Florida Statute 10.001 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS

Chapter 10
SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 10.001

10.001 Legislative representation.—Beginning with the general election held in the second year following each decennial census, the representation of the people of Florida in the Florida Legislature shall be as set forth earlier in such year by the Legislature by joint resolution or by the Supreme Court by order, as the case may be. A joint resolution of apportionment or an order of the Supreme Court adopted or entered pursuant to s. 16, Art. III of the State Constitution shall be included in the Florida Statutes in the same manner as a statute.

History.—s. 4, ch. 67-479; s. 1, ch. 72-242; s. 1, SJR 1305, 1972 Regular Session.

F.S. 10.001 on Google Scholar

F.S. 10.001 on CourtListener

Amendments to 10.001

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 10.001

Total Results: 142

William S. Manuel v. Convergys Corporation

430 F.3d 1132, 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1249, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24549, 2005 WL 3040815

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 15, 2005 | Docket: 398470

Cited 334 times | Published

application of the Georgia Trade Secrets Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. Id. The trial court in that

Tana v. Dantanna's

611 F.3d 767, 96 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1001, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14514, 2010 WL 2773447

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 15, 2010 | Docket: 238364

Cited 185 times | Published

Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-370 et seq. (Count II); fraud pursuant to O.C.G

University of Georgia Athletic Association, Etc. v. Bill Laite, Individually and D/B/A Bill Laite Distributing Co.

756 F.2d 1535, 225 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1122, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28844

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 8, 1985 | Docket: 494689

Cited 123 times | Published

trademark infringement in violation of Ga.Code Ann. § 10-1-450; 5 (3) deceptive trade practice

Priscilla Hill v. BellSouth Telecommunications

364 F.3d 1308, 32 Communications Reg. (P&F) 113, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6344, 2004 WL 691789

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 2, 2004 | Docket: 416111

Cited 116 times | Published

the Georgia Unfair Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390, et seq.; (2) fraud and negligent misrepresentation;

United States v. Baxter International, Incorporated

345 F.3d 866, 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 410, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19067, 2003 WL 22120071

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 15, 2003 | Docket: 111422

Cited 85 times | Published

losses and pay valid claims[.]”); Couoh ON lNS.3d § 10:1 (stating that, while “[t]he term ‘self-insurance’

McClendon v. Georgia Department of Community Health

261 F.3d 1252, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18566, 2001 WL 936051

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 17, 2001 | Docket: 397016

Cited 71 times | Published

C.G.A. § 10-1-372; (3) violations of the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-393; (4)

Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HBS International Corp.

910 F.3d 1186

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 4, 2018 | Docket: 8345553

Cited 61 times | Published

Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-372(a), and the federal Lanham Act, 15 U

Penalty Kick Management Ltd. v. Coca Cola Company

318 F.3d 1284, 65 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1563, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1122, 2003 WL 164280

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 2003 | Docket: 1072410

Cited 60 times | Published

the Georgia Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq., a claim for misappropriation

21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1625, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936c, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 294 Harry L. Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc., Eastern Air Lines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots Trust Administrative Committee of the Eastern Airlines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots

119 F.3d 888

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 2023562

Cited 51 times | Published

for TAC members from ALPA is paid by ALPA, see § 10.1(b)(ii). 10 According

21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1544, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 132 Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. John O. Nielsen, D.M.D., Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Who Are Similarly Situated, Kenneth O. Friday, George R. Bolling, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Intervenor-Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants, Complete Health, Inc., Samuel W. Sullivan, M.D., Movants

116 F.3d 1406

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 10, 1997 | Docket: 633595

Cited 48 times | Published

they relate to ERISA plans. It also held that § 10-1-115 and § 27-1-4 of the Alabama Code exempt all

National Ass'n of Boards of Pharmacy v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

633 F.3d 1297, 78 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1386, 97 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1931, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3543, 2011 WL 649951

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 24, 2011 | Docket: 1858496

Cited 47 times | Published

the Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq.[6] Count III, for breach of contract

Brown v. State

367 So. 2d 616, 8 A.L.R. 4th 1014

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1979 | Docket: 405331

Cited 45 times | Published

Justice, Pattern Rules of Court and Code Provisions § 10-1.9(a) (1975). [19] See Davis v. State, 308 So.2d

Yellowfin Yachts, Inc. v. Barker Boatworks, LLC

898 F.3d 1279

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 7, 2018 | Docket: 7611972

Cited 44 times | Published

maintain [a trade secret's] secrecy." O.C.G.A. § 10-1-761(4)(B). 21 Because Yellowfin

In Re Graupner

537 F.3d 1295, 2008 WL 2993570

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 6, 2008 | Docket: 2032212

Cited 43 times | Published

installment transaction under this article." See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31(a)(1). Reading these sections in pari materia

Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant v. Longhorn Steaks, Inc., Lone Star Steaks, Inc., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee v. Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon of Georgia, Inc., Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc., Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants

106 F.3d 355, 41 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1896, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3276

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 24, 1997 | Docket: 1061407

Cited 41 times | Published

infringement of a registered mark under O.C.G.A. § 10-1-450, (iv) denied without prejudice Defendant's

Arthur Quiller, Lillie Mae Quiller, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Barclays American/credit, Inc.

