CopyCited 334 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1249, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24549, 2005 WL 3040815
application of the Georgia Trade Secrets Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. Id. The trial court in that
0 red0 yellow80 green0 procedural
CopyCited 185 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 96 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1001, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14514, 2010 WL 2773447
Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-370 et seq. (Count II); fraud pursuant to O.C.G
0 red3 yellow114 green1 procedural
CopyCited 123 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 225 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1122, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28844
trademark infringement in violation of Ga.Code Ann. § 10-1-450; 5 (3) deceptive trade practice
0 red2 yellow85 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"Sinks (2008)phrase: "but see"
CopyCited 116 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 32 Communications Reg. (P&F) 113, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6344, 2004 WL 691789
the Georgia Unfair Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390, et seq.; (2) fraud and negligent misrepresentation;
0 red2 yellow86 green0 procedural
Declined to followFowler (2016)phrase: "decline to follow"
Declined to followFowler (2016)phrase: "decline to follow"
CopyCited 85 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 410, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19067, 2003 WL 22120071
losses and pay valid claims[.]”); Couoh ON lNS.3d § 10:1 (stating that, while “[t]he term ‘self-insurance’
0 red4 yellow90 green2 procedural
Cited "but see"Estate (2014)phrase: "but see"
CopyCited 71 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18566, 2001 WL 936051
C.G.A. § 10-1-372; (3) violations of the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-393; (4)
0 red3 yellow73 green0 procedural
DistinguishedBetts (2002)phrase: "distinguishing"
DistinguishedGreenless (2002)phrase: "distinguishing"
DistinguishedGreenless (2002)phrase: "distinguishing"
CopyCited 61 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-372(a), and the federal Lanham Act, 15 U
0 red0 yellow72 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWEEKS (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityEfstathion (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 47 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 78 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1386, 97 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1931, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3543, 2011 WL 649951
the Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq.[6] Count III, for breach of contract
0 red0 yellow59 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityHalmos (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 43 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2008 WL 2993570
installment transaction under this article." See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31(a)(1). Reading these sections in pari materia
0 red0 yellow33 green0 procedural
CopyCited 44 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
maintain [a trade secret's] secrecy." O.C.G.A. § 10-1-761(4)(B). 21 Because Yellowfin
0 red0 yellow30 green1 procedural
Cited as authorityDrago (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 45 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 8 A.L.R. 4th 1014
Justice, Pattern Rules of Court and Code Provisions § 10-1.9(a) (1975). [19] See Davis v. State, 308 So.2d
1 red1 yellow23 green0 procedural
OverruledAcosta (1986)phrase: "overruling"
DistinguishedDonovan (1981)phrase: "distinguishing"
CopyCited 30 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 83 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1769, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19918, 2007 WL 2377455
Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-372(a); breach of confidential relationship; breach
0 red0 yellow56 green0 procedural
CopyCited 60 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 65 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1563, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1122, 2003 WL 164280
the Georgia Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq., a claim for misappropriation
1 red0 yellow62 green0 procedural
SupersededDavidson (2007)phrase: "superseded by"
Cited as authorityPENCE (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 33 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17990, 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 224
gations and rights of the Indenture Trustee. Section 10.01 stated that “the Trustee undertakes to perform
0 red0 yellow32 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityJohn (2026)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityPerrotti (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 33 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 15 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1024, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19487, 1990 WL 101595
1984); 3 M. Nimmer & D. Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 10.01[C][4], at 10-1 (1989). JOINT AUTHORSHIP Defendants
0 red1 yellow23 green0 procedural
CopyCited 48 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
they relate to ERISA plans. It also held that § 10-1-115 and § 27-1-4 of the Alabama Code exempt all
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAdell (2011)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityFreeman (1998)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 31 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23768
various functions under the Bank Act. Id. § 10(1)(a-e). It is incongruous to suggest that a United
0 red2 yellow17 green11 procedural
Cited as authorityRogan (2004)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 26 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98760, 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 692, 2006 WL 1495222
relief under O.C.G.A. § 10-1-762, or an action for damages under 0.C.G.A. § 10-1-763.") [31] AlphaMed
0 red1 yellow28 green0 procedural
CopyCited 28 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 4355
Conveying Subsidiaries' obligations and liens. Section 10.1 of the term loans provides that no amendment
0 red0 yellow20 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySerafis (2021)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 28 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2016 WL 1719267
statements to' the FBI, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 10,01 (Count 15). Prior to trial, Mr. Smith filed
0 red0 yellow18 green0 procedural
