The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS

Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 11.45

11.45 Definitions; duties; authorities; reports; rules.—

(1) DEFINITIONS.—As used in ss. 11.40-11.51, the term:

(a) “Abuse” means behavior that is deficient or improper when compared with behavior that a prudent person would consider a reasonable and necessary operational practice given the facts and circumstances. The term includes the misuse of authority or position for personal gain.

(b) “Audit” means a financial audit, operational audit, or performance audit.

(c) “County agency” means a board of county commissioners or other legislative and governing body of a county, however styled, including that of a consolidated or metropolitan government, a clerk of the circuit court, a separate or ex officio clerk of the county court, a sheriff, a property appraiser, a tax collector, a supervisor of elections, or any other officer in whom any portion of the fiscal duties of a body or officer expressly stated in this paragraph are separately placed by law.

(d) “Financial audit” means an examination of financial statements in order to express an opinion on the fairness with which they are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and an examination to determine whether operations are properly conducted in accordance with legal and regulatory requirements. Financial audits must be conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States and government auditing standards. When applicable, the scope of financial audits must encompass the additional activities necessary to establish compliance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, 31 U.S.C. ss. 7501-7507, and other applicable federal law.

(e) “Fraud” means obtaining something of value through willful misrepresentation, including, but not limited to, intentional misstatements or intentional omissions of amounts or disclosures in financial statements to deceive users of financial statements, theft of an entity’s assets, bribery, or the use of one’s position for personal enrichment through the deliberate misuse or misapplication of an organization’s resources.

(f) “Governmental entity” means a state agency, a county agency, or any other entity, however styled, that independently exercises any type of state or local governmental function.

(g) “Local governmental entity” means a county agency, municipality, tourist development council, county tourism promotion agency, or special district as defined in s. 189.012. The term does not include any housing authority established under chapter 421.

(h) “Management letter” means a statement of the auditor’s comments and recommendations.

(i) “Operational audit” means an audit whose purpose is to evaluate management’s performance in establishing and maintaining internal controls, including controls designed to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse, and in administering assigned responsibilities in accordance with applicable laws, administrative rules, contracts, grant agreements, and other guidelines. Operational audits must be conducted in accordance with government auditing standards. Such audits examine internal controls that are designed and placed in operation to promote and encourage the achievement of management’s control objectives in the categories of compliance, economic and efficient operations, reliability of financial records and reports, and safeguarding of assets, and identify weaknesses in those internal controls.

(j) “Performance audit” means an examination of a program, activity, or function of a governmental entity, conducted in accordance with applicable government auditing standards or auditing and evaluation standards of other appropriate authoritative bodies. The term includes an examination of issues related to:

1. Economy, efficiency, or effectiveness of the program.

2. Structure or design of the program to accomplish its goals and objectives.

3. Adequacy of the program to meet the needs identified by the Legislature or governing body.

4. Alternative methods of providing program services or products.

5. Goals, objectives, and performance measures used by the agency to monitor and report program accomplishments.

6. The accuracy or adequacy of public documents, reports, or requests prepared under the program by state agencies.

7. Compliance of the program with appropriate policies, rules, or laws.

8. Any other issues related to governmental entities as directed by the Legislative Auditing Committee.

(k) “Political subdivision” means a separate agency or unit of local government created or established by law and includes, but is not limited to, the following and the officers thereof: authority, board, branch, bureau, city, commission, consolidated government, county, department, district, institution, metropolitan government, municipality, office, officer, public corporation, town, or village.

(l) “State agency” means a separate agency or unit of state government created or established by law and includes, but is not limited to, the following and the officers thereof: authority, board, branch, bureau, commission, department, division, institution, office, officer, or public corporation, as the case may be, except any such agency or unit within the legislative branch of state government other than the Florida Public Service Commission.

(m) “Waste” means the act of using or expending resources unreasonably, carelessly, extravagantly, or for no useful purpose.

(2) DUTIES.—The Auditor General shall:

(a) Conduct audits of records and perform related duties as prescribed by law, concurrent resolution of the Legislature, or as directed by the Legislative Auditing Committee.

(b) Annually conduct a financial audit of state government.

(c) Annually conduct financial audits of all state universities and Florida College System institutions and verify the accuracy of the amounts certified by each state university and Florida College System institution chief financial officer pursuant to ss. 1011.45 and 1011.84.

(d) Annually conduct financial audits of the accounts and records of all district school boards in counties with populations of fewer than 150,000, according to the most recent federal decennial statewide census; the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind; and the Florida School for Competitive Academics.

(e) Once every 3 years, conduct financial audits of the accounts and records of all district school boards in counties that have populations of 150,000 or more, according to the most recent federal decennial statewide census.

(f) At least every 3 years, conduct operational audits of the accounts and records of state agencies, state universities, state colleges, district school boards, the Florida Clerks of Court Operations Corporation, water management districts, the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind, and the Florida School for Competitive Academics.

(g) At least every 3 years, conduct a performance audit of the local government financial reporting system, which, for the purpose of this chapter, means any statutory provision related to local government financial reporting. The purpose of such an audit is to determine the accuracy, efficiency, and effectiveness of the reporting system in achieving its goals and to make recommendations to the local governments, the Governor, and the Legislature as to how the reporting system can be improved and how program costs can be reduced. The Auditor General shall determine the scope of the audits. The local government financial reporting system should provide for the timely, accurate, uniform, and cost-effective accumulation of financial and other information that can be used by the members of the Legislature and other appropriate officials to accomplish the following goals:

1. Enhance citizen participation in local government;

2. Improve the financial condition of local governments;

3. Provide essential government services in an efficient and effective manner; and

4. Improve decisionmaking on the part of the Legislature, state agencies, and local government officials on matters relating to local government.

(h) At least every 3 years, conduct a performance audit of the Department of Revenue’s administration of the ad valorem tax laws as described in s. 195.096. The audit report shall report on the activities of the ad valorem tax program of the Department of Revenue related to the ad valorem tax rolls. The Auditor General shall include, for at least four counties reviewed, findings as to the accuracy of assessment procedures, projections, and computations made by the department, using the same generally accepted appraisal standards and procedures to which the department and the property appraisers are required to adhere. However, the report may not include any findings or statistics related to any ad valorem tax roll that is in litigation between the state and county officials at the time the report is issued.