764 F.2d 1400, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21759

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 8, 1985 | Docket: 496318

Cited 39 times | Published

preemption law. The Georgia law of usury under O.G. C.A. § 10-1-33 makes the civil penalties of the Georgia Motor

Bank of New York v. Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc. (In Re Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc.)

456 F.3d 1291, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17990, 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 224

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 18, 2006 | Docket: 12794

Cited 33 times | Published

gations and rights of the Indenture Trustee. Section 10.01 stated that “the Trustee undertakes to perform

Neva, Inc. v. Christian Duplications International, Inc.

743 F. Supp. 1533, 15 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1024, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19487, 1990 WL 101595

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1990 | Docket: 245820

Cited 33 times | Published

1984); 3 M. Nimmer & D. Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 10.01[C][4], at 10-1 (1989). JOINT AUTHORSHIP Defendants

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United States of America v. The Bank of Nova Scotia

691 F.2d 1384, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23768

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 29, 1982 | Docket: 769739

Cited 31 times | Published

various functions under the Bank Act. Id. § 10(1)(a-e). It is incongruous to suggest that a United

Optimum Technologies, Inc. v. Henkel Consumer Adhesives, Inc.

496 F.3d 1231, 83 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1769, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19918, 2007 WL 2377455

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 22, 2007 | Docket: 398974

Cited 30 times | Published

Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-372(a); breach of confidential relationship; breach

Camp Creek Hospitality Inns, Inc. v. Sheraton Franchise Corporation

139 F.3d 1396

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 1998 | Docket: 583740

Cited 29 times | Published

Georgia Trade Secrets Act ("GTSA"). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the

United States v. Michael Smith

821 F.3d 1293, 2016 WL 1719267

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 2016 | Docket: 3059367

Cited 28 times | Published

statements to' the FBI, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 10,01 (Count 15). Prior to trial, Mr. Smith filed

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc. v. Citicorp North America, Inc. (In Re Tousa, Inc.)

422 B.R. 783, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 4355

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 30, 2009 | Docket: 2102297

Cited 28 times | Published

Conveying Subsidiaries' obligations and liens. Section 10.1 of the term loans provides that no amendment

Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

432 F. Supp. 2d 1319, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98760, 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 692, 2006 WL 1495222

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 26, 2006 | Docket: 58449

Cited 26 times | Published

relief under O.C.G.A. § 10-1-762, or an action for damages under 0.C.G.A. § 10-1-763.") [31] AlphaMed

Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

432 F. Supp. 2d 1319, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98760, 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 692, 2006 WL 1495222

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 26, 2006 | Docket: 58449

Cited 26 times | Published

relief under O.C.G.A. § 10-1-762, or an action for damages under 0.C.G.A. § 10-1-763.") [31] AlphaMed

Dade County v. Dade County League of Municipalities

104 So. 2d 512

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1958 | Docket: 1312872

Cited 23 times | Published

Charter which is here involved reads as follows: "Section 10.01: Reservation of Certain Powers in Municipalities

Caliber Automotive Liquidators, Inc. v. Premier Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, LLC

605 F.3d 931, 94 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1866, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9373, 2010 WL 1816170

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 7, 2010 | Docket: 1411263

Cited 22 times | Published

CODE ANN. § 10-1-371 et seq. [12] GA.CODE ANN. § 23-2-55 et seq. [13] GA.CODE ANN. § 10-1-451(b). [14]

Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Co.

607 F.3d 1268, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10939, 2010 WL 2138957

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 28, 2010 | Docket: 1618581

Cited 21 times | Published

Construction." [5] Article 10 contained five sections. Section 10.1 stated that: Claims, disputes and other matters

Fla. Dept. of Bus. Reg. v. Invest. Corp.

747 So. 2d 374, 1999 WL 1018661

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1999 | Docket: 1475688

Cited 20 times | Published

Burris, Florida Administrative Practice Manual, § 10.01(d) (Supp.1997). Any substantially affected party

Chiles v. Dept. of State, Div. of Elections

711 So. 2d 151, 1998 WL 233507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1998 | Docket: 1338037

Cited 18 times | Published

Burris, Florida Administrative Practice Manual, § 10.01(d) (Supp.1997).

Florida Land Co. v. City of Winter Springs

427 So. 2d 170, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2290

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1983 | Docket: 1739640

Cited 18 times | Published

commencing referendum proceedings under article X, section 10.01(b), Code of Winter Springs. The purpose of the

Akanthos Capital Management, LLC v. Compucredit Holdings Corp.

