use and occupancy in violation of Section 8-1 and Section 33-8 of the Code of Metropolitan
Copy

Cochran v. E.I. duPont de Nemours, 933 F.2d 1533 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 WL 91098

the person or his agent by a physician. Va.Code § 8.01-249(4) (1985). Using this provision, Cochran argues
Copy

Sean Patrick Mahoney v. Virginia Colby Mahoney, 251 So. 3d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

Adoption, Paternity, and Other Family Practice, § 8-1 (Fla. Bar CLE 12th ed. 2017) (citations omitted)
Copy

Gillis v. United States, 722 F. Supp. 713 (M.D. Fla. 1989).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1989 WL 113229

practice or specialty in [Virginia]." Va. Code Ann. § 8-01-581.20. II. No Breach of Duty Some facts are not
Copy

Chapman v. DePuy Orthopedics, Inc., 760 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (M.D. Fla. 2011).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4510, 2011 WL 149329

limitations bars Chapman's action.[4] Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-243(A). Under Virginia law, the cause of action
Copy

Johnston v. Meredith, 840 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 289514

like manner as if it were incorporated." Va.Code § 8.01-15.
Copy

Gong v. Kirk, 278 F. Supp. 133 (S.D. Fla. 1967).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7403

The plaintiffs seek a declaration that Fla.Stat. § 8.01, F.S.A., is unconstitutional,' an injunction against
Copy

Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Medica Healthcare Plans, Inc., 376 F. Supp. 3d 1298 (S.D. Fla. 2019).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

written document signed by all the parties. (DE# 9-2, § 8.1) (emphasis added). Baptist Hospitals' interpretation
Copy

Mazon v. Tardif, 387 B.R. 641 (M.D. Fla. 2008).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34618, 2008 WL 1897596

the developer to designated unit owners. (Id. at § 8.1.) The exclusive right to use a limited common element
Copy

2D14-4561 / Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP. v. Colina, 202 So. 3d 94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13366

injunction prohibiting Dr. Colina from violating Section 8.1 of the Partner Professional Services Agreement
Copy

Miami-Dade Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-Dade (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

amendment is presently codified in Section 8.01 of the Charter. Section 8.01, titled Initiative, Referendum
Copy

City of Miami Beach v. Mut. Benefit Life Ins., 239 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5775

unincorporated areas of Dade County, Florida. See § 8-1, Code of Metropolitan Dade County. The trial court
Copy

Joe Taylor v. City of Gadsden (11th Cir. 2014).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

17 1945 Ala. Acts 734, 744 § 8(1)(b). 18 1965 Ala. Acts 468, 476
Copy

Rich Capitol, LLC v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (In Re Rich Capitol, LLC), 436 B.R. 224 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2010).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Mortgage addresses various remedial actions. Section 8.1 of the Mortgage permits acceleration of the debt
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1977).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

of the act (s. 83.780[1]). AS TO QUESTION 4: Section 8(1) of the act (s. 83.784[1]) provides for invoking
Copy

Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP v. Ramon E. Colina, M.D., 192 So. 3d 491 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16611, 2015 WL 6874913

made generally available to the public. Section 8.1 of the Partner Professional Services Agreement
Copy

Alberta S. Ellison v. Randy Willoughby (Fla. 2023).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

see also 2 Philip J. Padovano, Fla. App. Prac. § 8:1 (2023 ed.) (“A legal argument must be raised initially
Copy

Prop. Damage Advisory Comm. v. Celotex Asbestos Settlement Trust (In re Celotex Corp.), 497 F. App'x 896 (11th Cir. 2012).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

of the Committee under the Trust Agreement. Section 8.1, which is entitled, “Formation; Duties,” identifies
Copy

12550 Biscayne Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Nrd Investments, LLC (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

common 7 See also, § 8:1. In general, 1 Law of Condominium Operations § 8:1: In order to
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1998).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

Section 7(3)(a), Ch. 96-519, Laws of Fla. 6 Section 8(1), Ch. 96-519, Laws of Fla. 7 Section 7(3)(e)
Copy

Avisena, Inc. v. Santalo, 65 So. 3d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 32 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 439, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6355, 2011 WL 2028625

requirement. I The Agreement First, I think that Section 8.1 of the agreement unambiguously so provides. It
Copy

Christine C. Peterson v. Comm'r of IRS (11th Cir. 2016).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

period this Agreement is in effect. NSD Agreement § 8.1, 8.2, 8.10 (emphasis added). NSDs generally no longer
Copy