(i) Once every 3 years, review a sample of internal audit reports at each state agency, as defined in s. 20.055(1), to determine compliance with current Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing or, if appropriate, government auditing standards.

(j) Conduct audits of local governmental entities when determined to be necessary by the Auditor General, when directed by the Legislative Auditing Committee, or when otherwise required by law. No later than 18 months after the release of the audit report, the Auditor General shall perform such appropriate followup procedures as he or she deems necessary to determine the audited entity’s progress in addressing the findings and recommendations contained within the Auditor General’s previous report. The Auditor General shall notify each member of the audited entity’s governing body and the Legislative Auditing Committee of the results of his or her determination. For purposes of this paragraph, local governmental entities do not include water management districts.

(k) Contact each district school board, as defined in s. 1003.01(7), with the findings and recommendations contained within the Auditor General’s previous operational audit report. The district school board shall provide the Auditor General with evidence of the initiation of corrective action within 45 days after the date it is requested by the Auditor General and evidence of completion of corrective action within 180 days after the date it is requested by the Auditor General. If the district school board fails to comply with the Auditor General’s request or is unable to take corrective action within the required timeframe, the Auditor General shall notify the Legislative Auditing Committee.

(l) At least once every 3 years, conduct operational audits of the accounts and records of eligible nonprofit scholarship-funding organizations receiving eligible contributions under s. 1002.395, including any contracts for services with related entities, to determine compliance with the provisions of that section. Such audits shall include, but not be limited to, a determination of the eligible nonprofit scholarship-funding organization’s compliance with s. 1002.395(6)(l). The Auditor General shall provide its report on the results of the audits to the Governor, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Chief Financial Officer, and the Legislative Auditing Committee, within 30 days of completion of the audit.

(m) At least once every 7 years, conduct an operational and financial audit of each large-hub commercial service airport. Each operational audit shall include, at a minimum, an assessment of compliance with s. 332.0075, including compliance with chapter 287, and compliance with the public records and public meetings laws of this state. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “large-hub commercial service airport” means a publicly owned airport that has at least 1 percent of the annual passenger boardings in the United States as reported by the Federal Aviation Administration.

(n) At least once every 3 years, conduct an operational audit of the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association. Each operational audit shall include, at a minimum, an assessment of compliance with ss. 766.303-766.315 and compliance with the public records and public meetings laws of this state. The first operational audit must be completed by August 15, 2021.

The Auditor General shall perform his or her duties independently but under the general policies established by the Legislative Auditing Committee. This subsection does not limit the Auditor General’s discretionary authority to conduct other audits or engagements of governmental entities as authorized in subsection (3).

(3) AUTHORITY FOR AUDITS AND OTHER ENGAGEMENTS.—The Auditor General may, pursuant to his or her own authority, or at the direction of the Legislative Auditing Committee, conduct audits or other engagements as determined appropriate by the Auditor General of:

(a) The accounts and records of any governmental entity created or established by law.

(b) The information technology programs, activities, functions, or systems of any governmental entity created or established by law.

(d) The accounts and records of any direct-support organization or citizen support organization created or established by law. The Auditor General is authorized to require and receive any records from the direct-support organization or citizen support organization, or from its independent auditor.

(e) The public records associated with any appropriation made by the Legislature to a nongovernmental agency, corporation, or person. All records of a nongovernmental agency, corporation, or person with respect to the receipt and expenditure of such an appropriation shall be public records and shall be treated in the same manner as other public records are under general law.

(f) State financial assistance provided to any nonstate entity as defined by s. 215.97.

(g) The Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation created pursuant to s. 215.56005.

(h) Any purchases of federal surplus lands for use as sites for correctional facilities as described in s. 253.037.

(i) The Florida Development Finance Corporation or the capital development board or the programs or entities created by the board. The audit or report may not reveal the identity of any person who has anonymously made a donation to the board pursuant to this paragraph. The identity of a donor or prospective donor to the board who desires to remain anonymous and all information identifying such donor or prospective donor are confidential and exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution. Such anonymity shall be maintained in the auditor’s report.

(j) The records pertaining to the use of funds from voluntary contributions on a motor vehicle registration application or on a driver license application authorized pursuant to ss. 320.023 and 322.081.

(k) The records pertaining to the use of funds from the sale of specialty license plates described in chapter 320.

(l) The acquisitions and divestitures related to the Florida Communities Trust Program created pursuant to chapter 380.

(m) The Florida Water Pollution Control Financing Corporation created pursuant to s. 403.1837.

(n) The school readiness program, including the early learning coalitions under part VI of chapter 1002.

(o) CareerSource Florida, Inc., the state board as defined in s. 445.002, or the programs or entities created by the state board under s. 445.004.

(p) The corporation defined in s. 455.32 that is under contract with the Department of Business and Professional Regulation to provide administrative, investigative, examination, licensing, and prosecutorial support services in accordance with the provisions of s. 455.32 and the practice act of the relevant profession.

(q) The Florida Engineers Management Corporation created pursuant to chapter 471.

(r) The books and records of any permitholder that conducts race meetings or jai alai exhibitions under chapter 550.

(s) The corporation defined in part II of chapter 946, known as the Prison Rehabilitative Industries and Diversified Enterprises, Inc., or PRIDE Enterprises.

(t) The Florida Virtual School.

(u) Virtual education providers receiving state funds or funds from local ad valorem taxes.

(v) The accounts and records of a nonprofit scholarship-funding organization participating in a state sponsored scholarship program authorized by chapter 1002.

(w) The Florida Tourism Industry Marketing Corporation.

(x) Tourist development councils and county tourism promotion agencies.