677 F.3d 1286, 2012 WL 1414247, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8359

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 25, 2012 | Docket: 78447

Cited 17 times | Published

prevention doctrine were to apply in this case, Section 10.01 of the trust indentures requires CompuCredit

Meola v. Department of Corrections

732 So. 2d 1029, 1998 WL 904304

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1998 | Docket: 1513387

Cited 17 times | Published

Laurence H. Tribe, American Constitutional Law § 10-1, at 629 (2d ed.1988)(concerning the protection

Florida Key Deer v. Stickney

864 F. Supp. 1222, 39 ERC (BNA) 1641, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13430, 1994 WL 515901

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1994 | Docket: 2518492

Cited 17 times | Published

the environment of the United States." 44 C.F.R. § 10.1(a). FEMA's regulatory criteria, designed to determine

Dowd v. International Longshoremen's Association

975 F.2d 779, 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2489, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 25988

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 15, 1992 | Docket: 62024

Cited 17 times | Published

section does not differ from that applicable to a section 10(1) petition. Boire v. Teamsters, 479 F.2d 778

Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc. v. Longhorn Steaks, Inc.

106 F.3d 355

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 24, 1997 | Docket: 420670

Cited 16 times | Published

infringement of a registered mark under O.C.G.A. § 10-1-450, (iv) denied without prejudice Defendant’s

State Establishment For Agricultural Product Trading v. M/V Wesermunde

838 F.2d 1576, 1988 A.M.C. 2328, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3080

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 11, 1988 | Docket: 1211311

Cited 16 times | Published

Thomas J. Schoenbaum, Admiralty and Maritime Law, Section 10-1 at p. 381 (1987). Included in paragraph 34

N. PALM BEACH CTY. WATER CONTROL v. State

604 So. 2d 440, 1992 WL 140998

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1992 | Docket: 1289694

Cited 14 times | Published

development and its residents. Article VII, section 10[1] of the Florida Constitution prohibits the state

Harris Corporation v. Giesting & Associates

297 F.3d 1270, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14408, 2002 WL 1574994

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 17, 2002 | Docket: 212838

Cited 13 times | Published

also Ala.Code §§ 8-24-2, 8-24-3; Ga.Code Ann. § 10-1-702; Ind.Code 24-4-7-5; Mich. Comp. Laws § 600

Juno Industries, Inc. v. HEERY INTERN.

646 So. 2d 818, 1994 WL 685593

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1994 | Docket: 1405560

Cited 13 times | Published

ARTICLE 10 "PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY," Section 10.1 "RESPONSIBILITY FOR PERSONS AND PROPERTY," provides:

In Re the Complaint of Sheen

709 F. Supp. 1123, 1989 A.M.C. 1345, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3143, 1989 WL 29327

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1989 | Docket: 1155534

Cited 12 times | Published

disaster. Gilmore & Black, The Law of Admiralty, section 10-1, p. 819 (2d ed. 1975). [14] The situation is

Miller v. Marriner

403 So. 2d 472

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1981 | Docket: 1250421

Cited 12 times | Published

pleading. See Trawick's Florida Practice & Procedure § 10-1 at page 22 (1979). In the instant case, GDM had

Kason Industries, Inc. v. Component Hardware Group, Inc.

120 F.3d 1199, 43 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1831, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22846, 1997 WL 471361

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 29, 1997 | Docket: 2035575

Cited 11 times | Published

the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq., and state common-law claims

Charles Edward Ctr. v. Sec'y, Dep't of Homeland Sec., Customs & Border Prot. Agency

895 F.3d 1295

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 19, 2018 | Docket: 7472884

Cited 10 times | Published

Compensation Programs. See 20 C.F.R. § 10.1 . The Compensation Act also requires the creation

Charles Edward Ctr. v. Sec'y, Dep't of Homeland Sec., Customs & Border Prot. Agency

895 F.3d 1295

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 19, 2018 | Docket: 7472884

Cited 10 times | Published

Compensation Programs. See 20 C.F.R. § 10.1 . The Compensation Act also requires the creation

Capital Asset Research Corporation v. Roger Finnegan

160 F.3d 683

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 13, 1998 | Docket: 1281584

Cited 10 times | Published

the Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760, et seq. (1997) ("the Act"). On May 7, 1996

In The Matter Of James W. Ferris, Jr.

764 F.2d 1475

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 9, 1985 | Docket: 795500

Cited 10 times | Published

in Georgia. See O.C.G.A. Sec. 10-1-33(a). Section 10-1-33(b) provides that the finance charge is to

3V Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc. (In Re Tousa, Inc.)

444 B.R. 613, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14019, 2011 WL 522008

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2011 | Docket: 2061629

Cited 9 times | Published

specified the nature of the subsidiary guarantees: Section 10.01. SUBSIDIARY GUARANTY (a) Subject to this Article

Angela Harris v. Liberty Community Management, Inc.