Santizo-Perez v. Genaro's Corp., 138 So. 3d 1148 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 2041817, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7596

1 Lex K. Larson, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation § 8.01 (rev. ed. 2013). . This case presents a classic
Copy

World Capita Commc'ns, Inc. v. Island Capital Mgmt., LLC (In Re Skyway Commc'ns Holding Corp.), 415 B.R. 859 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2009).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 59, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2924, 2009 WL 3018090

as the Reorganized Debtor." (Main Case Doc. 420, § 8.1). Finally, § 8.2 of the Plan, entitled "Continued
Copy

Gong v. Bryant, 230 F. Supp. 917 (S.D. Fla. 1964).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7008

Congress, within the State of Florida, by virtue of Section 8.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. is unconstitutional
Copy

Se. Aluminum Supply Corp. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 540 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 779, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1982, 1989 WL 28446

the South Florida Building Code, adopted by Section 8-1 of the Metropolitan Dade County Code, and (2)
Copy

Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey, 377 B.R. 345 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2006).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 4423

2(e)(ii) of the Trust Agreement, as referenced in § 8.1 quoted above, provides that the “Trustees shall
Copy

Blank v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 926 F.2d 1090 (11th Cir. 1991).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 WL 25771

structured as a sale of an ongoing business. Under section 8.01 of the purchase and sale agreement, Buffalo
Copy

A.L.T. v. State, 63 So. 3d 855 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8405

suspect?” 4 Wayne R. LaFave, SEARCH and SeizuRE § 8.1(c) (4th ed. 2010) (internal footnotes omitted).
Copy

Alt v. State, 63 So. 3d 855 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 WL 2200793

suspect?" 4 WAYNE R. LAFAVE, SEARCH AND SEIZURE § 8.1(c) (4th ed. 2010) (internal footnotes omitted).
Copy

LABMD, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 891 F.3d 1286 (11th Cir. 2018).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Kanwit, Federal Trade Commission § 8:1 (2017) (noting that the Commission "has held over
Copy

Jackson v. State, 93 So. 3d 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 2470128, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10583

and Philip J. Padovano, Flonda Appellate Practice § 8.1, at 148 (2007 ed.))). On remand, if Jackson wishes
Copy

Seven Kings Holdings, Inc. v. Marina Grande Riviera Beach Condo. Assoc., Inc. (Fla. 4th DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

Jr., The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land § 8.01 (1988)). Because an easement appurtenant attaches
Copy

Seven Kings Holdings, Inc. v. Marina Grande Riviera Beach Condo. Assoc., Inc. (Fla. 4th DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

Jr., The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land § 8.01 (1988)). Because an easement appurtenant attaches
Copy

Atl. Coast Line R.R. v. Benedict Pineapple Co., 52 Fla. 165 (Fla. 1906).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

authorities cited in note 1; Gould’s Pl. 430, section 8; 1 Saunders’ Pl. & Ev. 951; Powdick v. Lyon, 11
Copy

Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP v. Ramon E. Colina, M.D., 170 So. 3d 946 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11556, 2015 WL 4605677

made generally available to the public. Section 8.1 of the Partner Professional Services Agreement
Copy

Jones v. Preuit, 822 F.2d 998 (11th Cir. 1987).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

faith in carrying out the sale (under Ala.Code § 8-1-100 which forbids arranged bidding) is unrelated
Copy

Israel Medina Tovar v. U.S. Attorney Gen. (11th Cir. 2011).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

80–81. Resolving the question, the BIA compared § 8(1) of the CSPA to § 3 of the CSPA and concluded that
Copy

Richard Lee Brown v. Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (11th Cir. 2021).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the termination notice, then under Virginia Code § 8.01-126, Brown would provide the General District
Copy

Performance Air Mech., Inc. v. Miller Constr. Servs., Inc. (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

the Virginia Uniform Arbitration Act, Va. Code § 8.01-581.01 et seq., is similar to the Federal Arbitration
Copy

R.I.D.C. Indus. Dev. Fund v. Snyder, 387 F. Supp. 466 (M.D. Fla. 1975).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1324, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14432

rights of stockholders. See 9 Collier in Bankruptcy, § 8.01 at 155 (14th ed. 1940). . . . Thus, a Chapter X
Copy

Aldo Disorbo v. Am. Van Lines, Inc. (Fla. 4th DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

alternatively determined to be a distribution, section 8.1 (governing how distributions of net cash flow
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1978).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

accept petitions filed by tenants pursuant to Section 8(1) of the Act. In light of the answer to question
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1993).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

audit of the library district. Question Four Section 8(1), Ch. 85-376, Laws of Florida, authorizes the
Copy