CopyCited 22 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 94 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1866, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9373, 2010 WL 1816170
CODE ANN. § 10-1-371 et seq. [12] GA.CODE ANN. § 23-2-55 et seq. [13] GA.CODE ANN. § 10-1-451(b). [14]
0 red2 yellow35 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDrummond (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 16 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
infringement of a registered mark under O.C.G.A. § 10-1-450, (iv) denied without prejudice Defendant’s
0 red0 yellow72 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDOZIER (2026)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 23 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
Charter which is here involved reads as follows: "Section 10.01: Reservation of Certain Powers in Municipalities
0 red0 yellow18 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBrowning (2010)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBrowning (2007)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 39 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21759
preemption law. The Georgia law of usury under O.G. C.A. § 10-1-33 makes the civil penalties of the Georgia Motor
0 red0 yellow3 green12 procedural
Cited as authoritySweeney (2005)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 20 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1999 WL 1018661
Burris, Florida Administrative Practice Manual, § 10.01(d) (Supp.1997). Any substantially affected party
0 red0 yellow22 green0 procedural
CopyCited 21 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10939, 2010 WL 2138957
Construction." [5] Article 10 contained five sections. Section 10.1 stated that: Claims, disputes and other matters
0 red0 yellow18 green1 procedural
Cited as authorityManzini (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityMoreno (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityANDERSON (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 18 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 233507
Burris, Florida Administrative Practice Manual, § 10.01(d) (Supp.1997).
0 red0 yellow16 green0 procedural
CopyCited 17 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2012 WL 1414247, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8359
prevention doctrine were to apply in this case, Section 10.01 of the trust indentures requires CompuCredit
0 red0 yellow18 green0 procedural
CopyCited 11 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 43 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1831, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22846, 1997 WL 471361
the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq., and state common-law claims
0 red0 yellow67 green0 procedural
CopyCited 41 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 41 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1896, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3276
infringement of a registered mark under O.C.G.A. § 10-1-450, (iv) denied without prejudice Defendant's
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityNassau (1999)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1998 WL 904304
Laurence H. Tribe, American Constitutional Law § 10-1, at 629 (2d ed.1988)(concerning the protection
1 red0 yellow13 green0 procedural
OverruledAdams (2001)phrase: "overruling"
Cited as authorityMcCutcheon (2023)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2290
commencing referendum proceedings under article X, section 10.01(b), Code of Winter Springs. The purpose of the
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
CopyCited 17 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 39 ERC (BNA) 1641, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13430, 1994 WL 515901
the environment of the United States." 44 C.F.R. § 10.1(a). FEMA's regulatory criteria, designed to determine
0 red1 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"Norton (2003)phrase: "but see"
Cited as authorityShaw (2013)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityDeer (2008)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 51 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
for TAC members from ALPA is paid by ALPA, see § 10.1(b)(ii). 10 According
CopyCited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1992 WL 140998
development and its residents. Article VII, section 10[1] of the Florida Constitution prohibits the state
0 red1 yellow11 green0 procedural
CopyCited 17 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2489, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 25988
section does not differ from that applicable to a section 10(1) petition. Boire v. Teamsters,
479 F.2d 7780 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
CopyCited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Georgia Trade Secrets Act ("GTSA"). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyCited 10 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Compensation Programs. See 20 C.F.R. § 10.1 . The Compensation Act also requires the creation
0 red0 yellow25 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityThrasher (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 13 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14408, 2002 WL 1574994
also Ala.Code §§ 8-24-2, 8-24-3; Ga.Code Ann. § 10-1-702; Ind.Code 24-4-7-5; Mich. Comp. Laws § 600
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
CopyCited 13 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 685593
ARTICLE 10 "PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY," Section 10.1 "RESPONSIBILITY FOR PERSONS AND PROPERTY," provides:
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLASSITER (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityCannon (2011)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBrockman (2008)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 26004, 2012 WL 6604518
Fair Business Practices Act (GFBPA), Ga.Code ANN. § 10-1-390 et seq. 1 The district
0 red0 yellow25 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityANDERSON (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityWALKER (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 12 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1989 A.M.C. 1345, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3143, 1989 WL 29327
disaster. Gilmore & Black, The Law of Admiralty, section 10-1, p. 819 (2d ed. 1975). [14] The situation is
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBerman (1994)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2014 A.M.C. 1636, 2014 WL 1816946, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8663
contains several other provisions pertinent here. Section 10.1 provides: Liability. Full liability for