702 F.3d 1298, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 26004, 2012 WL 6604518

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 19, 2012 | Docket: 889655

Cited 8 times | Published

Fair Business Practices Act (GFBPA), Ga.Code ANN. § 10-1-390 et seq. 1 The district

Cappuccitti v. DirecTV, Inc.

611 F.3d 1252, 2010 WL 2803093

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 15, 2010 | Docket: 1889416

Cited 8 times | Published

Practices Act ("FBPA"), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq. The FBPA, in O.C.G.A. § 10-1-399(d), provides that [i]f

Indian River Colony Club, Inc. v. Schopke Const. & Engineering, Inc.

592 So. 2d 1185, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 249, 1992 WL 5350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1992 | Docket: 1428868

Cited 8 times | Published

not performing its contractual obligations (section 10.1); or (2) the owner could terminate on fourteen

Whildon L. Moyer v. Citicorp Homeowners, Inc.

799 F.2d 1445

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 24, 1986 | Docket: 965107

Cited 8 times | Published

sought the recovery of the penalty provided in section 10-1-38(c) of MVSFA: "double the time price differential

Whildon L. Moyer v. Citicorp Homeowners, Inc.

799 F.2d 1445

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 24, 1986 | Docket: 965107

Cited 8 times | Published

sought the recovery of the penalty provided in section 10-1-38(c) of MVSFA: "double the time price differential

UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. v. Megatrux Transportation, Inc.

750 F.3d 1282, 2014 A.M.C. 1636, 2014 WL 1816946, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8663

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 8, 2014 | Docket: 258937

Cited 7 times | Published

contains several other provisions pertinent here. Section 10.1 provides: Liability. Full liability for

Pathway Financial v. MIAMI INTERN. REALTY

588 So. 2d 1000, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8943, 1991 WL 175868

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1991 | Docket: 1708220

Cited 7 times | Published

See J. Alpert & P. Murphy, Florida Law of Damages § 10-1 (1978). The plaintiffs are not entitled to both

Williams v. State

399 So. 2d 999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 428272

Cited 7 times | Published

Instructions, Civil and Criminal (3d ed. 1977) § 10.01; and "... the punishment provided by law for the

Garris v. Weller Construction Company

132 So. 2d 553

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1961 | Docket: 1382146

Cited 7 times | Published

filing of claims was Chapter 26484, Laws of 1951, Section 10(1), which, in effect, provided that the period

Florida Key Deer v. Brown

386 F. Supp. 2d 1281, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20147, 2005 WL 2234155

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2005 | Docket: 2518505

Cited 6 times | Published

the environment of the United States." 44 C.F.R. § 10.1(a). FEMA's regulatory criteria, designed to determine

Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.

157 F. Supp. 2d 1291, 45 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 710, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13317, 2001 WL 995270

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2001 | Docket: 2337250

Cited 6 times | Published

individual proof of claim. Newberg On Class Actions, § 10.01 (3d ed.1992). As noted in Newberg: Formulae for

DSR, Inc. v. Manuel (In Re Hamilton Roe International, Inc.)

162 B.R. 590, 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 327, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 2019, 1993 WL 554005

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1993 | Docket: 1065336

Cited 6 times | Published

made clear in the introductory sentence of Section 10.01. That section begins as follows: "In order to

DSR, Inc. v. Manuel (In Re Hamilton Roe International, Inc.)

162 B.R. 590, 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 327, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 2019, 1993 WL 554005

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1993 | Docket: 1065336

Cited 6 times | Published

made clear in the introductory sentence of Section 10.01. That section begins as follows: "In order to

John T. Atkinson, Jr., Marie Atkinson, Homer L. Ogden v. General Electric Credit Corp.

866 F.2d 396

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 27, 1989 | Docket: 818355

Cited 6 times | Published

Georgia Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act. Ga.Code Ann. § 10-1-33 (1982). The charges were, however, within the

Richard Doyle v. Southern Guaranty Corporation, Jimmy E. Wood v. Fort Wayne Mortgage Co.

795 F.2d 907, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27236

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 18, 1986 | Docket: 969374

Cited 6 times | Published

(10% add-on) then allowed under GMVSFA. O.C.G.A. § 10-1-30 et seq. The cases came to us on

Brewer v. Gray

86 So. 2d 799

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1956 | Docket: 432055

Cited 6 times | Published

including Section 10.01, Florida Statutes 1955, F.S.A., in the 1955 Revision. Section 10.01, Florida Statutes

Electric MacHinery Enterprises, Inc. v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc. (In Re Electric MacHinery Enterprises, Inc.)