(4) SCHEDULING AND STAFFING OF AUDITS.—

(a) Each financial audit required or authorized by this section, when practicable, shall be made and completed within not more than 9 months following the end of each audited fiscal year of the state agency or political subdivision, or at such lesser time which may be provided by law or concurrent resolution or directed by the Legislative Auditing Committee. When the Auditor General determines that conducting any audit or engagement otherwise required by law would not be possible due to workload or would not be an efficient or effective use of his or her resources based on an assessment of risk, then, in his or her discretion, the Auditor General may temporarily or indefinitely postpone such audits or other engagements for such period or any portion thereof, unless otherwise directed by the committee.

(b) The Auditor General may, when in his or her judgment it is necessary, designate and direct any auditor employed by the Auditor General to audit any accounts or records within the authority of the Auditor General to audit. The auditor shall report his or her findings for review by the Auditor General, who shall prepare the audit report.

(c) The audit report when final shall be a public record. The audit workpapers and notes are not a public record; however, those workpapers necessary to support the computations in the final audit report may be made available by a majority vote of the Legislative Auditing Committee after a public hearing showing proper cause. The audit workpapers and notes shall be retained by the Auditor General until no longer useful in his or her proper functions, after which time they may be destroyed.

(d) At the conclusion of the audit, the Auditor General or the Auditor General’s designated representative shall discuss the audit with the official whose office is subject to audit and submit to that official a list of the Auditor General’s findings which may be included in the audit report. If the official is not available for receipt of the list of audit findings, then delivery is presumed to be made when it is delivered to his or her office. The official shall submit to the Auditor General or the designated representative, within 30 days after the receipt of the list of findings, his or her written statement of explanation or rebuttal concerning all of the findings, including corrective action to be taken to preclude a recurrence of all findings.

(e) The Auditor General shall provide the successor independent certified public accountant of a district school board with access to the prior year’s working papers in accordance with the Statements on Auditing Standards, including documentation of planning, internal control, audit results, and other matters of continuing accounting and auditing significance, such as the working paper analysis of balance sheet accounts and those relating to contingencies.

(5) PETITION FOR AN AUDIT BY THE AUDITOR GENERAL.—

(a) The Legislative Auditing Committee shall direct the Auditor General to make an audit of any municipality whenever petitioned to do so by at least 20 percent of the registered electors in the last general election of that municipality pursuant to this subsection. The supervisor of elections of the county in which the municipality is located shall certify whether or not the petition contains the signatures of at least 20 percent of the registered electors of the municipality. After the completion of the audit, the Auditor General shall determine whether the municipality has the fiscal resources necessary to pay the cost of the audit. The municipality shall pay the cost of the audit within 90 days after the Auditor General’s determination that the municipality has the available resources. If the municipality fails to pay the cost of the audit, the Department of Revenue shall, upon certification of the Auditor General, withhold from that portion of the distribution pursuant to s. 212.20(6)(d)5. which is distributable to such municipality, a sum sufficient to pay the cost of the audit and shall deposit that sum into the General Revenue Fund of the state.

(b) At least one registered elector in the most recent general election must file a letter of intent with the municipal clerk prior to any petition of the electors of that municipality for the purpose of an audit. Each petition must be submitted to the supervisor of elections and contain, at a minimum:

1. The elector’s printed name;

2. The signature of the elector;

3. The elector’s residence address;

4. The elector’s date of birth; and

5. The date signed.

All petitions must be submitted for verification within 1 calendar year after the audit petition origination by the municipal electors.

(6) REQUEST BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY FOR AN AUDIT BY THE AUDITOR GENERAL.—Whenever a local governmental entity requests the Auditor General to conduct an audit of all or part of its operations and the Auditor General conducts the audit under his or her own authority or at the direction of the Legislative Auditing Committee, the expenses of the audit shall be paid by the local governmental entity. The Auditor General shall estimate the cost of the audit. Fifty percent of the cost estimate shall be paid by the local governmental entity before the initiation of the audit and deposited into the General Revenue Fund of the state. After the completion of the audit, the Auditor General shall notify the local governmental entity of the actual cost of the audit. The local governmental entity shall remit the remainder of the cost of the audit to the Auditor General for deposit into the General Revenue Fund of the state. If the local governmental entity fails to comply with paying the remaining cost of the audit, the Auditor General shall notify the Legislative Auditing Committee.

(7) AUDITOR GENERAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—

(a) The Auditor General shall notify the Legislative Auditing Committee of any local governmental entity, district school board, charter school, or charter technical career center that does not comply with the reporting requirements of s. 218.39.

(b) The Auditor General, in consultation with the Board of Accountancy, shall review all audit reports submitted pursuant to s. 218.39. The Auditor General shall request any significant items that were omitted in violation of a rule adopted by the Auditor General. The items must be provided within 45 days after the date of the request. If the governmental entity does not comply with the Auditor General’s request, the Auditor General shall notify the Legislative Auditing Committee.

(c) The Auditor General shall provide annually a list of those special districts which are not in compliance with s. 218.39 to the Special District Accountability Program of the Department of Economic Opportunity.

(d) During the Auditor General’s review of audit reports, he or she shall contact those units of local government, as defined in s. 218.403, that are not in compliance with s. 218.415 and request evidence of corrective action. The unit of local government shall provide the Auditor General with evidence of corrective action within 45 days after the date it is requested by the Auditor General. If the unit of local government fails to comply with the Auditor General’s request, the Auditor General shall notify the Legislative Auditing Committee.

(e) The Auditor General shall notify the Governor or the Commissioner of Education, as appropriate, and the Legislative Auditing Committee of any audit report reviewed by the Auditor General pursuant to paragraph (b) which contains a statement that a local governmental entity, charter school, charter technical career center, or district school board has met one or more of the conditions specified in s. 218.503. If the Auditor General requests a clarification regarding information included in an audit report to determine whether a local governmental entity, charter school, charter technical career center, or district school board has met one or more of the conditions specified in s. 218.503, the requested clarification must be provided within 45 days after the date of the request. If the local governmental entity, charter school, charter technical career center, or district school board does not comply with the Auditor General’s request, the Auditor General shall notify the Legislative Auditing Committee. If, after obtaining the requested clarification, the Auditor General determines that the local governmental entity, charter school, charter technical career center, or district school board has met one or more of the conditions specified in s. 218.503, he or she shall notify the Governor or the Commissioner of Education, as appropriate, and the Legislative Auditing Committee.