0 red0 yellow16 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityNetto (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 8 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 249, 1992 WL 5350
not performing its contractual obligations (section 10.1); or (2) the owner could terminate on fourteen
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWilson (2008)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 9 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14019, 2011 WL 522008
specified the nature of the subsidiary guarantees: Section 10.01. SUBSIDIARY GUARANTY (a) Subject to this Article
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CopyCited 12 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal
pleading. See Trawick's Florida Practice & Procedure § 10-1 at page 22 (1979). In the instant case, GDM had
0 red0 yellow2 green1 procedural
Cited as authorityRomellotti (1995)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8943, 1991 WL 175868
See J. Alpert & P. Murphy, Florida Law of Damages § 10-1 (1978). The plaintiffs are not entitled to both
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
CopyCited 10 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
in Georgia. See O.C.G.A. Sec. 10-1-33(a). Section 10-1-33(b) provides that the finance charge is to
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27236
(10% add-on) then allowed under GMVSFA. O.C.G.A. § 10-1-30 et seq. The cases came to us on
0 red0 yellow8 green2 procedural
CopyCited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
sought the recovery of the penalty provided in section 10-1-38(c) of MVSFA: "double the time price differential
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPrice (2023)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 5 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 77, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2374, 2009 WL 2710266
contract claim. 1. Section 10.1 Cannot Defeat EME's Breach of Contract Claim Section 10.1 of the Trade Contract
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAndrews (2023)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20147, 2005 WL 2234155
the environment of the United States." 44 C.F.R. § 10.1(a). FEMA's regulatory criteria, designed to determine
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityUsfs (2015)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityOceana (2014)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 45 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 710, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13317, 2001 WL 995270
individual proof of claim. Newberg On Class Actions, § 10.01 (3d ed.1992). As noted in Newberg: Formulae for
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityHerman (2017)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBarfield (2015)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 16 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1988 A.M.C. 2328, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3080
Thomas J. Schoenbaum, Admiralty and Maritime Law, Section 10-1 at p. 381 (1987). Included in paragraph 34
0 red0 yellow0 green1 procedural
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 129, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 201, 1989 WL 27659
are grown. The court held the provisions of Section 10(1) of Chapter 88-308, Laws of Florida, amending
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityScofield (2004)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
filing of claims was Chapter 26484, Laws of 1951, Section 10(1), which, in effect, provided that the period
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBenson (1993)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityWetmore (1979)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1544, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 17061, 1997 WL 345949
as they relate to ERISA plans. It also held that § 10-1-115 and § 27-1 — 1 of the Alabama Code exempt all
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
CopyCited 6 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 327, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 2019, 1993 WL 554005
made clear in the introductory sentence of Section 10.01. That section begins as follows: "In order to
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
Instructions, Civil and Criminal (3d ed. 1977) § 10.01; and "... the punishment provided by law for the
0 red1 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"Hubbard (1982)phrase: "but see"
Cited as authorityEvans (1984)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Georgia Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act. Ga.Code Ann. § 10-1-33 (1982). The charges were, however, within the
0 red0 yellow3 green3 procedural
Cited as authorityWells (2003)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
including Section 10.01, Florida Statutes 1955, F.S.A., in the 1955 Revision. Section 10.01, Florida Statutes
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLegislature (1972)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityWarnock (1965)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityLamson (1960)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1625, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 20761, 1997 WL 437161
for TAC members from ALPA is paid by ALPA, see § 10.1(b)(ii). . According to § 2.13(d), the TAC "may
0 red0 yellow16 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCaprio (2020)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGriffin (2015)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityPowers (2013)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 46 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1677, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8337, 1998 WL 210558
Georgia Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the
0 red0 yellow15 green0 procedural
CopyCited 4 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 2150
the Florida Constitution, Fla. Const., Art. VII, § 10.[1] In addressing these Objections, it is important
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBuridi (2015)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13624, 1993 WL 383603
Institutions: Mergers, Acquisitions and Conversions § 10.01-02 (5th ed. 1991). B. Public Policy Underlying
0 red1 yellow4 green0 procedural
DistinguishedCollins (1996)phrase: "distinguishing"
Cited as authoritySkow (2012)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 10 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
the Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760, et seq. (1997) ("the Act"). On May 7, 1996
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 21348, 2010 WL 4027719
Practices Act (“FBPA”), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq. The FBPA, in O.C.G.A. § 10 -1-399(d), provides that [i]f