416 B.R. 801, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 77, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2374, 2009 WL 2710266

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2009 | Docket: 1492740

Cited 5 times | Published

contract claim. 1. Section 10.1 Cannot Defeat EME's Breach of Contract Claim Section 10.1 of the Trade Contract

48 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 476, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 857 Camp Creek Hospitality Inns, Inc. D.B.A. Sheraton Inn Atlanta Airport v. Sheraton Franchise Corporation, Itt Sheraton Reservations Corporation, Sheraton Savannah Corporation, and Itt Sheraton Corporation

130 F.3d 1009

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 11, 1997 | Docket: 766884

Cited 5 times | Published

Georgia Trade Secrets Act ("GTSA"). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the

Mitchell K. Friedlander v. Pdk, Labs, Inc., a New York Corporation

59 F.3d 1131, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19935, 1995 WL 410811

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 27, 1995 | Docket: 1044169

Cited 5 times | Published

Georgia Fair Business Practices Act (FBPA), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq., and requested: (1) a temporary

Ivey v. BACARDI IMPORTS, CO., INC.

541 So. 2d 1129, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 129, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 201, 1989 WL 27659

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1989 | Docket: 1516497

Cited 5 times | Published

are grown. The court held the provisions of Section 10(1) of Chapter 88-308, Laws of Florida, amending

Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc. v. Nielsen

116 F.3d 1406, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1544, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 17061, 1997 WL 345949

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 10, 1997 | Docket: 64035316

Cited 4 times | Published

as they relate to ERISA plans. It also held that § 10-1-115 and § 27-1 — 1 of the Alabama Code exempt all

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Holland & Knight

832 F. Supp. 1532, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13624, 1993 WL 383603

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1993 | Docket: 1611954

Cited 4 times | Published

Institutions: Mergers, Acquisitions and Conversions § 10.01-02 (5th ed. 1991). B. Public Policy Underlying

In Re General Development Corp.

135 B.R. 1002, 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 2150

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Dec 18, 1991 | Docket: 1550207

Cited 4 times | Published

the Florida Constitution, Fla. Const., Art. VII, § 10.[1] In addressing these Objections, it is important

Headley v. Lasseter

147 So. 2d 154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1962 | Docket: 1249821

Cited 4 times | Published

as an Engineering Contractor as defined in Section 10-1(k) of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County,

The Sampson Farm Limited Partnership v. Parmenter

238 So. 3d 387

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2018 | Docket: 6261373

Cited 3 times | Published

deceased partner’s family (specifically defined in section 10.1 of the Agreement to generally exclude spouses)

Ferox, LLC v. Conseal International, Inc.

175 F. Supp. 3d 1363, 2016 WL 1242165

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2016 | Docket: 64308002

Cited 3 times | Published

construed in accordance with Florida law. See Agreement § 10.1. “Contract and statutory interpretation are both

Camp Creek Hospitality Inns, Inc. v. Sheraton Franchise Corp.

139 F.3d 1396, 46 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1677, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8337, 1998 WL 210558

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 1998 | Docket: 64050352

Cited 3 times | Published

Georgia Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the

Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc.

119 F.3d 888, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1625, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 20761, 1997 WL 437161

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 766056

Cited 3 times | Published

for TAC members from ALPA is paid by ALPA, see § 10.1(b)(ii). . According to § 2.13(d), the TAC "may

Cappuccitti v. DirecTV, Inc.

623 F.3d 1118, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 21348, 2010 WL 4027719

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 15, 2010 | Docket: 65659366

Cited 2 times | Published

Practices Act (“FBPA”), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq. The FBPA, in O.C.G.A. § 10 -1-399(d), provides that [i]f

Jackson-Shaw Co. v. Jacksonville Aviation Authority

510 F. Supp. 2d 691, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 844, 2007 WL 61059

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2007 | Docket: 2449910

Cited 2 times | Published

materials, that exceed $50,000. 2004 Fla. Laws 464, § 10(1). Jackson-Shaw argues that JAA's failure to determine

PMI Investment, Inc. v. Rose (In Re Prime Motor Inns, Inc.)

167 B.R. 261

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: May 12, 1994 | Docket: 1604099

Cited 2 times | Published

(See Tr. [Bingham] at 195-96; PMI Exh. 2 at Section 10.1(a).) The Guaranty also provided that PMI had

Mandelstam v. CITY COM'N OF SOUTH MIAMI

539 So. 2d 1139, 1988 WL 114739

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1988 | Docket: 1511041

Cited 2 times | Published

"schools, public and private," are permitted uses. Section 10-1-1.05 of the same ordinance provides that "words

State Establishment for Agricultural Product Trading v. M/V Wesermunde

838 F.2d 1576

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 11, 1988 | Docket: 66232109

Cited 2 times | Published

Thomas J. Schoenbaum, Admiralty and Maritime Law, Section 10-1 at p. 381 (1987). Included in paragraph 34 of

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Associated Telephone Directory Publishers

756 F.2d 801, 225 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 899

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 29, 1985 | Docket: 66205068

Cited 2 times | Published

Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Ga.Code § 10-1-372 (1982).3 *806Southern Bell claims injury to

City of Winter Springs v. Florida Land Co.