GSE Consulting, Inc. v. L3Harris Tech., Inc. (11th Cir. 2023).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Intel- lectual Property.” Similarly, Section 8.1 of the Plan provides that each party
Copy

In re Sagamore Partners, Ltd., 512 B.R. 296 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24499, 2014 WL 794333

written notice or invoice therefor; Id. at 84, § 8.1(a)(i). Any notice to Saga-more “required or permitted”
Copy

Hillsborough Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Kubik, 110 So. 3d 928 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 614183, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2777

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 8.1 (2013 ed.) (“A legal argument must be raised initially
Copy

Shipston Assocs. v. Esselte Pendaflex Corp., 74 F.3d 1126 (11th Cir. 1996).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1996 WL 30573

for damages, costs, or attorneys’ fees because section 8.01(d) of the security deed shielded the Bank from
Copy

Aldridge v. Lily-tulip, Inc. Salary Ret. Plan Benefits Comm., 953 F.2d 587 (11th Cir. 1992).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 WL 10832

provision, along with identical language in Section 8.1 of the Plan, obligates Lily to fund the Plan
Copy

Luis Pedraza v. the City of Miramar, Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

follows: • City of Miramar Code of Ordinances section 8-1 provides: “All general laws of the state
Copy

& SC13-1959 Lucious Boyd v. State of Florida & Lucious Boyd v. Julie L. Jones, etc., 200 So. 3d 685 (Fla. 2015).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

by service of disqualified juror); Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-352(B) (2014) (new trial will not be granted unless
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2004).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

2000-477, Laws of Fla. 2 Section 3, supra. 3 Section 8(1), supra. 4 Chapter 97-256, Laws of Fla. 5 See
Copy

Byrd, The Florida Senate v. Black Voters Matter Capacity Bldg. Inst., Inc., Equal Ground Educ. Fund, Inc. (Fla. 1st DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...orida’s apportioned twenty-eight congressional districts by “employ[ing] areas included within official county, tract, block groups, and block boundary descriptions used by the [U.S. Census] in compiling the” 2020 census numbers for the State. § 8.0001(1), Fla. Stat. (2022). 7 Official electronic maps provide to the public visual representations of these legally defined boundaries. See § 8.051, Fla. Stat. (2022); see also § 8.0001(2)(e), Fla....
...8 The resultant map of the North Florida congressional districts addressed in this appeal is as follows: Representatives shall be elected only from districts so established.” 2 U.S.C. § 2c (emphasis supplied). 7 A “tract” is a “relatively permanent statistical subdivision of a county.” § 8.0001(2)(f), Fla. Stat. (2022). A “block” is “the smallest geographic unit for which population was tabulated in the 2020 decennial census,” and it is “nested within tracts and within block groups.” § 8.0001(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2022). 8 The “blocks” are the component geographic parts that make up each congressional district. See § 8.0001(2)(b), Fla....
Copy

Underwriters of Lloyd's v. Carol Osting-Schwinn (11th Cir. 2010).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the other Names assume. Lloyd’s Act, 1982, c. 14 § 8(1). Names purchase insurance through underwriting
Copy

Nationwide Mut. Ins. v. Cornutt, 907 F.2d 1085 (11th Cir. 1990).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

209, 210 (Ala.1988) (citing cases). . Ala.Code § 8-1-1 (a). . Livingston v. Dobbs, 559 So.2d 569 (Ala
Copy

City Fed. Sav. Bank v. Dominion Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 657 F. Supp. 477 (S.D. Fla. 1987).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2998

law substantiate this position. See Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-184 (1986 Cum.Supp.) (Power to issue declaratory
Copy

Florida Police Benevolent Ass'n v. State, 818 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4788, 2002 WL 553399

action. P.B.A. argued in the complaint that Section 8.1.A(1) of the 2000-2001 General *586Appropriation
Copy

Worth v. Beal, 310 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14080

construction placed thereon by the court; but Section 8.01, according to the brief of appellee at pages
Copy

Amendments to Florida Rules of Crim. Procedure 3.851, 3.852 & 3.993, 772 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 2000).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 285, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 774, 2000 WL 381496

the dual-track scheme followed by Virginia. Section 8.01-654.1, Code of Virginia, provides in pertinent
Copy

Robertson v. State, 559 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2520, 1990 WL 43124

nor sealed. See W.R. LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 8.1(c) (2nd ed.1987). The consensual search is circumscribed

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.