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPaher (2020)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 225 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 899
Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Ga.Code § 10-1-372 (1982).3 *806Southern Bell claims injury to
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityColour-Tex (1990)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 WL 2803093
Practices Act ("FBPA"), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq. The FBPA, in O.C.G.A. § 10-1-399(d), provides that [i]f
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
deceased partner’s family (specifically defined in section 10.1 of the Agreement to generally exclude spouses)
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19935, 1995 WL 410811
Georgia Fair Business Practices Act (FBPA), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq., and requested: (1) a temporary
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyCited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2016 WL 1242165
construed in accordance with Florida law. See Agreement § 10.1. “Contract and statutory interpretation are both
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDelgado (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHirsch (2017)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
as an Engineering Contractor as defined in Section 10-1(k) of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County,
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 48 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1853, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 28458, 1998 WL 789149
the Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760, et seq. (1997) (“the Act”). On May 7, 1996
0 red0 yellow15 green0 procedural
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Thomas J. Schoenbaum, Admiralty and Maritime Law, Section 10-1 at p. 381 (1987). Included in paragraph 34 of
0 red0 yellow4 green4 procedural
CopyCited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 844, 2007 WL 61059
materials, that exceed $50,000. 2004 Fla. Laws 464, § 10(1). Jackson-Shaw argues that JAA's failure to determine
0 red1 yellow2 green0 procedural
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Georgia Trade Secrets Act ("GTSA"). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 124 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1431, 2017 WL 4369451, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19168
§ 1125; and unfair competition under O.C.G.A. § 10-1-372. This is SCAD’s appeal from the district
0 red0 yellow10 green1 procedural
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2010 WL 4136306
second product or service as well." H. Hovenkamp § 10.1, at 397. Plaintiffs do not allege a tying claim
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityRoss (2014)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBruno (2012)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
(See Tr. [Bingham] at 195-96; PMI Exh. 2 at Section 10.1(a).) The Guaranty also provided that PMI had
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
& LESLIE BOOK, IRS PRACTICE & PROCEDURE § 10.01 (June 2022 ed.). As the Supreme Court has recognized
0 red0 yellow27 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
simply say “AcryliCon.” 2 O.C.G.A. § 10–1–760 et seq. 3 AC-USA’s Second Amended
0 red0 yellow23 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDay (2026)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityPENCE (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBARAHONA (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida
Mo. Ann. Stat. § 451.090 (2018); Mont. Code Ann. § 10-1-202 (2018); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-102 (2018); Nev
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CopyCited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 114739
"schools, public and private," are permitted uses. Section 10-1-1.05 of the same ordinance provides that "words
CopyCited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19693
commencing referendum proceedings under Article X, section 10.01(b) of the City Charter to require the City Council
CopyCited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11490
re-enacted the court-approved plan into law (F.S. 10.-001-10.031, F.S.A.). The Legislature therefore is
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13358, 1995 WL 544743
labor. See Ala.Code, § 8-20-7 (1994); Ga.Code Ann. § 10-1-641 (Miehie 1994); Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. , 10,
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida
Depot of the obligation and another provision-section 10.1-that describes Home Depot's rebuilding of any
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35731, 2007 WL 1455963
as prescribed in Section 4.0 of the DRP Manual. § 10.01.03. Under Section 4.0, "[p]ermit reviews for complete
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyCited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 1248
an event of default under the Loan Agreement. Section 10.1 of the Loan Agreement provides in relevant part
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 118 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1481, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47694, 2016 WL 1441465
B. Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 10.01 [A]). The Copyright Act, however, “eradicated much
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
See The Law of Easements & Licenses in Land § 10:1. “[A] restriction” on the landowner’s use of its
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
“misappropriated” that trade secret. See GA. CODE ANN. § 10-1- 760–767. (2020). USCA11 Case: 21-12853 Date
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLopez (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Argued: Apr 22, 2025
deceptive trade practices, GA. CODE ANN. § 10-1-372; and unjust enrichment. Republic moved
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBitgood (2026)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityWard (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5823
joint tort-feasors. 1 Harper and James, Torts, § 10.1 at 692-693. Appellant has not demonstrated error
CopyCited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 214, 1988 WL 12508
associated with the sale. Baynes, Florida Mortgages, § 10-1 (1982). The certificate of title will issue not
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
section does not differ from that applicable to a section 10(1) petition. Boire v. Teamsters,
479 F.2d 7780 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | District Court, M.D. Florida