413 So. 2d 84, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19693

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1982 | Docket: 1344462

Cited 2 times | Published

commencing referendum proceedings under Article X, section 10.01(b) of the City Charter to require the City Council

Gunderson v. Adams

328 F. Supp. 584, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11490

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1970 | Docket: 66071164

Cited 2 times | Published

re-enacted the court-approved plan into law (F.S. 10.-001-10.031, F.S.A.). The Legislature therefore is

James Farmer v. State of Florida

268 So. 3d 1009

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2019 | Docket: 15013083

Cited 1 times | Published

Mo. Ann. Stat. § 451.090 (2018); Mont. Code Ann. § 10-1-202 (2018); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-102 (2018); Nev

Julian Depot Miami, LLC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

364 F. Supp. 3d 1354

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2018 | Docket: 64323126

Cited 1 times | Published

Depot of the obligation and another provision-section 10.1-that describes Home Depot's rebuilding of any

Savannah College of Art and Design, Inc. v. Sportswear, Inc.

872 F.3d 1256, 124 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1431, 2017 WL 4369451, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19168

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 3, 2017 | Docket: 6162912

Cited 1 times | Published

§ 1125; and unfair competition under O.C.G.A. § 10-1-372. This is SCAD’s appeal from the district

Roberts v. Gordy

181 F. Supp. 3d 997, 118 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1481, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47694, 2016 WL 1441465

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2016 | Docket: 64308509

Cited 1 times | Published

B. Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 10.01 [A]). The Copyright Act, however, “eradicated much

Solnes v. Wallis & Wallis, P.A.

15 F. Supp. 3d 1258, 2014 WL 1512249, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52707

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2014 | Docket: 64294586

Cited 1 times | Published

language of the Agreement, emphasizing that Section 10.1 states, “The parties agree that Escrow Agent

In Re Florida Cement & Concrete Antitrust Litigation

746 F. Supp. 2d 1291, 2010 WL 4136306

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2010 | Docket: 2337542

Cited 1 times | Published

second product or service as well." H. Hovenkamp § 10.1, at 397. Plaintiffs do not allege a tying claim

MAVERICK MEDIA GROUP v. Hillsborough County, Fla.

508 F. Supp. 2d 1126, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35731, 2007 WL 1455963

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 16, 2007 | Docket: 2341633

Cited 1 times | Published

as prescribed in Section 4.0 of the DRP Manual. § 10.01.03. Under Section 4.0, "[p]ermit reviews for complete

Capital Asset Research Corp. v. Finnegan

160 F.3d 683, 48 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1853, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 28458, 1998 WL 789149

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 13, 1998 | Docket: 395011

Cited 1 times | Published

the Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760, et seq. (1997) (“the Act”). On May 7, 1996

Brandon Chrysler Plymouth Jeep Eagle, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.

898 F. Supp. 858, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13358, 1995 WL 544743

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1995 | Docket: 65999262

Cited 1 times | Published

labor. See Ala.Code, § 8-20-7 (1994); Ga.Code Ann. § 10-1-641 (Miehie 1994); Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. , 10,

Northeast Hotel Associates v. Prime Motor Inns, Inc. (In Re Prime Motor Inns, Inc.)

131 B.R. 233, 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 1248

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Aug 23, 1991 | Docket: 237507

Cited 1 times | Published

an event of default under the Loan Agreement. Section 10.1 of the Loan Agreement provides in relevant part

Matter of Boromei

83 B.R. 74, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 214, 1988 WL 12508

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1988 | Docket: 1452718

Cited 1 times | Published

associated with the sale. Baynes, Florida Mortgages, § 10-1 (1982). The certificate of title will issue not

One Hundred Seventy Second Collins Corp. v. Rosene

222 So. 2d 444, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5823

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1969 | Docket: 64509756

Cited 1 times | Published

joint tort-feasors. 1 Harper and James, Torts, § 10.1 at 692-693. Appellant has not demonstrated error

Top Tobacco, L.P. v. Star Importers & Wholesalers, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 2025 | Docket: 69880847

Published

Argued: Apr 22, 2025

deceptive trade practices, GA. CODE ANN. § 10-1-372; and unjust enrichment. Republic moved

D.H. Pace Company, Inc. v. OGD Equipment Company, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 22, 2023 | Docket: 66917810

Published

Argued: Mar 1, 2023

Trade Practices Act (“GUDTPA”), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-370 et seq.; unfair competition in violation of

Burt Kroner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 13, 2022 | Docket: 65344471

Published

& LESLIE BOOK, IRS PRACTICE & PROCEDURE § 10.01 (June 2022 ed.). As the Supreme Court has recognized

Acrylicon USA, LLC v. Silikal GMBH

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 29, 2022 | Docket: 64929567

Published

“misappropriated” that trade secret. See GA. CODE ANN. § 10-1- 760–767. (2020). USCA11 Case: 21-12853 Date

