The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS

Chapter 10
SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 10.001

10.001 Legislative representation.—Beginning with the general election held in the second year following each decennial census, the representation of the people of Florida in the Florida Legislature shall be as set forth earlier in such year by the Legislature by joint resolution or by the Supreme Court by order, as the case may be. A joint resolution of apportionment or an order of the Supreme Court adopted or entered pursuant to s. 16, Art. III of the State Constitution shall be included in the Florida Statutes in the same manner as a statute.

History.—s. 4, ch. 67-479; s. 1, ch. 72-242; s. 1, SJR 1305, 1972 Regular Session.

F.S. 10.001 on Google Scholar

F.S. 10.001 on Casetext

Amendments to 10.001

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 10.001

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 10.001.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PALANTIR USG, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 904 F.3d 980 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 2377(c)(1) ; FAR 10.001(a)(2). . . . . § 2377(c)(2) (emphasis added); FAR 10.001(a)(3). . . . agency's requirements if those requirements were modified to a reasonable extent." § 2377(c)(2) ; FAR 10.001 . . .

SIGMATECH, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 135 Fed. Cl. 694 (Fed. Cl. 2018)

. . . . § 9.104-1 (General Standards); § 10.001(b) (Policy); § 15.305(a) (Proposal Evaluation); § 15.404-2 . . . the minimum information necessary” at this juncture. 5/18/17 Gov’t Reply at 10-11 (citing 48 C.F.R. § 10.001 . . .

ANALYTICAL GRAPHICS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, v., 135 Fed. Cl. 378 (Fed. Cl. 2017)

. . . Intervenor, citing 48 C.P.R. § 10.001, argues that “FAR provides three steps in the procurement process . . . Intervenor, quoting from 48 C.F.R. § 10.001, argues, somewhat confusingly, that after conducting market . . . So too are the “results of the market research” used to consider small business issues. 48 C.F.R. § 10.001 . . . Although referenced by intervenor, "48 C.F.R. § 10.001 (a)(3)(vi) and (vii)" provide an agency use the . . . The court notes that 48 C.F.R. § 10.001(a)(2)(vi) provides that: On an ongoing basis, take advantage . . .

PALANTIR USG, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 129 Fed. Cl. 218 (Fed. Cl. 2016)

. . . might not be available to satisfy agency needs, agencies shall reevaluate the need in accordance with 10.001 . . .

DTND SIERRA INVESTMENTS, L. L. C. v. HSBC BANK USA, N. A. As, 627 F. App'x 285 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . Code § 10.001. . . . Violations of Section 10.001 may result in a penalty “sufficient to deter repetition of the conduct” . . .

RAYMOND EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 120 Fed. Cl. 413 (Fed. Cl. 2015)

. . . The court sees no violation of FAR 10.001(a)(3)(i) in this procurement. . . . Finally, plaintiff asserts that DeCA’s market research violated FAR 10.001(a)(2)(i) because it plainly . . . Pl.’s Mot. at 32 (quoting FAR 10.001(a)(2)). . . . Apparently, REI interprets FAR 10.001(a)(2) to command that DeCA’s market research focus primarily on . . . The court finds no violation of FAR 10.001 (a)(2)(i) in DeCA’s market research, which, in the court’s . . .

AMERICAN AUTO LOGISTICS, LP, v. UNITED STATES, LLC,, 117 Fed. Cl. 137 (Fed. Cl. 2014)

. . . See FAR 12.202 (2013) (“Market research (see 10.001) is an essential element of building an effective . . . at FAR 12.102(g)(1); (B) Include the written determination in the contract file....”); see also FAR 10.001 . . . ‘[d]etermin[ing] if sources capable of satisfying the agency’s requirements exist.’ ” (quoting FAR 10.001 . . . (quoting FAR 10.001(b), 10.002(b) (internal citations omitted))). . . .

ADVANCED AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 111 Fed. Cl. 205 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . Protest; Standing; Blue & Gold Fleet-, Documented Market Research; 8(a) Business Development Program; FAR 10.001 . . . Plaintiff further argues that the government violated FAR 10.001 because it did not perform the market . . . The Government Did Not Violate FAR 10.001 Plaintiff argues that the government violated section 10.001 . . . Id. § 10.001(a)(3)(i). . . . Id. § 10.001(b). . . .

INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES OF AMERICA, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 108 Fed. Cl. 711 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . The specific provisions in FAR Part 10 that have been violated here, in the court’s view, include FAR 10.001 . . . (a)(2)(ii), FAR 10.001(3)(i), and FAR 10.002(b). . . .

FIRSTLINE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 107 Fed. Cl. 189 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . [f]ull and open competition^]”); 10.001(a)(3)(i) (agencies must “use the results of the market research . . .

ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING SOLUTIONS CONSULTING CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 92 Fed. Cl. 722 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . Market Research as Basis for 8(a) Set-Aside Decision Under FAR 10.001, agencies must “[c]onduct market . . . FAR 10.001 requires agencies to use the results of the market research to “[determine if sources capable . . . Id. § 10.001(a)(3)(i), (b). . . . See 48 C.F.R. § 10.001(a); Def.’s Resp. 2, 4-5. . . . . §§ 10.001(b), 10.002(b)(1). . . .