7 Matulis testified that it occurred in late January and Beck testified that it occurred on February 2, 2017. (Doc. 70 at 55-57 & 126). 8 On the morning prior to Aponte's termination, B & B terminated Beck's employment. (Doc 70 at 39-40). 9 At trial, B & B argued that Aponte had not established an FMLA interference claim because his FMLA leave was not the proximate cause of his termination. (Doc. 71 at 124-125). However, "a causal nexus is not an element of an interference claim, but that the employer
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityConage (2020)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 503, 1992 WL 3682
moreover appears to be at variance with Article X, section 10.01 of the bargaining agreement, providing that
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDistrict (2011)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Argued: Mar 1, 2023
Trade Practices Act (“GUDTPA”), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-370 et seq.; unfair competition in violation of
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBaum (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 458, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2508, 50 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 165
10.1 of the Contract. The relevant portion of Section 10.1 provides: If Purchaser fails to perform its
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
See The Law of Easements & Licenses in Land § 10:1. “[A] restriction” on the landowner’s use of its
CopyPublished | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 202, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3260, 2006 WL 3543154
conditions to Confirmation of the Plan set forth in Section 10.1 Of the Plan have been satisfied before the Confirmation
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
the Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760, et seq. (1997) (“the Act”). On May 7, 1996
CopyAgo (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1998).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
the employee had obtained permanent status. Section 10(1), Chapter 96-519, Laws of Florida, extends the
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Article 10 contained five sections. Section 10.1 stated that: Claims, disputes and other
CopyPublished | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 627, 1996 WL 307294
Restated Joint Plan of Reorganization, in which Section 10.1(a)(xv) provides as follows: (xv) Regardless
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19860
Instructions, Civil and Criminal (3d ed. 1977) § 10.01; and ”... the punishment provided by law for the
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 54 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1281, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5165
under the Georgia Trade Secrets Act, O.C.G.A. Section 10-1-761(2)(B), and that this tort occurred in Atlanta
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
under the Georgia Trade Secrets Act, O.C.G.A. Section 10-1-761 (2)(B), and that this tort occurred in
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
as they relate to ERISA plans. It also held that § 10-1-115 and § 27-1-4 of the Alabama Code exempt all
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16651
refused to bargain with the Labor*717ers based on section 10 1 of chapter 75-464, Laws of Florida, the act
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30883
Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act (MVSFA), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-30 et seq. We reverse, holding that there has been
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 107 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1531, 2013 WL 3369153, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13738
Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-372; and for violation of the June 18, 1999, final
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10- 1-372; and for violation of the June 18, 1999, final
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Georgia Fair Business Practices Act (FBPA), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq., and requested: (1) a temporary
CopyPublished | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 425, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2168, 50 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 110
000 non-refundable deposit to GECC. Moreover, Section 10.1 of the APA at least suggests that if the Purchaser
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
simply say “AcryliCon.” 2 O.C.G.A. § 10–1–760 et seq. 3 AC-USA’s Second Amended
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
the Georgia Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq., a claim for misappropriation of trade
CopyPublished | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 297, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 148, 2010 WL 286615
accommodations in the operation of the Hotel. (Ex. 19 at § 10. 1.) Dr. Klauber is the president and principal of
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
the Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq.6 Count III, for breach of contract
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
Florida Appellate Practice § 10 1:7 (2021 ed.) (“The phrase ‘any
CopyAgo (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1979).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
certification is issued to that applicant. Section 10(1), Ch. 79-272. A business organization must have
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Georgia Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Georgia Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Trade Secrets Act ("GTSA"). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
contract would be in violation of Article I, Section 10(1) of the Constitution of the United States. The
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
for TAC members from ALPA is paid by ALPA, see § 10.1(b)(ii). 10
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
prevention doctrine were to apply in this case, Section 10.01 of the trust indentures requires CompuCredit
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2643
contracts and is unconstitutional. U.S.Const. Art. I,. § 10;1 Art. I, § 10, Fla.Const.2 See Village of El Portal
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 45 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1065, 48 Fed. R. Serv. 476, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 35977, 1997 WL 761207
Trade Secrets Act (“GTSA”). See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq. The record shows that Tom Faust, the
1 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCoffee (1998)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93647, 2007 WL 4557227
a solution." (City of Palatka Personnel Rules, § 10.1(D), Doc. # 85 (emphasis added); see also Bush Aff
1 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
No longer good lawTurner (2020)phrase: "no longer good law"
Cited as authorityKeller (2015)phrase: "rule_authority"