(f) The Auditor General shall annually compile and transmit to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Legislative Auditing Committee a summary of significant findings and financial trends identified in audit reports reviewed in paragraph (b) or otherwise identified by the Auditor General’s review of such audit reports and financial information, and identified in audits of district school boards conducted by the Auditor General. The Auditor General shall include financial information provided pursuant to s. 218.32(1)(e) for entities with fiscal years ending on or after June 30, 2003, within his or her reports submitted pursuant to this paragraph.

(g) If the Auditor General discovers significant errors, improper practices, or other significant discrepancies in connection with his or her audits of a state agency or state officer, the Auditor General shall notify the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Legislative Auditing Committee. The President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall promptly forward a copy of the notification to the chairs of the respective legislative committees, which in the judgment of the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives are substantially concerned with the functions of the state agency or state officer involved. Thereafter, and in no event later than the 10th day of the next succeeding legislative session, the person in charge of the state agency involved, or the state officer involved, as the case may be, shall explain in writing to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and to the Legislative Auditing Committee the reasons or justifications for such errors, improper practices, or other significant discrepancies and the corrective measures, if any, taken by the agency.

(h) The Auditor General shall annually compile and transmit to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Legislative Auditing Committee by December 1 of each year a report that includes a projected 2-year work plan identifying the audit and other accountability activities to be undertaken and a list of statutory and fiscal changes recommended by the Auditor General. The Auditor General may also transmit recommendations at other times of the year when the information would be timely and useful for the Legislature.

(i) The Auditor General shall annually transmit by July 15, to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Department of Financial Services, a list of all school districts, charter schools, charter technical career centers, Florida College System institutions, state universities, and local governmental entities that have failed to comply with the transparency requirements as identified in the audit reports reviewed pursuant to paragraph (b) and those conducted pursuant to subsection (2).

(j) The Auditor General shall notify the Legislative Auditing Committee of any financial or operational audit report prepared pursuant to this section which indicates that a district school board, state university, or Florida College System institution has failed to take full corrective action in response to a recommendation that was included in the two preceding financial or operational audit reports.

1. The committee may direct the district school board or the governing body of the state university or Florida College System institution to provide a written statement to the committee explaining why full corrective action has not been taken or, if the governing body intends to take full corrective action, describing the corrective action to be taken and when it will occur.

2. If the committee determines that the written statement is not sufficient, the committee may require the chair of the district school board or the chair of the governing body of the state university or Florida College System institution, or the chair’s designee, to appear before the committee.

3. If the committee determines that the district school board, state university, or Florida College System institution has failed to take full corrective action for which there is no justifiable reason or has failed to comply with committee requests made pursuant to this section, the committee shall refer the matter to the State Board of Education or the Board of Governors, as appropriate, to proceed in accordance with s. 1008.32 or s. 1008.322, respectively.

(8) RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL.—The Auditor General, in consultation with the Board of Accountancy, shall adopt rules for the form and conduct of all financial audits performed by independent certified public accountants pursuant to ss. 215.981, 218.39, 1001.453, 1002.395, 1004.28, and 1004.70. The rules for audits of local governmental entities, charter schools, charter technical career centers, and district school boards must include, but are not limited to, requirements for the reporting of information necessary to carry out the purposes of the Local Governmental Entity, Charter School, Charter Technical Career Center, and District School Board Financial Emergencies Act as stated in s. 218.501.

(9) TECHNICAL ADVICE PROVIDED BY THE AUDITOR GENERAL.—The Auditor General may provide technical advice to:

(a) The Department of Education in the development of a compliance supplement for the financial audit of a district school board conducted by an independent certified public accountant.

(b) Governmental entities on their financial and accounting systems, procedures, and related matters.

(c) Governmental entities on promoting the building of competent and efficient accounting and internal audit organizations in their offices.

History.—s. 6, ch. 67-470; s. 6, ch. 69-82; s. 1, ch. 72-6; ss. 1, 2, ch. 73-234; s. 1, ch. 75-122; s. 1, ch. 76-73; s. 1, ch. 77-102; s. 2, ch. 79-183; ss. 1, 3, 6, ch. 79-589; s. 1, ch. 81-167; s. 1, ch. 83-55; s. 1, ch. 83-106; s. 1, ch. 84-241; s. 1, ch. 85-80; s. 14, ch. 86-204; s. 2, ch. 86-217; s. 1, ch. 87-114; s. 4, ch. 89-87; s. 30, ch. 89-169; s. 9, ch. 90-110; s. 19, ch. 90-227; s. 65, ch. 91-45; s. 17, ch. 91-282; s. 2, ch. 91-429; s. 91, ch. 92-142; s. 136, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 15, ch. 94-249; s. 1309, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 95-214; s. 1, ch. 95-380; s. 12, ch. 95-396; s. 26, ch. 96-318; s. 1, ch. 96-324; s. 21, ch. 97-96; s. 1, ch. 97-111; s. 1, ch. 97-255; s. 26, ch. 97-271; s. 3, ch. 99-333; s. 1, ch. 2000-151; s. 4, ch. 2000-264; s. 31, ch. 2000-355; s. 36, ch. 2000-371; s. 30, ch. 2001-140; s. 15, ch. 2001-266; s. 1, ch. 2002-1; s. 17, ch. 2002-22; s. 880, ch. 2002-387; s. 2, ch. 2004-305; s. 1, ch. 2004-331; s. 3, ch. 2004-484; s. 1, ch. 2005-171; s. 7, ch. 2006-190; s. 5, ch. 2009-68; s. 1, ch. 2009-214; s. 2, ch. 2010-5; s. 13, ch. 2011-34; s. 1, ch. 2011-49; s. 1, ch. 2011-52; s. 36, ch. 2011-142; s. 1, ch. 2012-5; s. 1, ch. 2012-134; s. 1, ch. 2013-15; s. 1, ch. 2013-51; s. 19, ch. 2013-252; s. 1, ch. 2014-17; s. 55, ch. 2014-22; s. 1, ch. 2014-39; s. 15, ch. 2014-184; s. 1, ch. 2014-223; s. 1, ch. 2015-2; s. 1, ch. 2015-98; ss. 5, 36, ch. 2016-62; s. 1, ch. 2017-116; s. 13, ch. 2017-233; s. 1, ch. 2018-5; s. 2, ch. 2019-15; s. 1, ch. 2019-103; s. 31, ch. 2020-30; s. 1, ch. 2020-167; s. 1, ch. 2021-27; s. 1, ch. 2021-134; s. 3, ch. 2023-8; s. 1, ch. 2023-16; s. 5, ch. 2023-173; s. 1, ch. 2023-245.