NATALIA SOLANGE FONT POMALES v. AKLIPSE ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2022 | Docket: 63108526

Published

Florida Appellate Practice § 10 1:7 (2021 ed.) (“The phrase ‘any

Acrylicon USA, LLC v. Silikal GMBH

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 26, 2021 | Docket: 43326014

Published

simply say “AcryliCon.” 2 O.C.G.A. § 10–1–760 et seq. 3 AC-USA’s Second Amended

Acrylicon USA, LLC v. Silikal GMBH

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 26, 2021 | Docket: 58963037

Published

simply say “AcryliCon.” 2 O.C.G.A. § 10–1–760 et seq. 3 AC-USA’s Second Amended

Pine Mountain Preserve, LLLP v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 22, 2020 | Docket: 18571795

Published

See The Law of Easements & Licenses in Land § 10:1. “[A] restriction” on the landowner’s use of its

Pine Mountain Preserve, LLLP v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 22, 2020 | Docket: 18564573

Published

See The Law of Easements & Licenses in Land § 10:1. “[A] restriction” on the landowner’s use of its

Aponte v. Brown & Brown of Fla., Inc.

382 F. Supp. 3d 1318

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 23, 2019 | Docket: 64324620

Published

7 Matulis testified that it occurred in late January and Beck testified that it occurred on February 2, 2017. (Doc. 70 at 55-57 & 126). 8 On the morning prior to Aponte's termination, B & B terminated Beck's employment. (Doc 70 at 39-40). 9 At trial, B & B argued that Aponte had not established an FMLA interference claim because his FMLA leave was not the proximate cause of his termination. (Doc. 71 at 124-125). However, "a causal nexus is not an element of an interference claim, but that the employer

Village of Palmetto Bay, Florida v. Alexander School, Inc.

223 So. 3d 1037, 2017 WL 1018495, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3469

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2017 | Docket: 4617672

Published

Alexander Schools, Inc. (“Alexander School”) finding Section 10.1 of the Village’s Charter to be unconstitutional

Unique Sports Products, Inc. v. Ferrari Importing Company

720 F.3d 1307, 107 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1531, 2013 WL 3369153, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13738

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 8, 2013 | Docket: 420713

Published

Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-372; and for violation of the June 18, 1999, final

Unique Sports Products, Inc. v. Ferrari Importing Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 8, 2013 | Docket: 2902961

Published

Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10- 1-372; and for violation of the June 18, 1999, final

Akanthos Capital Management, LLC v. CompuCredit Holdings Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 25, 2012 | Docket: 2904857

Published

prevention doctrine were to apply in this case, Section 10.01 of the trust indentures requires CompuCredit

National Association v. Board of Regents

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 24, 2011 | Docket: 2906563

Published

the Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq.6 Count III, for breach of contract

Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. Kraus-Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 28, 2010 | Docket: 2907306

Published

Article 10 contained five sections. Section 10.1 stated that: Claims, disputes and other

Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n v. Colony Beach & Tennis Club, Inc. (In Re Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n)

423 B.R. 690, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 297, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 148, 2010 WL 286615

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 2010 | Docket: 1638474

Published

accommodations in the operation of the Hotel. (Ex. 19 at § 10. 1.) Dr. Klauber is the president and principal of

In Re Ocean Blue Leasehold Property LLC

393 B.R. 792, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 458, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2508, 50 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 165

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Sep 5, 2008 | Docket: 1419937

Published

10.1 of the Contract. The relevant portion of Section 10.1 provides: If Purchaser fails to perform its

In Re Fountain Imaging of North Miami Beach, LLC

392 B.R. 508, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 425, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2168, 50 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 110

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jul 10, 2008 | Docket: 1467926

Published

000 non-refundable deposit to GECC. Moreover, Section 10.1 of the APA at least suggests that if the Purchaser

Sharp v. City of Palatka

529 F. Supp. 2d 1354, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93647, 2007 WL 4557227

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2007 | Docket: 2244927

Published

a solution." (City of Palatka Personnel Rules, § 10.1(D), Doc. # 85 (emphasis added); see also Bush Aff

In Re Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

356 B.R. 813, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 202, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3260, 2006 WL 3543154

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2006 | Docket: 1809016

Published

conditions to Confirmation of the Plan set forth in Section 10.1 Of the Plan have been satisfied before the Confirmation

Andrew J. Wagner v. Daewoo Heavy Industries

314 F.3d 541

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 2003 | Docket: 2039050

Published

the Georgia Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq., a claim for misappropriation of trade

Godwin v. Solutia, Inc.

215 F. Supp. 2d 1291, 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2449, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16332, 2002 WL 1837851

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2002 | Docket: 2370896

Published

States Code, Section 1132(g)(1). [2] Under section 10.1(d)(3) of the Plan, Solutia's Plan Committee

Robert Eugene Lamb v. Turbine Designs, Inc.