MAGNUM OPUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 94 Fed. Cl. 512 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . See FAR § 10.001 (setting forth policy requiring market research); id. § 10.002 (describing procedures . . .

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 15 So. 3d 642 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Applying the underlying section 120.56(3) to this case, we hold that rule 21Q-10.001, which was held . . .

BENCHMADE KNIFE COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 79 Fed. Cl. 731 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . days notice that it intended to issue a solicitation for a bundled procurement, as required by FAR H 10.001 . . .

VALE, v. R. McDONOUGH,, 958 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Applying this reasoning to the situation in Board of Optometry, this court held that rule 21Q-10.001, . . .

KSD, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 72 Fed. Cl. 236 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . In this case, the July 25, 2005 justification stated that: Market Research as defined by FAR 10.001 has . . . The plaintiff relies on the following portion of FAR 10.001(a)(2)(v) (2005) to argue that the Army’s . . . to— (i) Determine if sources capable of satisfying the agency’s requirements exist---- 48 C.F.R. § 10.001 . . . In addition to the requirements for conducting market research set forth in FAR 10.001, FAR 10.002 (2005 . . . The plaintiff in this case argues that FAR 10.001 charges the government with affirmatively determining . . .

J H REINFORCING AND STRUCTURAL ERECTORS, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, T- C,, 50 Fed. Cl. 570 (Fed. Cl. 2001)

. . . V 1999) (Chapter 14A-Aid to Small Business); FAR § 19.1305 (HUBZone set-aside procedures); FAR § 10.001 . . .

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES, v., 50 Fed. Cl. 443 (Fed. Cl. 2001)

. . . . § 10.001 (2000) (market research for possible NDI acquisition required). . . .

In P. LOPEZ, v. P., 269 B.R. 607 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . . & Rem.Code § 10.001(2) & (3).” . . . Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, §§ 10.001, 10.002, and 10 .004 state in part: CHAPTER 10. . . . SANCTIONS FOR FRIVOLOUS PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS § 10.001. . . . Kirby for violation of § 10.001(2), i.e., unsupportable legal claims or contentions. . . . Thus, the second suit violated § 10.001(2) and (3) of the Texas Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code quoted above. . . .

M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY, a v. UNITED STATES,, 40 Fed. Cl. 389 (Fed. Cl. 1998)

. . . . § 10.001 (1992); W.C. Fore Trucking, Inc., ASBCA No. 32156, 1989 WL 46971 (1989)). . . .

UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT DIVISION, v. UNITED STATES,, 27 Fed. Cl. 393 (Fed. Cl. 1992)

. . . . § 10.001, FAR § 10.001 (“ ‘Specification’ means a description of the technical requirements for a material . . .

ATLANTIC RESEARCH CORPORATION, v. DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE, GTE, 716 F. Supp. 904 (E.D. Va. 1989)

. . . limited interpretation of that requirement gave GTE a competitive advantage in violation of FAR §§ 10.001 . . .

STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY A. O. D. J. O. D. v. FLORIDA SOCIETY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY J. M. D. C. M. D. H. M. D., 538 So. 2d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . rule invalid, Applying the theory underlying section 120.56(3) to this case, we hold that rule 21Q-10.001 . . . It is, therefore, subject to the same provisions in section 120.56(3) as the invalid rule 21Q-10.001. . . . This section 120.56 rule challenge proceeding involves a determination of the invalidity of rule 21Q-10.001 . . . Rule 21Q-10.001 implemented the statutory provisions in the following language: Application for Certification . . . The final order held rule 21Q-10.001 invalid in only one of the several respects argued by petitioners . . . and the Department: (a) That the language within Rule 21Q-10.001(3), Florida Administrative Code, which . . . conclusion of a post-graduate course conducted by a Board approved school of optometry,” as rule 21Q-10.001 . . .

FLORIDA SOCIETY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY J. M. D. C. M. D. H. M. D. v. STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY, 532 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . administer chapter 463 and enact rules for that purpose, § 463.005, Fla.Stat. (1987), adopted rule 21Q-10.001 . . . Appellants filed a petition with the Board challenging the validity of rule 21Q-10.001 and the validity . . . It promulgated and filed rule 21Q-10.001 with the Secretary of State, effective November 20, 1986. . . . and every optometrist which the Board proposes to certify” pursuant to section 463.0055 and rule 21Q-10.001 . . . Rule 21Q-10.001 provides: Application for Certification. . . .

In P Z ISLAND FARMS, INC. M. GRUNER, v. ABBOTT COBB, INC., 478 F. Supp. 529 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . This principle is clearly stated in 3 Collier Bankruptcy Manual (2d edition) § 10.001, p. 288: The acquisition . . .

SWIFT INDUSTRIES, INC. No. v. BOTANY INDUSTRIES, INC. No., 466 F.2d 1125 (3d Cir. 1972)

. . . .* 32.555% 37.686% Aireo Supply Company, Incorporated 21.087% 10.001% Lincoln Homes Company None 33.444% . . .