Note.—Former s. 11.186.

F.S. 11.45 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.45 on Casetext

Amendments to 11.45

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 11.45

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 11.45.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

. . . VA-FR-017; 11.45 Acres of Land, Owned BYL. Benton Wray, Jr., Diane S. Wray, Alvin E. . . .

NGUYEN v. NEW LINK GENETICS CORPORATION,, 297 F. Supp. 3d 472 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . These revelations precipitated a 30% drop in the stock's value, from $16.50 to $11.45 per share on May . . .

IN RE YAHOO INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 153 F. Supp. 3d 1107 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . By 2011, some analysts estimated that the Alibaba investment was worth $11.45 per share — 97% of Yahoo . . .

IN RE BODY SCIENCE LLC PATENT LITIGATION, 167 F. Supp. 3d 152 (D. Mass. 2016)

. . . coll.7 11. 46-47 (“Especially in hospitals, the mobility of the patient ... ”); (’991 Patent coll.15 11.45 . . .

ZOLTEK CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 815 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

. . . preparation of the starting material, and states that it is commercially available. '162 patent, col.4 11.45 . . .

ZOLTEK CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 815 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

. . . preparation of the starting material, and states that it is commercially available. '162 patent, col.4 11.45 . . .

HITACHI MAXELL, LTD. v. TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS TAIWAN CO. LTD. TPV l USA Co. TPV Co. TPV TPV Co., 143 F. Supp. 3d 485 (E.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . cite the following intrinsic evidence to support their position: ‘412 Patent col.l 11.21-25, col.l 11.45 . . . Id. at col.6 11.45-52. This discussion does not define the “input picture signal” by its source. . . . Id. at col.6 11.45-52, col.7 11.27-43. . . . component signal[ ] ... comprising luminance signals and two color difference signals.” ‘412 Patent col.3 11.45 . . .

CIRCUIT CHECK INC. v. QXQ INC., 795 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

. . . indicia is removed from areas of said plate adjacent each of said predetermined holes.” '796 patent col.6 11.45 . . .

CADENCE PHARMACEUTICALS INC. SCR v. EXELA PHARMSCI INC. LLC,, 780 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

. . . See '222 patent col.l 11.16-22, 11.45-48. . . .

ASTRAZENECA LP AB, v. BREATH LIMITED, LP AB, v. LP AB, v. LP AB, v., 88 F. Supp. 3d 326 (D.N.J. 2015)

. . . DTX 892 at col.2 11.45-51; see also Trial Tr. 1679:19-1680:16 (Zhanel). . . . See DTX 892 at col.2 11.45-51; Trial Tr. 373:6-12 (Zac-cheo). . . . See PTX 507 at col.4 11.45-49; accord DTX 0004 at 017807. . . . See also DTX 971 at col.5 11.45-50 (Harris states that other sterilization processes usually will not . . .

KENEXA BRASSRING, INC. v. HIREABILITY. COM, LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC,, 59 F. Supp. 3d 206 (D. Mass. 2014)

. . . containing digital data corresponding to one or more' discernible source data strings.... '561 col.8 11.45 . . .

AMERICAN CALCAR, INC. v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC., 768 F.3d 1185 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . Id. at col.5 11.45-52. . . .

CAPE FEAR RIVER WATCH, INC. v. DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., 25 F. Supp. 3d 798 (E.D.N.C. 2014)

. . . Compl. 11.45. . . .

HOWLINK GLOBAL LLC, v. NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP., 561 F. App'x 898 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . See '744 Patent col.8 11.45-54, col.9 11.37-38, col.1011.8-9. Representative Claim 1 states: 1. . . .

NOVO NORDISK A S v. CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, LTD., 719 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

. . . Id. col.9 11.45-58. . . .

KELLY- BROWN v. WINFREY, Co. LLC, s FAS, ABC, 717 F.3d 295 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . McCarthy on Trademarks § 11.45 (citing Breuer Elec. Mfg. Co. v. . . . Secret Stores Brand Mgmt., Inc., 618 F.3d 1025, 1042 (9th Cir.2010) (citing McCarthy on Trademarks § 11.45 . . .

WEGO CHEMICAL MINERAL CORP. v. MAGNABLEND INC., 945 F. Supp. 2d 377 (E.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . The unit price was $11.45 per pound, for a sum total of $6,870,000. . . . The parties subsequently agreed to reduce the unit price for both purchase orders from $11.45 per pound . . .

DDB TECHNOLOGIES, L. L. C. v. FOX SPORTS INTERACTIVE MEDIA, LLC CSTV d b a CBS CSTV, 936 F. Supp. 2d 806 (W.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . CaughtFlyBall Fielder, Location ThrownBall Thrower, Receiver RunToBase Runner, Base_ '479 Patent, col. 14, 11.45 . . .

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC. v. ALL- TAG SECURITY S. A., 711 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

. . . Id. col.3 11.45-48. The figures show this material-free gap 7 between the capacitor plates. Id. . . . process “ensures that there is no dielectric material between” the conductive layers. '343 patent col.3 11.45 . . .

SANDISK CORPORATION, v. KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CO. INC., 695 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . amount, such as one, and then writes that incremented count in the new block....” '424 patent col.8 11.45 . . .

KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC. KCI KCI USA, KCI KCI v. SMITH NEPHEW, INC., 688 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . Id. at col.2 11.45-49; '651 patent col.4 11.18— 23 (“[A] method of treating tissue damage is provided . . . E.g., '081 patent col.2 11.45-49 (“The present invention includes ... applying a negative pressure to . . .

CASTLE BEACH CLUB CONDOMINIUM, INC. v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORP., 96 So. 3d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 11.45(2), Fla. Stat. (2011); § 627.351. . . .

FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CRS, INC., 880 F. Supp. 2d 601 (E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . See, e.g., '151 Patent Reexamination Certificate col.1 11.45-46 (emphasis added). . . . See, e.g., T51 Patent Reexamination Certificate col.l 11.45-52. . . .

CLS BANK INTERNATIONAL, CLS v. ALICE CORPORATION PTY. LTD., 685 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . See '510 Patent col.3 11.45-46 (disclosure of the invention) (“The entities submit such orders to a ‘ . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 685 F.3d 1034 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . can, in turn, cause damages on the converters used for feeding the rotor current. '221 patent, col.1 11.45 . . .

WALKER DIGITAL, LLC, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 484 F. App'x 496 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . the word processing application program 400 until the search results are received. '295 patent col.4 11.45 . . .

In BAXTER INTERNATIONAL, INC., 678 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . Baxter as the corresponding structure for the “means for controlling” limitation. '434 patent, col.16 11.45 . . .

NOAH SYSTEMS, INC. v. INTUIT INC., 675 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . Id. at col.4 11.45-61. . . .

SANOFI- AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, v. GENENTECH, INC., 473 F. App'x 885 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . discloses two examples of plasmids, both of which are circular and extrachromosomal, see '140 patent col.2 11.45 . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 670 F.3d 1206 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . can, in turn, cause damages on the converters used for feeding the rotor current. '221 patent, col.l 11.45 . . .

METTLER- TOLEDO, INC. v. B- TEK SCALES, LLC,, 671 F.3d 1291 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . Avery p. 2 11.45-50. . . .

SEIRUS INNOVATIVE ACCESSORIES, INC. v. GORDINI U. S. A. INC., 849 F. Supp. 2d 963 (S.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . secured to the mask member; and iii) a securing means associated with the scarf member. '804 patent col.6 11.45 . . . claim 8, such as nylon covered close sponge neoprene is disclosed by the '240 patent. '240 patent eol.5 11.45 . . . Id. at eol.5 11.45-67. . . .

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, v. NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION CANADA, 458 F. App'x 910 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . material’s strain hardening multiplied by the melt index raised to the 0.25 power. '053 patent col.6 11.45 . . .

STONE STRONG, LLC, v. DEL ZOTTO PRODUCTS OF FLORIDA, INC., 455 F. App'x 964 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . “for lifting and positioning the blocks ... when constructing a retaining wall.” '818 Patent col.4 11.45 . . .

ZIRCON CORPORATION, v. STANLEY BLACK DECKER, INC., 452 F. App'x 966 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. at col.22 11.45-48. This claim denotes division. . . .

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION, v. RETAIL DECISIONS, INC., 654 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . J.A. 32, col.2 11.45-46. . . .

EON- NET LP, L. L. P. v. FLAGSTAR BANCORP,, 653 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. col.7 11.45-47 (internal reference numbers omitted). . . .

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY d b a AT T v. F. FITCH d b a, 801 F. Supp. 2d 555 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . . # 19], ¶¶ 11.42-11.45. . See Transcript [Doc. # 62], at 131. . 2007 Agreement, § 35. . . . .

RETRACTABLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. J. v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY,, 653 F.3d 1296 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. col.2 11.45-47. . . .

FOX GROUP, INC. v. CREE, INC., 819 F. Supp. 2d 490 (E.D. Va. 2011)

. . . Id. col.2 11.45—47. . . .

INNOVENTION TOYS, LLC, v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC. R Us,, 637 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Specifically, the '242 patent describes (1) the game’s components, including the game board, '242 patent col.4 11.45 . . . ultimate objective, namely, illuminating an opponent’s key playing piece with a laser beam, id. col.6 11.45 . . .

HODGES, v. AKEENA SOLAR, INC., 274 F.R.D. 259 (N.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . after Defendants announced a credit line increase, and Akeena’s stock price rose on January 2, 2008 to $11.45 . . .

UNITED STATES v. NEVAREZ,, 412 F. App'x 692 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . The car that Nevarez drove contained 11.45 kilograms of a substance containing methamphetamine, which . . .

FUJITSU LIMITED, LG U. S. v. NETGEAR INC., 620 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . signals and power-on timing “so that an improved ... power-saving can be realized.” '642 patent col. 3 11.45 . . .

W. WYERS v. MASTER LOCK COMPANY,, 616 F.3d 1231 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Id. col.l 11.45-54. The towing attachment accepts either a tow-bar eye or tow-ball arrangement. . . .

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC. v. ATI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ATI ULC,, 607 F.3d 784 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . defines the represented values for all possible bit combinations for the sl0e5 format. ’327 patent col.8 11.45 . . . Id. col.3 11.45-48. . . .

PRESSURE PRODUCTS MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC. v. GREATBATCH LTD., 599 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . splitting or peeling it off from the pacemaker catheter.” '904 patent col.l 11.41-44; '335 patent col.l 11.45 . . . See '904 patent col.l 11.41-61; '355 patent col.l 11.45-63. . . .

PA ADVISORS, LLC, v. GOOGLE, INC., 706 F. Supp. 2d 739 (E.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . user’s expressed desire to locate data substantially pertaining to said search request data. col.24 11.45 . . .

SEB S. A. T- v. MONTGOMERY WARD CO. INC., 594 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Onishi eol.l 11.45-59. . . .

WELLS FARGO COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, v. UNITED STATES,, 91 Fed. Cl. 35 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . According to the CAP, Wells Fargo expected a yield, including the tax benefits, of 11.45% in Cal-trans . . .