207 F.3d 1259, 54 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1281, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5165

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 28, 2000 | Docket: 506442

Published

under the Georgia Trade Secrets Act, O.C.G.A. Section 10-1-761(2)(B), and that this tort occurred in Atlanta

Robert Eugene Lamb v. Turbine Designs, Inc.

207 F.3d 1259

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 28, 2000 | Docket: 395722

Published

under the Georgia Trade Secrets Act, O.C.G.A. Section 10-1-761 (2)(B), and that this tort occurred in

Capital Asset Research v. Finnegan

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 13, 1998 | Docket: 395007

Published

the Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760, et seq. (1997) (“the Act”). On May 7, 1996

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 10, 1998 | Docket: 3255424

Published

the employee had obtained permanent status. Section 10(1), Chapter 96-519, Laws of Florida, extends the

Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Nielsen

142 F.3d 1375

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 9, 1998 | Docket: 422767

Published

as they relate to ERISA plans. It also held that § 10-1-115 and § 27-1-4 of the Alabama Code exempt all

Camp Creek Hospitality v. Sheraton

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 11, 1997 | Docket: 422141

Published

Georgia Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the

Camp Creek Hospitality v. Sheraton

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 11, 1997 | Docket: 422140

Published

Georgia Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the

Camp Creek Hospitality v. Sheraton

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 11, 1997 | Docket: 211844

Published

Trade Secrets Act ("GTSA"). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the

Camp Creek Hospitality Inns, Inc. v. Sheraton Franchise Corp.

130 F.3d 1009, 45 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1065, 48 Fed. R. Serv. 476, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 35977, 1997 WL 761207

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 11, 1997 | Docket: 236596

Published

Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the

Aruvision Holding and Exploitation v. Disney/ABC Television International Inc.

992 F. Supp. 1370, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21748, 1997 WL 833304

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1997 | Docket: 66021179

Published

New York law governs the Agreement (Agreement § 10.1).

Hunt v. Hawthorn Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 74098

Published

for TAC members from ALPA is paid by ALPA, see § 10.1(b)(ii). 10

Friedlander v. PDK Labs, Inc.

89 F.3d 747

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 26, 1996 | Docket: 419991

Published

Georgia Fair Business Practices Act (FBPA), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq., and requested: (1) a temporary

Walter v. Celotex Corp. (In Re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.)

197 B.R. 372, 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 627, 1996 WL 307294

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 28, 1996 | Docket: 1442935

Published

Restated Joint Plan of Reorganization, in which Section 10.1(a)(xv) provides as follows: (xv) Regardless

First Florida Banks, Inc. v. Mid-State Federal Savings Bank

612 So. 2d 730, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1794, 1993 WL 33336

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1993 | Docket: 64693778

Published

Mid-State Federal’s claim for $750,000 un*731der section 10.1 of the New Agreement is properly brought in

Dowd v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

975 F.2d 779

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 15, 1992 | Docket: 66278069

Published

section does not differ from that applicable to a section 10(1) petition. Boire v. Teamsters, 479 F.2d 778

Pensacola Junior College Faculty Ass'n v. Board of Trustees

593 So. 2d 254, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 503, 1992 WL 3682

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1992 | Docket: 64665124

Published

moreover appears to be at variance with Article X, section 10.01 of the bargaining agreement, providing that

Lillie B. Cowan, Counter-Defendant v. Miles Rich Chrysler-Plymouth, Counter-Claimant

885 F.2d 801, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15267, 1989 WL 108483

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 29, 1989 | Docket: 821731

Published

Vehicle Sales and Finance Act [MVSFA], O.C.G.A. § 10-1-30 et seq. However, the MVSFA claim

Ferris v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

764 F.2d 1475, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30883

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 9, 1985 | Docket: 66207867

Published

Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act (MVSFA), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-30 et seq. We reverse, holding that there has been

Williams v. State

399 So. 2d 999, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19860

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 64583312

Published

Instructions, Civil and Criminal (3d ed. 1977) § 10.01; and ”... the punishment provided by law for the

Rebholz v. Metrocare, Inc.

397 So. 2d 677, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2643

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1981 | Docket: 64582186

Published

contracts and is unconstitutional. U.S.Const. Art. I,. § 10;1 Art. I, § 10, Fla.Const.2 See Village of El Portal

Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 517 v. Greater Orlando Aviation Authority

385 So. 2d 716, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1980 | Docket: 64577164

Published

refused to bargain with the Labor*717ers based on section 10 1 of chapter 75-464, Laws of Florida, the act

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 21, 1979 | Docket: 3259017

Published

certification is issued to that applicant. Section 10(1), Ch. 79-272. A business organization must have

Carson v. City of Fort Lauderdale

155 So. 2d 624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1963 | Docket: 60214480

Published

contract would be in violation of Article I, Section 10(1) of the Constitution of the United States. The