E. BROCK, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, a k a a l q F. S. a T., 21 So. 3d 844 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The term “postaudit” was defined in section 11.45(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1975), and is no longer in . . . See § 11.45(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . financial audit, an operational audit, or a performance audit, as those terms are defined in section 11.45 . . . Such audits are distinct from the “financial audits” of financial statements defined in sections 11.45 . . .

In PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION. N. V. L. P. v. USA, Dr. s Dr. s Co. N. V. L. P. v., 583 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . Life Sciences 37:945-952, 1985. '318 patent col.2 11.45-57. . . . .

AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., 614 F. Supp. 2d 90 (D. Mass. 2009)

. . . (See '809 patent col.3 11.45-48, col.6 1.67-col.7 1.5.) . . .

ICU MEDICAL, INC. v. ALARIS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., 558 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . Id. col.2 11.45-48 (summary of the invention). . . .

ROTHMAN LLC, v. TARGET CORP. s J. C. USA, L. P. LLC s K-, 556 F.3d 1310 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . Id. at col.3 11.45-67. A fledgling inventor, Ms. . . .

RESPIRONICS, INC. RIC LLC, v. INVACARE CORP., 303 F. App'x 865 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . See '802 patent col.6 11.45-59; '193 patent col.6 11.53-67. . . .

TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION, v. VIDEOTEK, INC., 545 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . See '250 patent col.19 11.45^8 (“Sample switch 1608 along with reference 1621, negative integrator 1607 . . .

PAPYRUS TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC., 581 F. Supp. 2d 502 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . buy order with the sell order and reported to the remote computer and executed. '981 Patent col.33 11.45 . . .

BRASFIELD, v. SOURCE BROADBAND SERVICES, LLC, C-, 255 F.R.D. 447 (W.D. Tenn. 2008)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation (Fourth) § 11.45 (2004). . . .

MANGOSOFT, INC. v. ORACLE CORPORATION,, 525 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . the network, e.g., id. col.3 1.44 (“local persistent memory device of a first computer”); id. col.3 11.45 . . .

PITKIN IRON CORPORATION, a v. KEMPTHORNE,, 554 F. Supp. 2d 1208 (D. Colo. 2008)

. . . based on an average calcium carbonate content of 82%— was estimated in the MCVE to be approximately $11.45 . . .

LUMA CORPORATION, v. STRYKER CORPORATION,, 273 F. App'x 948 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . that may be obtained from an additional input device.” '801 patent col.2 11.33-36; see also col.17 11.45 . . .

R. BELL, d b a v. HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY,, 539 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (S.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . Co., 292 F.3d 1139, 1150-51 (9th Cir.2002) (quoting 2 McCarthy on Trademark and Unfair Competition § 11.45 . . .

REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, v. DAKOCYTOMATION CALIFORNIA, INC. v. A S,, 517 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . Id. col.l 11.45-46. . . .

CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. LLC, v. LEAR CORPORATION,, 516 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . describes translating “trinary bits” back into “a binary number” in the receiver, '544 patent col.8 11.45 . . .

UNITED STATES v. N. WHITE,, 265 F. App'x 719 (10th Cir. 2008)

. . . On April 27, 2006, law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at White’s residence and found 11.45 . . .

In WORLDCOM, INC., 368 B.R. 308 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Breach of the UC Contract Appendix P to the UC Contract listed an $11.45 per month rate for a basic service . . . $1,308.85 plus a reconciliation payment of 9,953 (volume shortfall) times a base monthly price of $11.45 . . . that it owes EffectNet $1,381.80 plus a February 2002 reconciliation payment of $114,019.10 (9,958 x $11.45 . . . service rate of $27.40 would be considered the “base monthly price” since the base service rate of $11.45 . . . However, the Debtors argue (1) the “base monthly price” refers to the basic service rate of $11.45, which . . .

ACUMED LLC, v. STRYKER CORPORATION,, 483 F.3d 800 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

. . . located in a plane “normally extending relative to the longitudinal axis of the nail.” '545 patent, col.3 11.45 . . . Patent No. 5,697,934, col.2 11.45-46 (filed Dec. 2, 1996); see also id. at col.3 1.66-col.4 1.1 (describing . . . Id. col.3 11.45-48. . . .

PFIZER, INC. v. APOTEX, INC., 480 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

. . . excellent pharmacokinetic properties, near-optimal solubility, and improved stability. '987 patent col.2 11.45 . . .

In DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF HYDE PARK, INC. v. Dr. H., 360 B.R. 787 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2007)

. . . 1996 through 2000 show a declining trend beginning in October 1996 of 0.15 days and averaging negative 11.45 . . .

In J. GOULD, d b a Co. NJP IV LLC, v. J. d b a Co., 363 B.R. 45 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2007)

. . . Also, on September 27, 2005, attorneys Reynolds and Fleischer billed 11.45 hours total for travel time . . .

HYDRIL COMPANY LP, U. K. v. GRANT PRIDECO LP, 474 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

. . . Section 11.45 of the Merger Agreement defines “Intellectual Property” to “mean patents, patent rights . . .

SHANGHAI MEIHAO ELECTRIC, INC. v. LEVITON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. USI, 212 F. App'x 977 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

. . . See id. col.3 11.45-54. . . .

MEDTRONIC XOMED, INC. v. GYRUS ENT LLC,, 440 F. Supp. 2d 1300 (M.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . (Doc. 144, Ex. 20, col.3 11.45-54.) . . .

GATEWOOD, v. COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 415 F. Supp. 2d 983 (W.D. Mo. 2006)

. . . Moore (“Moore”) was the only other full-time - employee that Gatewood identified and she performed 11.45 . . .

NORTH STAR STEEL CO. v. UNITED STATES,, 68 Fed. Cl. 672 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . result, [WAPA] would be willing to implement the calculation methodology shown[, reducing the rate to 11.45 . . .

FORT BERTHOLD LAND AND LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION J. Jr. A. G. J. L. S. Sr. N. v. ANDERSON,, 361 F. Supp. 2d 1045 (D.N.D. 2005)

. . . [and] reversing my decision to establish a summer seasonal grazing rate of $11.45 an AUM. . . .

GRATZ v. BOLLINGER,, 353 F. Supp. 2d 929 (E.D. Mich. 2005)

. . . Bader 7.3 4.15 11.45 Mr. McDonald .8 3.7 4.5 Mr. Troy 11.2 11.2 Mr. Healy 4.5 4.5 Mr. P. . . . Bader 11.45 $270 $3,091.50 Mr. McDonald 4.5 $380 $1,710 Mr. Troy 11.2 $335 $3,752 Mr. . . .

VERIZON FLORIDA, INC. v. A. JABER,, 889 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 2004)

. . . Staff witness Draper calculated the cost of equity to be 11.45% using the DCF model and 11.02% using . . .

HALLMON, v. STATE, 876 So. 2d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . However, for purposes of negotiations I’ll offer a nine-year sentence mid-range, 6.875 years up to 11.45 . . .

SUTRON CORPORATION, v. LAKE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY,, 870 So. 2d 930 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . That it is not a state agency seems well established where the legislature noted, in section 11.45(l) . . .

GLOBETROTTER SOFTWARE, INC. v. ELAN COMPUTER GROUP, INC., 362 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2004)

. . . See '297 patent, col. 17, 11.45-46 (claim 3); col. 23,1.7 (claim 23); col. 31, 1.36 (claim 55). . . .

BAKER, v. JOHN MORRELL CO., 263 F. Supp. 2d 1161 (N.D. Iowa 2003)

. . . If Baker were still employed by John Mor-rell, she would be earning $11.45/hour, plus benefits. . . . Baker still employed by John Morrell as a computer scale operator, she would currently be earning $11.45 . . . the remaining 142 weeks of the front pay award period, the court utilized the following equation: (11.45 . . . dollars/hour x 40 hours) + ((11.45 dollars/hour x 1.5) x 3.75 hours/ week) x 142 weeks = $74,181.69. . . .

SOUNDTUBE ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v. BROWN INNOVATIONS, INC., 233 F. Supp. 2d 188 (D. Mass. 2002)

. . . (Col.l, 11.45-50.) . . .

In RAY, v., 283 B.R. 70 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2002)

. . . general matter, counsel are directed to In re Nichols, 221 B.R. 275 (Bankr.N.D.Okla.1998). .This includes 11.45 . . .

In STONE WEBSTER, INCORPORATED AEC VPS VPS DSS LLC SC LLC ABU F K A SWL, 279 B.R. 748 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002)

. . . The court took Maine Yankee’s $81 million damages figure and adjusted it downward by $11.45 million. . . .

In POLYGRAPHEX SYSTEMS, INC., 275 B.R. 408 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . . § 11.45(l)(b) (defining “county agency” to include a property appraiser). (b) State Control. . . .

BEAM LASER SYSTEMS, INC. v. COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 144 F. Supp. 2d 475 (E.D. Va. 2001)

. . . See '883 Patent, col.6, 11.45-54; id. col.7, 11.12-21. . . . .

NIZAMI, v. PFIZER INC., 107 F. Supp. 2d 791 (E.D. Mich. 2000)

. . . received an e-mail notice from this group indicating that he had failed to reconcile 20.34 percent and 11.45 . . .

MAYTAG CORPORATION, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION,, 95 F. Supp. 2d 888 (N.D. Ill. 2000)

. . . and second upstanding annular walls 46 and 50, upper edge 47 of first wall 46 and aperture 51 (col.6, 11.45 . . .

PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC. a v. TERRI WELLES, INC. a PIPPI, a, 78 F. Supp. 2d 1066 (S.D. Cal. 1999)

. . . McCarthy, TradeMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION, § 11.45, at 82 (1999). . . . MoCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 11.45, at 80 (1999). . . . McCaRthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 11.45, at 81 (1999). . . . MCCARTHY, TRADEMARKS AND Unfair Competition, § 11.45, at 82 (1999). . . .

HIPP, W. Jr. v. LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 39 F. Supp. 2d 1359 (M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . Manager: January—July District Manager: July—December $58,647 14.36% 1995 District Manager $51,934 -11.45% . . .

McCLUNG- GAGNE, v. HARBOUR CITY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD, INC., 721 So. 2d 799 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . General may audit a particular entity, the term “governmental entity” is defined broadly in section 11.45 . . .

K. SMITH, v. AMES DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., 988 F. Supp. 827 (D.N.J. 1997)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 11.45 at 11-79. . . .

In WALD, 211 B.R. 359 (Bankr. D.N.D. 1997)

. . . According to John Ust, senior credit officer with Agri Bank, a tier 3 loan rate of 11.45% would be the . . .

SPERLING, v. HOFFMANN- LA ROCHE, INC. a, 924 F. Supp. 1346 (D.N.J. 1996)

. . . The difference between the 18.4% termination rate and the 9.3% termination rate is the equivalent of 11.45 . . .

In H. R. THOMAS,, 195 B.R. 18 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . In this regard, counsel expended 11.45 hours of time having a value of $1,259.50, and advanced disbursements . . .

BANCAMERICA COMMERCIAL CORPORATION ASARCO v. TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., 900 F. Supp. 1427 (D. Kan. 1995)

. . . . $11.45 $4.82 $2,389.82 4/89 5/30/89 $7,612.00 $3,045.00 $1,995.00 $0.00 $1,050.00 13.79% $33.36 $4.60 . . .

In GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION PICK- UP TRUCK FUEL TANK PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. M. E. W. L. No. D. D. No. No. No. I. No. No. No. No. No., 55 F.3d 768 (3d Cir. 1995)

. . . these sources of information and conducted full adversarial negotiations ... ”); 2 NewbeRG & Conte § 11.45 . . .

A. GEORGINE, v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. v. ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 157 F.R.D. 246 (E.D. Pa. 1994)

. . . See 2 Newberg on Class Actions § 11.45, at 11-102 n. 247 (citing West Virginia v. Chas. . . .